Summary
On this episode we are joined by Todd Madison of Transparent California. Transparent California is a public database that collects data on public employee compensation in the state of California. They collect almost 4 million records per year and have about 42 million records online. The data they collect reveals that over a million public employees in California make over $100,000 a year, with 100,000 people making over $250,000 a year and 4,000 making over $500,000 a year. The conversation discusses the high salaries and benefits of public employees in California, particularly in the education sector. It highlights the disconnect between public employee compensation and performance, as well as the unsustainable pension debt in the state.
Check out our whole site at www.californianunderground.live
Check out Transparent California at www.transparentcalifornia.com
Chapters
00:00 Introduction and Overview of Transparent California
07:08 Expanding Data Collection Beyond Schools
27:12 The Unsustainable Pension Debt
34:40 The Importance of Transparency
[00:00:00] If you're a California conservative, a libertarian, a moderate Democrat, believe in common sense,
[00:00:11] or just the sane person, this is the political podcast for you. It's the California Underground
[00:00:17] Podcast.
[00:00:27] What's going on everybody? Thanks for tuning in to another episode of the California Underground
[00:00:30] Podcast. I am your host Phil, along with me as always is my trusted cohost, the best and
[00:00:34] fastest researcher in the West. And tonight we have probably another very, very good researcher,
[00:00:41] someone who handles a lot of data, who is one of the OG guests from California Underground.
[00:00:46] He was on many years ago. We're glad to have him back to give us an update on what's
[00:00:51] going on with public officials, how much they're making. Todd Madison from Transparent
[00:00:55] California. Todd, welcome back to the show. How are you?
[00:00:58] All right, thanks Phil. Good to meet you Camille. I've been listening to you guys for a while.
[00:01:04] Well we definitely appreciate that. And like I said, Camille loves diving into this sort
[00:01:09] of stuff so I feel like this is sort of like up Camille's alley learning about what you
[00:01:13] do in Transparent California. So why don't we just start right there, people who
[00:01:18] may have not heard you on our last time you were on, talk about Transparent California
[00:01:23] and what it is that you do. Sure, absolutely. Thanks. So Transparent
[00:01:27] California is a public database. We're a watchdog agency. We specialize in public
[00:01:34] and public employee compensation. So all of the focal school superintendents, city
[00:01:40] managers, police and fire captains, teachers, dog catchers, landscape engineers, whatever
[00:01:48] they are, if they work for a public agency in the state of California, our mission
[00:01:52] is to collect the data on our compensation. There's really nothing that is more prone to
[00:01:57] abuse in government than people using tax dollars to line their own pockets. There's
[00:02:03] really nothing that needs the light of sunshine, shine on it more than that. I think we
[00:02:08] would all agree. And that's what we do. You know, Transparent California, we collect
[00:02:12] almost four million records per year in the state of California. We collect, we've
[00:02:18] got about almost four hundred high in the records online coming back to 2011 right now.
[00:02:23] So anybody out there ever wants to go and look up and see what their local school district
[00:02:27] takes, what their local city government, their water district, their cemetery district,
[00:02:32] their hospital district, in whatever it is we collect from over 3,000 public agencies
[00:02:37] in the state of California every year. And more than likely it can sound like
[00:02:42] they've got it. So that's the mission that we have.
[00:02:46] So what got you inspired to hop into such an enormous task of gathering this much data?
[00:02:55] It was an accent. So what actually happened is, so I was on your show before because
[00:03:01] I was the San Diego County Sheriff's School of Choice and K-12 Education is kind of a hobby
[00:03:07] of mine that's been a real interest, one of my hobbies. Back in the olden days when I was
[00:03:13] out working six days a week, 12 hours a day, you know I've been killing the buffalo. My
[00:03:18] wife was at school, she was our ambassador of school, so she was out there volunteering
[00:03:24] in schools, being on the PCOs, PTAs, all this stuff. And I used to just kind of
[00:03:30] make them to take care of it into a brainchild that's off, can't stream out of brain.
[00:03:35] When I finally got a little bit of free time and I really wanted to get in, I found out
[00:03:40] that the state had increased taxes proposition 30. Some may remember it was a tax increase
[00:03:46] designed to call it inference education, that's what it was for. But yet I didn't see any
[00:03:51] improvement happening in my local district. I didn't see class sizes going down. I didn't
[00:03:56] see structural materials. I didn't see science supplies. I didn't see things happening.
[00:04:01] But yet the school district was getting tens of millions of dollars for. So I started
[00:04:06] looking at it. My background in private news grabs to the director of the division,
[00:04:10] the national retailer. So I've spent a lot of time looking at budget documents and managing
[00:04:15] large groups of employees trying to figure out how to make things work, you know, the way they
[00:04:20] should. I was turned to customer service so it was necessary for us to make customers happy.
[00:04:25] That was my job. So when I looked at this, I bought, okay, I'm gonna apply those skills.
[00:04:29] I'm gonna, if you use my ninja excel skills to figure out where the money's going
[00:04:34] in our school district and take a look at that, that led me to pay. Over 90% of I'm a strength
[00:04:40] in funds in our schools is spent on pay, labor, and benefits for the school, which makes sense
[00:04:46] in some people business. So looking at that, that led me to transfer to California. So I started
[00:04:51] looking at the data there and starting becoming a pain in the butt at school more days. I used
[00:04:56] to stand up in different presentations every May during budget season. I would get my
[00:05:00] presentation at the ocean side, get my school district showing them exactly what they were
[00:05:05] going to run out of money based on their tendency and give themselves raises with all the extra money
[00:05:10] we're giving to them in tax dollars. So that actually led me to look at the data and ice.com
[00:05:16] and error in the data and I emailed to Instructor in California and said, okay, you know, what's
[00:05:21] up with that? We need to fix this. When did I get accurate data? And the dang charted the time
[00:05:27] and then Robert Thoner said, well, if you think you can do better, how about if you join us?
[00:05:32] So that's how I got into transfer to California. I was an unpaid volunteer for years
[00:05:38] and then eventually decided to pay me a very small amount of money to be in charge of the data
[00:05:43] collection process. So I made roughly 120th of what the state and controller office analyst
[00:05:49] who does the same thing makes in this. So starting to trade in California, like I say,
[00:05:55] eventually became the director of research in charge of the data collection efforts. So
[00:05:59] we made over 3,000 public records that request every year. Take the like that for to put online
[00:06:06] to free everybody to look at. How many people does that take to accomplish that? Well, we have
[00:06:14] myself who is overall part time. So we have myself we all was in charge of the project. We
[00:06:20] have two other people. We have one guy who's charged at the special district collections
[00:06:24] in all the seven fairing districts and water districts and all that. And then we have a guy who
[00:06:29] specializes in formatting the data. So it means all the weird data formats that agencies give us
[00:06:34] in terms that is something we can upload into the website. I'm assuming they're emailing you
[00:06:38] files. You guys aren't making 100,000 calls throughout the year. No, it's generally done
[00:06:45] via email. It's a somewhat updated process. When I first got started in this, it was
[00:06:51] transferring California and only been doing this for about three or four years.
[00:06:55] And it was like plenty. I mean, people just cannot they don't want to get in here.
[00:06:59] They're may records of course. So so we used to have been feeding on used to be in the part
[00:07:05] of the process over and over and over again. Nowadays, I think they've pretty much given
[00:07:10] up. I think they know that if they don't answer us there, they were not just going to come
[00:07:13] up and go away. So we have a lot more success at just getting people to answer.
[00:07:19] Still, you know, there are agencies that refuse. We end up filing lawsuits periodically,
[00:07:24] you know, against those who don't want to provide the information. But by and large,
[00:07:29] it's somewhat the team this days. Well, you brought up the state controller.
[00:07:37] At least you're not being investigated by the FBI. Is that right? Is that the
[00:07:40] state controller Fiona Ma who's being investigated by the FBI right now?
[00:07:44] I've heard something about them, but I can't tell you any details of that.
[00:07:49] I'd have to your researcher would have to look that up.
[00:07:52] Give me what I would have to research it.
[00:07:56] So in terms of you got started with schools, public schools, when did you start branching
[00:08:02] out into other parts of the government and say, well, it worked here with the schools. Let's
[00:08:08] try this agency. What was the first agency after you started doing schools?
[00:08:13] Transparency, California was always collecting from all agencies. So when I came in, it was
[00:08:18] originally a project from the California Policy Center. Once my lands christians and all the
[00:08:25] people over there, they started in Transparency, California. So Genesis and this, I don't know
[00:08:30] if anybody remembers this, but the city of Bell at a giant scale. Yes. And yes. So in the 2000s,
[00:08:38] as it was discovered, the new city of Bell, the city manager and the city council had been
[00:08:43] scratching each other's backs and raising each other's pay all fruit and that late. And
[00:08:49] all pretty much totally legal because it was actually approved by the city council
[00:08:54] until the city manager was making $800,000 a year.
[00:09:00] Back then, what 800,000 a year was a lot of money.
[00:09:03] Yeah. It's not now, of course, by tank and gas, maybe. But no, so the city manager,
[00:09:11] you know, he ended up going to jail for this. It wasn't really legal. But as a result of that in
[00:09:17] 2014, in past, I mean, 2040, which actually requires all of state agencies to afford their
[00:09:23] compensation into the state of California except schools. Schools are voluntary still. But
[00:09:30] everyone else is supposed to report enough. And critical issue there is that they aren't required
[00:09:35] to report names. They're required. They report positions. Okay. So if you look at any state agency,
[00:09:42] any local agency, how many different counties and they have how many different, you know,
[00:09:47] except for the very top management, the titles are not good. There's often many, many people.
[00:09:53] Plus, we also find what we've done in the past when Mika isn't covered is cases where people
[00:09:58] are actually collecting on disability claims at the same time that they're working from paying
[00:10:03] elsewhere. There's kind of a famous one, the guy who actually discovered the Boston Marathon bomber
[00:10:10] was working for the FBI and he was actually on a disability claim from the state of
[00:10:15] California at the same time. So put on him. Glad he found the bomber and that's for sure.
[00:10:21] But you know, on the other hand, you know, it's a double dembing. It's a violation of the rules and
[00:10:28] so on and so forth. So without names, you would never have that. So what we do is we pick it back
[00:10:33] on that law because they are required to report in the state that piece of data exists,
[00:10:39] which is a fundamental thing that I don't know how much you guys know about the California
[00:10:43] Public Records Act. But it requires you can only ask for insisting data. You can't require
[00:10:50] anything. The person you're asking or the age you're asking to create anything for you can only
[00:10:55] ask for something that already exists. So because it already exists, we know it exists.
[00:11:00] It's a state requires that that means we can go ask for it. So that's why we're able to do what
[00:11:05] we do. So since the last time we talked and last time we talked, we were talking more
[00:11:12] about school choice and we talked a little bit about TransFranccom for you.
[00:11:15] What have you found recently that is that listeners would find pretty shocking to hear
[00:11:23] where their tax dollars are going to? Well, I think just the magnitude, the overall magnitude of
[00:11:28] pay. I think it's a people don't understand we have this myth, you know, that public employees
[00:11:34] and just grossly underpaid, you know, that's why we justify the massive pension payments and
[00:11:39] all this stuff. You think of your local public employee and local administrative system, local
[00:11:45] guard duty, local whatever it is, and barely making above minimum wage, you know, we're all
[00:11:51] empathetic to that. They do a great job. I mean, I have no problem paying them. But if you look
[00:11:56] at the actual data, there is over a million public employees in the state of California
[00:12:00] that have been over $100,000 a year. So that may not be richest these days,
[00:12:07] but it certainly is a fence. And if you look at some of the other things, if you want to go for
[00:12:14] over $250,000 a year, you know, there's, I don't know, sorry, 100,000, $100,090 employees,
[00:12:25] they can open $250,000 a year, $4,000 a year, over $500,000. Wait, wait, wait, say that.
[00:12:32] I thought you were saying 100,000. So 100,000 public workers make over $250,000 a year?
[00:12:39] Yeah, exactly. How do I get one of those jobs but like from home?
[00:12:46] There's 492 that make over a million.
[00:12:50] Two for the sky. I mean, why not go for the 492?
[00:12:55] Does that look like a greedy?
[00:12:57] Yeah. And those are, those are planning rapidly. The over 500 clubs up 10% the last year,
[00:13:03] the over a million clubs up 12% in just the last year.
[00:13:06] Seriously, what kind of positions are those?
[00:13:08] Well, so the really high end ones, there's a Danny and Charles Kelly is a coach at UCLA,
[00:13:14] O'Buzz I guess, on Canadian over $5 million last year. So, you know, I mean, there are
[00:13:19] people like that, the highest end ranks 10 million, probably like by coaches, I think five or six top
[00:13:24] all coaches. I'm always stuck on this. It costs money to go to UCLA. Why is that money not paying
[00:13:33] the coaches? Well, it is. It's just government money. It's, I mean, I don't know how much of
[00:13:40] that is in tuition revenue and supports that. And some of it is private, but ultimately it's
[00:13:47] government and kinds of check. Okay. So that's why we see it. We can't look in private.
[00:13:53] I mean, any private organizations people ask me all the time for union. Hey, you know,
[00:13:58] they want to know how much the union president makes for this union value. We can't look at
[00:14:03] that because they're a private entity. What? Yeah, the unions are all private entities.
[00:14:09] They're not often in the schools. The union president is often paid by the district
[00:14:14] and then they're supposed to be reimbursed by the union. So sometimes we can see into that because
[00:14:20] they're paid by the school. The union tape private industries. I'm so I'm so confused right now and
[00:14:27] also a little bit mind blown because I didn't know that. Okay. Oh yeah. No, no, no, union is a
[00:14:32] totally private. As a matter of fact, and I forget the details, but there was an instance
[00:14:36] not too long ago where the unions were actually opposed to having their own employees
[00:14:41] organized as a unit. And so, you know, I have to look at the details on that. I can tell you
[00:14:48] off the bat. Okay, that's entertaining. I'm just giving kind of way. I'm still wrapping my head
[00:14:55] around 100,000 people make over $250,000. I mean, what does the governor make? The governor
[00:15:01] doesn't even make like, no, I can keep it like 175 or something like he's not on our list.
[00:15:06] We know. You know, earlier when we're talking elected officials really don't make that much.
[00:15:12] And we looked up their pay easily. But like you said, what are they getting
[00:15:17] from behind in secret? The back end deals are really where they make them. Yeah. But on the front
[00:15:23] end, you know, just as I'm probably looking at an example. So because again, James Hammond
[00:15:27] is the superintendent of schools in Ontario Montclair School District. Ontario Montclair,
[00:15:32] 83% of their families qualify for free lunch. So free lunch from appalling for $39,000 a year.
[00:15:40] So 83% of their families make $39,000 a year or less. Mr. Hammond pays himself almost $700,000
[00:15:47] a year as the superintendent of schools in that district. So I just an example and it's
[00:15:54] totally approved. It's totally legal. It is for, you know, proper standard. So it's all legal.
[00:15:59] I know things doing in the evening and various there. Montabella Unified, the superintendent of
[00:16:05] the sweat, there he won $5 billion in 2019. Part of that was a legal payout but it's still a huge
[00:16:11] amount of money. We can teacher pay because they're valid for you. You know, we hear often
[00:16:16] about how teachers are tremendously underpaid and, you know, we need to sacrifice education
[00:16:22] of kids or whatever money could go into that so that we can pay in dangerous war.
[00:16:26] I'm totally down with teachers. I mean, I love teachers. They're absolutely great. You know, we
[00:16:31] need more of them, good ones. But the media told compensation is $130,000 a year right now. So
[00:16:39] is that rich? No, absolutely not. But I think it's barely paid. I think they're being paid
[00:16:44] barely for the job at that point. So when we see them demanding more money to be taken from
[00:16:49] money that can be used for education, that annoys me. That bothers me.
[00:16:55] I know two days of familiar with the San Diego Unified that's going on right now in the layoffs.
[00:16:59] They're laying off several hundred employees. So last year they gave themselves a 58% raise
[00:17:06] precious in the board for 15% raise. The media combat that point with San Diego Unified
[00:17:12] teacher was $138,000 a year. So they gave themselves a 15% raise and county warned them
[00:17:18] and said, you're going to have to cut. If you improve this raise, you're going to have to cut.
[00:17:22] They ignored it in any way. Now they're cutting. So that's what happens. There's usually a distance
[00:17:29] between the raise and the cut. Usually a month or four months at least because they want everybody
[00:17:34] to forget that the reason they're cutting is because they gave themselves a raise. So that's
[00:17:39] how we typically see it. So things like that just happen. So a frequently in public of an
[00:17:47] employee. Do they just think like, I mean, this is you examine the data and provide us with that
[00:17:55] information? I mean, the question that I think people are listening and wondering is,
[00:18:00] do these people not see that there's not an endless supply of money, that they're not
[00:18:05] going to just keep getting money. Maybe they think they're just going to keep getting
[00:18:08] money. Maybe they think they can just keep raising taxes and get more and more at the
[00:18:11] end of the day. But this just seems like so unbelievably negligent. If you know,
[00:18:18] we raise our pay 15%, we're going to end up paying, we're going to end up cutting all these people
[00:18:25] and they just don't care. They just, you know, they give themselves raises anyway.
[00:18:30] I don't know what your thoughts are. People don't watch school board meetings. People don't
[00:18:35] watch console meetings. People don't look at the details. Unfortunately, by the time they
[00:18:40] find out it's too late, you know, it's already happened. Like I say, in the case of saying
[00:18:46] they mutified the county themselves, the county office, which is responsible for making sure our
[00:18:51] school was concerned financial shame said on the, they sent a letter the day of the
[00:18:57] board meeting that said you're going to have to cut 10, 131 million dollars.
[00:19:03] So what they said if you improve this raise, but yet they didn't disclose that. They didn't
[00:19:07] say that in the meeting. They didn't tell people that before they approved it and they never had
[00:19:12] disclosed it. I've never heard them mention it in the meeting. I went and spoke in front of them a
[00:19:16] few weeks ago when they had the layoffs and asked if they were now going to apologize to all those
[00:19:21] low-paid people who were in their jobs because everybody else wanted a 15% raise.
[00:19:27] This is just like the minimum wage fast food thing in California.
[00:19:31] Exactly. It's exactly the same effect.
[00:19:34] But we use inflation that the biggest is that parents aren't there, you know, demanding.
[00:19:39] The schools will make a argument all the time that the reason we can't educate our kids properly
[00:19:45] is because we don't get enough money from the state. That is what they will say all the time.
[00:19:50] The reality that state funding has gone up at three times the rate of inflation in the last 10
[00:19:54] years and the problem is not that they don't get enough money. The problem isn't ensured
[00:19:58] since it's themselves rather than using new proof of education. I would thank parents and be
[00:20:05] marching the streets about that but we give the grandparents and orbeez to give it and say something
[00:20:11] but not enough. All right, so you guys have an incredible sight and we were talking about before
[00:20:19] we hopped on. If you are a data nerd who loves to look at this stuff, give me one second and I can
[00:20:27] pull this up for us. So this is your guys' site so it's very straightforward, transparentCalifornia.com.
[00:20:39] You can go here and look up salaries. So I'm going to your site.
[00:20:44] Tell me, give me a name or a job title I can look up that will find something.
[00:20:50] Sure. Let's take a look at James Hammond group to be with James and then NJMMOND.
[00:20:59] Search. Okay, so there he is. So you can see that he's even, I'm not going to report him to 3000
[00:21:07] in 2021, 728,000 in 2019 I guess that is and so on and so forth. So that's how you can look
[00:21:15] up pretty much anybody you want. Typically I urge people to look up the local school superintendent
[00:21:22] or their local city manager, the chief of police often that I'm totally down with police.
[00:21:30] I think if they do a job that's absolutely necessary but if you look at linked list
[00:21:35] let's get you another day to look up here. Let's look at Herman Robinson.
[00:21:39] Robinson. Yeah, R-O-B-I-N-S-O-N. Yep, you got it.
[00:21:44] So with Robertson is a police officer in LAHO. He makes total compensation $879,000 last year.
[00:21:55] So you know with the people of LAHO, Hermione is probably the most awesome police officer
[00:22:02] here and I'm very glad that he's there. But with the people of LAHO maybe be better off if they
[00:22:09] cut his salary back to a least $250,000 or something and pay him an entry or four-horn
[00:22:15] police officer on the beam. Yeah, you know I mean when that benefits them.
[00:22:20] I'm going to put in, I just looked him up because I was interested. Lamont Jackson
[00:22:26] is the superintendent for San Diego Unified. Are police officers on here?
[00:22:33] Yeah, police officers are on there by our providers are on there. His regular pay is $359,000.
[00:22:42] Yeah and then total with benefits is $475,000. I got into the wrong business.
[00:22:50] Well one of the critical things about being in the long business talk,
[00:22:53] people look at that $475,000 and they go well that doesn't count because that's not
[00:22:58] take home money. I can't buy groceries with that because I think China that is enabits.
[00:23:02] But I can tell you. Yeah Camille as a mom, I mean how much would you appreciate having a
[00:23:08] healthcare plan that was fully paid for by someone else with that was totally
[00:23:12] bullplated and flushed? No co-pays, no deductibles, you know or minimal co-pays and
[00:23:17] deductibles. I think my daughter just got out of the hospital a couple weeks ago. Yeah.
[00:23:25] The average total expense on healthcare for most of our public employees is about $25,000 a year.
[00:23:33] If you look at what they're spending. That includes dental. That includes dental.
[00:23:39] Superacists. Yeah I mean my husband put them through I stay home.
[00:23:44] Yeah and then when it gets even worse when you talk about retirement benefits.
[00:23:50] So right now the state and the total contribution to a teacher is civilian
[00:23:56] bully's teachers to them as someone else to mine with them. I was 29% of their pay every
[00:24:01] single year. Every single year they get 29% of their pay contributed into their retirement account.
[00:24:06] So if you as a private employee got 29% of your pay and put it in your 401k,
[00:24:12] you would have tens of billions of dollars after a 30 year career. So it's amazing.
[00:24:20] It's not too late for you Phil. Get out. I'm looking at this going. I might as well just
[00:24:25] trade in my bar license and try and get one of these positions. This is unbelievable.
[00:24:31] I pulled up Barbara Ferrer who was recently in the news because what did I just post something
[00:24:37] about something was racist? Oh gosh now I can't remember. I just posted it today on Instagram.
[00:24:43] Because yeah it was so ridiculous. And she's at the head of this and she's
[00:24:48] I mean she's the director of public health in Los Angeles. We don't have to go back down the
[00:24:52] COVID road. She didn't do great on it. I think she did horrible. I don't think she has any,
[00:24:59] she's not a doctor yet. She's the director of public health in Los Angeles and her regular pay
[00:25:04] is 490. Total pay and benefits is $661,000 a year. And then she says things like STDs in LA
[00:25:12] are because of racism. That's what you posted. Yeah that's okay yeah that's what it was like oh my
[00:25:19] gosh. Yeah. This site alone should make people sick. Well then you look at some of the people
[00:25:27] in charge. I saw special ones CNN about homelessness in San Francisco a while back and they're walking
[00:25:34] around with a bunch of officials. They paid something like $90,000 to draw lines on a parking
[00:25:39] lot so people can put tents in there. And this guy is giving us a tour and I'm looking him up.
[00:25:45] That guy made almost $400,000 a year. So he's making $400,000 a year to supposedly
[00:25:52] solve the homeless problem. To draw chalk lines? Yeah to draw chalk lines or pay lines.
[00:26:00] So I mean the fundamental problem is that there's no connection between pay and performance.
[00:26:05] That's it. I've been getting a job in the public sector and I feel sorry. Yeah I wouldn't blame you
[00:26:12] if that was the case because it's just I mean like people say like are you going to the public
[00:26:18] sector you don't make any money? That's clearly not the case here. If you're in California you can
[00:26:23] get a good job and make a ton of money. Are social workers on there? Probably they probably don't make
[00:26:30] a lot of money usually but one of the fundamental things is that they don't make a lot of money
[00:26:35] to start. You know when you're involved in a teacher negotiation often you'll hear you ask
[00:26:40] parents like how much did teachers make and they'll say $40,000. $50,000. In reality of course
[00:26:47] we know it's $130,000 in a meeting and that's a midpoint but what they're using is the starting
[00:26:53] pay. So you know when the labor union negotiates they deliberately keep the starting pay low
[00:27:00] because that is the perception of people of what teachers make so that drives the feeling that
[00:27:06] we should increase their pay because people look at the starting pay and go oh that's
[00:27:10] ridiculous. So in reality they're in control of that schedule. They can raise the starting
[00:27:16] pay if they really believe that they need to raise starting pay to attract and retain all
[00:27:20] the new teachers just raise it. It's their negotiation. They could do it anytime. All they'd have to do
[00:27:25] is take the money away from somewhere else in the schedule you know just like getting business.
[00:27:31] So yeah so talking about the not the take-home pay but also the pensions and the benefits
[00:27:39] you you also broke down a lot on what people are getting paid pension wise and I'm just kind
[00:27:46] of looking at this here now. How much California owes and pension to I'm trying to find the number
[00:27:52] if you have the number you can just shoot it. I don't have the total it's like a trillion dollars
[00:27:55] there's some ridiculous no we feel yes but I can tell you so we we have 1.5 trillion is the
[00:28:02] number 0.5 trillion yeah I knew it was it was a big number we pay about 65 billion in pensions
[00:28:08] annually I'm gonna pay that out there's 126,000 people who are seeing pensions over 100,000
[00:28:15] dollars a year there's 1200 over 250,000 dollars a year so 0.5 trillion yeah that 0.5 is a huge
[00:28:24] number too yeah like that's a huge number in addition to 1 trillion 1.5 trillion oh my gosh
[00:28:33] yeah and one of the things though is that they feel like the pensions are such a good deal and
[00:28:38] they're actually being ripped off you know they don't even even the math teachers in school districts
[00:28:44] apparently don't get this but if you you know imagine it if then supposed being the school
[00:28:50] district just did the 25% of your salary and what you put it into 401k you know not that we would
[00:28:56] save money because it wouldn't be 29% people would save money you could use that for an
[00:29:00] income from education but the person we get on 100,000 dollars they give 25,000 a year for 30
[00:29:07] years put into their 401k and at the end of that they can leave it to their kids you know
[00:29:12] which you can't do on a pension you know when you when you pass away on a pension generally
[00:29:18] as follows can get a deed you can cut the right pension set up but you can't leave it you know to
[00:29:23] give them to your kids or grandkids or anything like that so um so technically you know they're
[00:29:27] really being ripped off and they just don't know it it comes to the pensions
[00:29:33] that's I struggle to think how they believe they're going to pay 1.5 million in trillion
[00:29:44] trillion sorry 1.5 million would be nothing that'd be a drop in the bucket 1.5 trillion
[00:29:51] in pension debt I just I and they keep raising it like you said people in california keep complaining
[00:29:58] that it's not high enough so it's never going down like where do where do we even go from here
[00:30:03] with 1.5 trillion dollars in debt well it's easy to predict so right now I think about 70% of the
[00:30:10] pension debt is still the future pension obligations are funded so they are only funding to pay out 70
[00:30:17] some percent of the the benefits that they promised so at some point they're gonna hit the wall at some
[00:30:24] point they're not gonna have enough money to pay out benefits at the rate that they're paying
[00:30:28] out now so when that happens really only one or two things to happen either they can cut the
[00:30:34] benefits or they can increase taxes so they're they're betting on when they go to to when they
[00:30:41] hit that wall and they need more money they go to people they say oh we need to raise taxes these
[00:30:46] poor public employees aren't gonna get their full benefits unless we do and they're betting
[00:30:50] people will approve it I'm kind of hoping people don't I'm kind of hoping that I mean I want
[00:30:56] I want them to get their benefits I mean I you shouldn't cheat people out of benefits
[00:31:00] they've been promised absolutely not but on the other hand the warning signs are there right now
[00:31:06] so if you're a public employee out there and you're listening to this you need to advocate
[00:31:10] for someone to take up your case and make the pension system make sense you know they can you
[00:31:16] they need to make people contribute more to their own pensions they need to do something with the
[00:31:20] way the pension system is managed they need to do something to fix the pension pension system
[00:31:26] now because coming into the people five or ten years from now and just say well not moving
[00:31:30] into cow except for these taxes it's probably not a winning strategy well I can imagine that
[00:31:36] the commercials that um you know seiu and uh california teachers association they'll
[00:31:42] they'll blast all over our screens will be these poor teachers and you don't want them to
[00:31:47] lose their pension and they'll show these all these poor teachers but they're not going to
[00:31:51] talk about the the guy making four hundred thousand dollars a year that you know that no
[00:31:58] i'm gonna say that poor guy four hundred thousand dollars a year needs someone to pay for his pension
[00:32:03] now they're going for misleading stads you know the la unified had a strike i read a
[00:32:09] negotiation last year with the classified staff and if anybody deserves more money it's classified
[00:32:15] support staff but they the union put out this number that the average person named
[00:32:19] 25 000 a year and i was like how is that possible that's actually below minimum wage if the average
[00:32:26] person in in la unified makes less than 25 000 in la unified is violating minimum wage laws so um
[00:32:33] so i went through and i looked at our data and the average was actually seven three thousand
[00:32:39] so it's different what they said in their marketing to convince people versus what actual
[00:32:44] numbers say who's doing these numbers that failed public school education failed them and they
[00:32:49] can't do math well i think it's i think it's kind of purpose i think that what they're so if i look at
[00:32:55] our data there's eight thousand people in la unified that exist in their records and got eight
[00:33:00] not so if i include all of them then i can get down to something like 13000 i can get a lot
[00:33:07] closer to their number so uh but they're not saying i mean i i think a person who's
[00:33:11] like this in the records but didn't make any money you can't be counted as an employee
[00:33:16] because you can't you can't say that's representative of what people make so who would this be like who
[00:33:22] who would be in the district not making money what is i don't know why they exist in the payroll
[00:33:27] systems they think they're thinking they're getting some down to some sort you know they could
[00:33:32] they're maybe they're here because they can they're a sub and they just never worked
[00:33:36] you know or something um you know i don't really know why they exist but but they're there if you
[00:33:41] look at the data they're there so that's what bothers me the most is then if if our if our public
[00:33:48] employees came out said okay you know the average firefighter makes a hundred and forty two thousand
[00:33:53] dollars here and we don't think that's enough we think you should be it should be more and we're
[00:33:59] going to cut uh farmers to repair rowans to do that so then people can make an honest decision
[00:34:05] they can say yes it's more important to me to pay buyer buyers more than it is to have you know
[00:34:11] top all free roads i'd be fine with it you know the problem that i have is basically just lying
[00:34:16] with the numbers and and making it up right there is nothing more um obscene to me you've had
[00:34:25] rubica for your excitement she did an awesome job there is nothing worse to me than public
[00:34:30] employees holding the education and kids hostage for more financial benefit for themselves you know
[00:34:37] in any anywhere else in society if you it seemed like held a kid over a railroad track and said either
[00:34:43] give me money or i'm gonna drop this kid um that would not work you know but yet routinely in
[00:34:50] in public you know we see people saying we're gonna damage the education of your kids
[00:34:53] unless you give us more money and that's just unacceptable to me that just not for me it
[00:34:58] should work yeah and i i i feel like this is all people who are listening i definitely encourage
[00:35:06] you to go check out transparent california play around with it put numbers in or put names in
[00:35:10] put positions in because i think you'll be sickened to see how much some of these people make um
[00:35:17] and information is power and i think it's important to get that out there where
[00:35:23] people can see these numbers they they see them black and white they can see right through it they
[00:35:29] can see that they're being lied to um so uh i mean camille and i are big believers and look up the
[00:35:36] data you can look up a lot of this stuff you can find the actual facts and data and then do the
[00:35:40] research yourself um so i encourage anyone who's listening and or tuning in just check out uh
[00:35:46] transparent california dot com and play around with it just put in a couple you know wherever
[00:35:51] you live you live in a certain place go check out the superintendent of your kid's school and you know
[00:35:56] look at how much they're making and if they're driving a roose roice or something like that i don't
[00:36:00] know um it's always the kids too it's always the teachers and they always roll out the teachers
[00:36:06] poor teachers poor kids and stuff like that but they never roll out the you know the the other
[00:36:12] bureaucratic official who's making six hundred thousand dollars a year um so anything so you
[00:36:20] put out 2022 numbers when are we going to see 2023 numbers so the our our collection cycle is based
[00:36:29] on the state controller's office cycle for those mandatory reporting that i mentioned earlier
[00:36:34] so we can't start collecting until they put out their deadline their deadline for cities counties
[00:36:40] and such is April 30th okay so we're really cating and start collecting until April 30th if we
[00:36:45] start before that all we need is kickback to me because you say we don't have it they can't get
[00:36:50] it because we don't have it so then we gotta make another request so once the kickoff happens
[00:36:55] April 30th now we've got this this team of basically three part-time people who need to make
[00:37:00] 3 000 public records act requests so generally that cycle tends to take six to nine months to do
[00:37:06] so we you know we we start with the biggest agencies first so ellie county ellie city you
[00:37:13] know sacramento you know we start with the big ones first um so you'll see those but um
[00:37:20] it will take by the time we get down to the little cities we'll stone those screens the charters and
[00:37:24] all that stuff it'll be probably 20 to 25 before we've got the 2023 date all uploaded so if
[00:37:31] if you're any of your viewers want to prioritize anything if they if they quote sponsor an agency
[00:37:39] which is only three by box on our site even like sponsor by bikes and that puts it at the top of
[00:37:44] the list when i get my list of okay what do we need to ask next week but what 100 or 200
[00:37:51] public records and requests are we gonna make next week the sponsored ones and
[00:37:54] are at the very top of the list so if you really have a an intent to see some data from
[00:37:59] some agency um just sponsor it and it'll go you know right to the frontal line so that's
[00:38:05] the best way to get that kind of data you can also ask yourself you know if you really want to
[00:38:10] you can you've been saying you know you've been make a public records act requestments and I'd
[00:38:14] like the same data the income the transparent telephone and they'll have to give it to you
[00:38:20] so that's going to be too high 25 dollars is a pretty good price to get all the information
[00:38:26] about one of your local agencies that you're interested in so yeah you'll get it anyway for
[00:38:31] free I mean we don't charge anybody for anything um so you'll get it the real question is like
[00:38:37] and if particularly if it's a smaller agency we probably won't get into until the end of this year
[00:38:42] you know early next year you know but if you wanted to come in in April you know or May or whatever
[00:38:47] they give us your sponsor and you know that helps for that so in wrapping up before we log off
[00:38:55] tonight talking about sponsorships and stuff like that where can people find more or support
[00:39:00] transparent california and support the cause transparent california.com so um so you go there
[00:39:08] you can look things up if you want we have a free way to subscribe so you can just click subscribe
[00:39:14] and it's free and then we will notify you when your data is posted so if you really want to see
[00:39:20] you know what that local cemetery industry director is making you know you can you can
[00:39:24] click subscribe putting your email and then whenever data gets posted you can email so that's
[00:39:30] all free sponsorship prioritizes the subscriptions just basically let you know when something comes in
[00:39:36] and of course you can donate as well you know everybody is welcome to donate um we're a 501c3 so
[00:39:42] uh so you just tax deductible so you can do that you'd like to do it as well.
[00:39:48] Well now I'm interested in seeing what the cemetery district supervisor or whatever
[00:39:52] does in San Diego I didn't even think of that that's a public position and they probably make a
[00:39:56] bajillion dollars. When I was on the CBC podcast Will Swain was like is there really such a thing
[00:40:03] as a cemetery district? Yes there is there's about 14 or 15 people in the state. I'm sure and
[00:40:10] they probably make decent money based on what we've learned tonight um all right with Todd
[00:40:16] thank you so much for coming back on I urge everybody to go check out transparent california
[00:40:20] if you can support it because like I said information is power and the more people start to figure out
[00:40:26] and spread the word about how much these people are making out they're being irresponsible with a lot
[00:40:30] of this money um I think it will change minds and hearts and hopefully that policy will bubble
[00:40:37] upwards so uh outside of the website is there any other place that people can follow transparent
[00:40:42] california on the daily? Facebook, Twitter you know we have a facebook page and I mean
[00:40:48] typically post um there we repost when we can mention the media almost every day almost every
[00:40:54] day our reporter somewhere uses our data to illuminate some story so we repost those stories there and we
[00:41:00] also repost those out on twitter um any little tidbits you know if we turn over a rock and find a
[00:41:06] place that the internet paying $800,000 in beer we might post that you know on the facebook page
[00:41:11] we have a blog you know for longer forum things if you really want to know what the ins
[00:41:16] and outs that are of education pay in the state of california teachers administrators
[00:41:21] support staff benefits there's a good blog series on our website on that you want to know the
[00:41:26] details so things like that so you became in tune I mainly right now we have tax it's taxis
[00:41:32] right you know so we're gonna see taxes increase this year we've got a lot how many how many
[00:41:37] cities in san jupyuk county have tax increases as well as on the agenda so if the next time
[00:41:42] your city council comes in and says we cannot provide you with um x service because we don't
[00:41:48] have enough money go look at how much they pay themselves you know and then we bet i've seen
[00:41:53] people actually go to city council meetings and school board meetings and just read and
[00:41:57] transparent telephone just go okay you tell us we need to raise the sales tax here meanwhile
[00:42:02] here's a list of all the people you know standing in front of me or in the city and
[00:42:06] then make over $250,000 a year just let him know you know that you're watching
[00:42:12] but that's what the news for yeah information is power well thank you Todd for coming on again
[00:42:20] look forward to being next year come back on give us more updates see if we found any $800,000
[00:42:25] janitors or something sound good all right well thank you thank you yeah and as we end every show
[00:42:33] like to make sure you like share subscribe review comment all that stuff helps with the
[00:42:37] algorithm and the best thing you can do to support the show it's absolutely free is
[00:42:42] just share it with someone who's interested in learning more about how much do we pay our public
[00:42:46] officials and why is it so damn much go check out transfer at california thanks everyone for
[00:42:53] tuning in and we'll see you on the next one later
[00:43:03] thank you for listening to another episode of california underground if you like what you
[00:43:12] heard remember to subscribe like and review it and follow california underground on social media
[00:43:16] for updates as to when new episodes are available

