Ep. 250 - Do We Need Another Recall?

Ep. 250 - Do We Need Another Recall?

Summary

In this episode, Phil and Camille discuss the second effort to recall Governor Gavin Newsom and whether he deserves to be recalled again. They review Newsom's State of the State address in 2022, focusing on his promises regarding gas prices and the economy. They also examine the process and timeline of a recall election and the challenges of electric vehicle adoption. The conversation highlights the high gas prices in California and the state's struggling economy, leading to the conclusion that Newsom's promises have not been fulfilled. In this conversation, Camille and Phil discuss the failures of California Governor Gavin Newsom in various areas, including the state's unemployment rate, job growth, homelessness, crime rates, and more. They highlight the misleading jobs numbers, the ineffectiveness of mask mandates, and the slow progress in addressing the homelessness crisis. They also emphasize the importance of focusing on local elections and flipping seats in the state legislature to bring about positive change in California. While a second recall of Newsom is discussed, they suggest that redirecting energy towards local elections may be a more effective strategy.


Make sure to check out our full website at www.californiaunderground.live


Chapters

00:00 Introduction and Background

00:49 The Second Effort to Recall Governor Gavin Newsom

03:00 State of the State Address in 2022

04:31 Gas Tax Increase and Rising Gas Prices

05:50 Understanding the Recall Process

07:43 Recall Election Results

08:02 Potential Duration of a New Recall

09:25 Cost and Timing of Signature Collection

11:13 Recall Election Candidates

11:25 Cost of Recall Elections

12:29 State of the State Address in 2022

13:16 No Pause in Gas Tax Increase

15:23 Blaming Oil Companies for Gas Prices

19:24 Gas Prices and Taxes in California

20:23 Challenges of Electric Vehicle Adoption

25:47 Electric Vehicle Sales and Infrastructure

28:14 California's Leadership in Clean Technology

29:59 EV Sales and Market Growth

35:11 EV Sales and Market Slowdown

37:35 California's Economy and Job Growth

38:56 California's Unemployment Rate

39:03 California's Unemployment Rate and Job Growth

40:15 Misleading Jobs Numbers

41:41 Postponed State of the State Address

42:55 California's Economy and Budget Deficit

43:37 Impact of Acupuncturists and Dieticians on Jobs Numbers

44:04 Inaccurate Jobs Data

44:45 Public Perception of California's Economy

45:16 Lockdowns and Saving Lives

46:08 Effectiveness of Mask Mandates

47:12 Exaggerated Evidence for Masks to Fight COVID

49:24 Homelessness Crisis and Care Court

50:01 Failure to Implement Comprehensive Homelessness Strategy

58:11 Crime Rates and Failed Policies

01:00:56 Need for a Second Recall

[00:00:00] If you're a California conservative, a libertarian, a moderate Democrat, believe in common sense,

[00:00:11] or just the same person.

[00:00:13] This is the political podcast for you.

[00:00:15] It's the California Underground Podcast.

[00:00:27] What's going on, everybody? Thanks for tuning into another episode of the California Underground Podcast.

[00:00:31] I'm your host Phil and as always with me is my trusty co-host, the best ambassador researcher in the West.

[00:00:37] Camille, are you over jet lag yet?

[00:00:40] I'm over jet lag. It's been a week.

[00:00:44] We can half-one-ever.

[00:00:45] Yeah. I think I'm finally back to normal.

[00:00:49] I feel like I'm finally back to myself.

[00:00:51] Last week was brutal. There were days that I was just like,

[00:00:55] fall asleep in my desk where I'm just like, I can't do this work anymore.

[00:00:58] This is too much.

[00:00:59] So good to be back on Pacific Standard Time after being over in Europe.

[00:01:05] But today we're going to be talking about because it just got the green light from the Secretary of State

[00:01:09] to start gathering signatures.

[00:01:12] The effort, the second effort to recall Governor Gavin Newsom.

[00:01:17] We're not living Groundhog Day.

[00:01:18] This is not old news.

[00:01:20] That has been rehashed.

[00:01:21] This is actually happening.

[00:01:23] This signature gathering process has been greenlit to start.

[00:01:26] I think it's something like one, let's just say 1.2 million signatures need to be submitted

[00:01:31] by September 3rd.

[00:01:32] So a way we go.

[00:01:35] And we've kind of discussed this back and forth about it

[00:01:38] and I'd as followers on Instagram, like with their thoughts about the recall or a second recall was.

[00:01:45] There's a lot of people who said it's a waste of time and resources, especially in a year where

[00:01:50] it's a presidential election.

[00:01:53] Some people are like, no, we absolutely need to do it.

[00:01:55] You deserve to be recalled.

[00:01:57] So the point of today's episode, even though the title, when you read it, it kind of sounds

[00:02:03] it could be taken in a couple different ways.

[00:02:05] It could be saying, do we need a recall?

[00:02:09] Do we need a second recall?

[00:02:10] Like asking a question.

[00:02:13] Kind of, could maybe it start cascading where it's like, nah, do we really need a second recall?

[00:02:17] Like are we critiquing it?

[00:02:19] But the point of today's episode is to kind of answer that question.

[00:02:24] Does there need to be a second recall?

[00:02:26] Like does Gavin Newsom deserve to be recalled again in terms of where California is?

[00:02:33] Now I know a lot of listeners right off the back are going to be like, yep, absolutely he needs to be recalled.

[00:02:37] But I think we're going to examine more since his recall.

[00:02:43] We're going to look at stuff since then, the promises he's made.

[00:02:46] And see where we're at as things have things gotten worse or better.

[00:02:50] Has he done sort of the same plateaued?

[00:02:52] Any thoughts before we hop into any discussion?

[00:02:57] No, I'll let you lead this.

[00:02:59] I know you kind of have a timeline tonight.

[00:03:02] Time frame.

[00:03:03] So you lead it all to like documents.

[00:03:05] Okay.

[00:03:07] All right, then let's get started.

[00:03:08] We pulled up, or you pulled up, I should say,

[00:03:11] his last state of the state, because correct me if I'm wrong there was no state of the state last year.

[00:03:16] He didn't give them last year.

[00:03:17] Right.

[00:03:18] And I don't know if that's said not.

[00:03:19] I didn't look into that.

[00:03:21] It's just like every couple of times I looked at state of the state 2023 it popped up 2022.

[00:03:26] So I couldn't find whether he gave one last year or not.

[00:03:29] So we're looking at 2022, which works because it's right after right 2021 is when he got recalled or

[00:03:37] they had the recall election is trying to.

[00:03:39] It was in September of 21 that he won the recall if you will.

[00:03:44] And then so it was like six months later in March that he gave the state of the state address.

[00:03:51] Then he, right.

[00:03:53] I guess so he obviously won reelection in 2022 and he did do a little speech like I guess an

[00:04:01] acceptance speech of sorts in 23.

[00:04:05] So maybe that counts as a state of the state?

[00:04:07] Yeah, that's probably what they thought was like he gave his state of the state when he gave his

[00:04:12] biggest acceptance speech.

[00:04:13] Like he marched down that.

[00:04:15] It was like trying to speak Spanish.

[00:04:17] Yeah, that's right and she.

[00:04:19] And he was like, look at how good she is.

[00:04:20] Yeah, I mean, I'm learning Spanish so I don't want to judge but it came off really

[00:04:24] pretty badly on her part.

[00:04:26] It's not like like the whitest person possible trying to speak Spanish.

[00:04:30] But yeah, so 2020 was the last time he gave a state of state where just came in out of COVID.

[00:04:35] I think the state of emergency was over in March of that year.

[00:04:38] So this was around the time he filing relinquish just state of the emergency bars.

[00:04:44] All the COVID stuff started to drift away and it looked like we were kind of heading back on.

[00:04:49] Yeah, we're going back.

[00:04:50] I think all of us for life you were still in a state of emergency but.

[00:04:55] Isn't that insane?

[00:04:57] Right?

[00:04:57] Like a lot of people, I don't think real.

[00:05:00] Maybe they don't remember because they want to block it out.

[00:05:03] But yes, the state of emergency didn't end in California until 2022.

[00:05:08] Two years later after COVID started.

[00:05:10] That's how long they held on to it.

[00:05:12] Even though there was no more restrictions, no one was wearing masks anymore like it was all over.

[00:05:15] There was still a state of emergency going on in 2020.

[00:05:18] So we have some highlights from a state of the state address.

[00:05:20] What we're going to do is we're going to take some of that stuff he said.

[00:05:23] We're not going to watch him or Camille's benefit.

[00:05:26] We're not going to stay here and watch him again.

[00:05:27] So we're going to I got the transcript.

[00:05:29] We're going to look at it.

[00:05:30] We're going to pull some things from it that I highlighted.

[00:05:33] And then we're going to discuss like where is California at this point?

[00:05:37] So that way we can answer the question like,

[00:05:40] does he deserve?

[00:05:40] Do we really need a second recall?

[00:05:42] And also for just to kind of frame it,

[00:05:45] he's termed out in 26 right?

[00:05:50] So maybe we should start right there.

[00:05:52] I think that's a good place to start because a lot of people I think have missed

[00:05:55] conceptions of what a recall does.

[00:05:58] And this is a good way to kind of introduce what is a recall in California.

[00:06:02] So if you don't remember what a recall is or you're kind of confused on

[00:06:07] what the purpose of it is, when you recall the governor first you have a vote.

[00:06:12] So first they have to collect all the signatures and then they have an election.

[00:06:16] And all these people jump in if you remember back in 2021,

[00:06:20] it was a melee of people all running.

[00:06:24] A lot of people's great names that we know who were all of a sudden jumping in the race

[00:06:29] and they were all wanted to replace Newsom.

[00:06:32] The procedure is you have a recall election and there's two questions.

[00:06:38] The first question is, does do you think governor Newsom deserves to be recalled?

[00:06:44] If the yes vote wins, there's a second question.

[00:06:48] And the second question is, if so, who would you like to replace it?

[00:06:53] So that's why we have like 20 candidates.

[00:06:56] And I think it's like you have to get more than like 20% or something

[00:07:00] to actually, or is it just the top vote governor that actually gets it?

[00:07:03] It's a top vote governor.

[00:07:04] So it has to be yes, it has to be 50% plus one vote

[00:07:09] for and then top person most votes wins.

[00:07:16] So hypothetically, in the last election, Newsom didn't get recalled because

[00:07:22] majority of people, a large majority of people voted no, he does not deserve to be recalled.

[00:07:27] So that's it. That's the end of the recall election.

[00:07:30] It doesn't, nobody goes on to the second question.

[00:07:32] Hypocetically, if there was a yes vote and that one,

[00:07:37] we would have Larry Elder who was the top vote governor in that recall election.

[00:07:42] He got the most votes. So he would have become the next governor.

[00:07:46] But only for a short time because we were re-electing that the elections he's

[00:07:52] started again in 20, so it would have been like about a year-ish

[00:07:57] that he would have been and then obviously from there he could have chosen to run again.

[00:08:01] Yeah, Newsom could have just ran it down, just become governor.

[00:08:05] He, we didn't successfully recall him.

[00:08:08] We were able to successfully get the recall, but he still won the special election

[00:08:13] and then he was re-elected the following year.

[00:08:17] And then I'm laughing because you and I were together in person like I'm not the go,

[00:08:21] I think what we started reminiscing about this the recall and all the candidates

[00:08:27] and then it was like two days later where they're like the announcers like

[00:08:31] they're trying to do another recall.

[00:08:33] Yep, here we go again but they they have qualified it and they now have to go start getting

[00:08:38] signatures. That will be that's the tough slog. Well actually the tough slog is actually getting

[00:08:42] enough people to vote yes. And I imagine we won't have another recall until next year anyway which

[00:08:49] actually gets some more time because it's 2026. Well yeah, it'd be like a year and change

[00:08:55] that we'd probably get a new governor. But yeah so that was the craziness to recall.

[00:08:59] Because I know with the 2021 recall they gave additional time due to things being shut down

[00:09:05] in the whole student emergency. I think they gave an additional four months to collect signatures.

[00:09:12] And I forget what the exact timeline was for that I had looked at recently but I don't remember now.

[00:09:18] So they wouldn't be giving that additional time so they only have do you know how many months

[00:09:24] to collect signatures? April, May, June, July, August, five months, five full months because

[00:09:31] it's September 3rd they need to submit signatures by. Okay but then they don't do the

[00:09:38] election quite that and then they set news and I think so selects the election date.

[00:09:44] So I think it has to be within 90 days or something they have to have the recall

[00:09:50] and feel like yeah it has to be quick. Like it can't be dragged out like oh the recall will be

[00:09:56] in next year in November. Like now I have to like be relatively quick because I remember

[00:10:01] was a mad dash and it was like as soon as they got the signatures which was around

[00:10:06] summertime. It's funny how many people waited until they got the signatures and then they all

[00:10:11] jumped in like Larry Elder so yeah we'll see what happens. Re calls bring out

[00:10:20] some of the weirdest politicians you'll find because everybody wants to throw their hat in the

[00:10:25] ring and everybody can run on the recall ballot. That's another one so if you're interested

[00:10:30] that's another topic so if nothing else if a recall does actually get on the ballot

[00:10:35] we'll have plenty of content and people to look at. And the last minute just sorry before we

[00:10:41] divid this I think it cost the state $200 million dollars for the last recall which is just

[00:10:46] it's another important factor to look at. Yeah but a lot of people will say we've spent so much

[00:10:51] money on other frivolous things. That $200 million seems like a drop in the bucket compared to

[00:10:56] whatever else we're spending on. Right so that's that's the process so if people now people can

[00:11:03] kind of think about what is a recall if they didn't know what a recall actually does I think

[00:11:08] because a lot of people got confused and were like wait didn't we recall them already because

[00:11:13] we got the signatures and it was on the ballot but I think they got confused like maybe you

[00:11:17] actually had to show up and vote whether you want them recalled or not. So that's our that's our

[00:11:23] PSA about it if it does happen we'll obviously bring it up more about what a recall is anyway so

[00:11:31] 2022 paint the picture it's March it's two years later after COVID

[00:11:36] Gavin Newsom has just defeated his recall he's in all his glory he's ready to go

[00:11:44] and he's also facing election that year which he then wins. So I'll start with some highlights

[00:11:50] the first off he says tonight is also a moment for us to reflect on what it means to live in a

[00:11:56] society where elected leaders still settle our disagreements by and large with civility and compromise

[00:12:01] which I find funny coming from Gavin Newsom because he does make a habit out of bullying people on

[00:12:08] Twitter and making tonight comments on Twitter about everybody he doesn't agree with so I don't know

[00:12:13] how much civility and compromise he actually believes in. First topic he talked about in January

[00:12:21] we proposed to pause the gas tax increase now it's clear we must go further that's why working

[00:12:28] with the legislative leadership I'll be submitting a proposal to put money back in the pockets of

[00:12:33] Californians to address rising gas prices. Who at a time? I'm sorry who proposed this was

[00:12:42] I don't think it was the Democrats that proposed to pause like a stacks increase

[00:12:47] I feel like the Republicans were like fighting hard for Democrats didn't want to listen to us

[00:12:53] now I think that was definitely a Republican thing and I think they were definitely pushing for

[00:12:58] that it never happened the gas tax has gone up every year since then so in terms of we proposed

[00:13:05] anything I don't know what he's talking about let's see as a mouse in his pocket or something

[00:13:09] because Democrats were not on board with a gas tax or pausing the gas tax increase

[00:13:16] right I never happened. We didn't feel that year. I think it was a real deal. Yeah because I think

[00:13:23] there's what 50 cents or something they were like hey if we pause it we save people 50 cents

[00:13:29] at that time which is a lot of money when you think about it I paid we have this in our notes

[00:13:35] I paid for 99 yesterday at the at the pump for gas at Costco mind you not like an expensive place

[00:13:45] at Costco I paid for 99 you had in your notes how much did you paid recently well I my husband

[00:13:52] tells me my car coming but I looked at all my local gas stations like seven immediately around me

[00:13:57] and every single one was five thirty or more per gallon as of last night that's insane so we're already

[00:14:05] topping off at five dollars at minimum we're already topping off at five dollars and I don't even

[00:14:12] live here like I'm kind of far from the freeway you have like they can easily like this is the only

[00:14:20] gas station for miles or this is the convenient one like I where I live it's considered a bedroom

[00:14:25] community like people don't come here for tourist stuff I guess the next library but like nobody

[00:14:30] really comes here you know it's just people who live here so it's not like they're like oh we'll

[00:14:34] get out like you know everyone this is the community gas station we could just gallon prices it's not

[00:14:39] you go down and say that's why we're working on the legislative leadership I'll be submitting a

[00:14:42] proposal to put money back in the pockets of California and so address resident gas prices

[00:14:47] but at a time when we've been heating and burning up one thing we cannot do is repeat the mistakes

[00:14:53] of the past by embracing polluters drilling even more oil which only leads even more extreme

[00:14:58] whether more extreme drought and more wildfire so there's a graph that I think people have seen

[00:15:08] let me see if I can pull it up if you want to talk amongst yourselves why I pull up a screenshot of

[00:15:12] it so this is a graph that a lot of people have seen before this is basically how much the state adds

[00:15:22] on to other price of our gallons so it's $130 the gallon this is 2022 mind you sure it's only

[00:15:28] gone up since then well yeah it's every July first and we have another little increase it always

[00:15:35] goes up a little bit and then you'd send $12.00 state and local sales tax 25 cents for cap and trade

[00:15:43] 22 cents for low carbon fuel standard 18 cents federal excise 51 cents state excise tax so a lot

[00:15:51] of that is state taxes now if you remember his big solution to solving this problem is was he wanted

[00:16:04] to wait for he wanted to blame the oil companies and say that it's the oil companies who are

[00:16:11] gouging Californians intentionally right because they don't want to gouge any other people in any

[00:16:17] other states so in Florida they don't want to gouge people in Florida in Texas they don't want to

[00:16:23] gouge people in Texas any other Midwestern state Nebraska they don't want to gouge people there but

[00:16:29] they have a vendetta against California and they've decided we're going to gouge prices specifically

[00:16:37] here by so much more so this was funny enough this is actually a year ago this article March 27th 2023

[00:16:47] in the LA Times uh California law makers approved Newsom's oil bill here's what you need to know

[00:16:54] after months of deliberation the final bill does not cap oil refinery profits for penalize the

[00:17:00] industry as Newsom had intended when he accused companies of intentionally driving up gas prices

[00:17:04] to boost revenue instead the bill SBX12 gives the California Energy Commission the power to set

[00:17:12] up set a cap and impose penalties through a regulatory process if it decides that oil companies are

[00:17:18] making excessive profits and that penalty will not result in higher prices for consumers sounds like

[00:17:24] it does anything or doesn't just sound like it's more regulatory oversight that won't do anything

[00:17:30] yeah it's still stuck all the time watching because this big plan was he wanted to do this windfall

[00:17:36] tax profit we've talked about this before it doesn't windfall tax actually do anything or windfall

[00:17:40] profit tax it showed in the 70s they tried to do that which in the Carter that didn't work most of

[00:17:46] them it doesn't ever really work it doesn't doesn't do what it's intended to do it sounds nice it's

[00:17:52] a buzz word but it doesn't actually do what it needs to do and this bill didn't even include it anyway

[00:17:59] the legislation focuses on transparency including requiring the industry to provide more information

[00:18:04] about maintenance and pricing decisions in order to allow state officials to better understand

[00:18:08] the market and deter companies from gouging consumers quote even when we are not experiencing a spike

[00:18:15] we pay higher prices than in other states even when we account for our taxes and environmental

[00:18:19] policies said assembly member juck wee urwin of thousand oaks you know that califian's pay as

[00:18:25] much as 260 more per gallon the residents of other states at one point last year this is unacceptable

[00:18:31] well if we look back at that graph accounting for the amount of taxes and regulatory fees that

[00:18:36] actually go into a gallon of gas I think the bill is not facing the right by it should be looking

[00:18:43] inwards rather than outwards as to why gas is so expensive here let's see let me

[00:18:51] profit in placing additional requirements on our findings could drive companies out of the state

[00:18:55] reducing supply and increasing fuel costs the oil groups said the industry at urge the state

[00:19:00] to take more time to understand the bill's potential effects on supplies so instead of a cap approved

[00:19:07] by lawmakers sp x12 allows the energy commission to establish a maximum gross gasoline refining

[00:19:13] and a penalty for exceeding that margin if they do necessary before setting a cap and penalty

[00:19:18] commission must find the benefits of doing so outweigh potential costs to consumers so

[00:19:24] so we've put it here it's been year exactly a year has everything happened I have not seen

[00:19:33] a report I've not seen gas prices go down I don't think I've seen oil companies shirk away from like

[00:19:39] this I you know this idea of they're actually gouging them I mean yeah today we're all paying over

[00:19:45] five dollars a gallon for gas so I've definitely not seen gas prices go down there is a little bit more

[00:19:53] than I want to say California's average gas price is not the only not only the highest in the nation

[00:19:58] this is from California globe the article that you've sent over it is even higher than Hawaii's

[00:20:03] gas price per gallon which to me isn't saying because Hawaii's supposed to have the most expensive

[00:20:08] gas because it's an island and there's no refinery like it's literally an island you have to

[00:20:13] bring oil to and gas to I know they say California is like figuratively a island when it comes

[00:20:20] to refineries and gas but Hawaii is quite literally an island and it's cheaper to buy gas in Hawaii

[00:20:25] in October 22nd senator Shannon Grove of Baker's Field Boiled Down the actual pro-an

[00:20:30] Californian's highest in the nation gas prices and gas taxes any letter to the governor highlights

[00:20:35] Californians isely markets which are just said it's kind of like an island and inability to

[00:20:40] access additional fuel that meets California's stringent standards against the environmental

[00:20:45] policies the most hostile regulatory requirements the most aggressive environmental policies the

[00:20:50] extraordinary expense of cap and tree the highest tax per dollar gasoline and possible standards

[00:20:55] that are not found in any other state in the nation and limited supply so in 90 although I thought

[00:21:02] this was really interesting because we've talked about this in terms of how many refineries they're

[00:21:07] actually potentially are in California and how much they've shut down and we've made this argument

[00:21:13] that if you want to if you're all about protecting workers rights and reducing carbon and the environment

[00:21:21] you should be drilling for oil here we need oil oil something we definitely need we need

[00:21:26] through a fine oil so why don't we drill oil here ensure that workers have protections they get a

[00:21:36] good wage they have all that and the American employment law system protecting them also it

[00:21:42] travels afar list is since it's not coming from Ecuador or Latin America or any other country far

[00:21:47] thousands of miles away accomplishes two goals protectors workers rights creates great middle class

[00:21:53] jobs and upper middle class jobs and it reduces carbon so I don't know why don't we think about that

[00:22:02] way not think no for do away it's not the California way to actually think about let's produce more

[00:22:07] oil in 1982 California had 43 operational oil refineries any population nearly 25 million

[00:22:16] today we have only 11 operational oil refineries and a population nearly 40 million

[00:22:23] and those 40 million residents are driving more cars to have more houses and apartments working

[00:22:27] more commercial buildings shopping in more stores and traveling more across the state all of which

[00:22:32] which takes more traditional energy so there you have it um so to answer the question did he tackle the

[00:22:43] issue of rising gas prices based on his state of the speech in 2012 I would give a lot of no

[00:22:50] rhinos down because at the end I'm probably gonna make a comment about all the things he caught on

[00:22:55] this ginger deliver wrong yeah it doesn't sound like he fixed gas prices two years I know he sent

[00:23:00] out he sent out money but that was two years ago yeah was that what the visa gift card things were

[00:23:07] think so they were like just prepaid debit cards which I don't think people were specifically

[00:23:13] using for gas um credit and it was I think up to 400 for vehicle up to two vehicles per household

[00:23:24] we didn't get any I think we got to or we got one yes our first we were like going through stuff

[00:23:34] and then like we found something and I found something I look at my wife and I go you didn't

[00:23:39] activate this card and she's like no I thought it was like junk mail I thought it was like one of

[00:23:42] those junk about credit cards I'm like no this is like an actual card and she called up the number

[00:23:48] and they're like this is preloaded with a hundred dollars it's now active and she's like oh

[00:23:54] got a hundred bucks it's like no it's our money anyway so

[00:23:59] this was interesting he brought up in the state of the speech he kind of did this like

[00:24:05] loosely based like drilling even more oil which only leads to even more

[00:24:08] trim weather more trim drought more wildfire he kind of tied drilling for oil

[00:24:15] to the wildfires that we've experienced um I was trying to see if there's I mean of course there's

[00:24:21] plenty of things to say like yeah oils bad and refining for oil is bad and for polluters

[00:24:27] I've never seen any direct correlation between the wildfires happening

[00:24:31] and drilling for oil or how much we drill for oil here in California it seems like those are not

[00:24:37] really like directly connected it's not like the drilling starts the wildfires there was lots of

[00:24:44] fires whenever one of the really big fires PG need to credit this obviously not the word fault

[00:24:51] the admitted quality yeah is there responsibility and and obviously that's not all the fires

[00:24:58] but um I do know that California is really bad about cleaning up the brush

[00:25:06] done you know ignite easily during a hot summer and we don't store water that we get during

[00:25:11] our very rainy years and so we don't have available water so yeah I don't know how you can

[00:25:18] blame that on oil I mean it's a 10-inch hole I mean it's a tenuous argument you can say well

[00:25:25] drilling for oil might cause carbon and global warming which is still a whole debatable issue anyway

[00:25:32] but to directly cause and say like oh oil is why we have wildfires in California it's real

[00:25:38] tenuous stretch to say that they're connected somehow they're not I mean if you're arguing as well

[00:25:46] we got to get rid of oil and you have to pay six dollars at the pump because we have wildfires

[00:25:51] and it's kind of like why don't or you can just do your job and like you know protect forests

[00:25:56] and actually do forest management and have plenty of water that's a novel idea too

[00:26:00] and not just blame it on oil because we all know oil big oil is always the big bogeyman for

[00:26:06] democrats they've been going after big oil since I even started following politics it's always

[00:26:11] the big bogeyman his big oil but his solution because we don't want to have people use gasoline

[00:26:18] or oil anymore in the cars is obviously electric vehicles he goes on to say underscoring the

[00:26:26] importance of excelling california's leadership in clean technology and I apologize to everyone

[00:26:30] out there I don't do a good Gavin Newsom impersonation so I'm just not even going to drive

[00:26:35] it's too raspy my voice would hurt this is not a not just a national security environmental justice

[00:26:41] imperative clean energy is this generation's greatest economic opportunity a perfect example

[00:26:48] are dominance in electric vehicle sales and manufacturing it was california's policies that created

[00:26:53] this market now we have the opportunity to extend this leadership to secure a critical component

[00:26:58] of the supply chain for batteries like tapping the one world's largest lithium reserves right here

[00:27:03] in california so right there there's always this concern about actually mining lithium it's like

[00:27:08] messy you have to use shocker you have to use trucks and equipment that are powered by oil to actually

[00:27:16] get the lithium out to create the batteries creates a lot of carbon so it's not an absolute clean

[00:27:24] operation to go get that lithium our nation leading climate investments 38 billion will ensure

[00:27:31] that other innovations will surely follow not by recreating the 20th century by extracting more oil

[00:27:37] but by extracting new ideas drilling for new talent by running our economy in a carbon free engine

[00:27:47] it's a cute use of words right there

[00:27:53] his speech writer must have thought they were really like clever when they did that they were like

[00:27:57] I got this is gonna be good i'm gonna use like oil terms to talk about what we need to be doing um

[00:28:03] okay electric vehicles but this really isn't like new sums fault per se but since then do you think

[00:28:11] EVs have gotten more popular or less popular well i think they're a little more popular

[00:28:17] i think tesla people want tesla's i think tip people want tesla's just for the tesla name

[00:28:23] i swear if it was gas powered they'd still be getting one but the thing is like there's a tons

[00:28:30] around me um i don't know about i don't you know i don't go anywhere so i don't know about it

[00:28:36] there's tons of tesla's all the road around me people are still completing about their inability

[00:28:40] to charge them yeah so this year i think EVs the news is that EVs have hit a wall

[00:28:48] EV sales have hit a wall yes people want EVs they think maybe people think it's a good idea

[00:28:54] but i think the reality of implementing it is much harder than they were expecting and i think a

[00:28:59] lot of places who thought and this is something else Gavin Newsom proposed is that all cars in

[00:29:04] california are going to have to be electric by 2030 so or what six years away from that um and we

[00:29:11] have quite a long way to go before everyone has an EV now that's not to say you can't like go buy a car

[00:29:18] it just car sales perhaps right they don't have to be EVs by 2030 it's just you won't be able to buy

[00:29:26] a gas powered car in california that's what they're trying to do i don't think they're gonna

[00:29:31] accomplish that goal i think that's probably gonna be pushed off like five years every time we get

[00:29:35] close it's gonna get pushed off five years because it's just kind of i just don't think it's not actually

[00:29:40] a cool observation about that so we you know went out of country a couple weeks ago we we

[00:29:47] and we drove it's easier six of us and all of our luggage is easier for us to drive to the airport

[00:29:52] in park and so we paid for like this one structure and it's three or four levels and the bottom

[00:29:59] level is primarily EV parking with the chargers and it was mostly empty i have i just took my

[00:30:08] yard to or all the dawns to put down Monday and there's they had redone the parking lot recently

[00:30:14] with a bunch of EV you know charging spots they're usually all empty and it's so frustrating

[00:30:20] because i need a spot like right from the dentist no there's it's all EV parking and like i'm seeing

[00:30:26] implemented more and more and there there's often like let's say six seven eight spots and they'll

[00:30:31] be maybe one part in them so i understand yeah we notice that a lot too but but you're right like

[00:30:40] that means that the demand is not there yet right so this is from Forbes magazine uh this came how

[00:30:49] oh march 24th couple days ago uh in a sobering revelation from a Boston consulting group study

[00:30:56] the vast majority of potential EV adopters want three things to happen but for those seriously

[00:31:00] consider switching from gas to EV they want under 20 minute charging times which has been a big concern

[00:31:06] a 350 mile plus driving range and a sticker price of under $50,000 it's only one EV the Hyundai i

[00:31:13] i knock i know i i don't even i say that long range meeting those criteria as the industry has

[00:31:20] a long way to go so says in the us EV sales have increased since 2016 in 2017 they were around 65

[00:31:26] thousand EV sold and by 2022 that number had ballooned out to over 800,000 sales following an

[00:31:33] upper trend EV sales increased 51% the first half of 20 still those gains represented decline

[00:31:38] from the 71% growth in the same period last year in addition Tesla the market leader with over half

[00:31:43] of all EV sales recently revealed this lowest quarterly profitability in previous two years was

[00:31:48] caused a $138 billion decline in a value of the company shares meanwhile in Britain last year

[00:31:55] prime minister rishi soon alchemy the major you turn on the country's planned van of gas

[00:32:00] sling vehicles to be announced that the government was post-planned its introduction from 2030

[00:32:04] to 2030 uh another company to maximize profitability general motor says announced it's pulling back

[00:32:09] on its plans to build 400,000 EVs by mid 2024 two years ago the company said it'll phase out

[00:32:15] internal combustion by 20 plants to collaborate with haunted to develop a range of more recently

[00:32:20] priced EVs have also been scrapped executive is at four so they don't currently require the

[00:32:24] production capacity to fill demand thus they are post-rolling billions of dollars in EV investment

[00:32:30] finally goes on to say there's also strong evidence that shows most individuals who buy electric

[00:32:34] also own an internal combustion engine powered vehicle quote they are not switching to electric

[00:32:40] vehicles from their gas powered vehicles most electric vehicles are bought as quote compliments

[00:32:45] not as replacements according to economic economists they're merely increasing the overall

[00:32:51] quantity of automobiles they have on hand so this idea we're leading the way and we're plowing

[00:32:59] forward with EVs and it's kind of slowing down at this point i think more people are

[00:33:08] seeing that the infrastructure is not there like you say it's just it's not convenient we don't know

[00:33:12] like good people it's hard to find charging stations unless you're a Tesla i think Tesla

[00:33:17] finds it for you and they'll give you directions but most of the electric vehicle other ones they

[00:33:22] don't have super charging it takes hours it's a long time a lot of people live in apartments so like

[00:33:27] already charge it they have charge like so uh yeah this idea of like electric vehicles are

[00:33:33] going to be paving the way for California and then we're gonna be ready in 2030 to do that i don't

[00:33:38] think that's gonna be a reality i think that's probably gonna fall short really thoughts three it's

[00:33:43] quite a pushback like you said is it works not ready for yeah i think it's just it's it's it's a lofty

[00:33:50] goal i just don't think it's gonna happen i like that article said there's a lot of people who still

[00:33:54] have a gas powered car for plenty of other reasons probably reliability long distance trips they know

[00:34:01] they can do it but maybe they have a little electric car that they can kind of just hop around town

[00:34:06] which makes more sense you could have all of us put a forward to like buy a new Tesla think about now

[00:34:10] like for us we have a few teenagers and we would if our kids went a by far or we want to help them buy

[00:34:17] a car or whatever like you imagine like my husband and i like we each replace our car with an electric

[00:34:22] car right now we need to spend or somehow our kids need to afford to which okay different subjects

[00:34:30] that we will go off on but like fast food places are even hiring kids anymore because they're like

[00:34:34] i'm gonna take a 16 year old 20 bucks an hour and so how are my kids ever supposed to buy a car a

[00:34:39] little loan of 58,000 100,000 dollar electric car anyway yeah before to live like this it's not

[00:34:48] getting easier in California that's for sure it's game much harder uh his next topic you want to turn

[00:34:55] to is the economy because i say when it comes to the economy California is unmatched we dominate and

[00:35:02] research innovation entrepreneurialism venture capital and remain the world's fifth largest economy

[00:35:08] our GDP growth is a well i think we're gonna talk about that our GDP growth is consistently outpaced

[00:35:14] not only the rest of the country but most other large western democracies in December alone

[00:35:20] 25% of americans jobs would be right here in California a million new jobs in the last 12 months

[00:35:26] more new business starts during the worst of the pandemic in Texas and Florida combined

[00:35:33] comment about the this this statistic that they love to use with business applications

[00:35:41] casual i was watching some video on youtube like walk don't run

[00:35:45] he made a good point which is they they like to say oh most business applications and businesses

[00:35:51] it's something like 70% of those applications first off we don't even know like what they are

[00:35:57] we don't know they're not gonna necessarily be big businesses many of them are just like LLCs

[00:36:04] so here in California if you want to be a freelancer you have to be an LLC so that contributes to how

[00:36:10] many you start it's just you you're not creating jobs and we don't know whether these businesses are

[00:36:16] created actually creating a lot of jobs like they can just be someone's sole business but

[00:36:21] California just got some great news and by great i mean absolutely horrible about the economy and

[00:36:27] where they're at the ap wrote California's unemployment rate is the highest in the nation

[00:36:34] slower job growth is to blame so what what they should be this is March 22nd 22

[00:36:42] i wish i had a sound board like the price is right that like horn that goes bump bump bump but i don't

[00:36:48] the California's unemployment rate is now the highest in the country reaching 5.3%

[00:36:52] February following new data that revealed job growth in the nation's most popular state was much

[00:36:58] lower last year than previously thought sad California lost a staggering 2.7 million jobs at the

[00:37:06] start of the coronavirus pandemic losses brought on my Gavin Newsom state home order which forced

[00:37:10] many businesses close the state had added more than 3 million jobs since then a remarkable

[00:37:15] streak that averages over 66,000 new jobs her mom's the coin of the state employment development

[00:37:21] but this year while the data initially showed California added 300,000 jobs between September 2022

[00:37:29] and September 2023 the corrected numbers released earlier this month show that the state added

[00:37:35] just 50,000 jobs during that period oh my gosh that is white at difference that is a enormous

[00:37:43] difference um that's just two totally different things yeah that is that's that's quite misleading

[00:37:53] 300,000 and you've only added 50,000 50,000 jobs at as in California in a state of 40 million people

[00:38:00] wow a lot of jobs that's really horrible just as also as an aside whenever you see jobs numbers

[00:38:07] in like the news or so and so created this many jobs wait three months and then go back because

[00:38:15] a lot of these government agencies once they start to get the real numbers in this has been happening

[00:38:20] with the Biden administration like this entire administration this will be like look we created

[00:38:24] this many jobs and then they go back and are like just kidding we only created like you know how many

[00:38:29] millions jobs like it's not that many jobs um always wait a little bit when I release jobs numbers

[00:38:35] in the economy because the hard that has to come in and then they'll fix it yeah I'm still

[00:38:40] we really fast because I don't think we said at the beginning news then we like let me

[00:38:46] sure everyone knows but news them actually postponed his state of the state address this year

[00:38:51] or hasn't done it at all and that's kind of what we're like right this could be our own state

[00:38:57] of state let's let's talk what's really going on but it'll be interesting to see if he even does

[00:39:02] one but you can see why he doesn't want to do one what is he going to talk about? I mean he'll

[00:39:06] fix he'll figure out how to spin it um they'll talk probably about social justice issues to probably

[00:39:11] talk about at California but you know 500 million abortion pills or something like that like

[00:39:17] that's a big thing to do but a prop one pass and now we got billions of dollars to throw it homeless

[00:39:22] non-profits and construction unions um I mean help homeless that's that's what they want to do

[00:39:27] they want to help almost not enrich their nonprofit and union buddies yeah so you're right they

[00:39:33] he this was something we were kind of bad in around like should we do our own stays they speech but

[00:39:37] then we kind of wrapped it into this recall idea uh he's been delaying it and postponing it because

[00:39:42] he wanted to wait until he saw what happened with prop one because he didn't want to do a state of the

[00:39:46] state if prop one failed because that's like his signature proposition or or piece of legislation uh

[00:39:55] I think California's economy is the leading edge of the national economic slowdown said soon

[00:40:01] won son a professor of finance and economics at Loyola Marymount University seven of California's

[00:40:06] 11 job sectors lost jobs in February that's not good

[00:40:12] that's an overwhelming majority of job sectors lost jobs just last month

[00:40:18] the largest decrease was in construction with 9,900 jobs lost or reflection of disruptions from

[00:40:25] a series of strong storms that hit the state in February the job loss would have been much worse

[00:40:30] had it not been for a strong showing among the health care sector led by increases in the jobs

[00:40:35] such as acupuncturists and tie additions according to the state employment development department

[00:40:40] so thank you acupuncturists and dieticians for keeping those jobs numbers

[00:40:44] better than what we expect we owe a debt of gratitude to the acupuncturists and dieticians who are

[00:40:51] keeping our economy up right now uh the economic slowdown has made a sway the state's budget which for

[00:40:56] the second year in a row is now facing a multi-billion dollar deficit we've talked about this 73

[00:41:00] billion dollars there's another article you sent me was it the OC register yes you actually

[00:41:06] out of that one I did okay right it just goes on to talk more about it but they said for example

[00:41:13] it estimated the first half of 2020 through the state gained an average of 32,500 jobs each month

[00:41:20] but in January revised that to an average loss of 400 jobs from up let that sink in that's all

[00:41:29] they well they said they added 32 but then they revised it to negative so what went completely

[00:41:37] in the opposite direction so those jobs they said they added did it actually happen running these

[00:41:43] numbers imagine being that far off to be like yeah we had 32,000 jobs this month and then a month

[00:41:52] later it's like just kidding we lost 400 jobs this month uh recent poll by the public policy

[00:41:57] institute of California found that a jury of Californians think the state has headed the wrong

[00:42:01] direction predict bad economic times with the state of the economy in the next 12 months yeah okay

[00:42:06] so Californians not feeling good about the economy California is the California way

[00:42:14] that was the whole theme of this state of the state he kept saying this is the California way

[00:42:19] so this is the California way uh let's see he goes on to say speaking or not believing people behind

[00:42:25] no state took older steps to protect public health and human life over the last two years

[00:42:30] are lockdowns to stress as they were saved lives true or false that's such a loaded question

[00:42:37] but we i'm sure you can find data that says the lockdowns prevented covid from spreading in certain areas

[00:42:46] did it save lives i mean here we are looking at people to have jobs sorry keep getting

[00:42:51] people have jobs did that save your life people people lost businesses people committed suicide

[00:43:00] mental health got worse homelessness got worse did this really save lives like obviously my answer is

[00:43:09] no this didn't save lives and maybe the technical answer is it saves them lives from covid but when

[00:43:16] you start looking at it from all angles it warmed lives it destroyed just going back i forgot to ask

[00:43:23] you to tally do you think he's done better on the economy kept his promises 2022 if you want to write

[00:43:28] that down no it means it's definitely not worse our mask mandates save lives that's what he said

[00:43:36] um this was in the Chicago sometimes the research shows sorry mandates are just wrong they're wrong

[00:43:43] research shows cdc exaggerate the evidence for mass to flight covid i'm not a person who like and i

[00:43:51] saw people wearing like not a lot of people but while i was drawing like there's people wearing masks

[00:43:55] and i remember somebody hitting on your plane and my initial thought was like really

[00:44:00] i did i went there but then i stopped myself because i thought okay that person believes this mask

[00:44:05] is helping her or maybe preventing her from spreading something and i'm like okay i'm not

[00:44:12] mad about that like she believes she's doing this for good for her or other people whatever fun

[00:44:19] like i'm not i'm not gonna be cool and judge her about that but man i've never been that way either

[00:44:26] i like if i see people out in public with masks on still i'm like yeah i don't really care like as long

[00:44:34] as you're not forcing me to actually do it hurting me but don't tell me that i'm asking

[00:44:41] and that's where that was so ridiculous when they tried to mandate the vaccines and they tried to

[00:44:46] mandate the masks and they tried to mandate you into staying home and they like no no and i will never

[00:44:53] understand anyone who actually looks at the government and thinks oh you need to tell me what to do

[00:44:57] like i i wonder how people even mentally get there like talk about mental health issues

[00:45:02] how do you possibly look at the government people you don't know think oh you absolutely know

[00:45:08] better than me they can't even do math on jobs guys they don't know what's good for you they

[00:45:12] wouldn't even have a mask yeah they're not good at math i don't think you should listen to them

[00:45:18] specifically on this for your personal health so the study was published the study was published by

[00:45:25] Cochrane Library in authority of collection scientific databases analyzed 18 randomized control

[00:45:31] trials that aim to measure the impact of surgical mass or N95 respirators on the transmission

[00:45:36] of respiratory viruses found that wearing a mask in public places probably makes little or no

[00:45:41] difference to the number of infections so there you have it so on his claim that his lockdowns

[00:45:47] and mass mandates save lives did it or did it not okay here's the big one that he talked about

[00:45:55] he says but there's another crisis we're still tackling oh well that's the crisis of homelessness

[00:46:01] which is worsened over the last decade not only here in California but across the nation just a few

[00:46:05] years ago California lacked any comprehensive strategy no accountability no meaningful state

[00:46:11] resources to solve the problem but that's all changed in just three years we not only have a

[00:46:16] comprehensive plan we're also requiring new accountability and providing unprecedented

[00:46:20] investment for cities and counties if you want to go back and listen to our whole podcast on

[00:46:24] Propelon it we go in depth on Propelon with the whole plan for Propelon is so this is two years ago

[00:46:33] got a new sum said two years ago he said they have a comprehensive plan for new accountability

[00:46:39] between those two years I don't think that plan was ever implemented because now we have Propelon

[00:46:45] because this the reason they sold Propelon what's that I have no solace all this okay go ahead

[00:46:53] well this is when he starts talking about care court or maybe he'd be talking about prior to that

[00:46:58] but again this is March of 2022 so this is two years ago and I can't believe March 2022 was two years ago

[00:47:07] so he I don't know if this was when he announced it or first prior but anyway obviously he's talking

[00:47:12] up care for which is like what you're talking about he's about to go into so it was not established

[00:47:19] until October 2023 I get there's a system there's a process in place it takes time it's voted on

[00:47:26] whatever but that was 19 months later October 2023 was only a handful of months ago

[00:47:34] as of January of this year it was only implemented into eight counties we have 58 counties in

[00:47:41] government eight counties out of 58 have care court which all at you taco care court is in a second

[00:47:50] and in that October to January they only had two applicants maybe that's a lot for eight counties

[00:47:59] but how many homeless people do we have and only 220 applicants for this program that took 19

[00:48:08] months to establish baby yeah I actually went to a home it's actually funny I was sitting

[00:48:18] I got the news that prop one passed while I was sitting in a seminar about care court

[00:48:27] with someone with the judge who actually practices care court here in San Diego I think she's the

[00:48:32] only one who does it um they said they had like 58 cases so far in San Diego like that's all

[00:48:40] they have so far it's very early like they just started it's very early we went over the whole thing

[00:48:44] I'm not gonna bore you to death with like what care court is but basically it's like they can

[00:48:48] petition uh it gives them an opportunity to go into to get some rehab get some services get clean

[00:48:55] all that stuff basically kind of grabs people and you know paramet I even learned like paramedics

[00:49:03] and first responders can petition for somebody who could be like does we have to get under a

[00:49:08] roommate a community leader such as a policeman fire mt uh judge attorney etc and so I like I

[00:49:19] could go apply for somebody if like it was one of you know like my sisters or something that they don't

[00:49:25] need it sorry I just use hypothetical examples yeah like I could be I can be someone who could

[00:49:31] go apply and then they look at the case I believe you have to have an extreme mental illness

[00:49:36] such as schizophrenia I think it's extreme mental illness yeah something along those lines

[00:49:41] grave disability which I think also includes substance abuse yes so that's something that the

[00:49:48] legislature has tweaked because before it was grave disability was a whole different set of things

[00:49:56] and now adding substance abuse changes the dynamic of like okay someone's high on math or something

[00:50:03] running around the street screaming about stuff like okay that's a grave disability we can get them

[00:50:07] into care court but you bring up a good point which is it's only you know this is two years ago he's

[00:50:13] been talking about care court at this point we're literally just getting it off the ground not that many

[00:50:18] it's like 50 people in San Diego thousands of people here in San Diego who are homeless so not really

[00:50:25] I don't think it's moving the needle quite yet care court you know what budget was for that I don't

[00:50:31] I should have written a down I probably haven't actually don't remember what the budget was for that

[00:50:39] yeah I don't have the right sign here one thing that stood out to me I was looking at different

[00:50:47] counties there questions you know FAQs about care court and one thing with someone you know

[00:50:54] were the questions like well what about housing and it was like well on an as

[00:51:00] needed an available basis and I'm like okay well what housing would be available for this I don't

[00:51:05] even know I'm often do more research into all that but it's like I think it's an inpatient

[00:51:11] service for I don't remember how many months but whatever the time is they bring the person in they

[00:51:17] try to rehab them and then if there's not housing available I guess they're just released back out

[00:51:22] into you know if someone could take them in worried if not they're just released back out on the

[00:51:27] streets good luck have them about yeah there's no jobs well as we've learned they're not going to

[00:51:34] accounting how many jobs California is adding so there's no jobs there's no jobs just for numbers the

[00:51:39] last department tally of homelessness in California according to Cal matters is 128 percent of

[00:51:46] the nation's homeless population that's up nearly 40 percent from five years ago and this

[00:51:51] article is from 20 so the news some didn't even give care court a fair chance before he started

[00:51:57] pushing prop one and I just yeah care court isn't for our homeless person I get that it's more like

[00:52:02] because every homeless person is not mentally ill every homeless person is not a drug addict as we

[00:52:07] talked in an episode a few weeks ago a lot of people are being driven into homelessness five

[00:52:14] lot of jobs surprise price slow I get that not every homeless person is having this issue but

[00:52:24] I don't think that I don't think it's only like 220 let's just be fair and say there's 300 applicants

[00:52:30] but like it's I don't think that of 180,000 homeless people only 300 of them have mental health issues

[00:52:36] and certainly it hasn't expanded into even all of California there's just eight states for

[00:52:41] eight counties excuse me trying it out right now but so care for your chance okay sorry go ahead

[00:52:47] so do you think he's delivered on his promise to solve homelessness since 2020 you totally froze after

[00:52:52] you said so oh I said um do you think he's saw has he delivered on his promise to solve homelessness since

[00:53:00] 2020 all right no one's going to solve homelessness but has he even come even a little little

[00:53:06] close to fix it no no okay he hasn't made a dent in home okay so okay the last one I want to talk

[00:53:14] about really quickly is he talks about crime and he quotes Bobby Kennedy not RFK Jr. the Bobby

[00:53:23] Kenny OG Bobby Kennedy he says a nation this is Bobby Kennedy's quote which surrenders to crime

[00:53:30] whether by any difference for heavy-handed rep rep repression is a society which has resigned

[00:53:34] itself to failure. Newsom then says our approach is to be neither indifferent to the realities of

[00:53:40] the present day nor revert to heavy-handed policies that have marked the failures of the past we're

[00:53:45] funding local law enforcement and prosecutors to invest in solve more crime bolstering the attorney

[00:53:49] general's office prosecuting organized theft rings and getting illegal guns off the streets

[00:53:55] but we're also investing hundreds of millions in new programs to tackle the real causes of crime

[00:53:59] doubling down proven violence prevention programs that's the California way so real quick

[00:54:06] this is from the public policy institute of California before I go onto the numbers do you think he

[00:54:14] has made a dent in reversing the crime rate increase in California okay

[00:54:22] uh california's violent crime rate increased in 2022 california's violent crime increased by 5.7

[00:54:29] percent from orange and 68 crimes per 100,000 residents in 2021 to 495 and 205 aggravate a

[00:54:35] assault for 67 percent reported violent crimes violent crime has increased in recent years like the

[00:54:42] nation-calfine seeing increases in violent crimes in the years since the pandemic it states

[00:54:46] violent crime rate is up by 13.5 percent compared to the pre-COVID rate 2019 so not tackling crime

[00:54:56] and crime is not going down so do you think he's delivered on his promise to help decrease crime in

[00:55:02] California? To decrease no it sounds like he is not but you know he did propose a 26th amendment to

[00:55:09] get rid of all guns and so that should help right? Yeah uh that's his new thing as he wants the 26th

[00:55:15] amendment to ban I don't know guns he finds scary and all these you know leftist pipe dreams

[00:55:24] about guns it'll never pass I mean it's ridiculous no one if anybody knows anything about passing

[00:55:30] amendments really hard to do you're not going to get three quarters of the states to agree to a 26th

[00:55:36] amendment to limit that much gun rights um but you know it's a good political talking point so

[00:55:42] all right so we've gone through a whole bunch of things we've gone through crime homelessness

[00:55:46] the economy firemen oil all that stuff I guess to close out because we're at the top of the hour do you

[00:55:55] think we need a second recall of Gavin Newsom after reviewing everything that he has failed to do

[00:56:02] do you think it's warranted to say he does need another recall? I have to explain it's all this

[00:56:07] uh he's a failure he is rooting our state he's an absolute failure he needs to go

[00:56:15] will core like he but I think you know where I stand with it is an election year I feel like our

[00:56:22] time-focused energy money all the things we should really just flip seats in the assembly to get

[00:56:30] rid of the supermajority because you have to remember if we don't have a supermajority sending crazy

[00:56:35] bills to Newsom there won't be crazy bills for Newsom to sign and policy does matter I mean most

[00:56:42] of this is stupid policies he's signed into law they're absolutely asked nine and we've learned no

[00:56:49] one can math so let's flip seats I understand I have no respect for Newsom there's nothing to justify

[00:56:57] any of this I was gonna ask you which what kind of out of time that I was gonna say is there even

[00:57:00] anything good we can say that Newsom did for California I don't even know I don't have an answer to

[00:57:06] that but I would say next to the recall and please everyone really get out and get people to

[00:57:12] flip seats get people to vote get like seriously spend your time and energy instead of

[00:57:17] collecting signatures for a recall I mean maybe we can do both then I don't want to tell people

[00:57:22] like what to believe in if if that's your caption do it personally me I say no don't let's

[00:57:30] let's show Newsom like that's what we can really stick it to him flip the flip these seats

[00:57:34] start overturning a lot of these bills start you know introducing new ones to outdo these

[00:57:41] disgusting stupid policies fix things and then like show everyone look how like

[00:57:46] runderhand useless show how asked nine years and don't let it run for president ever because he

[00:57:53] would just be a laughing joke in the interimation right no there's all valid points I think

[00:58:02] it the long term health of California is in flipping the legislature we've said that a thousand times

[00:58:09] if you want to really change things in California you got to flip the legislature or at least

[00:58:14] break yeah I mean flipping the legislature is going to be a long time coming but breaking the

[00:58:19] super majority makes a big difference like you said it does change the dynamic in Sacramento

[00:58:25] you're not getting so many crazy Bay Area politician bills that are getting to news from Stask yeah

[00:58:31] I would say if you want to show your disgust with how California is being run you know start

[00:58:37] flipping those seats start flipping an assembly seat or a senate seat or something like that

[00:58:41] I think that sends a bigger message to those in power in California when things start

[00:58:49] seats flip from Democrats or Republican or just away from Democrat doesn't be too Republican

[00:58:56] could be independent or Victorian whatever but I think that sends a more powerful message

[00:59:02] to everybody in Sacramento if they start to lose their grip on the state and

[00:59:07] sure we can look at all this stuff and say does Newson deserve to be recalled based on that job

[00:59:16] performance yes he does deserve to be recalled he's delivered on literally nothing things have

[00:59:20] only gotten worse I can't think of one thing that's actually happened that's gotten better under

[00:59:27] Gavin Newsom so yeah does he deserve to get recalled sure but it's like take that same energy to

[00:59:33] recall Gavin Newsom and put it towards local elections that actually will have an impact on

[00:59:42] California because I don't you know we can recall they can get the signatures they can get a

[00:59:47] million signatures again put it back on the ballot try again I believe it's probably gonna end

[00:59:53] up still being 64 to he'll win again in a landslide hold defeated and then we'll be back at

[00:59:58] square one so it's a mixed bag I think he deserves to be recalled so I think there's better

[01:00:06] things to spend our time money on yeah I think with these better races especially this year

[01:00:12] 2024 is big year so presidential years are always big there's a lot of seats in the state

[01:00:17] legislature that are vulnerable and applicable so focus on those and it's pretty well we saw

[01:00:24] the attitude of which I totally understand and I'm not judging anyone but it gets exhausting

[01:00:29] and people put a lot of energy into the recall and they were very excited to have this option to

[01:00:34] recall him then it didn't go through and so many people then you know 2022 was just right around

[01:00:40] the corner and they were like what's the point of voting so like my coach didn't matter it didn't

[01:00:44] do anything we tried to recall him and they get that like and so it just feel like if that happens

[01:00:49] again and then you know he still stays in office and people are gonna go into 2026 with that

[01:00:55] like it even more worse attitude like we tried we've tried we did it we put all of our energy

[01:01:01] and time and money into it and it got us nowhere so why do I want to vote now what's the point

[01:01:06] yeah and again I don't say that judgey Lee like we can't burnt out and I just feel like

[01:01:12] that's why we already have an election going on let's really show them where we stand at this

[01:01:18] election more importantly you know new sum is for a lack of not I don't want to compliment him

[01:01:28] he he is remaining relatively as moderate as possible so that he can run for president in 20

[01:01:36] which is a blessing in disguise for us Californians that he has vetoed a lot of stuff that's far

[01:01:41] left if you want it he's gonna be gone in two years regardless so whether we recall him he's gone

[01:01:46] next year he's gone in two years it doesn't really change anything he'll be gone I'm worried about

[01:01:52] the next person up who could be even more far left than news which is why again focusing on the

[01:02:00] state legislature is so important because if you focus on the state legislature break that super

[01:02:07] majority then all of a sudden that far left governor doesn't have as much power to pass as much as

[01:02:14] he wants so it's protecting the future by focusing on the legislature not just Gavin Newsome and Reed

[01:02:21] yes any final thoughts before we sign off yes just to do a really quick recap so we talked about how

[01:02:29] he's failed with fixing gas prices and electric vehicles are kind of going nowhere right now

[01:02:35] he's failed with jobs job growth not that that's really the government's job but

[01:02:40] clearly they've lied about what's been going on or wrong whatever he didn't save lives like he said

[01:02:46] hasn't solved it or even made a debt and homelessness crime rates are higher we did even get to

[01:02:52] the fact that homeowners insurance policies are being just canceled across the state and homeowners

[01:02:58] insurance companies are like nope not I'm gonna do that anymore and they're still pushing reparations

[01:03:04] and the fact that we have what what is our deficit right now it is like in the $73 billion

[01:03:12] and now proc one past and we think we're gonna afford all these things and yet our unemployment

[01:03:18] is the highest in the nation so good luck California good luck yeah it's not pretty

[01:03:26] much we have each and you know and those listening you always have this podcast where

[01:03:31] we try to inform you with a sense of brevity and lightness to it to at least make you laugh about

[01:03:38] what's going on so try to keep you informed as much as possible but yeah it's it's rough out there

[01:03:44] but again focus on local start flipping things here and there you can start seeing positive change

[01:03:51] with that we assure you will be making fun of everyone who runs against new sum because oh my gosh

[01:03:59] we had some sunny offline conversations oh my gosh yeah I can't wait to see the circus that rolls into

[01:04:04] town if there is actually a recall anyway on that note like thank everyone for tuning in as always

[01:04:12] make sure you like share subscribe review helps with the algorithm as people find us other people

[01:04:17] who are interested in California politics and then best thing you can do to support the show

[01:04:22] that's absolutely free is share it with a friend family colleague whatever just let them know about

[01:04:28] us and tell them to give us a listen so on that note we'll see you on the next one later

[01:04:43] thank you for listening to another episode of California Underground if you like what you heard

[01:04:47] remember to subscribe like and review it and follow California Underground on social media for

[01:04:52] updates as to when new episodes are available