Are you a Californian who feels like your views on politics in California are not popular? Do you feel like no one will agree with you? Feels like when you meet someone who does agree you are part of a secret underground club of people who think like you? Then join us on the California Underground Podcast to hear others who share your views and solutions to save our beautiful state.
On this episode, we are joined by attorney Nicole Pearson who has been monitoring bad bills going through Sacramento and the attack on parental rights that is occuring as a result of these new bills.
This episode was recorded on 9.12.23
All the one-click campaigns for each of the #badbills 👉🏽 https://p2a.co/FoxBuQN
💥AB1078 https://p2a.co/Uiz01Lp
💥AB957 https://p2a.co/k28pM5a
💥AB665 https://p2a.co/8uzhnIo
💥AB233 https://p2a.co/3ujkvjU
💥SB596 https://p2a.co/m0pKn2W
💥AB5 https://p2a.co/O76sHlJ
💥SB407 https://p2a.co/estjV1u
*The California Underground Podcast is dedicated to discussing California politics from a place of sanity and rationality.*
Support California Underground on Patreon at www.patreon.com/CaliforniaUnderground
Follow California Underground on Social Media Instagram: www.instagram.com/californiaunderground
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCj8SabIcF4AKqEVFsLmo1jA
Substack: https://substack.com/profile/72986149-ca_underground
Shop California Underground Merchandise: https://california-underground.creator-spring.com
00:00:06
If you're a California conservative, A libertarian, A
00:00:09
moderate Democrat, believe in common sense or just the same
00:00:12
person, this is the political podcast for you.
00:00:15
It's the California Underground Podcast.
00:00:27
What's going on, everybody? Thanks for tuning to another
00:00:29
episode of the California Underground Podcast.
00:00:31
I'm your host, Phil, along with me as always, as my trusted
00:00:34
cohost, the best and fastest researcher in the West Camille.
00:00:37
And tonight we have a special guest, first time on the
00:00:40
episode, so a first time new guest.
00:00:42
I don't know why it's taking this long to get her on the
00:00:44
show. A fellow attorney just like me,
00:00:47
she's been sounding the alarm on a whole slew of bad bills.
00:00:52
I mean coming out of Sacramento, but I mean bad bills come out of
00:00:55
Sacramento. All the time, anyway.
00:00:57
So it's not shocking. Nicole, welcome to the show.
00:01:00
Thanks for coming on tonight. Thank.
00:01:02
You for coming? Yeah, it's definitely been long
00:01:05
overdue, but I'm excited to be here.
00:01:07
Yeah, and so for the people who don't know who you are, why
00:01:10
don't you tell a little bit about yourself before we hop
00:01:13
into all these bad bills? Okay.
00:01:15
Well, I am a mom of three. Now, and I am a lawyer like
00:01:21
Phil, and I kind of have fallen into this constitutional law,
00:01:28
human and civil rights advocacy work, legal work.
00:01:34
I don't really know what to explain it to.
00:01:36
But just so people know very quickly, like I was just told I
00:01:40
want everybody know. I was very terrified of COVID.
00:01:43
I locked myself down, my family down.
00:01:47
My our two daughters have medical conditions that made me
00:01:50
very scared of COVID. But it was while I was in COVID
00:01:54
and while we were locked down that I started to see things on
00:01:57
the Internet and social media that really opened my eyes to
00:02:02
what was going on. And really, in a weird way, was
00:02:06
lucky enough to live in Orange County, where we had some very
00:02:09
egregious bad actors, including the COVID-19 vaccine Digital
00:02:15
Passport. Which San Diego, Orange County
00:02:18
and Ventura were the 2 pilot or they see me the three pilot
00:02:22
programs for the digital passport, which is what made
00:02:26
kind of exposed me or revealed to me that this was not truly
00:02:29
about our health, safety and welfare.
00:02:31
This was about control, tracking and tagging and tracking and
00:02:35
controlling us. And then when I started to see
00:02:37
what was happening at our local Board of Supervisors, what was
00:02:39
happening in the schools with children specifically, I just
00:02:43
started like. Really, truly lost my mind.
00:02:46
Like I had messages from people that were like girl get, get
00:02:49
like, you know, random people, you need help, you need, you're
00:02:52
like, you know, you're crazy. And so I just started sending
00:02:57
cease and desist letters trying to explain the law to people
00:03:01
thinking that these people just didn't understand the
00:03:04
Constitution. They just didn't understand what
00:03:06
the education code meant or the health and safety code to very
00:03:09
quickly realize they knew exactly what they were doing.
00:03:11
They knew exactly what the law said, and they didn't care.
00:03:14
So I started up my facts, law, truth, justice, Instagram page
00:03:20
because my personal page got really volatile and I also just
00:03:23
didn't want my family exposed to that.
00:03:26
So I started this like. Horrible handle.
00:03:28
That's like so many words long that no one remembers that I
00:03:32
couldn't decide. I thought the facts are
00:03:34
important. Law is obviously important and
00:03:38
with the facts and the law we can find truth and hopefully
00:03:41
achieve justice. And I just was up all night and
00:03:43
I couldn't figure which order or which words were more important.
00:03:47
They all went together. So we formed facts like truth,
00:03:49
justice and then ever since then have been trying to just read
00:03:53
the law. I was just talking to you guys
00:03:55
offline that. I'm not the smartest attorney
00:03:58
and I'm not the most experienced attorney, but I can't read.
00:04:01
And I've always said the laws on your side, the laws on our side,
00:04:05
laws on our side. Like I would not have given up
00:04:08
my career, clients, friends, family, colleagues, so many
00:04:13
things if I didn't know that what I was standing for was the
00:04:16
truth and like injustice and for the law.
00:04:19
And and so that's why where I'm where we're at right now,
00:04:23
fighting for all of that and really to protect the children,
00:04:25
that's that's my mission, is to protect children.
00:04:29
It's interesting during COVID, I think, because everyone slowed
00:04:33
down, but in my experience, a lot of attorneys all of a sudden
00:04:37
turned into constitutional attorneys because I think we had
00:04:40
a lot of time on our hands. So we're just kind of sitting
00:04:42
around going, OK, well now what do we do?
00:04:44
But we also watched what was happening in front of us.
00:04:48
And a lot of questions came up that were new novel legal
00:04:52
theories. And, you know, if you're a legal
00:04:55
nerd or you're an attorney, you kind of look at this stuff and
00:04:58
you go, yeah, OK, is this constitutional?
00:05:01
Does the state have power? Does the federal government have
00:05:03
power? And there were arguments on both
00:05:06
sides. So it was everybody became a
00:05:08
constitutional attorney during COVID in one way or another,
00:05:11
whether people got as active as you did where they were filing
00:05:14
lawsuits and and fighting, or they just became commentators.
00:05:19
So I don't know if I I hope that's a good thing, that
00:05:22
there's many more constitutional attorneys out there who are
00:05:25
looking at all of this and seeing, you know, especially
00:05:30
what was it last year? Was it Doctor Richard Pan?
00:05:33
He was part of that vaccine group and they're trying to push
00:05:36
a whole slew of bad bills through and like more vaccine
00:05:40
requirements. And thankfully a lot of that
00:05:42
stuff got pushed down and didn't actually go anywhere.
00:05:47
But. In terms of what's coming up in
00:05:50
California, that's the point of tonight's episode.
00:05:52
We're talking a lot about the legislation because right now
00:05:56
the legislation legislative session is ending, coming up
00:06:00
this week, I believe, and we should we we want to let people
00:06:08
know what's going on. What are the bills that are on
00:06:13
their way to Governor Newsom's desk?
00:06:15
Which ones have been signed already?
00:06:17
What can people keep an eye out for?
00:06:19
You provided us with a whole list.
00:06:22
You have an actual fact sheet of bad bills that had that were
00:06:27
coming out. So I guess we can start there.
00:06:29
Is there anyone in particular you want to start with to kind
00:06:32
of highlight for people? No, We have like, a really bad
00:06:38
situation in California right now.
00:06:41
There are a couple of really. Maybe someone needs to use the
00:06:44
bathroom. What's up?
00:06:46
No, I can open this ball. It's work.
00:06:53
It's my friends. I'll be right there.
00:06:55
I'm almost done. OK, We'll be back.
00:07:00
We have. You know, I personally believe
00:07:04
that Assembly Bill 665 is the worst, that it was the worst.
00:07:07
That bill, that bill that we have, That bill was written by
00:07:12
Assemblywoman Wendy Creo. But let's just call a spade a
00:07:15
spade. It was coauthored by Senator
00:07:17
Scott Weiner. I mean, let's just, I need
00:07:19
people to understand, like going back to my background, like, I
00:07:23
didn't even know who my Assembly person or my senator was.
00:07:27
I did not know who my representative was.
00:07:29
I did not know about the legislative process, and I share
00:07:32
this because it's very easy to understand.
00:07:34
One of my goals is obviously to educate on these bills that also
00:07:39
empower people like to understand this process so that
00:07:43
they can get engaged. Because you absolutely going
00:07:46
back to being like a constitutional attorney, what
00:07:49
I'm about to describe to you and what I've been doing is what
00:07:52
every single one of us can be doing.
00:07:54
You do not need to be an attorney to do what I'm about to
00:07:56
share with you. We are American citizens and we
00:08:01
are live in a constitutional Republic.
00:08:03
And these people that I'm about to talk to you about, our
00:08:06
representatives work for us. They are elected
00:08:09
representatives. They're supposed to represent
00:08:12
our priorities and values and goals and means.
00:08:15
They're literally our public servants.
00:08:18
This is not inflammatory words. This is this is just the this is
00:08:22
the reality of the situation. And so I just want to you guys
00:08:26
to keep in perspective the what I'm what I'm talking about.
00:08:30
So like I was just mentioning every year several thousand
00:08:36
bills or over 1000 bills I would say come through the legislature
00:08:40
and and representatives present bills and he just mentioned
00:08:44
Richard Pan. But Senator Scott Weiner is
00:08:46
another Senator Scott Weiner, Assemblywoman Buffy Wicks
00:08:50
Assemblywoman Wendy Carrillo. There are set as few select
00:08:56
Senator Matt or I think it's Senator Haney Assembly member
00:09:00
member Evan Lowe. I guess Alex Lee is now on our
00:09:03
radar. There are some some
00:09:06
representatives that were always like kind of on the lookout for
00:09:08
their bills. So what happened last year with
00:09:11
all the COVID bills is that Senator Scott Weiner authored
00:09:15
many, many, many bad bills that were basically, as you guys all
00:09:18
know, hopefully by now we're. Basically making our lives
00:09:22
contingent upon getting the COVID-19 vaccine, whether it was
00:09:25
jabs for jobs Eighty 1993 or SB SB-866 jabs in order for your
00:09:32
kids to go to school. There were just there was bills
00:09:37
that were saying that law enforcement had to enforce
00:09:40
health orders from, you know, the state, otherwise they would
00:09:43
lose funding. So many bad bills all
00:09:46
circulating around. COVID-19 in these alleged states
00:09:49
of emergencies. So that was last year.
00:09:51
So this year we were bracing ourselves for what we have seen
00:09:56
as like a this like trans. I'm pretty sure people are aware
00:10:00
Trans LGBQT really like movement that's happening right now.
00:10:06
And we had heard a lot coming from Scott Weiner, but we didn't
00:10:09
see any bill really any bills come from him.
00:10:12
And So what we saw him do was partner.
00:10:15
With assembly people so that these bills flew through the
00:10:19
assembly under the radar because there were these known name
00:10:23
assembly people who are either have higher political
00:10:27
aspirations or don't know what's going on That basically or his
00:10:30
lackeys. That authored these bills were
00:10:33
the primary authors of these bills and then he was a
00:10:36
principal co-author but we all know they're really coming from
00:10:38
him. So AB665 was written by Wendy
00:10:42
Creel and Senator Scott Weiner. Neither one of them have
00:10:45
children and what they did and what they always do is they try
00:10:50
and pick some like hot button topic on really ride the
00:10:53
coattails of. Immigrant minority kind of
00:10:57
disenfranchised communities say that they are trying to grant
00:11:01
them access parity, empower them.
00:11:03
Those are really, you know, a key, you know, trigger words,
00:11:07
keywords and and that's how they pass these bills.
00:11:11
So you don't want to really oppose these bills because you
00:11:14
don't want to talk. You don't want to be the one
00:11:16
opposing a bill that's going to grant.
00:11:19
You know children on medical access to mental health services
00:11:24
so that they don't commit suicide, right?
00:11:26
That's how the bill was written. But when you look at the bill,
00:11:28
8665 amends a code section, a family code section and will
00:11:34
allow 12 year olds. Any 12 year old and up who is
00:11:38
deemed to be mature enough by a professional person will allow
00:11:41
them to run away from home with zero notice to you as a parent
00:11:45
and check into a government shelter.
00:11:48
Where they will be, obviously there will be adults in that
00:11:52
resident, that residential government shelter who will be
00:11:55
like I guess checking them in and taking care of them.
00:11:58
And where we are confident given the conversations we already see
00:12:01
children having at schools, for example, with teachers and
00:12:04
faculty and staff and counselors.
00:12:06
There will be conversations about your home life, what
00:12:10
whether they feel comfortable at home.
00:12:11
Whether they feel supported at home and understood at home.
00:12:13
And mind you, we're talking about kids in.
00:12:17
Adolescent age 1213141516, like a lot of us really didn't like
00:12:21
our parents during that time anyways.
00:12:23
Now they're going to be in a government shelter where who is
00:12:25
working hand in hand walkstep with CPS, having private
00:12:30
conversations. And we are confident that they
00:12:32
will be opening up criminal investigations, CPS
00:12:35
investigations of parents in order to remove these children
00:12:38
officially and permanently from your home.
00:12:40
So to me a B665. Is the worst bill because all of
00:12:44
the other bills kind of. Not that they don't matter, but
00:12:46
if your 12 year old is out of your home in a government
00:12:49
shelter under the thumb of a government official adult who is
00:12:52
like taking care of them, then everything else doesn't matter
00:12:55
Because they're going to be able to coerce them or manipulate
00:12:58
them. Or you know, whatever fear
00:13:01
monger them or whatever it is, drip drip them into believing
00:13:05
whatever it is they want them to believe, to go along with
00:13:08
whatever systems or policies or beliefs that they have.
00:13:11
So it kind of is like emancipates minors as young as
00:13:15
12. And that, to me, is the most
00:13:19
egregious, dangerous bill of all.
00:13:23
It kind of reminds me of the bill that passed last year.
00:13:26
We discussed it on the podcast. It was if Camille might remember
00:13:33
if it. Correct me if I'm trying to
00:13:35
remember this, this was. If a child runs a, I know.
00:13:39
I can't see you guys, so I was just talking because I was like
00:13:42
that's I can't tell you, but you're day.
00:13:44
We're we're still here. Yeah, we're still here.
00:13:46
Yeah, everything's good. And we heard everything.
00:13:49
So if we can't hear you, we'll we'll say something.
00:13:55
We'll just start talking and say we we can't hear you.
00:13:58
We weren't just staring at a blank.
00:13:59
Yeah, we weren't just staring into silence.
00:14:01
So. OK, OK.
00:14:03
I'm just like, I'm just gonna keep talking till someone comes
00:14:05
back. OK, so you're there.
00:14:08
So anyway, that was a very long winded explanation.
00:14:11
I can give you shorter one, but keep waiting so it finds you
00:14:13
what bill from the other year. It was the bill that what is it
00:14:17
if if kids run away from home because they deemed California
00:14:24
sanctuary state, trained sanctuary state, so if kids run
00:14:27
away? A court order from another
00:14:30
state, California, won't abide by, which to me violates the
00:14:34
federal constitution and privileges and immunities of
00:14:37
other states, I mean. In.
00:14:39
Fact so it's insane that California just goes, we're not
00:14:43
going to listen to what other states have to say in terms of
00:14:45
family custody. That kind of sounds like it
00:14:48
where the government just kind of steps in and goes no we're
00:14:51
we're going to take control of your child.
00:14:53
There's nothing you can do. That's basically it.
00:14:56
And and the state. Has more authority over.
00:14:59
It's almost like at this point the state of California is
00:15:03
almost in a position where they're their position is we're
00:15:08
allowing you, we're granting you permission to have children and
00:15:11
to raise them. But we have the ultimate say and
00:15:16
at the end of the day, we can pull your kids away and we can
00:15:19
put them in these residential shelters.
00:15:21
At the end day, there are children, so you won't you you
00:15:24
enjoy the privilege of having these kids from the state.
00:15:26
So does that sound correct? Yeah, I mean, we've heard them.
00:15:30
We've actually heard them saying, we've heard even Joe
00:15:33
Biden say, like, these children are not your children.
00:15:36
These children are our children. They're not your children.
00:15:38
They're not your children. And and people confuse this,
00:15:41
actually. It's really interesting.
00:15:42
When I was at Mass this weekend, the priest was talking about
00:15:46
how, like children, he's from God.
00:15:48
Our priest is from Ghana. And he was saying that, like
00:15:51
when the children would run around the village, that like if
00:15:54
you did something naughty like that your aunt, auntie would
00:15:57
spank you or ground you or, you know, put you on time out or
00:15:59
whatever it was. And he's like, oh, you know, our
00:16:03
children, you know, the children were the children of the
00:16:05
village, but. And I do believe that it takes a
00:16:08
village to raise a child. But and that's your community.
00:16:11
That's your extended your, your nuclear family your extended
00:16:14
family your aunties your uncles your neighbors, you know
00:16:17
certainly. But those people are not the
00:16:19
state those aren't the government children are not and
00:16:22
and people. I think the reason why I point
00:16:24
that out is because I think people have confused that it
00:16:27
takes a village of us, of individuals, of citizens to
00:16:31
raise a child. But we, I mean, unless we are
00:16:35
elected into office, we are not the state.
00:16:37
The government is supposed, and you already know that it is
00:16:40
supposed to be a small government of finite, limited,
00:16:45
enumerated powers. And we.
00:16:47
And that's why I kind of started this podcast was saying, you
00:16:50
know, the government. Is these government agencies and
00:16:54
these boards are the inch. It's from the law
00:16:57
instrumentalities of our creation.
00:17:00
We created them. We give them.
00:17:02
We don't even give them our power.
00:17:03
It's almost like proxy. It's like voting by proxy, like
00:17:06
we can't all 32 million or however many millions of us
00:17:10
Californians go to the Capitol and and vote on laws.
00:17:13
We have to, we give them the authority to vote.
00:17:18
Sorry, go ahead. No, you froze for just as.
00:17:21
Long you froze for a second. So you know you.
00:17:25
Ended at 32. Oh, that there's 32 of
00:17:28
us and we cannot all go to the Capitol and legislate and lobby
00:17:33
for these bills. We have elected representatives
00:17:37
to serve us in their public, in the public capacity and and so,
00:17:42
yeah, that that's exactly what's happening.
00:17:43
It's similar. I mean, what's going on in
00:17:45
California is even worse because.
00:17:48
We know that Governor Newsom is gunning for presidency.
00:17:50
He's saying he's not going for 2024 but 2028.
00:17:53
So what happens in California will spread across the country.
00:17:57
And he has already demonstrated time and again like you
00:18:00
mentioned last year, he does not care about the California
00:18:03
Constitution. He does not care about the US
00:18:05
Constitution, the federal Constitution, which is the
00:18:07
supreme law of the land and. He will just run.
00:18:11
Run him up. He will run Ramshock over that.
00:18:13
He does not care about any of these constitutional provisions,
00:18:16
even though he has taken an oath to uphold the state federal
00:18:21
constitution and the law. So it's it's pretty terrifying.
00:18:24
He does not care. California does not care.
00:18:29
I want to expand on just a couple things because this there
00:18:32
are already provisions in place with this this law, but this is
00:18:37
now. The child doesn't have to
00:18:39
present any sign of harm, correct?
00:18:42
Like it could just be any child. Whereas before there had to be,
00:18:45
they were possibly suicidal or there was harm going on in the
00:18:47
home, some sort of abuse. And now it that they're trying
00:18:51
to erase all that. It's just any child they can
00:18:54
decide to do this. And this is so hard to me
00:18:58
because the state of California has, I believe, about 60
00:19:02
children in foster care right now.
00:19:05
Where do they expect all these children when they make them
00:19:08
wards of the state? Where do they expect them to go?
00:19:10
And we are already hearing it now.
00:19:12
Many people are wonderful foster parents.
00:19:14
I'm not putting that down. But we do hear horrific stories
00:19:17
of, you know, these teenagers that go through abuse in these
00:19:21
foster homes and and then they're often the turnarounds of
00:19:25
the homes because they're kicked out of one home and into another
00:19:27
and. Right.
00:19:29
I just as a parent, have always baffled, absolutely baffled that
00:19:34
they're trying to separate children from parents.
00:19:37
But then I'm glad you mentioned masks because I wasn't sure
00:19:40
where you were with your faith and everything but the Bible
00:19:44
that I feel like Democrats are trying so hard to take the Bible
00:19:48
and then just make everything about it opposite and illegal.
00:19:51
You know, the Bible's so clear about parents train your child
00:19:54
the way that they should go. There's all these verses, and in
00:19:56
fact there's entire chapters dedicated to parenting.
00:19:59
And raising your children and then Democrats are like Nope,
00:20:03
Nope, Nope. And if you do any of that, we're
00:20:05
going to take them away for you. Well, and they just lie like
00:20:09
Governor Newsom is like, this is the we have the strongest
00:20:13
protections for local control. We are the freest state with the
00:20:17
freest, you know, free speech protections and right and
00:20:21
rights. And yet we passed last year AB
00:20:23
2098, which silenced doctors and medical professionals who were,
00:20:29
you know, spreading information that ran contrary to the then at
00:20:33
that moment current Coven 19 narrative.
00:20:36
That is, he literally suppressed free speech.
00:20:39
That that was to silence people from speaking and communicating.
00:20:44
AB665, Well, a B957, for example, is another horrifying
00:20:47
bill that says you must affirm your child and if you don't
00:20:51
affirm your child, you could lose custody of your child.
00:20:54
It says that judges must give priority to those and this is an
00:20:59
effect. This is not what the blip the
00:21:01
the bill says, but we've already seen this happening, is that
00:21:04
judges are giving priority or like favoring I should say
00:21:09
parents who affirm their child's self selected gender identity,
00:21:12
whatever that identity is, whatever age that child is.
00:21:16
If you are religious and your religion prohibits you or you
00:21:19
know doesn't believe in the transgender ideology, and yours
00:21:23
religion prohibits you from doing that, that is a violation
00:21:27
of your First Amendment right to free exercise of religion.
00:21:30
It's a It violates your First Amendment right to free speak,
00:21:32
to speak, free speech, to speak freely.
00:21:34
Say, I don't agree with this, It's actually compelled speech.
00:21:37
If you do say yes, I affirm my child.
00:21:40
Even though you don't affirm your child, you wouldn't
00:21:42
ordinarily do that. So I mean, these are
00:21:45
horrifyingly egregious bills. They completely run afoul of,
00:21:50
again, even the California Constitution and certainly the
00:21:53
US supreme, the US Constitution, which is the supreme law of the
00:21:56
land. And these protections are well
00:22:00
settled, OK? These are fundamental rights
00:22:02
that are enshrined in the US Constitution.
00:22:05
They have been protected parental rights.
00:22:07
Your right to privacy has been protected for over 100 years by
00:22:11
the US Supreme Court over and over again.
00:22:16
Poor, poor Camille is outnumbered by two Catholics on
00:22:19
this podcast. I'm a Christian.
00:22:20
It's OK. Well, I I hear enough people who
00:22:24
say, like, oh, Catholics aren't Christian.
00:22:28
Yeah, no, we just like to to. Domination.
00:22:30
Sorry, we're not going to get on the rent on that.
00:22:32
I feel like we all probably pretty much believe the same.
00:22:35
It's. Fine.
00:22:35
I mean, I mean, we're the original Christianity, but
00:22:39
that's not the point of this podcast.
00:22:40
Anyway, moving on, in terms of another bill I want to touch
00:22:46
upon was a B1078 and this has really become like a hot button
00:22:49
issue because of what's going on if you've been paying attention
00:22:53
like school board districts and. Each what was it?
00:22:56
Orange Unified just passed this same parental notification.
00:23:00
Jonathan Zacherson, who's been on the show before, has been a
00:23:03
big part of this in terms of getting these parental
00:23:08
notification policies where they were trying to say if someone,
00:23:13
child or student, comes to a teacher and comes out as
00:23:17
transgender, that. The teacher's position was they
00:23:20
wanted to keep it secret, but now they have this parental
00:23:23
notification, so this sort of goes hand in hand with that.
00:23:29
What's? That opposite, Because on the
00:23:31
one hand they're saying if you don't affirm your child, we're
00:23:33
going to take them away from you.
00:23:35
Is that on the other hand? This they're saying we need to
00:23:38
keep this from the parents because they're in a dangerous
00:23:40
situation. So we either can't or can't
00:23:43
affirm them because we're not. I'm sorry.
00:23:46
Right. So you must affirm, but we're
00:23:48
not going to tell you, and you don't get to.
00:23:50
Know. Right.
00:23:52
So so I've put these bills for this year really are like in two
00:23:58
camps but they all go together and and I would like to say for
00:24:01
the record I don't when we a lot of these bills are trans
00:24:07
oriented, transgender gender affirming care oriented bills.
00:24:11
This this is not about transgender children.
00:24:15
OK. Last year was not about COVID.
00:24:18
Every single year what I have kind of the analogy that I have
00:24:23
come up with or whatever conveyed is each year they pick
00:24:27
a hot button topic and that is the Trojan horse.
00:24:29
So when George Floyd Floyd died, it was, you know, systemic
00:24:32
racism and and racial disparities and and and, you
00:24:37
know, Black Lives Matter. And that was the Trojan horse
00:24:40
that they tried to usher in all of these horrible bills.
00:24:43
At the end of the day, we're trying to strip us of our
00:24:45
fundamental, constitutionally protected rights.
00:24:47
OK. Last year or like over like 2
00:24:50
years was COVID. And with the COVID Trojan horse
00:24:53
they were trying to usher in, like for example SB-866 by
00:24:56
Senator Scott Weiner was to empower minors to not just the
00:25:01
COVA 19 vaccine, but to consent as young as 12 to all vaccines.
00:25:07
Right. Because there were Trump MAGA Q
00:25:09
and on literally he was like there are Q.
00:25:11
And on conspiracy parents who don't believe in vaccines there
00:25:14
are crazy anti vaxxers and these children do not deserve to
00:25:18
suffer and die from COVID because they're there.
00:25:21
You know, parents are missing reading misinformation and
00:25:24
they're misinformed Q And on conspiracy theories, literally
00:25:26
that is what he said. And he said it was about COVA 19
00:25:29
vaccines. But when you read the bill, it
00:25:31
was about all vaccines. So then we would have had
00:25:34
children. Exam is 12 in the state of
00:25:36
California. If people do not know, you need
00:25:37
to wake up. Your child as young as 12 has
00:25:40
medical privacy and the right to consent to mental health
00:25:44
treatment, substance abuse, rehabilitative, rehabilitative
00:25:47
treatment, sexual reproductive health, including abortions.
00:25:52
There's a slew of medical treatment and care that your
00:25:55
child as young as 12, can already consent to.
00:25:58
So he wanted to do substance abuse, substance, uh, sexual
00:26:01
reproductive, health, mental health services.
00:26:04
And he would say your if your child can already get an
00:26:06
abortion, why can't they just get a vaccine?
00:26:08
It's just one shot. They can get this, this whole,
00:26:10
you know, procedure done without you knowing like, why not.
00:26:13
And that's what's called a slippery slope in the law,
00:26:15
Philly. You know that.
00:26:16
So they were just building and building and building and we
00:26:19
have allowed this to happen because what they do is they
00:26:22
take one horrifying like you were mentioning, but Camille 1
00:26:25
horrifying case. Of course there is that one
00:26:28
horrifying case of the 10 year old who got raped by her father,
00:26:31
who couldn't talk to anybody about it, that wanted to get an
00:26:33
abortion or just even just reproductive healthcare and
00:26:37
couldn't. And she was 10 or 12 or whatever
00:26:39
the age was. And so we create a law around
00:26:42
that one horrifying exception to the rule and we've allowed
00:26:46
consistently in California to allow these horrifying exception
00:26:50
exceptions to swallow the rule. So now, again in California,
00:26:53
minors as young as 12 can consent to again, I just really
00:26:57
want people to understand sexual reproductive health care, mental
00:27:01
health care, substance abuse treatment.
00:27:03
And he wanted to add vaccines. We were lucky enough to kill
00:27:06
that because this year it's the trans Trojan horse.
00:27:09
And I know I would bet my you know, Fltj that if last year he
00:27:16
would have passed vaccines, he would have been like they can
00:27:18
already get abortions, they can already get vaccines.
00:27:21
Why not allow them consent to gender affirming care?
00:27:25
It would have been the next thing.
00:27:26
So right now this year is the trans Trojan horse.
00:27:29
You know it's a Trojan horse covered in the rainbow flag.
00:27:32
No one wants to touch it because it's the hot button topic.
00:27:35
All of these bills start with, you know analysis of trans L GB
00:27:40
QTU's, how they're susceptible, you know, to mental health
00:27:45
issues, to suicidality, da, da, da da.
00:27:47
And then they're like and that's why we need to increase the gas
00:27:50
tax, right. But it has nothing to do with
00:27:53
that. But the reason that as the the
00:27:56
there's no other word really. Kind of funny because all my
00:28:00
notes for AV957, which is the parents who don't affirm could
00:28:03
lose custody. I actually wrote silvery slope
00:28:06
because what in the future can they.
00:28:08
Well we already did this and now what are they?
00:28:10
That's exactly what I wrote was you just said yeah, I used to
00:28:16
have a rant. This is going slightly off topic
00:28:18
but I have been so my oldest is almost 18 and I wasn't anti vax.
00:28:24
I just was very. It's my choice research.
00:28:28
I didn't believe in getting them all done at one time kind of
00:28:31
thing. So I was very pro, not following
00:28:34
the schedule and just doing what I wanted when I wanted.
00:28:37
And I've always been like that. And I've also always
00:28:40
homeschooled, so I didn't have to worry about those things for
00:28:43
school. But that was something that I
00:28:46
like. Probably 1213 years ago I
00:28:48
started noticing this like this funny little connection between.
00:28:54
And I don't know how to articulate this very well, but
00:28:56
between getting vaccines and owning our children and and I
00:29:00
started using that kind of like, I'm like, OK, so they want, you
00:29:02
know, they want our children as young as like 2 starting in
00:29:04
preschool. And they want to like get them
00:29:07
fulltime education and starting like 2 years old, all, you know,
00:29:11
and not even just through high school because they want them in
00:29:13
college. But I was like, they're going to
00:29:14
start, they're forcing these, They're mandating these
00:29:16
vaccines. And then they're going to keep
00:29:18
pressing them earlier. They're going to like all of a
00:29:20
sudden mandate preschool for the two and three-year olds.
00:29:22
They're going to get them in school.
00:29:23
They're going to get them vaccinated.
00:29:24
They're going to make us follow these laws and then they're
00:29:28
going to teach the kids what they want to teach in public
00:29:31
schools. And of course they're always
00:29:32
trying to outlaw a home school. So they're going to get in the
00:29:35
kids heads starting at 2 years old and then you know, and then
00:29:38
they're going to teach them. You need to go to education
00:29:41
because you need to do all this to get into a good college.
00:29:44
Then, you know, they're going to get into college and then
00:29:46
they're going to take out all these student loans that from
00:29:50
the government. They're going to owe the
00:29:52
government and the government. And of course, they don't get a
00:29:54
better job to pay more taxes. And so the government's trying
00:29:57
to just own them from 2 years old and on.
00:30:01
Yeah. What's so interesting you say
00:30:02
that because, you know, my family's from South America, and
00:30:05
the better grades you get, the better school you get into and
00:30:08
the less you pay. So, like, the less universities
00:30:12
in Argentina are free. I mean, that's how it should be,
00:30:15
right? It should be, you know,
00:30:16
meritocracy. It should be based, like how
00:30:18
hard you work. The better grades you get, you
00:30:20
should get, you should get, you know, rewarded for that.
00:30:23
But it's totally what you said. That's.
00:30:24
That's exactly it. And I mean, oh, it's going back
00:30:27
to the bad bills we have. I mean, and it's, you know,
00:30:31
California is a compulsory education state.
00:30:34
That's why I tell people like they're coming after the kids
00:30:37
because the kids are the lowest hanging fruit and they make it
00:30:42
super expensive for you to live here.
00:30:44
You children must go to school. So you have to, you know, like
00:30:47
you talked to, you brought it up so many times last year, Phil.
00:30:50
It's like people can't even commute to work anymore.
00:30:53
Like you're creating this gas task tax and people aren't going
00:30:56
to evil. Like people need to live in the
00:30:57
server suburbs and work in the city and now they're eating up
00:31:01
there. Or not the gas tax.
00:31:02
But the toll, I think it was a toll on the freeways.
00:31:04
Whenever there was like a couple, and there were several
00:31:07
of them, like people can't even commute into work anymore.
00:31:10
So they have your children over a barrel.
00:31:14
They have you over a barrel. And we have these bills right
00:31:18
now. 8665 is emancipating minors if your child can leave your
00:31:22
home at age of 12 with 0 allegations of incest, abuse or
00:31:27
danger like they want to kill themselves.
00:31:29
Right now in California children as young as 12 can consent to
00:31:32
mental health services but the without your knowledge or
00:31:35
consent like I was just mentioning.
00:31:37
But the only way that they can leave your home and check into a
00:31:39
residential shelter is if there are allegations and proof of
00:31:43
abuse, incest or that they are danger to themselves or others,
00:31:46
like they want to commit suicide or they want to kill their
00:31:48
brother or their dad or the teacher or whatever.
00:31:51
And of course we want those children to be removed from that
00:31:54
kind of volatile situation and then we'll we'll figure out
00:31:58
what's going on. But when you have that
00:32:00
happening, then you have allegations of abuse, incest or
00:32:03
danger. You have CPS.
00:32:05
You have someone actively stepping in to open up an
00:32:08
investigation and assure that child in the system and there
00:32:12
will be an investigation, and rightfully so, because there is
00:32:16
that there's proof of incest, abuse or danger right now.
00:32:19
This bill, AB665 gets rid of those requirements.
00:32:22
So you and this is what's going to happen, you're going to get
00:32:25
in a fight with your child over tick tock or their grades or
00:32:29
drinking and driving or have having sex with their boyfriend
00:32:32
or using social media too much or whatever it is.
00:32:36
You're going to get a huge fight.
00:32:37
You're going to slam the door. You're going to take their car
00:32:40
keys, whatever it is. They're going to go to school,
00:32:43
where they've now installed 10 more of these
00:32:47
professional people. They're called in the schools
00:32:50
who are literally looking for children.
00:32:52
And they're going to go, how are you doing when you want to?
00:32:54
Do you know what's going on? You look sad or you.
00:32:56
They mentioned something to their teacher, they mentioned
00:32:58
something your counselor, and they're going to have a
00:33:01
conversation, say, do you feel like comfortable going home?
00:33:03
And you're like, not really. My dad was so pissed at me last
00:33:06
night. He was so my mom was so angry.
00:33:09
And they're going to say, well, do you want to go cool off in a
00:33:11
government shelter? And your child doesn't
00:33:13
understand that you're going to go, They're going to go to
00:33:15
government children where they are looking for anything to open
00:33:20
up an investigation on you and then you.
00:33:23
This is the antithesis of innocent until proven guilty and
00:33:27
of due process. You have virtually your children
00:33:31
have been removed with from you without any allegations of any
00:33:34
wrongdoing, and now you're facing the expensive, like
00:33:37
financially and time consuming, expensive and energy sucking,
00:33:41
draining process of fighting Child Protective Services
00:33:45
without you having done nothing wrong.
00:33:49
And so they're removing the children that way.
00:33:51
They're removing the child, the children with 9 by 7 because the
00:33:54
child's going to be with the least mentally stable parent,
00:33:58
right, the the affirming parent. Those children will also, you
00:34:04
know, could end up in foster care.
00:34:07
And what you're what you're saying about foster care, it has
00:34:09
nothing to do with foster care people being good or bad.
00:34:13
It has everything to do with the fact that there's 60
00:34:16
children. I think it's like 66
00:34:18
children in the state of California who are in the foster
00:34:20
care system. We don't have even if the most
00:34:22
well-intentioned foster care system or home, there's simply
00:34:28
not enough resources. They're sleeping on the floors,
00:34:30
they're not supervised, The children abuse each other.
00:34:34
People don't realize that because they're up until 17.
00:34:36
So you'll have an 8 year old in there with a 17 year old who has
00:34:39
suffered a lot of trauma. They abuse each other, they're
00:34:42
abused by the counselors. Counselors take them out of the
00:34:45
homes, They traffic them, and traffickers wait outside of
00:34:48
foster counts because they know these children are vulnerable.
00:34:51
They know they don't have adults who are waiting for them.
00:34:54
Who are they are accountable to, who are, you know, taking care
00:34:57
of them, tracking them, Whatever.
00:34:58
You know, people spin it as like, oh, they're not property
00:35:01
in your want to control your property.
00:35:02
Whatever they don't, they know that they don't have any adults,
00:35:06
trusted adults, who are taking care of them, who are going or,
00:35:08
you know, know where they are and are going to be concerned if
00:35:11
they don't show up for three days.
00:35:13
And so all of these bills are rife for abuse and trafficking.
00:35:19
There's an assembly Bill 223 is a bill no one wanted to talk
00:35:22
about because it was super technical by Christopher Ward.
00:35:25
But Christopher Ward drafted a bill that says if an adult, any
00:35:29
adult, there's no definition of adult five can file a petition
00:35:34
for a name, gender or sex identifier change
00:35:37
confidentially. So now we have children in these
00:35:40
residential shelters or living with a mentally unstable parent,
00:35:44
right? Who's the affirming parent or
00:35:46
the most extremely affirming parent?
00:35:48
Or is a ward of the state because of another scenario I'll
00:35:51
tell you about in a second? And now an adult, any adult can
00:35:55
file for it, virtually erase their identity confidentially,
00:35:59
and you're the parent. You have no idea.
00:36:01
You have no idea why your child's out of your house.
00:36:03
You're fighting CPS and someone has filed A petition to change
00:36:07
their name, gender and sex identifier.
00:36:09
All of those markers are gone. Your child is erased.
00:36:12
Like, this is not a. This is not a fire like the
00:36:18
fire. We are in the fire.
00:36:21
This is the worst that I have seen.
00:36:24
I I mean, I've only been doing this for a couple of years.
00:36:26
But Senator Scott Weiner and his cronies, his cartel, his child
00:36:32
abusing human trafficking cartel have are attacking families.
00:36:37
They're attacking parents. They are actively removing
00:36:40
children from loving to parent homes, whatever that home may
00:36:44
look like. And no home is perfect.
00:36:46
OK, no home is perfect. But they are criminalizing
00:36:50
parents, demonizing them, turning children against their
00:36:54
parents when the school situation as well, telling
00:36:58
children that their parents are going to abuse them, kick them
00:37:00
out, don't understand them, go to the counselors.
00:37:03
It is a full frontal 360 attack on the nuclear family, whatever
00:37:08
that might look like in California.
00:37:10
And so those are the two kind of camps.
00:37:13
I'm this started with 1078 and I I got really off track.
00:37:16
But again, they're trying to remove parents out of stable
00:37:20
homes. And then if you can't, let's say
00:37:24
you can cling to your your child and your custody.
00:37:27
Or even if you can't, they're in compulsory education, like
00:37:30
Camille was just saying. And now we have a B1078AB5SB596.
00:37:37
We have Tony Thurman coming down to meetings and threatening
00:37:40
board members and parents. We have Govern Newsom opening up
00:37:43
investigations on school boards who are trying to protect kids
00:37:46
and families. And we have Rob Banta initiating
00:37:49
lawsuits against conservative boards.
00:37:51
And conservative, I don't mean Republican conservative, I mean
00:37:55
traditional and respectful of families, local authority, the
00:38:01
Constitution. So I would say traditional
00:38:03
conservative boards who are following, you know, long time
00:38:07
tested rules. And I mean, I don't know,
00:38:10
there's no other picture to paint.
00:38:12
That is the picture that is the reality of what's happening in
00:38:15
California right now. The funniest thing or it's not
00:38:19
funny. It's actually ironic.
00:38:22
I, I, I, I it's funny because you got to laugh at how absurd
00:38:26
the left is and how hypocritical they are.
00:38:29
They they cry about, you know, this is an attack on our
00:38:34
democracy. This is an attack on our
00:38:36
democracy. Everything's an attack on our
00:38:37
democracy. And now with the the school
00:38:41
boards and the fact that Rob Banta and Gavin Newsom are
00:38:44
basically going after every school board is.
00:38:49
In our mind, it's an attack on technically.
00:38:52
It's an attack on democracy and sort of the separation of powers
00:38:57
between local school boards and duly elected school board
00:39:00
members. And this is something that I
00:39:03
think was coming down the Pike for COVID.
00:39:07
And I remember talking about this a lot of my lives and stuff
00:39:09
back during COVID was like, you have to make sure you pay
00:39:13
attention to everybody who you is on your ballot all the way
00:39:16
down to school board. And a lot of people started to
00:39:20
show up to school board meetings and they start to go okay.
00:39:23
I'm going to get involved now. I get to see what's happening in
00:39:25
my school boards or in my school.
00:39:29
And now you have these school boards that are maybe right
00:39:32
leaning or or more conservative and they're implementing these
00:39:35
parental notifications. They're spreading like wildfire
00:39:38
because I think it's in the best interest of the kids and the
00:39:41
parents, but now because it goes against the agenda, Gavin Newsom
00:39:45
and Rob Banta. Now all of a sudden it's like,
00:39:48
okay, well, we love democracy, but we don't like democracy like
00:39:51
that. Like don't do it like that
00:39:53
because we're going to sue you and we're going to pass laws to
00:39:55
stop it. But it's not.
00:39:57
It's like it's they it's we're we're in an abusive relationship
00:40:03
with our government. Okay if you can just first of
00:40:06
all Gavin Newsom is a narcissist #1 #2.
00:40:09
If you can just understand that they are literally gas, that's
00:40:15
called gas lining. He passes a law that silences
00:40:19
doctors and then has the audacity at the same press
00:40:24
conference, virtually almost, that he's signing in a bill that
00:40:28
says you cannot speak freely based on your science, your
00:40:31
personal experience, your whatever.
00:40:33
We are the number one state protecting, you know,
00:40:39
constitutional rights to is it's called, it's being manipulative,
00:40:44
it's called gaslighting, it's called lying.
00:40:47
And it's like we're in this abusive relationship with our
00:40:51
government that you know it, they're just, he's slick and
00:40:54
he's kind of handsome. If you're into that greasy,
00:40:57
gross type, he could be charming and whatever, and he's literally
00:41:01
abusing you then telling you it's your fault that he's
00:41:04
abusing you. I mean, it is repulsive.
00:41:07
If you go look at psychology books 101, that is literally
00:41:11
what we're dealing with. And and that's why people are
00:41:13
having, you know, cognitive dissonance.
00:41:15
Everyone's cognitive. It's not freaking confident that
00:41:17
they're lying to you. They're lying to you.
00:41:20
They're abusing you. It doesn't make any sense.
00:41:22
But you have got to get out and just just take a step back and
00:41:26
look at what they're doing, look at their actions.
00:41:28
Stop looking at the puppets and what they're saying.
00:41:30
Look what they're doing. They are looking what they're
00:41:32
doing is this. They are taking school boards
00:41:35
who are implementing policies, mind you, you in California
00:41:40
school boards, excuse me, school districts and schools have to
00:41:43
tell you if your child's grades are suffering.
00:41:46
If your kid doesn't show up to school, they have to tell you.
00:41:49
And except when your child is suffering from a mental anxiety,
00:41:55
depression, some sort of mental health crisis, it is a mental
00:42:00
health crisis, OK? No one wants to call it a
00:42:02
disease. It's like you can be gender
00:42:04
dysphoria is actually a clinically diagnosed disease,
00:42:09
but your child is suffering from some sort of mental condition
00:42:13
stress that they are questioning their identity.
00:42:17
It just happens to be gender identity and they don't have to
00:42:19
tell you. So they have to tell you if
00:42:21
their if their grades are, they don't have to tell you when they
00:42:23
want to. They hate their entire body.
00:42:26
They hate their identity. They hate who they are.
00:42:28
So much so that they want to change their name, change how
00:42:30
people refer to them, change how they dress, change their
00:42:33
appearance and then maybe even start taking drugs and actually
00:42:37
amputate healthy parts of their body.
00:42:38
Like I don't need to know that as a parent and and the irony of
00:42:42
all ironies what you're saying Phil, is that the the if you
00:42:45
look at the legislative history behind those bills like the one
00:42:47
that you are obligated to tell about the grades, it's because
00:42:50
and they cite to studies over and over again.
00:42:54
So like before COVID, all like the studies that were relevant
00:42:57
and true before COVID and same with so before trans, this
00:43:01
transgender parents were integral to children's overall
00:43:06
mental well-being and success. And that's why you had to tell
00:43:09
parents you have got to get parents involved because if
00:43:12
their if their grades are suffering, there's something
00:43:14
going on and parents need to be involved so that you can come up
00:43:17
with like a support plan at school and then have the parents
00:43:20
at home, you know, working collaboratively.
00:43:22
You can't like, you know, train the kid at school, super tutor
00:43:26
them at school and then go home and have the wheels fall off.
00:43:28
They need, you know, you need to be collaborating with the place
00:43:32
and the people that they spend a majority of their time with and
00:43:35
also have that support system. So when it comes to grades,
00:43:37
parents are integral, but when it comes to children's gender
00:43:40
identity, they're not only not important to that mental health
00:43:45
issue, but they're actually Public Enemy number one.
00:43:49
I mean you have people just are being intellectually dishonest
00:43:54
if they're going to pretend that that's true that people are
00:43:57
being intellectually, the left is being intellectually
00:43:59
dishonest and what they do is going back to that Trojan horse
00:44:02
analogy is they take trans kids suicide, want to kill
00:44:06
themselves, trans kids want to suicide themselves and they
00:44:11
don't have the data to support that.
00:44:13
Trans kids do want to commit suicide because they are
00:44:16
typically suffering from, and this is, again clinically,
00:44:20
statistically, there are peer reviewed studies showing they
00:44:25
traditionally are suffering from a DDADHD, depression, anxiety.
00:44:30
There are other mental health conditions that go along with
00:44:33
and manifest themselves in gender confusion.
00:44:36
And #3, another huge reason why they want to kill themselves is
00:44:40
because they're living a lie, because they're not coming out
00:44:43
to their parents. If they were given the
00:44:45
opportunity and we're told, you know, given a supportive
00:44:48
environment and encouraged and given tools to have a great
00:44:52
meaningful conversation with their parents, the suicidality
00:44:55
would go down. The stress and anxiety would go
00:44:57
down. But that's not what schools are
00:44:59
doing. And and the other thing I want
00:45:01
to say very quickly is everybody needs to get in.
00:45:03
What, like, you need to understand these are the laws.
00:45:05
Understand California legislature is coming after your
00:45:08
children and understand that what's happening is already
00:45:12
happening. Like I'm not making this up and
00:45:14
sounding the alarm on these bills because I think that one
00:45:17
day because I'm some hysterical Orange County house wife, like
00:45:20
people like to call me. It says I'm already getting the
00:45:23
phone calls. Abigail Martinez is already a
00:45:26
mom whose child was removed from her custody and care because she
00:45:30
would not affirm her child's self elected gender identity
00:45:32
because her daughter was by I think it was bipolar.
00:45:35
Don't put me on that. She was had mental health issues
00:45:39
and when the transgender this is just a couple years ago started
00:45:42
gaining you know, momentum she went with the trans thing and
00:45:47
her Yale. Abigail said she wanted to take
00:45:50
her daughter to get therapy, and they said no.
00:45:52
And the school took her daughter, got her removed from
00:45:55
her mother's care, got her into, you know, protective service and
00:45:59
no foster care where she was pumped full of hormones and you
00:46:03
know, all the the the whole healthcare plan, gender for me
00:46:08
healthcare plan. Meanwhile, they're investigating
00:46:11
her for emotional and psychological abuse.
00:46:14
This is before these bills were even written.
00:46:16
OK, was exonerated, gets her daughter back, and her daughter
00:46:20
kills herself because her daughter didn't get the
00:46:23
treatment that she needed for three years and instead got
00:46:26
pumped full of like hormone raging inducing.
00:46:29
Like they make you super hard. Those hormones make you super
00:46:32
aggressive, they make you super horny.
00:46:34
I don't know what the clinical word is.
00:46:36
They make you very like she was all over the place and she
00:46:40
stepped in front of a training killed herself.
00:46:41
So this is already happening. Adam Veena's son is.
00:46:47
Three or four years old, saying he's non binary.
00:46:49
Why? Because his wife got awarded
00:46:52
custody. Because he would not affirm this
00:46:55
already happened. This bill just passed out of the
00:46:58
legislature. Harrison Tinsley's wife wants to
00:47:01
raise their children. His child, His son, non binary.
00:47:03
It's videos of his son crying. I don't want to wear a dress.
00:47:07
I'm not a girl. I don't want to wear high heels.
00:47:09
I don't want to wear makeup. And he's in a custody dispute
00:47:11
and that judge is threatening to take his son away from him.
00:47:15
All this stuff is already happening.
00:47:17
These children. I don't know if you know, what
00:47:20
was the name, the case that just settled with Harvey, Dylan, they
00:47:24
trans started to transition her child behind her back at school.
00:47:28
You're you need to go to campus and you need to get our parental
00:47:33
notification policy. Try and find conservative board
00:47:36
members to get them to pass the policy and you need to ask your
00:47:40
go into your schools and to your boards asks.
00:47:42
Ask them, e-mail them and do FOIA public records requests and
00:47:46
demand to know if they have gender transitioning programs
00:47:50
because these programs are already being implemented at
00:47:53
your school. So the parental notification
00:47:55
policy is something that is in response to these cases that are
00:47:59
already happening and these gender transitioning programs
00:48:02
that are already rolling out at your school, the teachers are
00:48:05
all up in arms. Like, oh, you're, you know, the
00:48:07
print notification policy is putting new, you know,
00:48:10
expectations and obligations on teachers.
00:48:13
It's like you're already getting trained how to how to profile
00:48:16
children to see who's gender curious, profile their families
00:48:20
to see who doesn't have a safe space at home.
00:48:22
And you're already being trained to create a safe environment for
00:48:27
them at school. They're already going after your
00:48:30
kids at school. It's already happening.
00:48:32
This is not that's why I do the work.
00:48:35
That's why I know you know I It's not.
00:48:38
I'm not trying to be inflammatory.
00:48:41
I already am getting the phone call.
00:48:43
We already have the cases. They're already happening.
00:48:45
Google Abigail Martinez. Google.
00:48:47
Adam Vena Google. Harrison Tinsley.
00:48:50
You will find Chloe Cole detransitioner.
00:48:54
All of these people exist. It's already happening.
00:48:58
And these bills were were made to, like you guys said, kind of
00:49:02
like solidify, concretize these policies that are already in
00:49:06
existence and remove parents from being involved in having a
00:49:11
say in what's going on in the children's.
00:49:15
I I don't think that's fun. Podcasts.
00:49:18
Oh, no, we. Sorry.
00:49:20
It's it's it's serious stuff. Because I think people need to
00:49:23
know how how much of this is coming down the Pike right now
00:49:27
and how serious this is. This is becoming law in
00:49:29
California. The governor is signing this
00:49:31
into law. And I don't think it's it's
00:49:35
tinfoil haddish to look at the bills that you've listed and see
00:49:41
there is a there is a pattern here.
00:49:43
There is something that they're trying to do here.
00:49:45
It's not hidden in the details. We're not imagining this when
00:49:50
you won, start to remove the voters ability to elect their
00:49:56
own local representatives. You remove the ability of those
00:50:00
duly elected local officials to enact the will of the people who
00:50:05
elected them. You start to punish people who
00:50:08
show up to school boards and make their voices her like this
00:50:11
one bill SV596 which fine someone $1000 and or a year in
00:50:18
jail for expressing their anger at at school board meetings and
00:50:24
you start to realize okay so we can't have control over our
00:50:27
local public schools. And then they start to force
00:50:32
these children and put a wedge between you and your children,
00:50:35
and they force them into the arms of the state, whether it's
00:50:40
through the school, whether it's through these shelters.
00:50:44
And you start to see there's sort of a pattern here of like,
00:50:46
well, if we expand the authority of the school and we push
00:50:52
parents out so they have no say in what our school does.
00:50:55
Then we can sort of keep them behind this, this wall of
00:50:58
secrecy. Behind this curtain of secrecy.
00:51:01
We can do what we want. We can indoctrinate them behind
00:51:04
this, this curtain. And then, oh, if you have a
00:51:07
problem with that, okay, well, too late.
00:51:08
We're going to take your kid away anyway.
00:51:10
So I don't, I don't think it's, it's Tinfoil, Haddish or
00:51:14
conspiracy at all. I mean, anybody who has half a
00:51:16
brain can look at the pattern of these bills and what California
00:51:21
is passing this year and go. They have a concerted effort and
00:51:24
they have an agenda to do something and to try and put a
00:51:27
wedge between parents and their children and take children away
00:51:30
from their parents. I I honestly believe that and
00:51:32
and people who know me, I don't say inflammatory things just to
00:51:37
you know get the the clicks and the views and all that stuff.
00:51:39
I try to break things down from a logical perspective.
00:51:42
But logically, you have to look at all this together and put the
00:51:46
puzzle pieces together and go. There's a concerted effort.
00:51:50
And people need to know about that.
00:51:51
So that's why I think it's good that we're talking about this
00:51:54
and letting people know this is what's coming out of the session
00:51:57
this just this year alone. Yeah.
00:52:00
So I mean, you you, that's that those are all the bills and and
00:52:04
there's a B 1078, which will, like you said, dictate what
00:52:09
material and curricula your students read.
00:52:11
OK, so you're they're mandatory in school.
00:52:14
A B5 is about, you know, training teachers how to and
00:52:18
it's all again, to be supportive of LGB, QT and trans youth.
00:52:22
No mention of detransitioning children.
00:52:25
But I don't, actually, I don't even want to go.
00:52:27
You just summarize the bills perfectly.
00:52:29
They're going to take them from your homes with the first set of
00:52:32
bills that we talked about or they're going to.
00:52:34
You're going to keep your children if you can.
00:52:37
And they're still going to get their agenda, plug in their
00:52:40
ideas through the mandated curricula and silencing board
00:52:45
members. Removing board members and
00:52:47
removing parents who have the, you know, who have the gumption
00:52:50
to trying and oppose. You know, all these bills except
00:52:54
for 596 have passed out of the California legislature.
00:52:57
They're on their way to Gov nuisance desk.
00:52:59
He has 12 days or until September 19th to sign these
00:53:02
bills into law. So I just, I would really like
00:53:05
to, you know, I don't know where we're going to end, but I do
00:53:08
want to make sure that we get in that everyone should be calling
00:53:10
Gavin Newsom every single day on your way to work on your lunch
00:53:14
break. It takes literally 20 seconds
00:53:16
because you're just going to list the bills.
00:53:18
I don't know if you, like, post this with a caption or anything,
00:53:21
but you're just going to say I'm calling to, you know, demand
00:53:24
that the governor oppose, excuse me, veto 86, six, 589 by
00:53:29
782-2385, a B1078SB596 when it comes to his desk.
00:53:34
So we just need to go over and over and over again on these
00:53:38
bills and just keep calling him, you know, truthfully between you
00:53:42
and me, I don't know what this chance of success of that is
00:53:46
going to be. But he does have, yeah, he does
00:53:49
have presidential aspirations. So it's really important that he
00:53:54
knows that we're awake and we're watching him and we'll remember
00:53:57
this and say and we will remember this when he comes, you
00:54:00
know, comes and runs for president and also share this
00:54:03
information. Because what happens in
00:54:05
California, first of all, anybody can call the governor.
00:54:09
You can have your in laws and your families in Colorado and
00:54:12
Texas and whatever calling everybody should be calling him
00:54:14
and everybody should be calling him because if he becomes
00:54:17
president, it will come to their state.
00:54:20
So everyone should be calling. Everyone has a vested interest
00:54:23
in this. But the second thing that people
00:54:26
need to do is mark their calendars.
00:54:28
Well I can't talk about it yet but we will get you.
00:54:32
I've been looking at my phone totally transparent because we
00:54:35
have a next step for you guys. I'll let Phil will be the first
00:54:40
to know as soon as it's confirmed.
00:54:43
But as you know me Phil we'd like a a good show of force so
00:54:47
we will of peaceful force so we will be having a gatherings
00:54:51
within the next 5 days to of parents and concerned citizens
00:54:56
because it's wild. There's grandparents aunts and
00:54:59
uncles put people without kids because they're like this is
00:55:01
wrong this is wrong. We we don't do this and the last
00:55:06
thing so I'll get you that information once it's finalized
00:55:08
and confirmed but we I don't know if you know but protect
00:55:11
kids ca.com is another thing that we put together.
00:55:17
There are three initiatives that we got on we're trying to get on
00:55:20
the ballot for November because like I said California
00:55:23
legislature the capital is not protecting us.
00:55:25
They're actually actively coming after us and our elected
00:55:28
representatives are out to freaking lunch are compromised.
00:55:33
So we are three initiatives. One is to I don't want to
00:55:36
misquote them so let me just really quickly pull them up.
00:55:41
One is to protect girls spaces and and sports.
00:55:45
Another one is about parental notification and transparency
00:55:49
and let me put here the last one is I just want to get the right
00:55:54
messaging for you. Protects girls parent
00:55:58
notification from schools, protect girls sports and prevent
00:56:01
child sterilization. So that's basically you know,
00:56:04
would be illegal. Making it illegal to do render
00:56:09
gender affirming care to minors, protecting girls, sports and
00:56:12
spaces obviously is getting, you know, male individuals out of
00:56:17
their locker rooms, bathrooms and their sports.
00:56:20
And then the parental notification policy is what we
00:56:23
are trying to do right now on a local level.
00:56:26
We have got to protect ourselves.
00:56:28
Right now what you can do is talk to your kids, go to your
00:56:31
school, talk to the teachers, talk to your principal, find out
00:56:34
if they have a gender affirming care or gender transitioning
00:56:38
policy in place or anything to that effect.
00:56:41
Go to your next school board meeting.
00:56:42
Demand to find out. Do a public records request.
00:56:45
Demand to find out and start having conversations with your
00:56:48
kids right now. That's how you start now.
00:56:50
And then try and get what our parcel notification policy
00:56:54
passed in your district. If you're working on that and
00:56:57
you need help. Like your board members are
00:56:59
scared. They don't understand the
00:57:00
policy. They don't want to get sued.
00:57:02
Aaron Friday, Jennifer Kennedy or myself, I'm Dean Brownlee.
00:57:06
Also, we will help you. We will zoom with you.
00:57:09
We will meet. We will explain the law and
00:57:11
explain how these policies are legal and how they can defend
00:57:15
themselves. And then really, really, really
00:57:19
go find out. Go to protectkidsca.com, go to
00:57:22
the initiative, sign up for updates because we need to get
00:57:25
about 500 and 7500 and 76 signatures in 180 days.
00:57:30
Once they get green lighted, and those will create laws, we will
00:57:34
create our own laws. We'll put them on the ballot
00:57:37
come November, but we have to get them on the ballot first.
00:57:41
So we need to get those signatures in 180 days and we'll
00:57:45
need everybody's support to to do that and we can start
00:57:49
spreading awareness now. So once we get them on the
00:57:50
ballot, we can start getting the sick.
00:57:52
Once we get them green lighted, we start getting the signatures.
00:57:55
If we get 576, they get on the ballot in November and we
00:57:59
know they're going to pass because that Rasmussen poll, the
00:58:03
survey they did, it's like over. It's like overwhelming.
00:58:06
It's like 80% of Californians absolutely believe that parents
00:58:10
should be notified when their child is having suffering mental
00:58:13
health issues. So these these initiatives will
00:58:16
pass. We just need to get them on the
00:58:17
ballot. We're coming up on the hour, and
00:58:22
I'll make sure I try to spread as much of this as possible.
00:58:25
I'll put all this stuff in the show notes.
00:58:27
I want to share your stuff as well.
00:58:31
Maybe we can organize some sort of call to action.
00:58:33
I think that'd be great. That always seems to work really
00:58:35
well. Sometimes if you just make it
00:58:37
easy and just do a Google doc that people can like a script
00:58:41
people can read off of, that usually seems to work really
00:58:43
well. One law before we hop off that I
00:58:48
wanted to comment on, which as attorneys, scares the crap out
00:58:52
of me SB-40. Which incentivizes people to be
00:58:59
attorneys to be reported to the State Bar who have inspired or
00:59:04
actually engaged in, quote, treason, sedition, or
00:59:07
insurrection against California the USA.
00:59:10
So to me, that sounds like anybody who could be MAGA.
00:59:15
We want to report to the State Bar, which or if you file the
00:59:19
lawsuit that challenges the governor or state government.
00:59:23
So if you if you sue the governor like we did, if you sue
00:59:27
the state, if you sue Joe Biden, I mean very easily you will be
00:59:31
accused of insurrection and treason.
00:59:34
I mean, I can't think that law is SB-40.
00:59:37
That's Senator Tom Umberg's law. He's in here in Orange County.
00:59:40
He used to be a Jag judge. He's an attorney, a former
00:59:44
judge. He's a disgrace to the legal
00:59:47
profession. He makes me sick.
00:59:49
He jockeyed AB957. He should know better.
00:59:52
Maybe 9 by 7 is void for ambiguity on its face.
00:59:56
If violates First Amendment, you know, right exercise, free
00:59:59
religion, free speech, compelled speech, all of it.
01:00:02
He is the least indicative, no least indicated to be
01:00:08
representing our profession and the gall of hit.
01:00:11
That is the last piece. And I actually never talked
01:00:15
about SB-40 because. I it was almost like it was too.
01:00:22
I didn't even want to breathe life into it and we had you
01:00:27
know, good information that it wasn't proceeding.
01:00:29
And we it's not it's not it's it's not going to move out of
01:00:32
the legislature. So but yeah that's from Senator
01:00:38
Tom Umberg. If you live in Via Park in that
01:00:41
area, in Orange, Santa Ana area, he jockeyed 957.
01:00:46
So he's the one that's removing custody of children.
01:00:48
And I I want to say one thing really quickly on 957 people are
01:00:53
talking about, you know, one of the problems with that bill
01:00:55
besides all those constitutional free exercise, religion, free
01:00:58
speech, compelled speech, your due process rights, fundamental
01:01:03
14th Amendment due process rights to manage the the care
01:01:07
and custody and upbringing of well-being, education, religion,
01:01:10
health of your child, which has been protected by the Supreme
01:01:13
Court for over 100 years. Aside from that, in addition to
01:01:17
that, the bill is extremely poorly written and it says
01:01:21
whoever affirms like a judge needs to look at the health,
01:01:24
safety and welfare. And that includes who affirms
01:01:27
the child. And there's no definition of
01:01:29
affirmation. And this is super, super, super
01:01:31
important. And I hate that we've waited
01:01:33
till the end, but I hope people are so listening.
01:01:35
There's no definition of affirm and affirm means it can mean two
01:01:38
things, social affirmation or medical affirmation.
01:01:41
Social is hair cut, name, pronouns, clothing, medical
01:01:46
obviously is. You know, has cross sex,
01:01:48
hormones, you know, surgery, mastectomies, you know, the
01:01:53
vagina, plasty, all those things.
01:01:55
So there's no definition of affirm.
01:01:56
So you you have three options. You have one scenario where one
01:02:00
parent is the affirming parent, the other is not.
01:02:02
That person's going to get custody.
01:02:04
You have two parents who are both affirming who wins.
01:02:10
Is it the most extreme affirming parent and is it me because I
01:02:13
want to get my our daughter top surgery even though she's four
01:02:16
and she doesn't need top surgery or even want it.
01:02:18
But I I'm the most affirming parent.
01:02:21
What happens there. Number two.
01:02:23
Number three, no one was talking about this and this is what
01:02:26
you're referring to Camille is when.
01:02:28
And then I mentioned this in the fox our fox, my Fox News
01:02:31
interview that kind of went viral is if both parents.
01:02:34
I hate you Phil, we're getting divorced.
01:02:36
Wasn't meant to be. You know, it's not you, it's me.
01:02:40
But we do agree that we will never affirm, or we're certainly
01:02:45
not going to affirm our five year old or three-year old or
01:02:47
two year old or 11 year old. Then that means under this law,
01:02:51
the way it's written is that both of us are acting contrary
01:02:55
to or jeopardizing our child's health, safety and welfare.
01:02:59
That means that the child marked my words.
01:03:01
It's going to happen. Both of the parents are acting
01:03:05
jeopardizing their health, safety and welfare.
01:03:07
Both of the parents are are not acting in the child's best
01:03:10
interests. Those are the two terms of art
01:03:13
used in the law and the child will be removed from both of us,
01:03:17
which is the last way, Bethany, that they're going to get them
01:03:20
into those foster care systems. So this is coming after you.
01:03:24
Another bill that wasn't mentioned because it got amended
01:03:27
by Ana Caballero and Angelique Ashby, Aggie R Curry, Luz Rivas
01:03:34
is SB599 because people like I'm never going to get a divorce and
01:03:38
I doesn't matter to me. Well, SB599 says visitation.
01:03:43
If you don't affirm for visitation, so now you lost
01:03:45
custody because you're not the affirming parent.
01:03:47
Now you won't even get to visit because you're not the affirming
01:03:50
parent. And in these laws, in that law
01:03:55
599, they it talks about domestic abuse. 599 was written
01:04:00
about visitation and changing visitation to be remote, whether
01:04:04
it's domestic abuse and their allegations of domestic abuse.
01:04:08
And they talk about the child's health, safety and welfare.
01:04:10
They talk about the Penal Code, they talk about child abuse.
01:04:12
They call about talk about child neglect and child endangerment.
01:04:15
And I said it from the very gecko I go this is going, this
01:04:18
definition is going to go to the Penal Code.
01:04:20
And here we have 599 that's taking, after taking SB, excuse
01:04:25
me, a B957. They're taking it that
01:04:28
definition of, you know, health, safety and welfare to include
01:04:31
affirmation in terms of custody. They're using it for visitation
01:04:35
and it is now going to go over to the Penal Code for child
01:04:38
abuse, endangerment and neglect. So these bills, you think I'm
01:04:42
never going to get a divorce and I'm never going to fight over my
01:04:45
child? But these bills, again, it's the
01:04:47
foothold and it will soon be able to reach you.
01:04:51
And you may find yourself in the situation as Abigail Martinez
01:04:54
where your child is confused because they're 14 and they're
01:04:57
hormonal and they hate you because you took away their tick
01:05:00
tock like every single normal 14 year old.
01:05:03
And you can be accused of abusing mentally or emotionally
01:05:08
abusing your child or endangering them or neglecting
01:05:10
them for refusing to get them gender affirming care.
01:05:13
And you too will lose custody and you also won't be able to
01:05:15
visit your kid. So these bills are just really
01:05:19
egregious on all levels. They came after the lawyers with
01:05:22
SB-40. They came after the parents with
01:05:25
SB-596 and 665 and and 957. You've got to you have got to
01:05:32
get involved. Like Phil said at the local
01:05:34
local level, that's where you can control things and it
01:05:36
trickles up and we will get these criminals out of office
01:05:39
because hopefully for as bad as it is hopefully with this,
01:05:43
people understand please go to facts, law, truth, justice.
01:05:46
Our website, I mean my Instagram I'm am amplifying a lot of other
01:05:53
accounts who are. We're doing a legislator
01:05:57
scorecard. It's Cal with California Parents
01:06:00
United all spelled out. And we're doing a scorecard of
01:06:03
all the legislators and how they voted on these bills because
01:06:06
these legislators do not represent your interest.
01:06:10
They do not care about children. They do not care about families
01:06:13
and they need to be voted out and you need to replace them.
01:06:15
So you know, it's going to take a lot of work, but at least
01:06:18
we're it's really horrible, but at least we're all awake and now
01:06:21
we can unite and and figure out a way to resume our position at
01:06:27
the table because that's where we belong.
01:06:30
Yeah, I think it's it's important that people get
01:06:32
involved and people pick up the phone.
01:06:35
E-mail, as we saw with SB14, Newsome is prone to caving to
01:06:40
public pressure. Almost funny enough, he he
01:06:44
seemed to be trying to take credit for SB14 passing, which
01:06:48
was disgusting that now all of a sudden he's trying to take
01:06:51
credit for it. But anyway, public pressure does
01:06:55
work, and Diane Dixon was on a couple weeks ago, definitely
01:06:58
made it very clear. People think just because
01:07:01
there's a supermajority of Democrats, public pressure does
01:07:04
work. If you speak up and you're loud
01:07:07
enough and you create enough noise with the legislature, they
01:07:10
do back off of this stuff. Because they're politicians and
01:07:13
if they see the the it's very unpopular they will back off of
01:07:17
this stuff. So I yeah, we'll definitely work
01:07:20
together and get some sort of call action to get this out
01:07:23
there so people can contact the governor, let them know that
01:07:26
they oppose these bills. But we're we're coming up we're
01:07:30
actually a little over an hour. So we got some extra bonus time
01:07:32
out of you before we we sign off for the night.
01:07:36
Is there any final thoughts? Nicole, you were a great guest
01:07:39
and obviously don't be a stranger.
01:07:40
I think you need to come back. More often.
01:07:43
It's sad that it took this long. I love you guys.
01:07:46
So great, let's do it again and again and again.
01:07:51
No final words, is just what you just said.
01:07:53
Just get, don't. And then, you know, for all
01:07:58
these things, these horrible things that are happening, there
01:08:01
are really good things that are happening as well.
01:08:04
They're going to repeal AB2098. We're winning our lawsuits.
01:08:08
We're getting the parental notification policies passed,
01:08:11
you know, but let's not wait for the lawyers to come, I guess my,
01:08:15
my thing is, is that we can stay, like, off a lot.
01:08:20
I'll say this, the Revolutionary War was one with 3% of the
01:08:25
population, OK, we would have won.
01:08:29
It would have been a lot less death and dismemberment if just
01:08:32
a little bit more had joined the fight a little earlier.
01:08:35
So we're the 3% people listening here.
01:08:38
I'm sure part of the 3% who are engaged and who are pushing back
01:08:41
and getting engaged locally and really, really, really, I'm
01:08:44
literally talking about start in your classroom, start having
01:08:47
these conversations, start sharing this podcast, our
01:08:50
website, protect Kids, CA and the initiatives California
01:08:55
Coalition, Parents Coalition. Like that's where the parental
01:08:58
notification is. I'll give you all of these
01:09:00
links, literally copy and paste it and send it to your entire do
01:09:04
a BCC e-mail glass, send it to everybody because people don't
01:09:08
know what's going on. And when they find out what's
01:09:10
happening, they're appalled. Like, it's not even like, oh,
01:09:14
that's really unfortunate. They're like what the block is
01:09:18
going on. Like they literally are like
01:09:20
what are you talking about And you've used set Google.
01:09:24
Like I said Abigail Martinez Harrison Tinsley Adam Vina.
01:09:27
It's happening. So people don't know and we just
01:09:30
need to sound the alarm and people are willing to write
01:09:33
because the more like I said if we just have more we can end
01:09:36
this a lot sooner. The same way with cobit, if
01:09:38
people had just said no from the get go, we wouldn't we ended up
01:09:41
we were right on every issue. We were right on every single
01:09:44
issue. But it took two years to get
01:09:46
there. How many people were vaccinated
01:09:48
against their will? How many people were injured?
01:09:50
How many people lost their jobs, their pensions, you know, their
01:09:53
careers, so their homes, their families?
01:09:57
We are right. The law is on your side.
01:10:00
We would not be doing this if we didn't know that for 100%
01:10:04
certainty. So just share this, you know
01:10:07
share this information, connect with people and stay post.
01:10:11
You know, stay tuned. Follow us for updates and we
01:10:15
will guide you to final victory over these criminal, the
01:10:19
criminal California criminal cartel.
01:10:22
We will win, we will prevail. We just want to minimize the
01:10:25
damage in the meantime. I don't think we could have
01:10:28
ended any stronger than that. So I'm going to end every show
01:10:32
as I always do, which is if you like this show, make sure you
01:10:35
like, share, subscribe, review, hit the notification bell on all
01:10:38
of our platforms. And like Nicole said, best thing
01:10:42
you can do to help spread the word and support this show is
01:10:45
just share this with somebody and especially this episode,
01:10:48
share this, share this, share this with concerned parents,
01:10:51
share this with everybody. Because I think.
01:10:53
The more people know about this, I think more people will be
01:10:56
shocked and appalled at what's going on that this is actually
01:11:00
stuff that's becoming law here in California.
01:11:03
So with that we'll say good night to everybody.
01:11:07
Have a good night, everybody. Thank you guys.
01:11:09
Good night. Thank you for listening to
01:11:24
another episode of California Underground.
01:11:26
If you like what you heard, remember to subscribe Alike and
01:11:29
review it, and follow California Underground on social media for
01:11:32
updates as to when new episodes are available.