On this episode, we discuss how Gavin's wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, has created quite the lucrative scheme with her non profit, The Representation Project, and the connections with our state government.
We discuss how she profits from contracts with schools, the government, and how she makes money with her "Office of the First Partner" that was created exclusively for her.
Links Mentioned in the Show
https://www.openthebooks.com/substack-newsom-inc/
Open the Books Exposes the ‘Legalized’ Pay-to-Play Scheme by ‘Newsom Inc.’
Jennifer Siebel Newsom’s Out of Compliance Charity Was Still Soliciting Donations
Jennifer Newsom on Fox News Talking About New Documentary
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z1NTq7nUO14
Lobbyist funds to Jennifer
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/gavin-newsom-wife-jennifer-siebel-salary-representation-project-companies-california
https://deadline.com/2021/06/gavin-newsom-wife-nonprofit-jennifer-siebel-newsom-1234769678/
First Partner's Office
https://www.gov.ca.gov/ca-for-all-kids/?emrc=63fead196d60f
https://twitter.com/Scott_Wiener/status/1625185832889122816
*The California Underground Podcast is dedicated to discussing California politics from a place of sanity and rationality.*
Support California Underground on Patreon at www.patreon.com/CaliforniaUnderground
Follow California Underground on Social Media Instagram: www.instagram.com/californiaunderground
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCj8SabIcF4AKqEVFsLmo1jA
Substack: https://substack.com/profile/72986149-ca_underground
Shop California Underground Merchandise: https://california-underground.creator-spring.com
Review the Anchor.Fm Privacy Policy: Anchor - The easiest way to make a podcast
00:00:07
If you're a California conservative and libertarian, a
00:00:10
moderate Democrat, believe in common sense or just a sane
00:00:13
person. This is the political podcast
00:00:15
for you. It's the California underground
00:00:18
podcast. What is up everybody?
00:00:25
Welcome to a new episode of the California underground.
00:00:28
Welcome everybody. Tonight we have A fun topic.
00:00:33
I mean, as if it's not already like shocking enough that like,
00:00:35
the newsom's are greedy, power-hungry people and are in
00:00:41
politics for all the wrong reasons.
00:00:43
Tonight, we're going to be talking about how specifically
00:00:47
Jennifer news. I'm Jennifer sabeel Newsom.
00:00:50
The first partner has been making quite the living off of
00:00:55
nonprofits in video production and all sorts of stuff.
00:00:59
Thanks to your tax dollars. But before we get into the
00:01:02
night, into that night Camille, how are you doing tonight?
00:01:06
I am so good. I'm celebrating our first day of
00:01:08
freedom and what three years. I'm just kidding.
00:01:11
That is right. Yeah, we're actually seeing it
00:01:14
other out of the ordinary because I have not been acting.
00:01:17
Like I have been free. So did you?
00:01:19
Yeah. I mean I posted that Meme.
00:01:24
That was my celebration. So that's about as much as
00:01:28
you're going to get and yeah. It's funny.
00:01:32
I was watching the local news KUSI down here in San Diego and
00:01:35
they were talking a lot about the state of emergency and how
00:01:40
it ended and they're kind of talking to a lot of like lawyers
00:01:43
and people and Advocates who had worked on behalf of like covid.
00:01:48
And I know just just a little preview in a couple weeks.
00:01:50
We're actually going to have was a three-year anniversary episode
00:01:53
of covid. That's going to be fun.
00:01:57
We're going to have some people on, we're going to sort of like
00:01:59
walk down memory lane because there's stuff from covid that I
00:02:03
was just like you we had this happen on a past episode.
00:02:05
We were like looking at a video and we watched it was like, oh
00:02:10
my God I forgot all about this stuff from covid.
00:02:13
It just was like, PTSD, I just blocked it out, that's crazy.
00:02:17
Three years later. We finally Gavin Newsom, finally
00:02:21
relinquish the state of emergency.
00:02:22
And yeah it doesn't feel any different.
00:02:28
I mean I guess that that should make the point, like it hasn't
00:02:33
really felt different for a long time now.
00:02:36
So why did he hold on to it for so long because you're supposed
00:02:40
to by law? The governor is supposed to when
00:02:43
there's a state of emergency. It's it either ends when the
00:02:48
legislature steps in and says, okay, it's over which, of course
00:02:51
this legislature was never going to do to Gavin Newsom.
00:02:54
They were never going to do that to him and take away his power.
00:02:59
Because it's all Democrats or at the earliest possible time when
00:03:04
the emergency is over, was when he was supposed to actually end
00:03:08
the state of emergency. And I think you could make a
00:03:10
strong argument that at this point.
00:03:13
It covid hasn't really been an emergency for like, over a year
00:03:17
at this point. Like really?
00:03:19
Like I'm trying to think of like 20 21 or 20 22.
00:03:23
Now we're in 2023. 2022 2021 was sort of the last.
00:03:26
I feel like gasp of But yeah, it's finally over all that after
00:03:34
three years two-week supply curve.
00:03:38
What five months ago to where he's like every 28.
00:03:42
That's what a dancer would like. Wait, what?
00:03:44
Yeah, it's kind of like, the LA Board of Supervisors.
00:03:47
I saw also voted to end it by March 31st.
00:03:52
So they need a full month to wind down their state of
00:03:55
emergency even though it's not really been tested, but LA
00:03:58
County needs. A whole month to get rid of
00:04:01
their own thing but that's not really the point.
00:04:04
But yeah, this is all fitting because it's Newsome.
00:04:07
It is fitting. Yeah.
00:04:08
So happy sort of getting your freedom back day here in
00:04:13
California. State of emergency is over covid
00:04:16
is officially in the rearview mirror based on the state of
00:04:19
emergency side note. This has really nothing to do
00:04:23
with anything. This is just friendly banter Can
00:04:26
I just say how tired I am of this winter here in California?
00:04:31
Like, this is just been abysmal and I know I've only been here
00:04:36
since like, 2014 in Southern California when I came out for
00:04:40
law school and it's just sucks. Like this is, this has got to be
00:04:45
the worst winter. I ever.
00:04:46
Remember you're shaking your head because you're probably
00:04:50
like there's been worse winners here.
00:04:52
Yeah, it's not not that like this is probably as bad.
00:04:56
To get. But we only get to enjoy this
00:04:59
every few years and give us like, oftentimes in February.
00:05:05
It's really hot like this, this like, when bathing suits units
00:05:08
and starts. And so, it's sort of like we're
00:05:10
enjoying those of us who have been here.
00:05:12
Long term are enjoying The Long Winter, because next month,
00:05:17
we're going to be blasting racs and it's going to be so
00:05:19
expensive and her to be complaining about the heat wave.
00:05:22
Yeah, that's sort of what we were talking about this morning
00:05:25
was like, when we walked out of the gym where I can't, this does
00:05:28
not feel like San Diego weather was like, well, look at it, this
00:05:33
way, if I summertime will be sweating in our households
00:05:36
going, this sucks worse that cold weather again, but at
00:05:41
first, it was fine. It was, you know, you got to put
00:05:44
some blankets on, you got to put on your comfy sweaters and kind
00:05:48
of felt like winter, especially, around Christmas time.
00:05:50
It felt really nice. Got to snuggle up near the tree.
00:05:52
Re now, I'm over it now. I'm like, okay, it's March it's
00:05:55
time to turn the page. Let's get back to spring.
00:05:57
Anyway, that's not the point of what we're talking about
00:05:59
tonight. We weren't talking about whether
00:06:01
we're talking about the newsom's and specifically this idea of
00:06:06
Newsome ink. So to give you a bird's eye view
00:06:11
of what we're going to be talking about tonight.
00:06:12
Jennifer sabeel Newsome, she's sort of in the center of all of
00:06:16
this. She is she deemed herself.
00:06:19
The first partner of Gab, Awesome.
00:06:23
She did not want to be called the first lady.
00:06:25
She wants to be called the first partner.
00:06:26
So they established the office of the first partner going to be
00:06:30
talking about how much she gets in taxpayer dollars for that.
00:06:34
We're going to be talking about her nonprofit, the
00:06:36
representation project which is a film company, that produces
00:06:41
documentaries for children to watch in public schools and
00:06:46
basically it's a big vicious circle of tax dollars and
00:06:50
lobbyists pain into the new zones.
00:06:52
And Of like, it's a legal way. It's like, backdoor lobbying for
00:06:59
the newsom's, because there's only there's certain amounts you
00:07:02
can only donate to Gavin Newsom. But when you have a non-profit,
00:07:06
like Jennifer does, you can just donate to the nonprofit, a crap
00:07:11
ton of money, and you don't think that has any influence on
00:07:15
Jennifer and Gavin. I mean, that would be hard to
00:07:18
make that kind of Distinction. First off.
00:07:21
What are your initial your thoughts Camille about this
00:07:25
whole thing like like what's your first initial thought about
00:07:28
this Rabbit Hole you dive down to It's scary.
00:07:33
What politicians can get away with and do get away with.
00:07:37
And I know this isn't a strictly Democrat thing, so I'm not going
00:07:41
to say that. But this is it's bad, even the
00:07:45
right word, like the seem so bad to me what I know.
00:07:48
We're going to go through it, open the books has exposed and
00:07:51
but what they have really broken open, it's there so much, it's
00:07:55
scary. It's scary how much power they
00:07:58
have. How much money they can get and
00:08:01
control. Yeah, it is because money does
00:08:04
equal a lot of power. Yeah.
00:08:08
So let's hop into this one. This is the this is the article
00:08:13
that really sort of started. It all off.
00:08:16
Are good for Aunt Fran on Andrew over at open the books, he's
00:08:21
been on the show a couple times. They've done a really good job,
00:08:24
sort of exposing as much as possible in California and all
00:08:27
over the country. But specifically, here in
00:08:29
California they expose this whole Some ink.
00:08:32
So here's sort of the graph of what you can see happens here.
00:08:39
So here's Jennifer, I assume she's giving a speech in Spanish
00:08:43
which we'll talk about. She is sort of at the center of
00:08:48
all. This not really Gavin, Newsom,
00:08:49
he sort of off here as the governor.
00:08:52
So what happens is, she has this representation project which is
00:08:56
hers. She also has the Girls Club
00:08:57
entertainment Incorporated, also hers and the off.
00:09:02
Office of the first partner. So what happens is is she gets
00:09:07
money from the representation project 1.5, they pay into the
00:09:14
Girls Club entertainment Incorporated about 1.6, the
00:09:19
representation project creates documentaries, that is then
00:09:23
adopted by the California Board of Education, which then they
00:09:27
use in all their schools and then the California schools,
00:09:31
Payback The representation project 1.4 million, it really
00:09:36
becomes this whole web of corruption.
00:09:41
And then she also gets a whole bunch of money to the office of
00:09:44
the first partner because she has to have staff.
00:09:47
So, let's go through some of the this article.
00:09:49
What kind of talked about in Breakdown, like, what's going
00:09:53
on? And to the best of our ability
00:09:55
will break down. What's going on?
00:09:58
Did you do in summer of 2022? Governor Gavin.
00:10:01
Newsom convinced the state legislature to provide 4.7
00:10:04
billion for K through 12 Mental, Health Services, which among
00:10:07
other things, funded 10 new school counselors Gavin news and
00:10:12
convince the legislature because Jennifer sabeel Newsome, the
00:10:15
wife of the governor convinced him, the biggest advocate for
00:10:18
mental health, funding within the K through 12.
00:10:20
California public schools in the Newsom Administration was mrs.
00:10:24
Newsome in fact, Gavin. Newsom created the Office of the
00:10:27
first partner. So his wife could promote her
00:10:29
policy agenda using taxpayer money since 19.
00:10:32
So Bill newsom's been armed with nearly five million dollars and
00:10:35
nine staffers within our subdivision of the governor's
00:10:38
office. Last November Seville newsom's
00:10:42
advocacy in California, spending priorities were outlined in a
00:10:45
glowing news article. Loretta Winston director of the
00:10:48
California Association of school counselors a trade Association,
00:10:52
representing 3000's, California, school counselors was quoted
00:10:56
while the governor's recent investment will add additional
00:10:59
school counselor. So the workforce that will be an
00:11:01
even greater I need to access films and curriculum support
00:11:04
materials, such as Seville newsom's documentary series.
00:11:08
We would love to work with her and support her efforts.
00:11:12
So there's this little graph right here to give you an idea
00:11:16
of Melania. Trump had a staff of five people
00:11:19
to an enforceable. Newsom has a staff of nine
00:11:21
people it cost. One point two million dollars in
00:11:25
the first lady dr. Jill Biden has a staff of 12
00:11:28
people. So, all making sense right now
00:11:34
or do we need to slow down? Do you think I'm just waiting
00:11:39
for you to say that somehow Sam, Venkman freed was behind this
00:11:42
to. That would be the only thing
00:11:44
that would surprise me at this point.
00:11:48
That would not surprise me if he was actually behind me, I didn't
00:11:50
see. He actually he had told ya, I
00:11:55
mean, he's got his hands in a lot of democratic things.
00:11:57
I don't think he has his hands in this specifically, And they
00:12:01
go on to say the representation project leverages taxpayer
00:12:05
dollars to promote radical ideologies, personally profit.
00:12:08
And push the political Ambush Ambitions of her husband, she
00:12:11
brags that 2.6 million students have seen the film's Nationwide.
00:12:15
So she's not only selling these films to California school,
00:12:18
she's selling them out to National schools as well and
00:12:22
that's one way. She's making money,
00:12:25
representation project contracts with her for-profit Film
00:12:29
Production Company, Girls Club, and Attainment.
00:12:32
Since 20 2012 sabeel, Newsome receive one point five million
00:12:36
dollars in style away from the nonprofit.
00:12:38
Furthermore since 2012 this appeals nonprofit, paid her
00:12:42
profit Girls Club. 1.6 million dollars to produce films.
00:12:48
So, as you can see, as long as you set up, the right entities,
00:12:51
the nonprofit, the for-profit, you can start to funnel a lot of
00:12:55
money from one place to another. Last month, our investigation
00:13:00
broke, the story. That representation project was
00:13:02
not in compliance with the California charitable
00:13:04
solicitation act. Your organization was not
00:13:07
permitted to operate or solicit donations in California, most of
00:13:10
2022. All right, so let's start, she
00:13:13
has this nonprofit and it came out that she actually was not in
00:13:18
compliance with the charity with what, how you're supposed to run
00:13:24
a charity in California. This is from the globe in August
00:13:31
and September 20, 22 the globe, shared a report by open the
00:13:34
books, which sued and then Bubble Up La, the open the
00:13:39
books, Auditors found California state spending was 979 State
00:13:42
vendors, who give ten million dollars in political donations
00:13:45
to Gavin? Newsom dorian's 2010, 2018,
00:13:47
recall election, train twenty two election Cycles.
00:13:50
Meanwhile, these companies reaped 6.2 million dollars in
00:13:52
state payments. They also found this pay to
00:13:56
play. Do, do, do, do, do.
00:13:58
Do I add something sure. Go ahead.
00:14:03
The Girls Club entertainment was also out of compliance, starting
00:14:09
February 4th of 2020, until January 6 of 2021.
00:14:13
When they revived group, I've dealt with the, you know, the
00:14:16
correct paperwork, but heard the nonprofit.
00:14:23
Paid 100 and what was it? The representation project paid
00:14:28
Girls Club 150 dollars in 2020.
00:14:31
Now sure it's possible that they paid it in the first, you know,
00:14:35
four and a half weeks of the Year somewhere between January
00:14:38
1st and February 4th, but it's probably unlikely.
00:14:41
And so they paid the Girls Club entertainment which was not in
00:14:46
compliance and wasn't supposed to be operating as a business at
00:14:49
that time. A hundred fifty thousand dollars
00:14:51
during that time. So both both things were out of
00:14:55
compliance. Basically.
00:14:57
It's still accepting and receiving money.
00:15:01
And we we talked about this. How it seems odd that someone
00:15:05
was so much connection to power. And basically, right in the
00:15:10
middle of everything in Sacramento, couldn't get their
00:15:14
nonprofit in their corporation and compliance.
00:15:17
I mean, this is sort of like basic stuff that they don't.
00:15:22
Most people today attorneys to get take care of, don't you have
00:15:25
to have a board with a non-profit?
00:15:27
Like, isn't that a requirement? Yes, with a corporation is so
00:15:31
you have your board, you have your Treasurer, you have all
00:15:33
these people that should be, you know what, it's four, five, six,
00:15:36
seven people, at least that are running it.
00:15:39
So it's not like we're talking about this one, stay at home,
00:15:43
mom running around with all her kids and trying to do her at
00:15:46
home business and somehow some way, the paperwork just kind of
00:15:49
slipped on by, I would totally have graceful.
00:15:52
I get that, but even a working mom, I shouldn't say the
00:15:56
stay-at-home mom, just Eddie Eddie mom, you know, doing her
00:15:58
thing. This is a woman who has a
00:16:00
non-profit with a board who we're talking again, California?
00:16:04
Married to the governor of fifth largest economy in the whole
00:16:08
world and somehow she managed to to the corporation and the
00:16:12
nonprofit called a compliance. What's going on there?
00:16:17
I feel like there's just no excuse for that in this
00:16:20
situation. It goes on to say the nonprofit
00:16:25
is currently delinquent his charitable solicitation
00:16:27
registration California. The annual rrf one form
00:16:32
necessary to renew the organization status was rejected
00:16:35
early in 2022. So this was recent, this was
00:16:39
last year. The representation project
00:16:42
should have filed a new form and paid a 200 dollar fee $200.
00:16:47
It's hard to believe that the newsom's couldn't come up with
00:16:49
$200 and some attorney to figure this out, According to
00:16:55
California law, nonprofits cannot solicit funds.
00:16:57
While delinquent, nevertheless trp the representation project
00:17:01
solicited and accepted donations throughout the entirety of 2022,
00:17:08
fitting that I'm wearing my the elites hate you shirt.
00:17:12
Because this is just like, I mean talk about rules for the,
00:17:18
but not for me. I know that's like thrown around
00:17:20
a lot, but this is like an Act example, especially with the
00:17:24
newsom's that Jennifer was out of compliance.
00:17:29
Not following the law delinquent, not supposed to be
00:17:34
receiving funds. She still received funds, she
00:17:36
still received a lot of funds. There hasn't been any
00:17:40
investigation. Has there been any sort of
00:17:43
penalty? I mean most nonprofits, you have
00:17:46
to run them by the books because of the fact that they're
00:17:48
nonprofit because you get that benefit of you don't have to pay
00:17:52
taxes on certain things you have to pay a lot of taxes.
00:17:56
But because of that, because of those benefits comes with it,
00:18:01
the enormous amount of compliance and work, you have to
00:18:03
do to remain a non-profit most nonprofits.
00:18:07
I know No. They worried about like, well,
00:18:10
we're a non-profit. We can't be political and we
00:18:13
can't fear into this lane or that lane and it's a lot of work
00:18:17
to keep a non-profit in compliance Jennifer Newsom.
00:18:21
Just basically flaunted. All that was not in compliance,
00:18:24
didn't file, the paperwork and pay the measly 200 dollar fee.
00:18:28
And where's, where's her punishment?
00:18:32
Where why is she not being treated?
00:18:34
Exactly the same as the small nonprofit owner.
00:18:38
Who was just trying to make some, you know, do some help or
00:18:41
help the community or something like that.
00:18:44
She's not being punished. So, I haven't even heard that.
00:18:48
She's got a slap on the wrist to say, you're not supposed to be
00:18:51
taking this much money while all of 2022, you were delinquent.
00:18:57
And this is just, this is an exact example of the hypocrisy
00:19:02
and that sort of rules for the not for me.
00:19:05
Mantra of the newsom's and There's no other way to put a.
00:19:10
I mean there's you can go example, by example, by example
00:19:13
at the newsom's, but this has got to be the latest that.
00:19:16
I don't know how anyone could defend her doing this in terms
00:19:21
of soliciting when she's not supposed to be and the scheme
00:19:25
itself which we're going to dive more into.
00:19:27
But this is some shady stuff and it's not as aboveboard as I
00:19:34
think, they're trying to make it out to be What are your
00:19:37
thoughts? They're going to get away with
00:19:41
anything I made. Who's going to go after them,
00:19:45
right? And that's the thing.
00:19:47
Like who's going to investigate the governor's wife, when he has
00:19:51
so much power and influence in California.
00:19:55
It's not just because he's Governor but because he's
00:19:58
politically connected to so many people who can make.
00:20:03
I mean, if you're a rising Democrat in California.
00:20:08
You have to kind of Kiss the Ring of the newsom's.
00:20:12
You're not going to rise through the ranks without sort of
00:20:17
bending, a knee to the newsom's, because they have so much power
00:20:21
and influence, what are you going to do?
00:20:25
You're going to go against the newsom's and that seems to be a
00:20:29
one-way ticket to like, political or relevancy in.
00:20:31
California is, they'll just bury you as a Democrat.
00:20:35
So, who's gonna no one's going to investigate them?
00:20:39
And no one's going to call them out on it, because they're the
00:20:42
newsom's. Yeah.
00:20:45
So in like let's say the Secretary of State Attorney
00:20:52
General did something. Those are those hers friends?
00:20:54
They're just going to be like we didn't find anything wrong.
00:20:59
The report goes on to say after our work and earn national news
00:21:03
coverage to representation project quickly, scramble to
00:21:06
file their registration, paperwork.
00:21:09
Their paperwork with the California attorney general is
00:21:12
signed dated and receive January 12.
00:21:15
Process. That normally takes weeks was
00:21:18
executed in just hours. Okay, so it helped have friends
00:21:24
in high places, right? And so again, we have this sort
00:21:29
of no one's going to investigate them.
00:21:31
The Attorney General themselves should have been like wait a
00:21:34
second, you've been out of compliance for a whole year.
00:21:36
Maybe it's time for an investigation.
00:21:38
Maybe we should look in your nonprofit.
00:21:40
Now it's fine. We'll let you cut to the front
00:21:43
of the line and we'll sign off on it.
00:21:45
And And you'll be back in compliance within a matter of
00:21:48
hours, not in several weeks, which most people have to wait
00:21:51
for. So, not only the Jennifer
00:21:53
Newsom, and her nonprofit, not be in compliance and break the
00:21:57
law for an entire year. They were essentially given
00:22:04
preferential treatment by the chief law enforcement officer of
00:22:08
the state, the attorney general who then signed off on their
00:22:12
their documents to be in compliance within a mere matter
00:22:15
of hours. And there was no backlash at
00:22:17
all. That should anger people that
00:22:21
should really angry people how they get away with this.
00:22:23
And if you're not angry by this, then you're obviously just a
00:22:29
loyalist to the Democratic Party and Gavin Newsom.
00:22:31
But this is, this is frustrating to see and you look at this and
00:22:36
go when you have a one-party State who has so much control
00:22:41
and so much influence. What do you do, if the chief
00:22:46
executive officer or and the chief law enforcement officer
00:22:50
aren't holding people accountable, and they should be
00:22:52
holding them accountable. It really amazes me and my
00:22:56
husband and I were actually talking about it today.
00:22:58
What people are willing to turn a blind eye to And just not
00:23:03
care. And then, you know, he was
00:23:05
obviously voted back in. I think this came out after
00:23:09
after the recent election, but even the whole math, they would
00:23:12
last year's Super Bowl. You know, I only took it off her
00:23:15
photo and I didn't breathe with Gavin Newsom.
00:23:19
Hold my breath, for those two seconds.
00:23:21
And then, of course, a bunch of photos came out of him during
00:23:23
the game, not wearing a mask and, and people just so quickly,
00:23:26
forget that and don't care because they're going to vote
00:23:29
Democrat because they're loyalists.
00:23:31
Like you just said, Yeah, well speaking of something I didn't
00:23:35
do another thing. Like, he kind of thinks that did
00:23:40
not come out or came out right before the recall?
00:23:44
Do you remember the story about Rose McGowan how she came
00:23:47
forward because of Harvey Weinstein.
00:23:50
So Rose McGowan. If you remember the actress Lisa
00:23:54
I'm going to pull up this tab. Did they do?
00:23:59
Whoops? Old hold please.
00:24:07
Holding holding. There we go.
00:24:10
Every 2010. I have way too.
00:24:12
Many tabs open. Give it a second.
00:24:20
Any day now. Anyway, well while as well, then
00:24:24
here we go. Let's see, to do, I want to find
00:24:30
what she starts to talk about. This was in regards to Harvey
00:24:35
Weinstein. And she saw it, she started
00:24:40
speaking out about it. And this is one of her pose
00:24:45
where she blessed the hypocrisy. Remember, when Hollywood
00:24:47
actresses and paid off activists War, stupid black dresses, at
00:24:51
the Oscars that was sponsored by times up who were meant to help
00:24:55
abuse victims. I told the world they are like,
00:24:58
they were alive. Three years ago.
00:25:01
Wake up hard truths or inconvenient comfortable Alyssa.
00:25:04
It's lizard people like you SDK Knickerbocker.
00:25:08
Our coamo president, Tina Chen, who hurt people, your time is
00:25:13
up. So then there was a California
00:25:18
recall election coming up and she had an interview with Dave
00:25:22
Rubin and this was a big deal. I remember actually watching the
00:25:26
whole thing, like, Dave Rubin really pumped up this whole
00:25:29
interview. She shared that three months
00:25:31
before roses Weinstein story, broke back in 2017, Miss Newsome
00:25:37
sought Rose. Doubt in order to squash her
00:25:40
story, she asked Rose, what would it take to make you happy?
00:25:47
So this was her squashing. This Rose McGowan story.
00:25:54
Right before the election. Why do you think Jennifer wanted
00:26:00
to squash the story? Let's say she replied, I didn't
00:26:07
hold the Jennifer story. I totally forgot about her
00:26:10
actually until I was on Dave show and was only vaguely aware
00:26:13
of the recall. That's how little that blond
00:26:16
basic evil lady occupied my mind.
00:26:21
What was the story I can remember?
00:26:23
She Hold on, looking this up. What was the story?
00:26:27
Drop the bombshell? Oh yeah, she endorsed Larry
00:26:32
Elder, I remember that to do that. she thought the story was,
00:26:40
is that So this woman, I don't know.
00:26:44
This is what Rose McGowan said some blonde lady named with the
00:26:47
last thing. I knew some cold calls me and I
00:26:49
was like, David boies wants to know what it would take to make
00:26:53
you happy. So basically this was a long
00:26:57
time ago, I think what happened was Basically Jennifer Newsom
00:27:06
was trying to protect Harvey Weinstein with this because
00:27:11
Jennifer was in the film industry, she was in the
00:27:15
Hollywood in the film industry, that's sort of why she has this.
00:27:20
The video production company now and I think at the time, Rose
00:27:26
wanted to come forward with the story and Jennifer knew, some
00:27:30
cold calls around nowhere and says well what would it take to
00:27:34
make? You happy to not happy and not
00:27:38
talk about this but that story didn't come out with.
00:27:43
I don't think it came out with enough impact on the election,
00:27:47
obviously based on the recall. So yeah, just throw on that in
00:27:53
there as well. Another thing that she did
00:27:56
supposedly based on what Rose McGowan said.
00:28:01
And then she went in and she testified against Harvey
00:28:03
Weinstein. I believe she broke down and
00:28:04
cried, and there's a big deal. I'm sure she put on quite the
00:28:08
show for the Harvey. Weinstein crowd.
00:28:10
Anyway, let's go back to the article shot that I sent you.
00:28:14
I texted you this screenshot of the financials.
00:28:17
Yes you do. Hold on let me see.
00:28:22
If I can pull that up. They pull this up, hold on.
00:28:32
This is why we need a producer who can pull this stuff up a lot
00:28:34
faster than I can. We're hiring for the, the great
00:28:45
salary of free and heard, it will be a producer intern.
00:28:51
Okay, so what are we looking at here, you sent this screenshot
00:28:54
to me. These are Harvey Weinstein
00:28:58
stain, how we say his name. Political donations in
00:29:02
California. Mmm.
00:29:04
And so, he donated five thousand to Gavin Newsom for governor in
00:29:10
2010. Now that I mean, okay, whatever,
00:29:13
that's fine. He's the law, too.
00:29:15
To do that. But I just think it is
00:29:18
interesting that she Jennifer allegedly tries to silence Rose.
00:29:25
Then he's donating to her husband's Campaign, which he was
00:29:29
her husband. At this point, they got married
00:29:31
in 2008 and then she goes on to try to destroy him later when
00:29:38
it's convenient for her, I guess.
00:29:40
Yeah, so people can't really see right here.
00:29:43
It says Gavin. Newsom, Newsom for California,
00:29:45
Governor 2010. This was he wasn't successful.
00:29:50
This was a different run before he became Governor.
00:29:53
I think this is right here. I think that's something else
00:29:56
came out and kind of backed off of that run, right?
00:29:59
Yeah, well, Governor Moonbeam ran again.
00:30:02
So I think that kind of wanted to clear the field for Jerry
00:30:06
Brown to run again. And then it was sort of like a
00:30:11
It's okay, kid, like you be lieutenant governor and then
00:30:15
when Jerry Brown's gone you can be Governor.
00:30:19
But yeah, this was all stuff. That when Harvey Weinstein was
00:30:22
the darling of Hollywood and everybody loved him.
00:30:25
And everyone was talking about Grady was, and he was friends
00:30:28
with Oprah, and he shines all these people and I mean, this is
00:30:34
when all the abuse was happening and Newsome was accepting
00:30:37
campaign donations from him, so it would Harvey Weinstein if the
00:30:44
no one blew the lid on Harvey Weinstein, and what he was
00:30:47
doing. I bet that people still would be
00:30:50
taking money and having meeting which with Harvey Weinstein to
00:30:53
this day, like, if no one came forward, the only reason they
00:30:57
all came out and Said anything or tried to destroy him?
00:31:03
Was because it was the whole me to era and he sort of became the
00:31:07
big me to person. It was me too and everyone was
00:31:12
coming out and explain their stories.
00:31:15
And if that had never happened and none of those stories came
00:31:19
out, I bet you Harvey, Weinstein, would be donating to
00:31:24
Gavin's presidential campaign. Like, I think that's like, we're
00:31:29
honestly, that's where we're at. I bet he'd be giving Crap, ton
00:31:32
of money to Jennifer newsom's production company and
00:31:35
nonprofit. So it should probably accept a
00:31:39
minute and I'm not saying he's not a dirtbag and I'm glad
00:31:42
things came out and it's Hollywood's disgusting.
00:31:45
It's disturbing. And I think we all knew this was
00:31:47
going on, but no one was really willing to speak up and say
00:31:50
anything. And I'm glad that things came
00:31:52
out, which of course, that did open up the door for false
00:31:58
accusations or people taking a situation that was Was it
00:32:02
consensual? And then turning it in 2000 but
00:32:04
he raped me. I, you know, and that that's
00:32:08
horrific too. But it is.
00:32:15
This is probably I'm going to get so much hate if I say this
00:32:17
but I'm going to say it. Anyway, if women are willing to
00:32:21
sleep their way into a position, I'm sorry that's not rape.
00:32:26
And you did that to yourself. Yes.
00:32:29
A man took advantage of you, but you allowed it.
00:32:32
I mean you you decided that that role or whatever was more
00:32:36
important than your integrity and you allowed yourself in that
00:32:40
situation, that's not rape. It's just it's not their rape
00:32:45
exist. Yes, rape happened.
00:32:47
I'm not saying it didn't, but you were not naming names
00:32:54
because obviously, they're finding these situations but the
00:32:56
women allowed themselves to be taken advantage of because Famed
00:33:01
is important. That was their priority.
00:33:03
That's what they were after and they put themselves in
00:33:05
situations where they were going to socially climb their way
00:33:07
through all the wood. So I can't fault, man for them.
00:33:14
I mean, I disagree with it. I absolutely disagree with that.
00:33:17
I think it's horrific and sickening but there's men out
00:33:20
there like that if women are willing to put themselves in
00:33:23
that situation then are not going to say no.
00:33:27
Yeah, and I think it's Hollywood probably going to be the worst
00:33:30
of it. Where I mean it's always the
00:33:33
fabled casting couch and it's been going on.
00:33:38
Lord knows how long since Hollywood even started in Los
00:33:41
Angeles this is probably been going on probably just became
00:33:46
accepted. That was sort of how things were
00:33:49
done in Hollywood, Harvey Weinstein, just became he was
00:33:54
just the wrong time. Wrong era and he got called out
00:33:57
for me too. And again I'm not condoning that
00:33:59
any of this is saying any of it is acceptable.
00:34:02
That's just like you're saying But it does.
00:34:07
I think what we're trying to say is that it's interesting that
00:34:10
people had no problem associated with Harvey Weinstein because he
00:34:14
was a big powerful person in Hollywood.
00:34:18
I mean there's the character on Entourage who they make fun of
00:34:21
Harvey Weinstein and they like, they make like a character ature
00:34:25
of Harvey Weinstein and how powerful he is and how crazy he
00:34:29
is. And I think, I think it's even
00:34:34
more upsetting that there's probably women like Jennifer
00:34:38
Newsome who were aware this stuff happened and we're aware
00:34:43
because she was in the industry. How stuff happened?
00:34:48
And she never blew the whistle for as virtuous.
00:34:51
And as wonderful as she thinks she is, she let this happen.
00:34:55
She never came forward, she never was Brave about it.
00:34:58
She wanted to keep her place in the film industry and keep her
00:35:02
foot in Hollywood. And she had no problem letting
00:35:06
Harvey Weinstein donate to her husband's campaign for governor.
00:35:10
All of that was fine until he was caught and then Jennifer
00:35:13
Newsome had to go and testify, you know?
00:35:17
In trial and then all of a sudden it was a big issue so I
00:35:24
think that's the hypocrisy of it all.
00:35:26
Is that everyone was sort of okay with it and that's how
00:35:30
things were done and told me to happen and then people were not
00:35:33
okay with it and people who were okay with it all of a sudden
00:35:36
turned around and we're like, wait, I'm not okay with it now
00:35:39
because they blew the lid on it. So yeah, definitely a tricky
00:35:44
situation. But anyway, Back to Jennifer
00:35:48
Newsom and Office of the first partner.
00:35:51
So, if you think this sounds weird Office of the first
00:35:54
partner is a new thing. It's not something that is
00:36:02
customary in California, sort of California governance.
00:36:08
It's not like the office of the first lady.
00:36:10
It's the office of the first partner is that she took the
00:36:13
title in part to emphasize her contributions to the governor As
00:36:17
policy agenda, as you said, during a one interview or title
00:36:21
signals and intentional shift to reimagine, the role of a
00:36:24
Governor's spouse, all together as a partner who supports their
00:36:27
spouses work in service of the public.
00:36:30
Okay. That sounds nice in 2019,
00:36:33
Governor Newsom created office for his wife, as a division
00:36:36
within the governor's executive team, according to a press
00:36:39
release. The first partner in our team
00:36:40
will focus on lifting up women and their families breaking down
00:36:45
barriers for our youth and furthering the cause Gender
00:36:47
equity in California. Since he sat Inception, Jennifer
00:36:51
newsom's siebel newsom's office has received nearly four point
00:36:55
eight million in direct attacks. Payer funding.
00:36:58
The office of first partner has grown from Seven employees.
00:37:01
With a budget of seven hundred ninety one thousand to nine
00:37:04
employees with a bunch of one point.
00:37:06
One six, six proposed for 23 to 24.
00:37:10
So continues to grow continues to make more money.
00:37:15
How much money? I'm sorry.
00:37:19
I want to know her staff. What are they?
00:37:20
What is their job? What are their roles?
00:37:24
I believe? I just went over.
00:37:25
It was to reimagine the role of the governor spouse altogether
00:37:28
as a partner who supports their spouses work in service of the
00:37:31
public, right? Her she has staff.
00:37:34
She got like right what do her individual slump members?
00:37:37
Do they re imagine things? They are a partner who supports
00:37:40
their spouses work in the service of the public.
00:37:45
If that is, I believe that's pretty clear that she's now I it
00:37:52
says confusing to me is I'm not really quite sure.
00:37:55
I think they're just a liaison and I think they're part of.
00:37:58
They have an office in Sacramento right down the
00:38:02
hallway, from the governor and they're connected to State
00:38:07
Legislature and lobbyists, and that sort of continues.
00:38:10
The Vicious Cycle of the nonprofit in the for-profit.
00:38:17
Go Harry. Do you think he needed to keep
00:38:19
his wife busy so that he could have affairs?
00:38:21
And she Was busy doing her thing.
00:38:25
So he was like, here's here's a million dollars, how about it?
00:38:28
Well. I have heard rumors of that that
00:38:33
never came up that never came to fruition though.
00:38:36
Wasn't there a rumor? Like not too long ago that he
00:38:39
was having an affair with some secretary or something
00:38:43
speculation. When that whole thing with his
00:38:45
canceled trip, to Scotland happened and after his booster
00:38:49
shot and people were like, he's having a bad reaction.
00:38:53
No, she insisted it be cancelled because such and such was on the
00:38:57
agenda for they were, you know? Going to be a part of that trip
00:39:01
and she Jennifer didn't want that Tavern going with that
00:39:04
woman. I forget her name so it was a
00:39:08
lot of speculation but he has previously had affairs and he is
00:39:13
admitted that or at least one which is why I said that I'm not
00:39:17
accusing him of currently having an affair.
00:39:19
But he did previously have an affair that he admitted to.
00:39:22
Therefore, I am making a terrible joke that he's just
00:39:25
trying to keep his wife busy. So he can keep carrying on with
00:39:28
his affairs. Ruby Rippey Gibney.
00:39:34
He had her affair with her while he was the mayor of San
00:39:36
Francisco. So, his campaign managers wife,
00:39:42
right? I think is a, his campaign
00:39:47
managers wife. Yeah, his best friend's wife.
00:39:49
He had an affair with. That was the whole Travis Allen
00:39:51
thing. Yeah.
00:39:54
Where he called him out and said, why would you trust Gavin?
00:39:58
Newsom, if you can't trust him with your wife, people just
00:40:02
don't turn a blind eye and they just don't care.
00:40:05
Yeah, his infidelity and as long as she's getting paid, and she's
00:40:10
got her office. I mean, it's the Hillary Clinton
00:40:13
thing. You know, it's what everyone
00:40:15
says about Hillary Clinton is, why does she put up with Bill
00:40:17
and all his philandering? Because she got to be Senator,
00:40:22
and Secretary of State. That's why she became one of the
00:40:25
most powerful women in politics in American history.
00:40:29
So, yeah, if that's sort of the arrangement, you're fine with
00:40:34
then some people are fine with that arrangement.
00:40:37
Let's see. What else does it go on to say?
00:40:41
The wind will be in children is a major concern of Jennifer
00:40:44
stabile new. So once you engage with well,
00:40:46
but ironically newsom's notoriously strict lockdowns
00:40:49
exasperated. The youth Mental Health crisis,
00:40:51
a point even Jennifer siebel Newson, conceded.
00:40:54
This is just talking about the, how she's an advocate for
00:40:58
children's mental health between State, funding State regulation,
00:41:03
policy, advocacy, and radical moralizing explicitly intended
00:41:06
to shape, social Consciousness, Jennifer siebels Newsome,
00:41:10
Various government private public and philanthropic
00:41:13
Partners have proven to be a powerful, self-reinforcing
00:41:15
Network through the office of first partner sabeel.
00:41:18
Newsom has nine dedicated staffers 1.2 million dollar
00:41:21
annual budget? Choo choo helping secure nearly
00:41:25
5 billion in state funding for an additional 10 school
00:41:28
counselors. Political clout an attorney,
00:41:33
okay? So that's the whole open, the
00:41:38
books article on Newsome ink. There's some other stuff that we
00:41:44
can jump into if we want to talk about until we at right now.
00:41:47
Okay, so there is a video that I'm going to share.
00:41:53
This is from just one. Actually, well, I could bring up
00:41:59
several videos, but let's, this is one of her talking about one
00:42:03
of her new documentaries on ironically, Fox News.
00:42:07
So, pretty surprised to see Fox News.
00:42:12
Well, as we say at the start of every show and we did tonight,
00:42:15
one of our missions is to be pro-family.
00:42:18
So we wanted to share with you a new documentary out later this
00:42:20
week called fair play that shines a light on family,
00:42:24
gender, roles, only overlooked challenges of domestic life.
00:42:27
Take a look. When I became a mom, I felt like
00:42:31
my identity completely changed. I really didn't understand the
00:42:35
amount that she had to endure. It's not that sound, 10 minutes.
00:42:41
It goes back to the Twisted notion of where you just got to
00:42:44
ask for their help. I don't want to ask what time.
00:42:47
Yeah, I've to talk off from work or anything.
00:42:50
I became obsessed with a quest to figure out what was happening
00:42:53
job. When it comes to care, we're so
00:42:57
far behind. We are saying we value.
00:43:01
This is all just highlights from oh Bill Gates wife, isn't it?
00:43:04
Joining us now is the writer director and producer of fair
00:43:07
play. Jennifer siebel Newsom, Jen.
00:43:08
Great to see you. It's so easy to say, but what
00:43:14
does it mean in reality? It's a whole different thing.
00:43:18
And what I love about this film is that you really focus on the
00:43:21
specifics of what it means to be profoundly and what we need to
00:43:24
change. Change in order to make America
00:43:27
more profoundly. That's right.
00:43:29
Thank you. So really what we need to do in
00:43:32
America is recognized that the majority of households are
00:43:35
dual-income households, the days in ages of women at home at the
00:43:40
kitchen sink that far and few between, and we have so many
00:43:43
single parent households in this country as well.
00:43:45
It really takes a village and what this film recognizes is
00:43:48
that we all have lives outside of work and the workplace needs
00:43:52
to recognize that and uplift that.
00:43:54
So that people People can be their best selves at work.
00:43:57
And I'm just so grateful to have been able to make fair play.
00:44:00
Because it really was this deep dive into recognizing that the
00:44:04
majority of mothers are Breadwinners orko Brenner
00:44:07
Breadwinners. So 84 percent of black mothers
00:44:11
are primary or Co Breadwinners. 67 percent of Native American
00:44:15
Mothers, 62 percent of white mothers, and sixty percent of
00:44:18
Latino mothers are primary or Co Breadwinners.
00:44:21
And that's our new reality women's today.
00:44:25
Are doing more domestic work and Care work at home than mothers
00:44:29
in the 60s. So we have to check ourselves on
00:44:32
that and recognize that we've created workplaces that are
00:44:36
around Men's Life patterns and history of only bringing home
00:44:41
the bacon and then being taken care of at home, that's an old
00:44:44
model and in fact it didn't exist for many families
00:44:47
especially families of color. So the new reality is that we
00:44:50
have to create workplaces again that recognize that private
00:44:54
lives all So matter, so it's this dance between the public
00:44:57
and the private life that we need to unveil and accept and
00:45:03
then create policies like childcare and flextime and
00:45:07
family that will help move us all forward as a society.
00:45:12
And in which our society because we've been doing all of this
00:45:15
work on the unpaid and invisible facts and women.
00:45:21
Exactly. That's what's so interesting.
00:45:23
I mean it's so and one of the things that comes out so
00:45:26
strongly, you've got professional women, women who
00:45:29
work hard, they go out. They only often more than the
00:45:31
man in there. I just wanted to pause here and
00:45:35
I don't know if this is Steve Helton putting words in her
00:45:38
mouth. But it's interesting that he
00:45:41
talked about at the beginning that this documentary is
00:45:45
pro-family. And we've talked about this, a
00:45:49
lot on this platform, how a lot of Democrats are not necessarily
00:45:53
pro-family and they're not procreating families and they're
00:45:56
not Pros supporting families, their Pro.
00:45:58
Well, I should say their Pro, the government supporting your
00:46:02
family and their Pro. The government looking after
00:46:04
your kids and their Pro, you know, preschool that moment your
00:46:09
kid is potty trained, but they're not like like pro-family
00:46:13
like you and I would talk about being pro-family.
00:46:16
It seems like that's not in a line with what their policies
00:46:19
are that I couldn't see if she like really.
00:46:21
We agree with that in the beginning.
00:46:24
I think Steve was just kind of putting words in her mouth.
00:46:27
I don't know if did you pick up on that as well?
00:46:29
The whole pro-family thing I did but he asked her what that looks
00:46:32
like today saying, it's kind of the pro-family.
00:46:36
We could just throw that out but what does it actually mean?
00:46:39
But here's what I found, really interesting about everything
00:46:42
that was just said, and is specifically what he actually
00:46:44
just said is that they're talking about how women are
00:46:48
actually out earning husband's. In some of these dual income
00:46:52
households. Hmm, I thought we were still
00:46:55
fighting for women to earn earn more money because we're like
00:46:59
earning considerably less than men.
00:47:01
So now I'm confused or we know out earning her husband's.
00:47:03
I mean, I'm not, I don't work but women that are working.
00:47:06
Are they out earning their husbands?
00:47:08
Now is that the majority because that's what they just made it.
00:47:13
Yeah, that's why I mean, I thought the whole thing was the
00:47:15
wage gap between it was like, what 73 cents for every dollar
00:47:19
that was Her office now like I was looking at the web page and
00:47:24
there was like the whole, you know, equity for women thing and
00:47:29
so it sounds like it's flipped but then back to what you just
00:47:32
said about policies, like they say they're pro-family but it
00:47:34
seems like they are always enacting these policies that
00:47:37
really hurt family financial. So they're talking about, I
00:47:40
understand someone will want to work and I'm not you know,
00:47:43
talking on that whatsoever. But Democrat policies tend to
00:47:48
hurt families in the sense that they're making it unaffordable
00:47:52
for moms to stay home. And they need to have
00:47:55
dual-income households and this is now, okay, well, since we
00:47:59
need that, now we need to, you know, share in the home
00:48:03
responsibilities. Which I understand that to if
00:48:06
both parents are working, you know, both should probably be
00:48:09
helping out at home. But she's like, well, let's, you
00:48:14
know, change the norm now since most In most households are
00:48:17
dual-income, but what about changing policy to help a parent
00:48:23
be able to stay home. Right.
00:48:26
Where's where's that? Yeah, it's well let's just
00:48:31
continue to push it the way it is.
00:48:33
I'm supposed to equalizing it which yeah.
00:48:41
Hey, I thought I was just interesting how they were
00:48:43
talking about pro-family. When the newsom's near Democrats
00:48:46
are not entirely appropriate things to Republicans.
00:48:50
I think I can't. Yeah.
00:48:51
It does definitely mean completely different things.
00:48:55
All right, let's finish this out and then we'll go on to some
00:48:58
other videos. Then the household in that
00:49:01
traditional setup and of course, there are families but you've
00:49:04
all sorts of different arrangements and some many
00:49:08
single-parent families as well. And then come home and do a
00:49:11
whole second job. It's unpaid, as you say, what,
00:49:20
what, what could we do to? I mean, just in terms of the
00:49:24
policies. Yeah.
00:49:25
What's the, what's the sort of central idea is it that
00:49:27
actually, if companies let's just focus on the employer piece
00:49:31
here gave men more get, was it set an expectation that men
00:49:35
would also be given time to be effective through the parental
00:49:39
role in the family. Realize that one of the
00:49:41
directions you'd like to move in.
00:49:44
Yeah, so there's what needs to happen in the home and what
00:49:47
needs to happen at work at home. Fathers need to step into care.
00:49:51
There's so many benefits to Father, stepping into Care at
00:49:53
home. We've actually found that when
00:49:55
father's do 40 percent of the domestic work and childcare,
00:49:59
they're less likely to be on prescribe meds, or
00:50:02
antidepressants. They're happier, they've greater
00:50:05
longevity. They have better sex lives.
00:50:07
Their marriages are more stable there, their Partners.
00:50:11
If there are their partners are women Are happier more
00:50:17
fulfilled, they have more Leisure Time.
00:50:18
Their marriages again are more stable, their children benefit
00:50:21
to. And it's really cool to hear
00:50:24
that. It's others.
00:50:25
Do percent of the child care in domestic work.
00:50:28
The children have less behavioral problems.
00:50:31
Cognitive development and healthier long-term
00:50:33
relationships. So it's a win-win.
00:50:35
If father step into more Care at home in the workplace, then we
00:50:38
have to reduce the stigma around Men, playing a role in care.
00:50:42
We all know that when you're a father you're a caregiver.
00:50:47
But by virtue of contributing to the birth of the child, you are
00:50:52
a caregiver. It is your responsibility to and
00:50:54
your children. As I mentioned earlier, your
00:50:56
partner and you will all benefit from spending more time in here.
00:51:01
Got out of the pandemic. So many fathers actually got a
00:51:04
little glimpse of that and recognize, that's pretty
00:51:07
special. I'm sorry.
00:51:38
Jennifer. I'm getting an assigned to go to
00:51:41
commercial. Okay.
00:51:48
That's enough of that. It's enough.
00:51:50
Steve Hilton gushing all over. Jennifer Newsom.
00:51:54
He probably got the meat of the said, okay, that's about enough
00:51:57
new some time on Fox News, so we don't care if it's the wife of
00:52:01
Gavin. Newsom, that's about as far as
00:52:03
we're going to take it. We've gotten our fill.
00:52:08
All right, so that's that. Did you know that Jennifer
00:52:15
Newsome? Also speak Spanish?
00:52:17
I think I heard something. Did you know she's fluent in
00:52:21
Spanish? Gavin Newsom did during his
00:52:25
inauguration speech earlier this year mentioned that she learned
00:52:27
Spanish during the lockdown. Do you want to see some of her
00:52:32
speaking that speaking Spanish? Of course I do.
00:52:38
Okay, So that was not actually
00:53:03
Jennifer Newsom speaking Spanish, but it does sound a lot
00:53:06
like it. So this is actually her speaking
00:53:09
Spanish. Whew, don't need the ad.
00:53:14
Epic fail. Big fail.
00:53:53
The reason we bring this up, it's kind of funny.
00:53:55
You pointed it out that you found this article way back from
00:54:02
what when was this 2004 s is like an old article.
00:54:08
So it's not she's not even married yet this is yeah May
00:54:11
2004 and Lucy are Jennifer siebel helping the world in
00:54:19
Hollywood and you you were able to find this.
00:54:23
So this is one of your amazing finds.
00:54:25
She doesn't looks completely different.
00:54:31
That's what you don't want. Yeah.
00:54:33
She's pretty pretty. Yeah.
00:54:39
Trying to find the this is her, you know, doing her makeup and
00:54:43
the hotel room very important. Where did I miss?
00:54:46
It's up here, somewhere. I know it's wherever it talks
00:54:49
about like graceful, she went to Costa Rica.
00:54:52
While a child, siebel was introduced to conservation
00:54:55
International and one summer, during high school, she went to
00:54:58
Costa Rica to work for the group.
00:54:59
She speaks fluent Spanish. Now, the ironic thing is that
00:55:05
either her husband does not pay attention to her enough or
00:55:10
that's not true. Because when he gave his
00:55:13
inauguration speech just a month or so ago that we watched it, he
00:55:19
did bring up how proud of his wife.
00:55:21
He was because she would learn Spanish during the pandemic.
00:55:23
That's what she was busy doing. Or that was one of the things
00:55:27
she kept herself busy doing because she announced or Add
00:55:31
this big thing in Spanish and I think enough people picked up on
00:55:35
it, that didn't sound like completely fluent, Spanish, or
00:55:37
someone would practice enough Spanish.
00:55:41
And so either she was fluent in Spanish since 2004 or And her
00:55:50
husband does not pay attention to her enough to know that she
00:55:53
does speak fluent Spanish or she was lying.
00:55:57
So I'll leave that up to our listeners to figure out.
00:56:00
What do you think. Whether she actually speaks
00:56:02
fluent Spanish, or she just kind of made that up, maybe gather
00:56:06
will watch fair play and he'll realize he's been neglecting her
00:56:10
and it'll pay more attention to her and pick up on what she
00:56:13
does. And does not know Do you want to
00:56:17
watch a little bit of one of their videos?
00:56:21
What kind of finish out the episode with this?
00:56:25
This is a video that This was no.
00:56:30
Yes, please. Okay, okay.
00:56:32
We're going to watch a little bit of this, this video.
00:56:35
This is just sort of an idea of like the videos that are
00:56:38
producing and sending out to schools.
00:56:42
So If it loads. Awkward time not to load
00:56:55
holding. Holding, here we go.
00:57:04
misrepresentation for those who, Part one.
00:57:09
How does the media influence our culture?
00:57:23
They spend 17 hours a week, listening to music, 3 hours a
00:57:25
week watching movies. Four hours a week reading
00:57:30
magazines, 10 hours a week online and that's 10 hours and
00:57:36
45 minutes of media consumption a day.
00:57:39
That's a lot of media consumption.
00:57:41
Feel like I'm not even awake though.
00:57:43
It Specifically BlackBerry cell
00:58:28
phones, according to this documentary.
00:58:35
Kids, you're not on Facebook. That's what Boomers that's true.
00:58:40
Kids are not on Facebook anymore.
00:59:22
First female, vice president candidate.
00:59:26
They have to ask if she had breast implants.
00:59:50
okay, I think it's a good preview of Of what what you kind
00:59:55
of passing around in schools for audio listeners.
00:59:59
The other is a lot of gratuitous Imaging including a like a video
01:00:05
game stripper with like tape over her breasts.
01:00:09
So this is being shown to middle schoolers.
01:00:13
Here's my issue. As I'm watching this and this
01:00:15
may be a good way to kind of end in some up.
01:00:17
This whole thing outside of the fact that she's now using the
01:00:21
lever, As of government in power, to make millions of
01:00:24
dollars for herself and her family because let's just face
01:00:27
it, that money isn't going into like a private offshore account.
01:00:30
That money is probably going into the Newsome family.
01:00:35
I think Jennifer Newsom and this kind of ties in with the whole
01:00:38
Harvey. Weinstein thing.
01:00:40
Jennifer Newson was a product of Hollywood.
01:00:44
She's been in Hollywood and maybe now she's trying to
01:00:47
rectify all the issues of Hollywood in the media.
01:00:53
But I feel like this is stuff that maybe while she was in
01:00:57
Hollywood, it probably, maybe she was trying to be.
01:01:01
She was part of an industry that did promote this.
01:01:03
That was the, this is the way it was done.
01:01:07
Now that she has the power of being the wife of the governor
01:01:10
and she doesn't have to worry about Hollywood anymore.
01:01:12
She can kind of tackle these issues I guess it.
01:01:15
What I'm trying to say is it's easy to be bold when you have
01:01:18
nothing to lose and you're the first partner of the governor of
01:01:21
California. It's probably a lot harder to be
01:01:24
like a Rose, McGowan who speaks out, and speaks, you know, her,
01:01:30
her truth or honest truth. Or honest opinion when she
01:01:35
knows, she could never be booked for a gig or any acting job ever
01:01:39
again in her life. So, I guess she kind of probably
01:01:44
made her bones in Hollywood. The way it was whether it was
01:01:49
the Harvey Weinstein's and the way media portrayed.
01:01:54
I mean, we just saw images in that article, they definitely
01:01:58
played her up to look. You know, like a young beautiful
01:02:02
woman that, you know, that the media she is railing.
01:02:05
Now, she's turning around and railing against women.
01:02:08
Being objectified when she was in that magazine sort of being
01:02:12
objectified. So I guess that's my issue with
01:02:16
Jennifer news. Is that she is now.
01:02:19
She was a benefit of the beneficiary of this and now
01:02:22
she's trying to preach against it.
01:02:25
The simple term is it's just massive hypocrisy.
01:02:28
So feels like she's an opportunist.
01:02:31
Yes like she absolutely no had a bit of Fame.
01:02:36
I wouldn't say that she wasn't an A-list actress by any means
01:02:38
but yeah, even that article from 2004, I think the opening
01:02:42
sentence says something about 29 year old.
01:02:45
But looking at least five years younger which Course that's, you
01:02:48
know, ass women want to look younger.
01:02:50
We do. And I don't disagree with what I
01:02:52
saw in her film. That that is being thrown at
01:02:57
kids young. You know, it's being thrown at
01:03:00
adults to, oh my gosh, the ads that I get on Instagram, I'm
01:03:04
starting to feel bad about myself, like, oh my God, I need
01:03:07
all the things like it's amazing what charging advertisement
01:03:11
does. So I don't necessarily disagree
01:03:14
with the message there but yeah, it's always the hypocrisy.
01:03:17
Where it's just like, you know, she made her way through
01:03:19
Hollywood. Paul speaks of her way through
01:03:22
Hollywood. I can't actually say that she
01:03:24
did but appears that way, but now all of a sudden when things
01:03:27
came out, you know, oh nope. He briefed me know that industry
01:03:31
is terrible or she hasn't said that's terrible.
01:03:34
But this is what's being thrown women's faces.
01:03:35
Even though she was a part of, she literally was a part of
01:03:40
throwing that in other and girls women's faces.
01:03:43
And yeah, this video I feel like is completely dated because I
01:03:48
feel like a tree I mean the fact that they say kids are on
01:03:52
Facebook I'm like kids are not on Facebook anymore.
01:03:55
Your mom, she's obviously a very old video and their picture of
01:03:58
cell phones were all black berries.
01:04:01
I don't really feel like I see that sort of imagery, maybe the
01:04:04
media has changed. But anyway the more important
01:04:07
issue is this representation project and how she's kind of
01:04:12
set herself up into a cozy way, obviously your husband has no
01:04:16
problem with it, obviously he fully supports it.
01:04:20
I mean He gave her the office of the first partner, you know only
01:04:24
supports it and he can set the budget and say, oh it's a sub
01:04:30
office of my office. So guess what?
01:04:32
It's under my purview, and how that doesn't kind of reeked of
01:04:36
any ethical issues. I guess because it's equivalent
01:04:39
to the office of the first lady but the, the newsom's You know,
01:04:46
they didn't get to where they are and Newsome, didn't make one
01:04:52
point seven million dollars last year, according to his tax
01:04:54
returns by being dumb and they're smart enough, you know,
01:05:00
and a lot of people think that Gavin Newsom and the newsom's
01:05:03
are dumb. Never underestimate your
01:05:06
opponent. And Gavin.
01:05:07
Newsom is definitely not dumb. He's pretty Savvy.
01:05:12
They're both very smart. Yeah.
01:05:16
You know, I'm talking about. I think it's too and she's very
01:05:21
athletic and seems like she was an overachiever honestly.
01:05:29
Yeah, but we did it and we didn't talk about the fact that
01:05:34
she was a registered Republican until 2008.
01:05:39
Oh, I didn't even know she was a registered Republicans till
01:05:41
2000, so 2000 8. And then when she went to
01:05:46
re-register, I didn't write it down, but she actually
01:05:51
accidentally registered as some far-right party and then
01:05:58
interesting. What independent?
01:06:02
But is she a Democrat? Now we're seeing independent.
01:06:04
I don't think so. I think she's no party
01:06:06
preference or or even it's like hidden interesting.
01:06:16
Yeah, well, we know people change.
01:06:17
It's like Nathan Fletcher was a republican for a long time and
01:06:20
then sure it was politically convenient, opportunist
01:06:24
opportunist. So, yeah, I guess, my final
01:06:28
thoughts are on all of this. I'm not shocked by it, you know,
01:06:33
like when I saw this and I read it and I dove into it.
01:06:37
I'm not shocked by any of this. I think this is all pretty par
01:06:42
for the course in California. I think this is par for the
01:06:45
course for Newsome and his family.
01:06:48
It's par for the course that I'm not shocked, that she was out of
01:06:52
compliance for an entire year and nobody did anything about
01:06:57
it. I mean, it's just, it's par for
01:06:59
the course when the newsom's are in power.
01:07:01
And it is kind of fitting that we're recording this on the day
01:07:05
that he ended the state of emergency, he set it to end on
01:07:10
Today we're on totally worth it all.
01:07:14
Yeah, we did actually play it this way.
01:07:16
We just kind of pick the date. We went with this topic.
01:07:19
You actually wanted a different topic, your audience voted.
01:07:23
That's right. Yes, the audience voted.
01:07:25
We were going to talk about National divorce in California,
01:07:28
but people were more interested in Newsome ink.
01:07:30
So thank you to the audience and all those people who voted.
01:07:34
So I hope they all tune into this episode because you picked
01:07:38
it and this is where protecting do.
01:07:40
Chakra. See here at California
01:07:42
underground. As they say, it's like
01:07:43
protecting democracy in Ukraine, but we're getting off topic.
01:07:48
Yeah, so, I'm not surprised, I'm not surprised.
01:07:52
What are your final thoughts on Newsome ink, and the grift that
01:07:58
Jennifer Newsom is set up for herself.
01:08:01
There is actually more of a grift happening and now I
01:08:06
forget, I should have sent you the article maybe I did, and I
01:08:09
would have to find it, but There's a third nonprofit that
01:08:13
popped up very recently. And so there's actually no
01:08:16
financials on it. It's the California Partners
01:08:20
project and she's on there. And so I don't know if she's
01:08:23
getting paid from that but that she's definitely on the board of
01:08:28
that nonprofit. And like I said, no, financials
01:08:31
are available on it. So that one we have to watch.
01:08:33
We'll have to see what happens with that.
01:08:35
And I would encourage everyone to continue to watch and see
01:08:39
what happens with the Owls with Newsome where his money is
01:08:44
coming from to see, you know, if he ends up jumping into
01:08:48
presidential election coming soon and just that would
01:08:53
encourage everyone to continue to like, watch these companies
01:08:56
and where the money is coming because we can, you know, these
01:08:58
nonprofits have to release their financials.
01:09:01
Yeah. Hello.
01:09:04
So there's a new one on the horizon.
01:09:06
They'll probably be a follow-up episode to talk about that one.
01:09:11
All right well I think we covered it will wrap on that and
01:09:16
do some ink. Check it out.
01:09:18
Definitely go check out, open the books.com.
01:09:20
There are great organization. They do a lot of group work and
01:09:24
on Andrew I keep saying is Andrew londre.
01:09:27
I think it's Andrew. Andrew is a great guy who's been
01:09:30
a guest on the show and he's always willing to To spread this
01:09:32
information, he's fighting the good fight so check them out if
01:09:35
you want to throw a couple bucks their way.
01:09:38
I think they take donations or something.
01:09:41
Maybe maybe they're nonprofit. I do remember, maybe they're
01:09:46
being funded by a film industry, who knows?
01:09:51
But yeah, go check them out. They do a lot of good work.
01:09:54
So on that note. Thanks for tuning in.
01:09:57
Best thing you can do to support this podcast.
01:09:59
Make sure you share it with a friend.
01:10:01
Make sure you send them a text. Text or message and say hey you
01:10:03
should check out this really interesting episode about how
01:10:06
the new Sims are making billions dollars off of taxpayer funds
01:10:09
and how they've set it up to make a million dollars off of
01:10:12
everything else. That's always the best way you
01:10:15
can support the show, you can subscribe like share review,
01:10:19
listen on Spotify, watch us on YouTube, all that stuff.
01:10:23
And yeah we'll see on the next one.
01:10:26
Have a good night, everybody. Text or message and say hey you
01:10:03
should check out this really interesting episode about how
01:10:06
the new Sims are making billions dollars off of taxpayer funds
01:10:09
and how they've set it up to make a million dollars off of
01:10:12
everything else. That's always the best way you
01:10:15
can support the show, you can subscribe like share review,
01:10:19
listen on Spotify, watch us on YouTube, all that stuff.
01:10:23
And yeah we'll see on the next one.
01:10:26
Have a good night, everybody.