With the Impeachment Hearings underway, the circus is fully on display. With heaps of hearsay evidence, Adam Schiff looks to impeach the President over disgruntled desk jockeys who don't like how he conducts business.
But did President Trump set up the Democrats to fall into this Ukraine trap? Will it end up helping to drain the swamp?
With California facing more wildfires and power outages, California is poised to enter a literal and figurative Dark Age. Because of this more people than ever are fleeing the state to escape a state that is teetering on becoming a third world state.
Show Links
- This Impeachment Is About Who Sets Foreign Policy
- Could It Be That Trump Has Been Setting Up the Left All Along?
- California Power Outages A Look Into Future
- California Exodus Is Real
00:00:06
If you're a California, conservative a Libertarian, a
00:00:09
moderate Democrat. Believe in common sense or just
00:00:12
the same person. This is the political podcast
00:00:15
for you. It's the California underground
00:00:17
podcast. What's going on everybody?
00:00:21
Thank you for tuning in to another episode.
00:00:44
There's a lot to talk about with it.
00:00:46
There's some other stuff. All talked about was Carson
00:00:48
California. So let's get started with our
00:00:51
out of the gate monologue. I'm going to stretch some legal
00:00:56
muscle here for a second. I mean, I think I have the right
00:00:59
to as I've worked hard to become an attorney.
00:01:01
So I think it's only fair that I get a chance to do so, and I
00:01:06
will say this conviction can with conviction representative,
00:01:09
Mike Quigley. Is a line hack for what he said
00:01:13
in the impeachment hearings this week.
00:01:15
Who there? I said I feel better if you
00:01:18
didn't watch any of the impeachment hearings and I don't
00:01:21
blame you if you did it, there wasn't really much going on
00:01:23
represented my Quigley said something that would make any
00:01:26
attorneys head explode. That is of course if you are an
00:01:30
attorney who is so infected? With Trump derangement syndrome,
00:01:33
that you abolish everything you know in favor of my impeachment.
00:01:38
He stated that quote, hearsay evidence is often better than
00:01:42
direct evidence unquote. Wait, hold up.
00:01:50
I do remember hearing that in law school or when preparing for
00:01:53
a trial never do at Ernie's prep for trial and sit in their
00:01:57
conference rooms and say, gee, I hope we can find even more
00:02:02
hearsay evidence because of how much better it is there than
00:02:05
direct evidence or do they sit around say, you know, what's
00:02:08
missing in this trial, more hearsay evidence.
00:02:12
It's because it simply isn't true attorneys, don't think
00:02:16
hearsay. A evidence is better than direct
00:02:17
evidence because they know it is difficult to allow into a trial
00:02:22
hearsay. Summed up quickly is evidence
00:02:24
that the witness does not have direct knowledge of.
00:02:27
They heard it from someone else and are trying to use in court
00:02:30
to prove the truth of the matter asserted it's like if you were a
00:02:33
witness in the only thing you knew what was someone else told
00:02:36
you? Now, the reason this is
00:02:38
unreliable is because it doesn't give the accused the right to
00:02:41
cross-examine the person who actually set it.
00:02:43
In fact, it's downright unconstitutional.
00:02:47
And yes, there are exceptions before everyone says.
00:02:50
But fail there's so many exceptions to hearsay.
00:02:54
Of course there is, but there they have very specific purposes
00:02:58
and they are the exception, not the rule.
00:03:03
And there's always a very good rationale behind it.
00:03:05
For example, when someone is about to die in this is called
00:03:07
the dying declaration hearsay exception and they blurt
00:03:11
something out. They take that as allowable in
00:03:15
court. Now, of course, you can't
00:03:17
cross-examine the person who died, and it's also a belief
00:03:21
that because you were about to die, you were more likely to
00:03:24
tell the truth in your final moments and lie about something
00:03:26
because you have no benefit of lying right before you die.
00:03:31
However, this week there was none of that instead, as
00:03:34
representative. Jim Jordan, expertly pointed
00:03:35
out, he's heard church prayer, chains more, reliable than what
00:03:38
Ambassador Taylor said this week.
00:03:41
Ambassador Taylor, heard from someone who heard from someone
00:03:43
else then relate to someone else.
00:03:46
And then back to Ambassador Taylor, sounds reliable, right?
00:03:51
Ever play the telephone game. Does he end sentence ever?
00:03:54
Come out the same way as it started?
00:03:57
There's a reason for represented Quigley's idiotic statement.
00:04:00
However, it's because he is trying to help the Democrats by
00:04:03
laying the groundwork that there really is something there to
00:04:05
impeach President Trump on and by golly, we have loads of
00:04:08
hearsay evidence for you to hear.
00:04:12
None of the witnesses could Aqueduct adequately testify to
00:04:14
any direct knowledge of any impeachable offense by
00:04:17
President. Trump, they can only talk about
00:04:19
how they feel. President Trump didn't do what
00:04:21
normal presence do, which is allowed deep State, operatives,
00:04:24
like them decide foreign policy. Their feelings, their were hurt.
00:04:29
Their Authority was question, so they have an ax to grind against
00:04:32
President Trump and don't let the mainstream media tell you
00:04:35
differently. This was a very bad week for the
00:04:37
Democrats. Nothing of substance came out of
00:04:39
the hearings nada zilch Ouch. They are they will try to say
00:04:44
that the witness is just exposed to deep Corruption of President
00:04:47
Trump but they didn't reveal anything.
00:04:49
If you're worried about Senate Republicans, maybe not falling
00:04:52
in line to protect the president this week.
00:04:55
This should have solidified, it unless there is a bombshell
00:04:58
witness still yet to come out this hasn't done anything to
00:05:01
push needle at all. Even CNN's Jeffrey toobin said
00:05:05
how bad it was that. Nobody had any direct contact
00:05:07
with the president and that's a problem.
00:05:11
But the circus will continue. It keeps going this way.
00:05:15
They'll be closing up the tent, pretty soon in leaving town.
00:05:19
And of course, this is just one more failed attempt to stop
00:05:21
President Trump in undo, the will of 60 million voters, based
00:05:25
on nothing. More and what somebody said to
00:05:28
somebody else So a lot went on this week and if you watched the
00:05:33
couple days of hearings and the impeachment hearings, you saw
00:05:35
that there are a couple people who are trotted out people from
00:05:38
the state department George can Ambassador Taylor.
00:05:41
Maria yovanovich was the one on the third day who I'm just going
00:05:46
to say Marie jovanovic reminds me so much of Lena Headey.
00:05:51
It's a I can't I look at her. I said this is what Lena Headey
00:05:54
is going to be like in like 30 years.
00:05:58
That's my when you look at her again just think of that and
00:06:02
maybe you'll agree with me but like I said, there's a lot of
00:06:06
not, it's a lot of hearsay and you're starting to see that the
00:06:09
whole issue here was not necessarily the fact that
00:06:13
President Trump did something wrong that.
00:06:15
There's his quid pro quo, that there was this bribery notice.
00:06:19
They've also expertly change the narrative from quid pro quo to
00:06:23
bribery. Why is that?
00:06:25
Because bribery sounds more I guess.
00:06:31
Nefarious, it's the word. You should be looking for it
00:06:34
sounds worse to people. So they're now they've changed
00:06:38
the whole idea of quid pro quo because people maybe don't know
00:06:40
what quid pro quo means. And it sounds a little too
00:06:44
formal and legally. So people have just gone ahead
00:06:45
and said, well it's bribery, that's what it is.
00:06:48
It's just bribery. and that's, it was a subtle change, but you
00:06:55
notice that it went from the quid pro quo to the bribery,
00:06:59
Because they're trying to do anything they can to just
00:07:01
basically drag this out and tarnish President Trump as long
00:07:04
as possible and they talked about it a little bit there's a
00:07:07
good article in the American Thinker an opinion piece talking
00:07:11
about how maybe the Democrats are really painted themselves
00:07:15
into a corner with this and maybe President Trump sort of
00:07:18
set them up for this whole thing.
00:07:20
At the first thing I want to get to is this article from the
00:07:23
Federalist and it sort of touches upon what I said in the
00:07:26
out of the gate monologue, which is that it's not necessarily the
00:07:30
President Trump did something wrong like illegal or an
00:07:33
impeachable offense. It's that he did something
00:07:36
wrong. In the eyes of the deep State,
00:07:38
and the state department, and the cronies and the bureaucrats
00:07:41
and the desk jockeys who have been there for decades and
00:07:43
decades, they've been used to being the people who have run
00:07:47
foreign policy. And now you have someone who's
00:07:51
come along And doesn't let them do it and he's figured out back
00:07:55
channels and runarounds from the state department.
00:07:58
He's gutted the state department leaving it without people filled
00:08:02
in vacancies, which is something I'm Marie.
00:08:04
Jovanovic said she said, oh there's he hasn't filled a lot
00:08:07
of these vacancies even though people he said we don't need
00:08:11
these many people here. There's no reason I have this
00:08:13
many people so you can tell this is a lot of the fact that he got
00:08:18
it. Maybe he got it or recalled or
00:08:21
he changed his mind or he changed how foreign policy was
00:08:24
done from the White House but I don't remember electing people
00:08:28
in the state department and that's the issue here is that
00:08:30
you elect a president because you believed in his foreign
00:08:33
policy and the foreign policy comes down from him.
00:08:37
And as since it's part of the Executive Branch, the state
00:08:41
department, and he's the head of the executive branch, you elect
00:08:46
the president to decide what to do with foreign policy in the
00:08:49
state department. And now you have the state
00:08:50
department who are all hurt and disappointed at President, Trump
00:08:55
isn't doing exactly what they wanted him to do this article
00:08:59
from the federals is called The impeachment inquiry is really
00:09:03
about who sets US foreign policy.
00:09:06
Despite the historical headlines in the mainstream media, there
00:09:08
was no bombshell on the first day of public testimony in the
00:09:11
house. Impeachment inquiry is actually
00:09:13
very boring and tedious, but for those who have the patience to
00:09:16
sit through it on Wednesday, testimony veteran State
00:09:18
Department, officials, William Taylor and George can't date
00:09:21
help clarify with this impeachment inquiry is all about
00:09:23
disagreement between President Trump and a Cote.
00:09:26
A of career State Department bureaucrats about what US policy
00:09:30
should be in. Ukraine, to put it more bluntly.
00:09:34
The Democrats impeachment inquiry is about whether the
00:09:36
president or unelected, officials in the state
00:09:38
department, should be able to determine u.s. foreign policy
00:09:41
and to find US national interests abroad.
00:09:44
What we heard Wednesday was a lot of opinions from Taylor, can
00:09:47
about what US policy should be in Ukraine.
00:09:49
And what serves the national interest there, Both President
00:09:52
Trump has a different view of whose opinion should matter.
00:09:55
Clearly the president's opinion is one that counts because the
00:09:58
president not the State Department officials sets, u.s.
00:10:00
foreign policy. Like I said, it's the president
00:10:03
because we elect the president we don't elect the state
00:10:06
department people in the desk jockeys to figure out our
00:10:08
foreign policy but in Democratic styling Democrat styling which
00:10:13
has been dutifully pirated by the media.
00:10:15
The impeachment inquiry is all about whether Trump made us
00:10:17
security Aid, to Ukraine dependent on an investigation of
00:10:20
bird asthma in the Biden's. Quid pro quo and investigation
00:10:23
of Trump's political rival in exchange, for hundreds of
00:10:26
millions in USA, to maintain this narrative, Democrats have
00:10:29
had to insist, there could be no other motive for Trump to want
00:10:32
such an investigation. But of course, there are
00:10:35
perfectly valid reasons to think that corruption investigations.
00:10:38
Ukraine, might serve other broader, interests that go
00:10:41
beyond what Trump's re-election. Kent himself testified that such
00:10:45
investigations were in fact, legitimate given the history of
00:10:49
endemic corruption in Ukraine. Specifically record of
00:10:51
corruption at Purisima whose owner has been his first been
00:10:55
investigated during the Obama Administration, you ain't using
00:10:58
us funds. Democrats are paying themselves
00:11:02
into a corner here. Arguing that only their now
00:11:04
interpretation of Trumps motives is valid when clearly there are
00:11:08
other more plausible interpretations that are better
00:11:11
supported by the facts. To take one example, Taylor said
00:11:16
Wednesday, he doesn't think, Ukraine owes the United States
00:11:19
anything other than appreciation.
00:11:29
Well, many Americans, including the president self might
00:11:31
disagree with that. There are perfectly good reasons
00:11:33
to think, Ukraine or any other country that receives us Aid.
00:11:36
Might owe the United States. Something more than quote
00:11:39
appreciation. Maybe such countries also
00:11:42
America some level of cooperation and advancing US
00:11:45
national interest as defined by the president.
00:11:47
United States not Ambassador Taylor or any other unelected
00:11:51
bureaucrat. This is in fact exactly how the
00:11:54
Trump Administration views the matter which is likely, the
00:11:56
reason Reason Trump and other Administration officials have
00:11:59
been so adamant that there was no quid pro quo, the
00:12:02
administration's interest in the Biden's a yzma and 2016 election
00:12:06
meddling appear. So again backward-looking, not
00:12:08
forward-looking if Taylor and Ken and other State Department
00:12:12
officials. Don't agree with Trump about
00:12:14
that. This that's fine.
00:12:16
They are free to disagree. There are also free to be
00:12:19
annoyed or even concern about an irregular channel of Ukraine.
00:12:22
Diplomacy after all the existence of such a channel
00:12:25
itself, is a sign of the president lacks confidence in
00:12:28
the state department staff. However, the answer is that the
00:12:32
president sets foreign policy, not the unelected bureaucrats at
00:12:35
the administrative state so far, this, entire impeachment inquiry
00:12:38
hinges, on this fact, and the more American people get to see
00:12:41
the impeachment debate play out in public hearings.
00:12:44
The Clara will become that Democrats are relying on an
00:12:46
incredibly narrow and highly subjective interpretation of the
00:12:49
facts to justify their claims that Trump tried to set up a
00:12:53
quid pro quo with Ukraine. So like I said, this is not
00:12:59
about necessarily Sara Lee. Well, here's a, it should be
00:13:03
about two different things. Obviously, the Democrats have
00:13:07
painted themselves into a corner, they need to impeach
00:13:10
President, Trump represent Pelosi speaker, Pelosi knows
00:13:14
this, and so, she knows that they can't, they, she was pushed
00:13:18
to impeachment. She didn't want to do
00:13:20
impeachment. She was pushing off impeachment
00:13:22
for a long time because she knew that there probably wasn't a
00:13:24
good chance. She's as smart as much as people
00:13:27
don't like, Nancy Pelosi. She doesn't stay.
00:13:30
Met at her, her position at the point or the Apex of her power
00:13:35
by not being a smart political tactician.
00:13:39
Now, with that said, she knows she was caught in a rock and a
00:13:43
hard place. She either had to succumb to the
00:13:47
far left the aoc's, the Rasheeda to leaves the Elan, Omar's the
00:13:51
far left part of her party who have been calling for
00:13:55
impeachment since the day that they got into office, or she
00:13:59
could not. And then she would.
00:14:02
But now she's in a weird political position where she's
00:14:05
had to kind of support it and be there.
00:14:08
And she knows that it's gonna be a Gamble.
00:14:11
And I've talked about this on this show, it's a a gamble in
00:14:14
the sense that she knows that those Democrats that were in
00:14:18
Trump districts are now going to have to face re-election or
00:14:23
they're going to have to face primer.
00:14:25
They're going to have to face the voters again in 2020.
00:14:30
This causes a problem. You're not going to get the
00:14:33
people who voted for Trump and then go down ballot and say,
00:14:36
well, I'm going to vote for the Democratic representative.
00:14:39
If you're voting for Trump, you already.
00:14:40
Look at the Democrats and say, well, I'm not voting for
00:14:42
Democrats because they tried to impeach the president, I'm
00:14:45
voting for, and that I support. So down, ballot, you're
00:14:48
obviously not going to get any support for these
00:14:51
Representatives. Now, a lot of these Democrats
00:14:54
who are moderate Democrats and Trump districts are going to
00:14:57
face a hard backlash from these impeachment hearings.
00:15:01
They're going to put this off as long as possible, they're going
00:15:04
to do this. In this impeachment query,
00:15:05
they're going to do these hearings are going to do this a
00:15:07
little circus for as long as possible.
00:15:09
But they can't keep it up for a whole nother year, that would be
00:15:13
impossible. You're going to run out of
00:15:15
witnesses, unless all of a sudden you start producing fake
00:15:17
Witnesses or I wouldn't put it past Adam Schiff to start coming
00:15:20
up with false evidence, or doctored evidence.
00:15:24
But either way, they're going to have to vote on this and the far
00:15:28
left are not just going to sit by and be happy with the fact
00:15:31
that they had an impeachment inquiry.
00:15:33
They want Trump gone. They want him shamed out of
00:15:35
office, and they want him out. So there's no reason why this is
00:15:42
not going to go to a vote. And Nancy.
00:15:45
Pelosi knows this. She knows she's going to be
00:15:47
stuck. Sending this to a vote and that
00:15:51
you could potentially lose her speakership over this
00:15:55
impeachment. Come 2020.
00:15:59
However, it's either that or the far left goes out there and
00:16:03
screams about how Nancy Pelosi. Is protecting Trump or that he
00:16:10
you know to get getting that far left.
00:16:13
Riled up. So it's really a tough position
00:16:18
for. She went with the impeachment
00:16:19
thing, she's letting Adam Schiff, run it.
00:16:22
Adam Schiff was probably the most despicable representative
00:16:25
in all of Congress because of the way he lies and controls
00:16:29
thing in the way, he does everything.
00:16:30
So underhandedly you could tell the guy does not have genuine
00:16:34
motives. He has one motive and that's the
00:16:36
carry out, the Dirty Deeds of the Democrats in the left.
00:16:43
So with that, there's a Good opinion article in the American
00:16:47
Thinker. And it talks about title of his.
00:16:51
It could it be that Trump has been setting up the left all
00:16:53
along? Now, a lot of people if you
00:16:56
remember if you're a fan of going on Reddit or fortune or
00:16:59
any of those things, they're always talking about this idea,
00:17:02
40 chess. And this whole it sort of became
00:17:04
a meme at a point that President Trump is always engaged in 4D,
00:17:08
chess or 36d underwater basket, weaving chess or whatever you
00:17:12
want to call it. But this article makes the
00:17:16
argument that maybe he knew about this all along.
00:17:19
Along and he kind of coax them into it.
00:17:23
So in this article is from American Thinker, I always put
00:17:25
the article so you can look at and read them yourself.
00:17:28
I edit them. I don't always read the whole
00:17:30
article so you can go and read the whole article for yourself.
00:17:33
I always post the links to them in the show notes afterwards.
00:17:38
So, the title of his, it could be that Trump has been setting
00:17:41
up the left all along. Why is the impeachment theater?
00:17:44
That has been entertained the media swells these past six
00:17:47
weeks begun to feel like a bad movie of the week Tyrant and
00:17:50
chief Adam Schiff has been thrilling, the left with it,
00:17:52
anti-constitutional coup foskey cough, Ski Show trial.
00:18:00
Sorry for the pronunciation. I know how to say.
00:18:02
It's one of those words, you look at when you read it and you
00:18:05
can't you can't get it out of your mouth leaking and tweaking
00:18:08
Snippets of his irrelevant not Witnesses testimony.
00:18:11
In order to bend public. Into his malevolent, anti-trump
00:18:15
Obsession. We can all suss out the shift
00:18:18
Pelosi agenda. They hope to prevent Trump
00:18:20
selection by convincing the American people.
00:18:23
That he is somehow tainted by a fog of Nefarious activities both
00:18:27
before. And after the 2016 election,
00:18:30
Trump is guilty of exactly nothing, impeachable.
00:18:32
And they all know it, but he's an outsider and their DC Club of
00:18:35
self-appointed, privileged insiders.
00:18:37
And that is what they cannot will not tolerate.
00:18:41
The interloper must be metaphorically.
00:18:43
Lane and as public, and manner as possible, but just who in is
00:18:47
qu current domestic crisis. The left has, imagine is going
00:18:50
to be the hoisted upon. Their petard is beginning to
00:18:54
seem like it, maybe speaker Pelosi and the detestable Adam
00:18:57
Schiff. It's beginning to feel like are
00:18:59
hateful and tolerant, and left is being set up with a long
00:19:02
game, play if. So, then in none meant will be
00:19:05
delicious, first Nadler, and then shift have conducted this
00:19:09
so-called inquiry for weeks. Now, now, idlers hearings were
00:19:13
An embarrassment. So Pelosi, turn the gavel over
00:19:15
to shift big mistake, unless she is in on the cob, his
00:19:19
ridiculous. Secret Obsession depositions are
00:19:21
a joke meant to frighten Trump and his supporters, which is
00:19:24
absolutely not working. Now, we've been privy to open
00:19:27
testimony of three of his chosen not Witnesses, who contributed?
00:19:31
Exactly. Nothing to shifts, tale of
00:19:32
corruption. It is all backfire and since
00:19:35
they're trying to impeach Trump for what Obama /, Biden did
00:19:38
exactly. Did.
00:19:41
We've all seen Biden's little bit of bragging about
00:19:43
threatening Ukraine, that 1 billion wouldn't be withheld.
00:19:46
Unless a certain prosecutor was fired within 6 hours.
00:19:50
That prosecutor was charged with investigating the corrupt
00:19:52
Charisma Energy company on Whose board sat on her Biden Biden
00:19:57
intervene. In Ukraine state government to
00:19:59
protect the by rate that was blatantly making his own family,
00:20:02
fabulously wealthy and Ukraine was not the only foreign Nation.
00:20:06
The Biden's, the carries the Pelosi's the clintons, and the
00:20:08
Feinstein's tap for millions of That went directly into their
00:20:12
pockets for reference, see Peter, schweitzer's books,
00:20:15
Clinton, cash, and secret Empires.
00:20:18
Ambrose Bierce wrote that quote politics is the conduct of
00:20:21
public affairs for private Advantage.
00:20:23
Unquote. It is impossible.
00:20:25
We that Trump has not been in on this cabals, fraudulent scheme
00:20:29
for a long time now. Admiral Mike Rogers clued him in
00:20:32
on the Obama, administration's listening in wiring tapping on
00:20:35
his phones at Trump Tower in 2015.
00:20:37
That was why he moved his campaign headquarters to New
00:20:40
Jersey. He has known since then what
00:20:42
they were up to. So it isn't it possible that
00:20:44
he's been setting them up for these past three years?
00:20:47
Could he be manipulating Pelosi Schiff and their henchmen into a
00:20:51
world-class implosion he's began to see I'm this may be true as
00:20:56
the actual transcripts of shifts not Witnesses are released and
00:21:00
went actual journalist read, then it becomes clearer and
00:21:02
clearer that they have nothing. This attempt to impeach is all
00:21:06
about covering up their own crimes.
00:21:08
If this is true, then Trump will have kept his ultimate and most
00:21:11
important promise to drain the swamp.
00:21:14
The swamp is much, much, much higher and more corrupt than any
00:21:17
of us knew. The Trump has withstood, the 3
00:21:20
plus year, calculated attack on him.
00:21:21
His family, his friends, and his presidency is a testament to
00:21:24
Aspen Nominal strength of character.
00:21:26
That is why he was elected and will be re-elected.
00:21:29
If the can't the left can't cheat enough, the left always
00:21:32
cheats as they did to elect JFK. This 2020 election will be
00:21:36
consequential. They will cheat in 2022.
00:21:39
This is what open borders and no voter ID is all about all
00:21:43
Americans who love this country and their Constitution.
00:21:45
Must devote to defeat these criminals as Hugh Hewitt always
00:21:49
has always said quote, if it's not closed they can't cheat
00:21:53
unquote Reagan had No idea, how right?
00:21:56
He was when he said years ago, that quote, the leaders of the
00:21:58
democratic party have gone so far left.
00:22:01
They've left the country. So is it possible that President
00:22:07
Trump actually did? This is it possible that he has
00:22:10
been setting them up? It's quite possible.
00:22:14
It seems that it's almost 242. It is that this is what came out
00:22:19
that they net that they set this up.
00:22:22
And at this whole Ukraine thing blew up and almost immediately
00:22:25
afterwards. The question was well, why was
00:22:28
he asking them to investigate? Ukraine was because the Biden's
00:22:33
But the Biden's have connections to the Obama Administration and
00:22:36
it all starts to crumble down. When you look at the corruption
00:22:39
that's going out Ukraine and Ukraine is a hotbed for
00:22:42
corruption and the new president has pledged that he wants to try
00:22:45
and root out the corruption. In fact, he said to President
00:22:50
Trump and I'm paraphrasing. You are the model of us wanting
00:22:54
to drain the swamp here, and Ukraine.
00:22:56
We're learning lessons from you. We're learning from you about
00:22:59
draining, the swamp here in the Ukraine.
00:23:02
Which is probably why President Trump is leaning on President of
00:23:05
Ukraine to actually start investigating the crimes and the
00:23:09
corruption that's going on here. Is it possible?
00:23:13
He did this all along. I mean we've known about Hunter
00:23:18
Biden and Joe Biden. We've known about this for a
00:23:21
while. This is not new information is
00:23:23
not something that just came out with the calls for impeachment
00:23:29
with that said, did he calculate that if he could get that
00:23:33
someone And this is maybe hit the Arctic.
00:23:36
He's been using Riesling. Has he started to leak?
00:23:41
How do you find a leaker in your Administration?
00:23:45
Who how do you do that? You send out.
00:23:50
False information on purpose. And you see it's kind of like
00:23:55
you throw it down the tubes and see what pops out.
00:24:00
And if someone hears it or you tell it to someone and then that
00:24:03
pert and then all of a sudden appears, if you think someone is
00:24:08
a leaker, you tell them the false information and if it gets
00:24:14
to the media and somehow gets out and you know, they're the
00:24:16
leaker So, the question is, whether or not he knew all along
00:24:24
that Joe Biden and his son on her Biden were implicated in
00:24:28
this whole Ukraine thing. And he knew that maybe if you
00:24:31
went on this Ukraine offensive and maybe he made it look a
00:24:34
little nefarious. Someone was going to run until
00:24:39
Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff about it and start this whole
00:24:42
impeachment thing. He may have played it that way
00:24:47
if he did, it would be the one of the most, smartest political
00:24:50
moves in American history, to know that I'm going to set up
00:24:55
the Democrats. To shoot themselves in the foot
00:25:00
and drain the swamp themselves by saying, by making it look
00:25:06
like I committed this impeachable offense with the
00:25:08
Ukraine. And set them up.
00:25:12
So that when all this comes out when all the information comes
00:25:17
out and people start to see why they Ukraine was being
00:25:21
investigated people start to say, well yeah, why did Hunter
00:25:24
Biden who knows nothing about energy or was never on an energy
00:25:29
company? All of a sudden be put on the
00:25:31
board of an energy company in the Ukraine, making thousands of
00:25:36
dollars every month, tens of thousands of dollars every
00:25:38
month, not just A couple thousands, tens of thousands of
00:25:41
dollars every month. And this is a firm that's
00:25:44
already been implicated in corruption in Ukraine.
00:25:47
So it's not out of the realm of possibility to believe that this
00:25:51
firm is not acting on the up-and-up when it comes to doing
00:25:55
things, ethically or above the boards.
00:26:00
So would it be whether most Mars?
00:26:02
Would it be the smartest political move?
00:26:04
Probably in American history? Quite possibly?
00:26:06
If, if he actually pulls this off but it's been good fodder
00:26:11
because what he's done is he's taken this and said I'm being
00:26:15
investigated for the crimes of Obama and Biden and he keeps
00:26:20
going out there and telling his supporters that And it works now
00:26:25
his supporters. No, no.
00:26:26
The impeachment is a sham. It's another Witch Hunt.
00:26:29
It's Russia collusion 2.0 and they've all looked into it now
00:26:33
and said, well yeah, why isn't anybody interviewing hundred
00:26:36
biting? Why is no one asking him to
00:26:39
testify? I in the Senate Republicans are
00:26:42
definitely going to want to do that.
00:26:43
They once they get it in their hands, you know that the first
00:26:46
if they're conducting the trial, you know who they're going to
00:26:50
start calling. They're going to call the
00:26:51
Biden's. And it's going to die in the
00:26:56
Senate. If the, if anything has been I
00:27:00
was never really that a big fan of the the Senate.
00:27:02
Republicans, you have too many Senate.
00:27:04
Republicans like the Lindsey, Graham is in the Mitt Romney's,
00:27:06
who you just don't know if they're above the board, if
00:27:10
they're above board or above ground, when it comes to this
00:27:12
whole Maga platform. You know, they were reluctant in
00:27:17
the beginning. I mean Mitt Romney is still an
00:27:20
anti-trump or he'll always be an anti never Trumper because you
00:27:22
got passed over for Secretary of State and President Trump
00:27:25
humiliated him and because he did something that Mitt Romney
00:27:29
could never do in his Wildest Dreams, which was become
00:27:32
president. So you have a, you have a couple
00:27:36
of those Republicans there. Maybe not enough to swing it and
00:27:40
turn it into a super majority, but you could have enough that
00:27:43
could cause some problems, but I think now with how the
00:27:48
impeachment inquiry is going in the house, I think, if you're a
00:27:53
republican, you can kind of step back and say, okay, I feel like
00:27:57
that there's nothing here. This is all a sham.
00:28:00
Obviously, this is all hearsay, and Lindsey Graham is a smart,
00:28:03
he's a smart attorney. He's a former Jag makes I think
00:28:07
he still is a jacket tourney. The Air Force, I'm pretty sure
00:28:12
he's a jog attorney with the Air Force, so he's a smart guy when
00:28:14
it comes to the law. And he knows this is not how
00:28:17
trials are conducted, which is why is the head of the Judiciary
00:28:20
Committee. He's going to look at these
00:28:22
Witnesses and say, there's nothing here.
00:28:25
This is all hearsay. This is all just people saying
00:28:27
what I heard or what someone else heard of that it and not
00:28:31
only is it bad here? Say it's hearsay.
00:28:34
That doesn't prove anything. If it was hearsay.
00:28:37
That said, oh well, I heard from someone President Trump did this
00:28:42
and this is the impeachable offense.
00:28:44
Maybe that would be worth something.
00:28:46
However, that's not really what's Happening?
00:28:48
Here is they've been pushing these Witnesses and saying, do
00:28:52
you have you in all of this here, saying, all these things
00:28:55
that you've heard is any of it, an impeachable offense know.
00:28:59
And that's what most of the that's what they've all been
00:29:00
saying. I haven't heard anything about
00:29:02
an impeachable offense, they seem to just be airing their
00:29:05
grievances, This is just an airing of grievances for those
00:29:09
at the state department who were either recalled and Maria you
00:29:14
know voltage was not fired at common.
00:29:17
Contrary to what people were putting out online and in the
00:29:19
twitterverse she wasn't fired. She was recalled recall.
00:29:23
Just means she had to come back from where she was and she had
00:29:25
to get a desk job at the state department.
00:29:27
Not the worst thing in the world to continue having your job at
00:29:31
the state department. And then she was also, I think
00:29:34
she went to a fellowship in Georgetown, so she's doing All
00:29:37
right. You know they keep putting this
00:29:38
out there as he's poor sympathetic figures, poor Maria.
00:29:43
Maria yovanovich was fired by President Trump and now she's
00:29:48
out on the street and she has not Believe me, high up, people
00:29:53
who are ambassadors, who have this level of clearance in d.c.,
00:29:57
never go hungry. There's always a job waiting for
00:30:00
him, whether it's the media or consulting or lobbyists there is
00:30:04
0 or they can go into Academia if they want and pull six
00:30:07
figures from some of these schools.
00:30:11
There is always going to be a job for people who come out at
00:30:14
d.c. So don't feel bad for marine
00:30:18
jovanovic that she was recalled from the country.
00:30:20
She was reporting or is she was working it or she was stationed
00:30:23
in. Don't feel bad for her.
00:30:26
She's definitely not starving. She's not out on the street.
00:30:29
She's not collecting food stamps.
00:30:30
She's doing pretty well for herself.
00:30:36
And a lot of people I think are going to grasp at straws.
00:30:39
I had conversations with more leftist attorneys and they seem
00:30:43
to think that stuff is actually that there seems to be something
00:30:46
there. But when you have Jeffrey
00:30:49
toobin, the legal analyst, who hates Trump on CNN, looking at
00:30:55
the panelists and saying, none of these Witnesses have had
00:30:59
Direct contact with President Trump and that's a big problem.
00:31:05
Because legally, it doesn't show that anybody knows what happened
00:31:09
and they're just sort of making this up as they go along.
00:31:14
So Chef is going to continue bringing out mounds and mounds
00:31:20
of hearsay evidence. Because there's all these State
00:31:22
Department people who Were any of them in the room at President
00:31:27
Trump or any of them on the phone?
00:31:28
Call with President Trump? No none of them were.
00:31:32
So for any of these people to come out and say well I know
00:31:35
exactly what happened. I was there, I was on the phone
00:31:37
call. It's just all mountains and
00:31:41
mountains of hearsay evidence and it doesn't prove anything.
00:31:44
And so far, the hearsay hasn't proved whether there's an
00:31:47
impeachable offense, so the circus will continue this week.
00:31:54
There's a lot more witnesses to come out.
00:31:57
I would highly suggest you don't sit through it and waste your
00:32:00
time because You have better things to do in life, then sit
00:32:05
around and watch all these disgruntled State Department
00:32:08
employees talked about how they hate, President Trump, or think
00:32:12
he's doing things wrong because this isn't how we've been doing
00:32:15
it. This isn't how it's been going.
00:32:18
Well, people didn't elect President Trump to keep the
00:32:22
status quo and keep Washington the way it was.
00:32:25
And this is my favorite saying, I say all the time, when people
00:32:28
ask me, why did you vote for Donald Trump outside of the fact
00:32:33
that I agreed with his policies and what you stood for?
00:32:36
And, you know, he was to me, it just made sense.
00:32:40
The biggest thing for me was after years of frustration, with
00:32:44
these people claiming, they're Outsiders like Barack Obama
00:32:46
saying he's an outsider and he's Change change.
00:32:49
You can believe in. Yes, you can or yes, we can.
00:32:54
Michael Moore of all people said it best.
00:32:57
Donald Trump is the molotov cocktail that people have been
00:33:01
waiting to send in to Washington to burn the place down.
00:33:05
And that's what he's doing. He's going in there as an
00:33:08
outsider, not beholden to anybody, no favors owed to
00:33:11
anybody's, not connected to anybody, he doesn't owe anybody
00:33:15
anything. It's not like he made his way up
00:33:17
the ranks. And this person gave him money
00:33:19
or this person gave him. Our in this person, gave him a
00:33:22
boost to get him from state senator.
00:33:24
To Senator, it's none of it like that.
00:33:27
He just said, one day, I'm going to use my personal money on
00:33:30
going to run for president. And people lost in people in
00:33:35
d.c. are losing their minds because there's an outsider who
00:33:38
doesn't play by their rules, is exposing all the dirty tricks
00:33:41
that they're doing and they can't stand it.
00:33:45
And I continue to believe. That's why voters will again
00:33:48
line up and vote for President Trump in 2020 is because they
00:33:51
think he's going to continue to do this.
00:33:53
He's going to continue to to gut the state.
00:33:56
Department's can continue to change how things are done in
00:33:58
Washington, maybe not forever but he'll at least have riled
00:34:03
Washington, d.c. up. So now it's a California news,
00:34:08
this is an article from the Pacific Research Institute.
00:34:11
It's called California power. Outages a look into the future.
00:34:14
Now we've all been talking about the California power outages in
00:34:16
the wildfires have been going on.
00:34:18
And as I'm recording this, it's another dry hot day here in San
00:34:22
Diego. Just when you think fall is
00:34:24
here, and it's time to bring out the warm clothes and the boots
00:34:27
and stuff like that. It gets hot again and your nose
00:34:31
gets all dried out because of the fact that it got so dry
00:34:34
again. So the article again, Pacific
00:34:39
Research Institute, I'll post it in the showings.
00:34:42
California's. Great.
00:34:43
Black out of 2019, has begun as the lights keep going out for
00:34:46
Millions, across the state's Northern stretches.
00:34:48
What should be the past? Now seems to be the future.
00:34:51
PG&E began, shutting down power early, the morning of October
00:34:54
9th, when electricity was cut to more than 140 customers in
00:34:58
Sonoma, and Napa Solana and Marin County's.
00:35:03
Those outages and the ones that follow were ordered because they
00:35:06
there was a high risk of wildfires by Tuesday Weeks
00:35:08
Later, the media were reporting, that nearly two million cut in
00:35:11
Northern California residents were expecting me hit by the
00:35:14
fourth plan blackout of the month.
00:35:18
The state has long considered itself, a model of progress.
00:35:21
Always pressuring pressing forward to California.
00:35:23
Now chooses darkness, and rather than being a rare exception,
00:35:27
these Autumn blackouts are more likely.
00:35:29
A preview of coming long night, a modern state with a modern,
00:35:33
accommodate economy, a state, not fighting typhus, and other
00:35:37
medieval diseases, and it's streets, whatever solve the
00:35:39
problem before the blackouts began.
00:35:42
The California system for delivering electricity is
00:35:44
primarily managed by utilities that are lumbering inflexible
00:35:48
bureaucracies, operating government-protected,
00:35:50
monopolies. The entire blame can't be placed
00:35:53
on the utility though. PGM e.g. in a may have provided
00:35:56
the spark that started the campfire, but government
00:35:59
supplies. The fuel for forest fires, that
00:36:01
turn into raging wildfires burning everything in their
00:36:04
path. Federal Environmental Policy
00:36:06
driven by activist has continuously thwarted the use of
00:36:09
scientific management techniques including law.
00:36:12
Gagging prescribed Burns and thinning to treat Forest fuel
00:36:15
loads. In preventing fires, this Hoover
00:36:17
institution research, Terry Anderson.
00:36:20
The Eco groups would rather let nature quote take its course,
00:36:25
while living trees feed the Flames, dead trees are high
00:36:28
octane fuel and there might be nearly 150 million of them in
00:36:32
California since the u.s. forest service, removing them from the
00:36:36
areas near homes and other structures including power lines
00:36:39
and Equipment reduces risk. But it isn't easy, not only do
00:36:43
environmentalist oppose the removal, especially in the Deep
00:36:46
timber, in some instances. Government permits are necessary
00:36:49
and on occasion, only a licensed contractor.
00:36:52
Can legally do the job with California being quote, a place
00:36:56
that nature built to burn, unquote.
00:36:58
According to University professor and fire historian.
00:37:01
Stephen, Jay Pine, there's no avoiding it.
00:37:04
Tomorrow filled with fires. If man, refuses to harness his
00:37:06
environment, the first two blackouts alone, could cost the
00:37:10
state's economy, Three billion dollars as a Stanford professor,
00:37:13
as business and commerce have had to take fourth holidays,
00:37:17
students, have miss schools virtue signals have had to park
00:37:20
their dead electric vehicles. It's been a weeks of people,
00:37:24
stumbling around in dark homes. Few daring to open their
00:37:26
refrigerators for spoiling the groceries dining by candlelight,
00:37:30
has been by necessity, not in Hope of romance.
00:37:33
And only for those who have gas ovens, which have been outlawed
00:37:37
in several California, cities and kept manual can openers in
00:37:40
their Drawers. And let's not forget, at least
00:37:43
one person has already died. California is both literally and
00:37:47
figuratively entering its own Dark Age.
00:37:50
Decades of blue State policies have fundamentally altered the
00:37:53
trajectory of the state businesses and residents have
00:37:56
been fleeing the slow-motion wreck for years and will
00:37:58
continue to do so. No longer is California, land of
00:38:01
opportunity. It is a Purgatory of high taxes
00:38:03
on affordable housing and outrageously, steep cost of
00:38:06
living crumbling, roads and bridges Soul, grinding traffic,
00:38:09
and catastrophic homelessness. Each of these is a man-made
00:38:12
disaster created by public policy that limits and directs
00:38:15
rather than fries and stimulates entrepreneurship.
00:38:19
Once both the heart and backbone of state has become increasingly
00:38:22
under regulatory assault. Rabbit, pursue green policies,
00:38:25
promises a third-world Energy Future.
00:38:27
The transport of water over long distances solved by the ancient
00:38:31
Romans more than 2 years agos & before the than the
00:38:34
Egyptians baffles today's policy makers.
00:38:38
One party controls, both the legislative and executive,
00:38:40
levers, and behaves, more like a ruler than a representative far
00:38:43
from advances. These are regressions towards a
00:38:45
less enlightened time. California is falling into the
00:38:48
Shadows. Obviously, it's not that
00:38:54
surprising when you look at what's been going on with the
00:38:56
wildfires in the energy problems.
00:38:58
And it seems to be a yearly occurrence with what's going on
00:39:02
here in California. And a lot of people probably
00:39:04
look at and say, well, why can't California get its act together?
00:39:09
Gavin Newsom likes to boast about how we're one of the
00:39:11
biggest economies in the world that if we were our own country,
00:39:15
we were fifth largest economy in the world, or whatever.
00:39:20
The number is, it keeps going Up and down.
00:39:23
He likes to boast about how great our economy is.
00:39:26
I think the economy is great in spite of the fact in spite of,
00:39:30
what goes on here in California, the kind of the economy.
00:39:33
I've always said, could be a absolu bad, you know, could be a
00:39:40
gang busters economy. If you remove the regulations,
00:39:44
if you remove the taxes, if you removed the barriers to build
00:39:48
housing in this, this state, if you removed all the
00:39:50
environmental regulations, You could have a economy, like,
00:39:55
nothing. Anybody has seen here in
00:39:57
California. If you took, if you could just
00:40:00
take the economic structure and the favorable business policies
00:40:04
of a place, like Texas or Nevada, and just kind of copy
00:40:08
and paste them into California, you would have an enormous
00:40:11
economy humming along which would not only help those here
00:40:15
in California. Not to mention the help the
00:40:17
people here in California, who are suffering from homeless
00:40:20
people, who can't afford to live people who are living paycheck
00:40:22
to paycheck. Because the price of gas is too
00:40:24
high. The price of housing is too
00:40:25
high. The price of food is getting too
00:40:27
high. Price of electricity is getting
00:40:29
too high. You can have a burgeoning state
00:40:33
with an enormous strong middle class which would probably
00:40:39
intern. Actually help increase more tax
00:40:41
revenue because you have this thriving middle class that will
00:40:45
pay property taxes. That will pay because there's
00:40:48
more businesses, more payroll taxes.
00:40:52
But people, the Kyle form, I think California in spite of
00:40:56
all, it's pretty incredible. The fact that California does so
00:40:59
well in spite of how many regulations there are and they
00:41:03
keep thinking they get by on the fact that yes, California has
00:41:07
incredible. Real estate, has Silicon Valley.
00:41:09
People want to live in California, that's what gets
00:41:12
California by. If California was in the middle
00:41:15
of the country or up north, where there's a lot of snow and
00:41:18
inactive these types of policies, the state would
00:41:20
probably be going. Up at this point.
00:41:24
But because of the fact that California is such a enormously
00:41:28
attractive state for a lot of people.
00:41:30
Now, I'm not gonna lie, I love living in California.
00:41:34
I don't want to leave California but there are a lot of policies
00:41:36
that make it hard to live in California. so, Despite that you
00:41:43
now have Gavin. Newsom who's pointing the finger
00:41:46
at the utilities and these utilities are not completely
00:41:50
devoid of their fault. But you can't have Gavin, Newsom
00:41:54
just standing around saying it's not his fault either.
00:41:59
His predecessor Jerry Brown had the opportunity to pass a bill
00:42:03
that would allow for these utilities to make the
00:42:07
much-needed improvements. Whether it was putting these
00:42:09
wires into ground, renewing them cleaning up, stuff like that to
00:42:13
prevent wildfires Jerry Brown, it's negative.
00:42:17
So you have the government who stay in the way of letting the
00:42:20
power companies even actually change anything around here.
00:42:26
And it's Simple Solutions but the Greenies and the
00:42:29
environmentalists who believe that you just got to let nature
00:42:32
take its course. Nature is taking its course,
00:42:34
nature is destroying houses, its destroying property.
00:42:38
It's causing more people to have to evacuate their homes, lose
00:42:41
everything there. Have, it's putting people In
00:42:44
Harm's Way. Like the article said we've
00:42:46
already lost one person to these wildfires.
00:42:51
It is a scary scary thing when you see these wildfires but
00:42:54
environmentalists and Greenies, who don't want to change their
00:42:57
policies because they believe it's all about nature and we
00:43:00
can't do anything. We got to let nature take, its
00:43:02
course, even though it's probably better for us to
00:43:06
actually clean up these forest and limit the amount of fire
00:43:09
damage. They continue to push these
00:43:13
policies that prevent it and it's just a, it's an algorithm.
00:43:18
It's a, it's already, it's an anomaly.
00:43:23
What's the word I'm looking for? It's just a summation of what
00:43:29
one of the problems is with California.
00:43:32
It's when you base real policy, when you base decisions, not
00:43:38
uncommon sense, not on kitchen table Politics.
00:43:43
The stuff that matters to people.
00:43:45
How do I put food on the table? How do I make sure I pay my
00:43:49
mortgage every month. How do I save a little money for
00:43:51
my kids college? When you don't base your policy
00:43:54
decisions on that? And you base it on the virtue,
00:43:57
signaling far left wing of the Democratic Party.
00:44:02
These are the policies. You get that blow up in your
00:44:05
face. It sounds nice to say, well,
00:44:09
let's protect the forest and we're not going to do anything
00:44:11
and we're not going to clean them up, and we're not going to
00:44:13
cut down trees and we're not going to do, you know,
00:44:16
controlled Burns to try and keep things under control.
00:44:23
Then this is what happens. You get these policies that blow
00:44:30
up in your face and don't and they don't They don't play out
00:44:37
in the real world, they don't make sense, and they end up
00:44:40
hurting people. But as long as you get to Virtue
00:44:44
signal, as long as you get to stand up and say we've done X, Y
00:44:47
and Z because we love the environment or we're such
00:44:50
Greenies, then that's fine. Again, California seems to
00:44:57
always take the position of whatever helps with kitchen
00:45:00
table politics. Whatever helps with kitchen
00:45:05
table politics. Let's do the complete opposite
00:45:08
of that because it doesn't make any sense.
00:45:11
So it's last article, I want to read is called the California.
00:45:14
Exodus is real and it's written by r.l.
00:45:18
Stine and Fox and Hounds. Again, I'll post the link in the
00:45:24
web server in the show notes. Not unlike the Hebrews departing
00:45:29
Egypt and the Okies exiting the dust and a fan of the 1930s
00:45:32
Midwest, the number of Californians, getting the heck
00:45:34
out of Dodge, so to speak is staggering and just one decade
00:45:37
about 5 million, Californians left between 2004 and 2013.
00:45:42
Roughly three point. Nine million people came here
00:45:45
from the other States during that period for a net population
00:45:48
loss of more than 1 million people. 1 million people, the
00:45:52
trend resulted in a net loss of about 26 billion in annual
00:45:56
income Although foreign immigration is fueled
00:45:59
California's population growth for decades, California, natives
00:46:02
are moving out, starting in the 1990s.
00:46:04
California's been losing more residents to other states than
00:46:07
it has gained for the better. Part of three decades, the state
00:46:09
is experienced a net, Exodus of residents every year to the
00:46:12
point. That there are now more than 7
00:46:14
million people born in California that call other
00:46:17
states home. You may ask why the Exodus the
00:46:20
High Cost of Living fueled by pun intended.
00:46:22
The high cost of electricity and other utilities including
00:46:25
unparalleled fuel costs at the pump.
00:46:27
Fame humorist, Mark Twain. Said, everybody talks about the
00:46:30
weather, but nobody does anything about it in California.
00:46:33
Everyone talks about the High Cost of Living, the high cost of
00:46:36
electricity fuels and over-regulation but nobody does
00:46:38
anything about it. Well, a vast number of
00:46:41
California voters are take talking with their feet.
00:46:44
They're frustrated with the way their tax dollars are being
00:46:46
spent and feel their boats have no have no say as to how to
00:46:49
change it. When you examine the facts, you
00:46:51
see the Grim data. Some of the highest cost of
00:46:54
housing and living in the nation.
00:46:56
Some of the highest cost for electricity and fuels.
00:46:57
In the nation Unstoppable cost of more regulations, taxes and
00:47:01
increased will minimum wage targeted toward businesses.
00:47:04
They're just passed through the consumers of the services and
00:47:06
products from those businesses. The frustrating growth of the
00:47:09
homeless poverty and Welfare, populations driven by the cost
00:47:12
of housing electricity, and fuels, frustration towards the
00:47:15
deterioration electrical grid as allowed utilities to turn off
00:47:17
power prior to threaten winds to protect themselves from
00:47:20
liability lawsuits producing man-made blackouts growing.
00:47:23
Congestion from the increasing number of registered vehicles
00:47:25
and packing transportation. Infrastructures that are not
00:47:27
equipped to accommodate such an increases.
00:47:30
The state has chosen to become a leading importer of manufactured
00:47:33
goods, electricity and crude oil, rather than manufacturer
00:47:36
generate them. In state California's.
00:47:38
Rule linkers is environmental Steward as stewarded ship to
00:47:41
other states and countries that have significantly less
00:47:43
environmental controls getting clobbered.
00:47:46
By taxes is taking its toll on the psyche and pocketbooks of
00:47:49
its residents along with the High Cost of Living and doing
00:47:51
business moreover since More than 10 businesses have
00:47:55
either fled the state or reduce their Investments as Investors
00:47:58
Business Daily from Burger franchise Carl's jr.
00:48:01
International vehicle manufacturer.
00:48:03
Toyota big businesses are simply leaving the state and droves the
00:48:07
small ones find themselves at no choice but to leave as well.
00:48:11
They simply can compete with the big corporations that state and
00:48:14
take the hit and taxes with California.
00:48:16
So, lakhs on enforcing Federal immigration law, it's open
00:48:19
border sentiment is frightening, responsible employers away.
00:48:23
Has that remain in California are stuck in a lose-lose
00:48:25
situation. However, here's the Catch 22,
00:48:29
the immigrant worker protection acts as an employer who follows
00:48:33
Federal immigration law is now violating California law is
00:48:36
committed. A crime and subject to
00:48:38
significant fines at the same time.
00:48:40
It is also a crime. If an employer fails to follow
00:48:43
Federal immigration laws in California's one-party State,
00:48:47
everything that state, everything is controlled by the
00:48:49
Democratic party and its Union allies.
00:48:52
The governor and the legislature rushed through a massive tax on
00:48:55
gas and diesel fuel along with higher car, registration, fees
00:48:57
and hardly anyone outside the party noticed.
00:49:00
I see no good future for anyone in California.
00:49:03
Thanks to the current political environment is sad to see this
00:49:06
state where my parents were able to make a go with their
00:49:09
businesses with nothing more than a mission, hard work.
00:49:11
And no big government to get in their way.
00:49:13
Even farming is becoming more and more arduous as the
00:49:16
ill-informed legislature tries to run the true environmentalist
00:49:19
out of the State farmers, don't understand.
00:49:21
I careful. Environment.
00:49:23
Then no one does as the state's, many complex policy changes,
00:49:26
like, affordable, housing, and transportation congestion, and
00:49:29
inequality, we need the public and private sectors to work
00:49:32
together to address these issues.
00:49:33
Head on. That doesn't so much require
00:49:36
partisanship, as it requires competent leadership.
00:49:39
While many Californians were consistently, expressed their
00:49:42
pleasure with its current leaders at the polls.
00:49:44
Tapped out taxpayers and businesses are voting with their
00:49:47
feet and leaving the one-party State.
00:49:49
Sadly, most of you most, who understand The destructive path
00:49:53
of democratic legislature is on, is on have already left, not
00:49:57
wanting front row seats. The implosion leaving a little
00:50:00
hope of overturning irrationality that is California
00:50:03
Politics. The future, Exodus projections
00:50:06
do not bode well for the state as across.
00:50:08
All counties, all age groups, and all Races, and ethnicities
00:50:11
about 50% Californians are considering moving out like
00:50:15
rats, leaving a sinking ship or major stockholders, purging
00:50:18
their portfolios. The Smart Ones are opting out of
00:50:20
the family Enterprise called California And The Exodus is
00:50:24
real. So again just like the last
00:50:26
article. It's kitchen table, politics, in
00:50:30
California continues to do. Exactly the opposite of what
00:50:34
happened or what needs to be done to keep people in this
00:50:37
state. They continue to hand over the
00:50:40
power or they continue to make these policy decisions based on
00:50:43
their unions that are based on the Environmental Green.
00:50:46
He's none of it. Seems to make sense when you
00:50:49
look at a policy that comes out and say how can it's like when
00:50:54
President Trump past this tax cuts.
00:50:58
And it gave more money back to corporations federally.
00:51:03
So, California decided it would be a good idea.
00:51:07
It's because you're saving money federally as a corporation to
00:51:11
turn around and now hike the taxes on the state level to
00:51:17
recoup, the money that you saved.
00:51:20
From the federal government, as if the money you owed is money
00:51:26
that belongs to the government. That's the sort of ideas that go
00:51:30
through the Democratic run government here in California,
00:51:36
that it becomes, whatever is opposite of Common Sense.
00:51:39
Whatever is opposite of stuff that helps grow businesses or
00:51:42
helps middle-class families. That's what California does.
00:51:47
What will, you know, instead of saying gee and this it will
00:51:52
never hear the answer of this even though Gavin Newsom started
00:51:54
investigation with his attorney general, as they worry about
00:51:57
Sarah because I believe that they're really going to do a
00:52:00
thorough investigation of why gas prices are so high in
00:52:03
California. They say that they want and
00:52:08
we're just don't why? Why is guys probably why are gas
00:52:12
prices so high. It doesn't make any sense.
00:52:16
Instead of trying to figure out how rational solution as to why,
00:52:19
we could reduce gas prices here in California, they'll have a
00:52:24
phony investigation. I'll say it isn't our fault.
00:52:28
I'll point the finger at the big greedy oil companies.
00:52:31
Oh, it's the big greedy, oil companies.
00:52:33
It's not us, we don't have anything to do, it's never the
00:52:35
government's fault here in California.
00:52:38
The homelessness is not the fault of California, Democrats,
00:52:41
the high for price of housing is not the fault of California.
00:52:45
Democrats, the people leaving the state is not the fault of
00:52:48
the Democrats. None of it is the fault of the
00:52:51
Democrats that they're never going to sit there and admit it.
00:52:56
but, They continue to push forward these asinine policies
00:53:02
that go against and drive people out of this state.
00:53:10
At what point do people really start to step back and say we're
00:53:14
in trouble. We need to figure this out and
00:53:16
we need to get someone out here or we need to do something.
00:53:20
Maybe a moderate Democrat. Maybe not a far left is
00:53:23
Democrat. Maybe needs to be some sort of
00:53:25
Revolution. Do Republicans and independents
00:53:29
need to join together and say, look, we need to figure this
00:53:31
out, does there need to? I've said this before.
00:53:34
There needs to be a different type of Republican here in
00:53:36
California. It Lincoln wins in Nebraska or
00:53:40
in the midwest or in Texas, or something like that is not a
00:53:43
republican that's going to win here in California.
00:53:46
So the stodgy old establishment, California Republicans is not
00:53:51
going to win here in California. But I think what, you know, is
00:53:55
Travis Allen and I hate to always go back to Travis Allen,
00:54:00
but he had energy, he had a Grassroots, people were excited
00:54:04
by him. Is he the future of the party?
00:54:07
He may have been a little too conservative.
00:54:10
But he was a fighter and the problem with the Republicans in
00:54:13
this state is no one wants to fight.
00:54:16
No one, everyone just kind of shows up and says Hi.
00:54:21
I'm the Republican in this race nice, very nice for you to all
00:54:25
come out and they'll just take all the abuse from the Democrats
00:54:29
and they won't put up a fight at all.
00:54:31
And that's really the issue of what's going on here in
00:54:35
California, without a fighter, or someone who's going to come
00:54:39
in and say, We need to change what's going on here.
00:54:43
Otherwise this States going to go belly-up.
00:54:48
You know, there's no way of turning the ship around.
00:54:53
So with that said, you know, finish up this podcast on this
00:54:58
brutally. Hot day here in San Diego.
00:55:00
Hot and dry day here in San Diego, is it climate change?
00:55:05
Now, it's just a hot day in San Diego, just happens.
00:55:08
So with that, like I said, don't watch the impeachment hearings.
00:55:12
It's not worth your time. Watch highlights, watch Recaps
00:55:16
of it. So no reason to put yourself
00:55:18
through that, sort of torture. We'll be back next week with
00:55:23
another episode. Continue to talk about,
00:55:25
impeachment. What's going on in California?
00:55:32
So with that said, if you like to show, share it, tell people
00:55:36
about it. Subscribe, leave a review, give
00:55:40
a like whatever. Follow us on Instagram.
00:55:42
California underground. Send any questions or thoughts
00:55:46
of stuff. You want me to talk about
00:55:47
California on the ground at proton mail.com and that's it
00:55:53
until next time, Thank you for listening to another episode of
00:56:18
California underground. If you like what you heard,
00:56:20
remember to subscribe? Like and review it and follow
00:56:23
California Underground on social media for updates as to New
00:56:26
episodes are available. New episodes are available.