Episode 139 - New Study Shows California Lockdowns Did Not Help (Coffee and California Politics)

Episode 139 - New Study Shows California Lockdowns Did Not Help (Coffee and California Politics)

Every Wednesday morning I go live on Instagram and discuss California politics...over coffee.

This week we discuss a new study from the Committee of To Unleash Prosperity which ranked states based on how they fared with mortality, education, and economy regarding COVID lockdowns. Blue states such as California, New York, and New Jersey fared the worst. 

Also, we discuss Bari Weiss sounding the alarm on Shanghai policies coming to Sacramento in the form of AB2098. 

Links on Show

NY Handled COVID Poorly: https://nypost.com/2022/04/11/ny-handled-covid-19-lockdown-poorly-florida-among-best-study/

Blue States Failed to Protect People: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10708225/The-states-FAILED-protect-people-COVID.html

A Warning From Shanghai: https://bariweiss.substack.com/p/a-warning-from-shanghai?s=r

Follow California Underground on Social Media

Instagram: www.instagram.com/californiaunderground

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCj8SabIcF4AKqEVFsLmo1jA

Substack: https://substack.com/profile/72986149-ca_underground

Shop California Underground Merchandise: https://california-underground.creator-spring.com

Phil is a San Diego based attorney who specializes in criminal defense and constitutional law both under the US and California Constitution.

Review the Anchor.Fm Privacy Policy: Anchor - The easiest way to make a podcast


00:00:06
If you're a California, conservative a Libertarian, a

00:00:09
moderate Democrat. Believe in common sense or just

00:00:12
the same person. This is the political podcast

00:00:15
for you. It's the California underground

00:00:17
podcast. What's going on everybody?

00:00:21
Thank you for tuning in to another episode of coffee and

00:00:24
California. Politics.

00:00:25
Good morning, good morning. Good morning.

00:00:39
In politics coffee. I didn't think it was that

00:00:44
noticeable, I always thought my New Jersey accent.

00:00:48
Has kind of faded away the longer I've spent in California

00:00:51
but I guess not. I guess it's, there's still some

00:00:53
things I say. I like coffee and dog and stuff

00:00:56
like that. I'm not like those East Coast

00:00:59
was like I can't get me some water like that's really thick

00:01:05
that people when I meet them and they're like oh you're from New

00:01:07
Jersey, you don't have an accent.

00:01:10
Well, no, I'm not, you know, I'm not the situation from from

00:01:14
Jersey Shore, you know, that's what everybody thinks.

00:01:17
Tony Soprano. Like there's a lot of other

00:01:19
people in Jersey who are not who don't talk like that.

00:01:23
See now, I just said, I said, talk like that and speak in New

00:01:26
Jersey. That's where we're going to talk

00:01:27
about a little bit today. This new study that did come out

00:01:30
showing a lot of blue States, fared worse than red states,

00:01:35
which a lot of people were like, well, yeah, we know that we

00:01:37
know. That's why I like, we know that

00:01:40
we did. We did we didn't really need a

00:01:41
study on it, but yeah, trying to get shellenberger on the show.

00:01:46
So hopefully you're here. We can get them on before, it

00:01:48
gets to gets too crazy, but I'm going to talk about that study

00:01:53
is gonna be another article. I want to talk about in regards

00:01:56
to its, by Barry Weiss. You don't know Barry Weiss's she

00:01:59
was a New York Times article. She wrote for the New York Times

00:02:03
and now she's sort of been ostracized because she went off

00:02:05
the reservation and their mind, she went off the reservation,

00:02:09
but she's kind of critiqued, a lot of the stuff that went on

00:02:12
with covid. And the lockdown is everything.

00:02:13
So it's gonna be very covid. Heavy episode today, Hopefully I

00:02:18
don't get you know banned by the overlords for anything like that

00:02:22
but those are the things we're going to talk about today

00:02:26
looking to get the podcast will be live.

00:02:29
This Friday afternoon most likely because of you know all

00:02:35
the holy weeks coming up, Easter's coming upstairs, a lot

00:02:38
of services. So, it won't be as easy as night

00:02:44
at night. But yeah, so we'll be looking to

00:02:47
do that Friday afternoon. And yeah, if you want to support

00:02:52
the channel, as always, there's the coffee mug in the bottom, I

00:02:55
did Spruce it up. It's a lot brighter than this

00:02:58
one. This was the original one.

00:02:59
And I got comments that this was too dark, and I'll grade is a

00:03:03
little dark. The new one is a lot brighter.

00:03:07
It pops a little bit more as a little bit bigger.

00:03:08
So, If you're looking to get yourself a cop, California

00:03:13
underground coffee mug to support the channel.

00:03:15
Like, I say, all of the money that I get from this, or from

00:03:19
anything goes, right, directly back into the channel will

00:03:22
looking at kind of Studio space and stuff like that, how we can

00:03:26
really grow the platform to make it a lot bigger, and just create

00:03:29
more conversations in California in general.

00:03:32
I mean, I know we talked a lot about politics but I'm sorry.

00:03:35
I think there might be a people who are just looking for places

00:03:37
to go to talk about California and how weird California is.

00:03:41
And how off the rails it is. And just bring a lot of people

00:03:44
together, not necessarily always about politics, but politics is

00:03:47
usually behind why California. So, kooky and crazy.

00:03:51
But yeah, there's also the new shirt, the stop brownouts

00:03:56
support nuclear. That's also there and that's

00:04:00
about it. So let's get started talking

00:04:03
about this. This was in the New York Post.

00:04:05
It was reported in a couple different places but the New

00:04:07
York Post has a an article about really kind of breaking it down.

00:04:14
It talks about the study published by the committee to

00:04:16
unleash Prosperity, graded states, by comparing covid-19

00:04:19
outcomes based on the number or desk the economy and impact on

00:04:22
education. Overall the bottom 10 of the

00:04:25
studies report card were dominated by States that had the

00:04:28
most severe pandemic, lockdowns and were among the last to

00:04:31
finally reopen schools quote shutting down their economies

00:04:35
and schools was by far, the biggest mistake, Governors and

00:04:38
state officials made during covid.

00:04:41
In blue States, Stephen Moore, one of the study's authors and

00:04:44
co-founder of the committee to unleash Prosperity.

00:04:47
Now I looked into the committee to unleash Prosperity.

00:04:50
I don't know if it's just their website looks like it was built

00:04:52
in like 1997 or maybe they've been around since 1997 and

00:04:56
that's why their website looks like that.

00:04:58
But I always like to kind of look at who's conducting this

00:05:01
study to figure out, you know, is there like a biased or they

00:05:05
trying to just do this for one way or not?

00:05:06
I don't really see anything that kind of flag me.

00:05:08
I was like this is really something that they just created

00:05:10
this Foundation. Station.

00:05:11
And then they came out with this study because you gotta be

00:05:13
careful. There are studies and polls

00:05:15
conducted. I know this may shock you but

00:05:17
there are polls and studies that are conducted to show slant to

00:05:23
one way. So I said, what's the topic

00:05:26
today? A new study that came out

00:05:28
regarding covid policies. And that the blue States like

00:05:31
California, New Jersey and New York ranked at the bottom in the

00:05:34
red states did much better. So we're going to talk about

00:05:36
that and we're going to talk about Barry Weiss and her

00:05:38
article about how Shanghai is coming to Sacramento.

00:05:41
Of what? Where was I going with this?

00:05:47
I forgot now I'm no. So, is that I met?

00:05:50
Did it today and still, are they coming?

00:05:53
Oh, yes! So yeah, there are times that

00:05:56
you'll see a poll or a study, and this is just always my

00:06:00
advice because, you know me, I'm always someone who says, vet,

00:06:03
everything that you see that everything don't just take

00:06:06
everything at, like, face value and kind of always just dig deep

00:06:09
into it and there are Groups that will create polls and

00:06:12
they'll create studies to show one thing or the other.

00:06:15
And there will be another group that is funded by somebody or

00:06:18
they. Maybe they get federal dollars

00:06:19
and all of a sudden magically they come up with the result

00:06:22
that the federal government or the state government is looking

00:06:24
for. So always be careful.

00:06:26
I still like where you're getting a lot of this stuff from

00:06:28
I looked at I and it didn't really look like you know they

00:06:31
look like it was just created yesterday and that they just put

00:06:34
out this study, too kind of dunk on Blue States and be like,

00:06:38
look, red states are better and our policies are way better.

00:06:42
It looks like they've been around for a while it kind of

00:06:45
reminds me, there was a poll conducted here in San Diego.

00:06:48
By one of the the packs and I put packs and quote because it's

00:06:55
a loose term for what that pack is really doing where it showed

00:06:58
one candidate was leading another Camp, I'd like double

00:07:00
digits, but the methodology for polling was really really bad

00:07:04
and in fact that's not really true at all.

00:07:06
But because that was their favorite candidate and the one

00:07:08
that they endorsed the created a poll.

00:07:11
I'll wear. It looked a lot better than it

00:07:13
really was. And now, that Canada is running

00:07:16
around saying, oh, look, I'm up by double digits, but then you

00:07:18
look at the poll and you say, oh actually, it's not really good.

00:07:22
So, first lesson, always double-check where the work is

00:07:26
coming from double check, who's putting the stuff out there and

00:07:28
what their methodology is. Let's see, do do do, do my home.

00:07:34
State of New Jersey was the worst performing State.

00:07:37
The study found other places that also received an f grade

00:07:40
including For an Illinois, Washington.

00:07:42
D.c. all blue areas, deep blue areas.

00:07:47
Am I referring to the a d76 race?

00:07:51
Maybe, maybe I am San Diego Politics.

00:07:56
As a, you know, it's a big city, but it's somebody say it's a big

00:07:59
city, but it's a small town, San Diego.

00:08:01
So quote they had high adjusted death rates.

00:08:05
They had high unemployment significant GDP losses and they

00:08:08
kept their school shut down much longer than almost all there.

00:08:11
States, you Todd, Nebraska Vermont, in Florida, all

00:08:14
governed by Republicans, top the list, the study found the states

00:08:18
that lock down their businesses churches, schools and

00:08:21
restaurants for lengthy periods. Did not have a lower death rates

00:08:24
than those that largely remained open nursing home policies.

00:08:29
May explain the poor mortality rates in some states such as New

00:08:32
Jersey, New York were Cuomo faced backlash for an order that

00:08:35
directed nursing homes to take covid-19 patients.

00:08:38
Meanwhile in Florida. Whose GOP.

00:08:41
Governor DeSantis did away with covid restrictions earlier on in

00:08:44
the pandemic, ranked 28th, and mortality the study found in

00:08:47
comparison heavily lockdown California came in 27, so only

00:08:52
one position better than Florida, which for as much is

00:08:57
Newsom has been posting a lot about other states if you have

00:09:03
any doubts that he's setting himself up for a run for

00:09:05
president. So you just look at his Twitter.

00:09:07
His Twitter right now is basically him.

00:09:09
Critiquing all others. States.

00:09:11
He, he seems to just be obsessed with tweeting about other states

00:09:14
and what's going on and all the comments are people.

00:09:16
Like, we got problems here, bro, like you gotta fix the problems

00:09:21
here before you start planning your run for presidency.

00:09:25
Keeping schools. Closed had no impact on the

00:09:27
number of deaths in children or adults, according to the study

00:09:30
the states that lockdown. The economies have had

00:09:32
unemployment rates on average about two percentage points

00:09:35
higher than states. That did not engage in severe,

00:09:38
lockdowns. Hi State unemployment rates that

00:09:43
persisted for two years. Now, most lockdown states have

00:09:46
still not fully recovered, the jobs lost in the early months of

00:09:48
covid. Let's see, New York ranked 33rd

00:09:53
for the least impact education, second to last for its economic

00:09:56
performance. California is ranked 50th for

00:09:59
its education, disruption and 40th for the economy.

00:10:03
So California, keeping it schools closed.

00:10:06
No shocker there. Again, a lot of this stuff is

00:10:08
stuff that I think people who tuned in to this or have been

00:10:12
questioned this for about two years are sitting there going.

00:10:15
Well, yeah, like this is really, this is what we've been talking

00:10:20
Talking about for two years now like we've been trying to bring

00:10:23
this up now. The study is nice because it

00:10:26
does kind of give you a quantitative reason.

00:10:28
Say look at this study that showed that here are the numbers

00:10:30
and they can prove that, you know, Florida didn't do much

00:10:34
worse than California. Only one per one really position

00:10:37
worse 27 to 28 worse and mortality rate in terms of

00:10:42
economic performance and education.

00:10:43
You can see that red states did a lot better.

00:10:46
Then blue States like California, New Jersey, New

00:10:48
York, and Illinois. That's not stuff that I think is

00:10:52
really kind of shocking to. A lot of people who are probably

00:10:55
tuning in right now listening, they're probably not saying are

00:10:57
going home. Yeah, obviously, that's, that's

00:11:00
right. Like we all know that, but

00:11:03
that's the quantitative part of this is that it is out there

00:11:06
now. And I'm going to go into another

00:11:10
article, why it's kind of like why the timing is a little bit

00:11:13
interesting. And what that really, why is

00:11:17
this study so interesting right now.

00:11:19
So this was an article. Come from the New York Post.

00:11:21
I'll go ahead. And if you listen to the audio

00:11:23
podcast, I'll put the link in the show notes so you can go

00:11:26
look at this up your for yourself because there's another

00:11:30
article by Daily Mail which goes into much more in-depth.

00:11:34
It really actually breaks it down by big sections like the

00:11:36
economy mortality rate and all that stuff so you can really

00:11:39
dive into it and show graphs and all that stuff.

00:11:43
But here's why they pointed out why this study is sort of really

00:11:49
coming to light why it's important.

00:11:50
Right now, the study comes amid, fears coronavirus restrictions,

00:11:55
maybe phase back. And as Philadelphia announced,

00:11:58
it was bringing back. Its indoor Mass mandate only a

00:12:01
month after lifting it as covid cases.

00:12:03
Creep up. The Pennsylvania city will

00:12:07
remove its mass mandate or reimpose its mass mandate

00:12:10
starting on April 18th, Health commissioner Cheryl a bit.

00:12:14
It better goalie announced during a briefing, a few

00:12:18
officials also revealed covid cases had Jump to Dairy for this

00:12:22
in the city of Philadelphia city of millions of people 149 per

00:12:27
day. An 86% jump over the past two

00:12:32
weeks. So 149 per day 86% jump.

00:12:38
Now that's again, that's where they can play with percentages

00:12:44
and they can try to scare people because they can say all 86

00:12:47
percent jump in just the two weeks.

00:12:49
Well, what was the number of before then?

00:12:50
So obviously was pretty low fat. The jump was 249 per day, we're

00:12:54
not talking about, thousands of people are testing positive for

00:12:56
covid, 149, out of the sea. E of how many millions of

00:13:00
people, and how many people kind of going and public transit and

00:13:02
all that stuff. But I'm sure they will say,

00:13:06
like, oh, 86 percent, that's the big number.

00:13:09
That's really what, look at how scary that is.

00:13:12
And I always tell people, when you hear percentages, always

00:13:15
look at the raw numbers because They use percentages as a way to

00:13:21
kind of scare people or push their point a little bit better.

00:13:25
And my favorite example is, if you have one apple and then you

00:13:29
get to Apples, you can tell people, I had 100% increase in

00:13:33
my Apple possession, which is true.

00:13:35
You had a hundred percent increase in your Apple

00:13:37
percentage. It's not very if you told people

00:13:40
what I only have 2 apples, who will be like, well, that's not

00:13:42
that many apples. I don't really, I don't see what

00:13:45
you're trying to get at. So, percentage is always the

00:13:48
thing that if you look at it, they'll use it to scare people

00:13:51
and government. Officials love to throw out

00:13:53
percentages. They always love to say, things

00:13:57
went up by this percentage or that percentage.

00:14:00
And then when you say, well, whoa, give me the raw numbers.

00:14:03
They don't really want to talk about the raw numbers, but you

00:14:06
can look at a lot of stuff. And, you know, if they're

00:14:08
reporting is accurate. All of these sites, where they

00:14:10
give you the numbers, you can really see that.

00:14:12
A lot of these numbers aren't as scary as they make them out to

00:14:15
be. The city also, reported 46,

00:14:19
current hospitalizations 46 again in a city of not.

00:14:23
Well, this is going to bug me, so I'm gonna have to look it up

00:14:26
because I should have looked this up before the show, but

00:14:29
we're going to do this on the Fly and Bill O'Reilly's.

00:14:32
We're going to do it live. Phil Delphia apologies to anyone

00:14:39
who lives in Philadelphia because I'm not a fan of the

00:14:43
city and I'm not a fan of any of the sports teams.

00:14:46
That, you know, that's just that's just me.

00:14:49
So apologies to anyone is Philadelphia and I'm sure you're

00:14:52
a wonderful person but I don't like the Phillies.

00:14:56
I certainly don't like the eagles, I've nothing else to

00:14:59
fires. I don't really follow hockey or

00:15:01
the 76ers, I don't watch basketball but those two teams

00:15:03
right there, the Phillies Mets, had a really bad loss of the

00:15:07
Phillies the other night and that broke my heart.

00:15:09
So as of 2020, so this is a population.

00:15:14
Of 1.6 million people. There were 46 hospitalizations

00:15:18
and a city of 1.6 million out anyone.

00:15:25
Do the math on how? What, percentage 46 of 1.6

00:15:29
million is and how many there's probably so many other things

00:15:32
that are happening in Philadelphia that are causing

00:15:34
hospitalizations. It's amazing that they're

00:15:38
changing their entire lives just because of this.

00:15:42
So the Philadelphia Public Health said on Twitter, Monday,

00:15:44
the city will now enter level to mask precautions as triggered by

00:15:48
the recent increase in cases. What is there?

00:15:51
What? I wonder what the trigger is.

00:15:52
For Philadelphia that this this little amount was what triggered

00:15:58
them to go back into Mass to me. It seems like what you're covid.

00:16:02
Policy must be zero because if it's only 46% hospitalization

00:16:07
and this triggered, you rushing bass back to mass and indoor

00:16:10
places your, you must have a covid, 0 policy.

00:16:14
Is unattainable unattainable and it's not realistic and it's not

00:16:18
scientific to believe covid. There will ever be covid 0 after

00:16:22
a week to adjust all indoor public places, like schools

00:16:25
businesses restaurants, and government buildings will be

00:16:27
required, to use masking indoors, Jim Kenney mayor of

00:16:31
Philadelphia said, Philadelphia's covid-19 response

00:16:35
levels allows us to be clear transparent and predictable in

00:16:39
our response to local condition given the rising cases were

00:16:43
moving to level two on April 18th to prevent higher case

00:16:47
rates. Our city remains open, we can

00:16:50
still go about our daily lives and visit the people and places

00:16:53
we love while masking in indoor public spaces.

00:16:57
I don't know if that's what he sounds like but that's my that's

00:17:00
going to be my imitation of him. But case figures are not

00:17:03
considered to be a reliable metric when judging the state of

00:17:06
the pandemic by many federal officials, so Philadelphia, not

00:17:10
following the science. Where you at Philadelphia.

00:17:12
Now following the science City of Brotherly Love not following

00:17:15
the science. The Centers for Disease Control

00:17:17
and prevention changed its metrics earlier this year now,

00:17:21
valuing hospitalizations over all else when recommending Mass

00:17:24
orders on certain populations. According to see you see

00:17:28
Philadelphia County which includes the city is one of the

00:17:30
95% of counties considered to have low covid risk and not

00:17:35
recommended to wear masks and doors.

00:17:37
So looks like they're going against this.

00:17:41
Hence according to the CDC which was treated as all, holy and

00:17:46
all-powerful and all-knowing and infallible Philadelphia is going

00:17:50
against the science and they're going back to mass and doors

00:17:54
Anthony fauci. Everyone's favorite Anthony

00:17:58
fauci. Dr. Fauci.

00:18:00
The top infectious disease expert said this week Americans

00:18:04
should decide for themselves how they want to deal with the

00:18:07
pandemic, going forward. Based on the amount of risk,

00:18:10
they are willing. NG to accept.

00:18:13
He told ABC's this week on Sunday.

00:18:16
Let me take my drink. Hold on.

00:18:21
Clear My Throat day, I will be and we've said many times even

00:18:27
in our own discussions between you and I that there will be a

00:18:31
level of infection. This is not going to be

00:18:34
eradicated and it's not going to be eliminated.

00:18:37
And what's going to happen is that we're going to see each

00:18:40
individual is going to have to make the calculation on the

00:18:43
amount of risk that they want to take in going to endure dinners

00:18:48
and in going to functions. That was dr.

00:18:52
Fauci. Kobe cases are starting to rise

00:18:56
once again. In parts of the US after nearly

00:18:58
three months of declines coming off of the mass of winter

00:19:00
Omicron surge but Health officials say it's not a cause

00:19:04
for concern because hospitalizations and deaths,

00:19:06
remain low dr. A shisha Zhao the White House,

00:19:11
coronavirus. Response coordinator who also

00:19:14
served as the dean of the Brownie, and a little ball Baba,

00:19:16
who cares? So that despite recent case

00:19:20
Rises and more than half of the US states Americans don't have

00:19:23
reason to be excessively concerned about the current

00:19:25
pandemic situation. Why?

00:19:27
Because the pandemic is not good polling for Democrats right now.

00:19:32
So got to protect the administration according to the

00:19:36
most recent data daily covid rate cases have increased over

00:19:39
the past two weeks and 26. US states cases are increasing

00:19:42
Nationwide as well with that of from Friday April 24th average

00:19:45
of thirty six thousand daily infections at 25.

00:19:48
A percent jump from the previous week 36.

00:19:53
In a country of over 300 million, people 36 remember,

00:20:01
25 percent jump, remember that? That number we're all case

00:20:05
figures are not particularly High though.

00:20:07
And jaw also says a hospitalizations are currently

00:20:09
the lowest they've been at any point in the pandemic.

00:20:12
Sounds good, right? I mean that's the point.

00:20:14
We all kind of agree that hospitalizations and deaths were

00:20:17
really the thing that we should be looking at the hospitals.

00:20:20
I mean, let's let's get away in the Wayback machine.

00:20:24
If you're old enough like me to remember back in March of 2020,

00:20:28
that the reason this all started was because we didn't want to

00:20:32
overwhelm the Healthcare System, right?

00:20:35
That was the whole reason for why we did what we did.

00:20:40
So, it would make sense that we should.

00:20:42
Really be looking at. Hospitalizations and making sure

00:20:48
that we are not overwhelming, the Health Care system.

00:20:52
And if it looks like the raw numbers are showing now

00:20:54
Philadelphia at 46, 46 in a city of 1.6 million 46 people across

00:21:00
the city, went to the hospital because of covid.

00:21:03
That's what we should be looking at.

00:21:07
That's really what we should be focusing on. but, Philadelphia

00:21:13
doesn't seem to really want to look at it that way.

00:21:15
They see it as cases. And so which is it.

00:21:19
And I know we've asked this question a hundred times.

00:21:22
Plenty of people have asked this question, a hundred times.

00:21:26
And where do we go from? Here, is really I thought in the

00:21:31
beginning, I thought that they wouldn't reimpose a lot of this

00:21:33
stuff. I thought that we were kind of

00:21:35
done with it. I thought that it was bad

00:21:38
politics that they didn't want to go.

00:21:40
They wanted to kind of do there. Victory lap, that Biden was

00:21:43
going to do his Victory lap and say we beat the pandemic.

00:21:45
Democrats were going to take credit for beating the pandemic

00:21:49
even though the pandemic was going to do, what the pandemic

00:21:52
was going to do anyway because that's what science is a virus.

00:21:54
Doesn't give two craps about what's going on in the politics

00:21:57
or it doesn't give two craps about what's happening in the

00:22:00
midterms. It's not like the virus is gone.

00:22:03
Well it's the midterms and I want to make sure I support Joe

00:22:06
Biden. So I'm going to go received for

00:22:08
a little bit but in reality. After we went back to the 2nd

00:22:15
Mass mandate here in California, once we reopen and and he had

00:22:20
that whole noodles, had that whole big ceremony with the

00:22:24
minions at Universal Studios. I guess Disney was busy that day

00:22:27
to want have noodles there because he had to go to

00:22:31
Universal Studios. No, offense to people go to

00:22:33
Universal Studios, but it's the Lesser theme park and he had

00:22:38
this whole big thing. We're back in.

00:22:39
California is open and here's me juggling.

00:22:41
And here's the minions and look at all this great stuff and

00:22:44
we're back baby. And then we went back to mass

00:22:47
mandates and people were like, wait a second.

00:22:49
I thought we were we were past this so now I don't think I'd

00:22:54
put it past them that they are not going to just keep doing

00:22:57
this over and over again. The amount of complacency I

00:23:00
don't know whether people are going to do it or not.

00:23:03
I think after the second time I saw a lot more people, not

00:23:06
really responding to it. It's all a lot of people who

00:23:09
weren't listening to them as mandate.

00:23:10
I saw a lot of businesses that And enforcing them as mandate.

00:23:13
So I don't know if you went about third time, third time

00:23:17
might be going to the well, one too many times and Universal

00:23:23
Studios has a great date milk, milk shake.

00:23:26
Yeah, I'm sure it's fantastic. Although people are kind of like

00:23:28
in the comments people are, let me know that date milkshakes are

00:23:32
either disgusting or they're really, really good.

00:23:36
And I don't know, you can let me know in the comments whether you

00:23:39
think date milkshakes are really good.

00:23:40
It for anybody who's listening Has no idea what I'm talking

00:23:42
about. There was a post about one of

00:23:45
the assemblyman Eduardo Garcia is pushing for the date, Shake,

00:23:52
which when you say it quickly doesn't sound, right?

00:23:56
But it sounds weird but he wants to make it a date, Shake as the

00:24:00
official state milkshake. So, Your tax dollars hard at

00:24:05
work. Let's see where I want to finish

00:24:08
this up and then we can get into the Barry Weiss article.

00:24:14
Dr. Fauci also said, Americans will have to start to decide for

00:24:18
themselves how they would like to live with the virus and that

00:24:21
it could not be eradicated. Whoa, groundbreaking 400 dr.

00:24:25
Fauci to say something like that.

00:24:30
It did it did he has more stuff. It is incredibly contagious.

00:24:35
Even more contagious than the original sub variant of Omicron

00:24:38
and it caused the substantial spike in cases in Europe.

00:24:43
He told Morning Joe referring like a spike and we'll go on it

00:24:47
but I don't want to keep talking about it because you can go

00:24:49
check out the article for yourself.

00:24:50
It's on daily. It's a really, really long

00:24:52
article, but it's really in-depth talking about basically

00:24:56
looking back and hopefully we learn from it.

00:25:00
I don't know if we are learning from it.

00:25:02
I think the only thing that politicians have learned from it

00:25:04
is that they can use it as a cudgel and a sword to chop up

00:25:09
your rights and limit your freedoms.

00:25:11
And this brings me to really kind of the next point that I

00:25:15
want to talk about. Now, I've mentioned on this show

00:25:17
before that, a lot of people say that China wants to take over

00:25:22
the United States. I don't necessarily think China

00:25:26
wants to take over the United States.

00:25:29
And that's my personal opinion. I don't think China really wants

00:25:32
to take over the United States. I think they can benefit from

00:25:35
having some sort of power over the United States and and having

00:25:38
that sort of relationship. But I also think that they don't

00:25:43
really want to take a ring United States.

00:25:45
However, I think there are a lot of politicians who go to China

00:25:49
and look at their style of government and say, hmm.

00:25:53
How can we get what you're doing over here?

00:25:57
Basically they're saying look, I love what you're doing with the

00:26:01
place, please. Can you show us how we can do it

00:26:05
over here in the United States? Because these pesky like

00:26:07
constitutional rights, really, really just getting in the way

00:26:12
of us. Getting our goals done and

00:26:14
making the most amount of money as possible.

00:26:18
And that's really what I think is going on here.

00:26:21
I don't think trying to watch. It's the one day, all of a

00:26:24
sudden become, you know, like Annex America as a another

00:26:30
territory like that. But I think there are

00:26:33
politicians who from the inside want to implement the Chinese

00:26:36
style of government. And I've also said this before,

00:26:39
I don't think China is necessarily a communist country.

00:26:42
I think they wanted the Communists governance.

00:26:45
They wanted that style of governance, but they didn't want

00:26:48
the Communist economy because they are still very capitalistic

00:26:52
economy. As you can see, why we kind of

00:26:55
cater to them all the time and worry about what they think

00:26:58
about our movies or anything like that.

00:27:00
And they care we care about what whether they like the NBA or

00:27:04
not. Like those are things that I

00:27:07
don't think, we'd they really want a communist style economy,

00:27:10
you know, where we share everything and the state kind of

00:27:12
runs everything. I think they just want

00:27:16
totalitarianism. And again, I think that's stuff

00:27:19
that our officials here. Who don't want to talk about the

00:27:25
human rights abuses over in China and don't really have

00:27:29
anything to say bad about China. Whenever that happened whenever

00:27:33
anything happens. They're just trying to implement

00:27:39
their own style and this article by Barry Weiss.

00:27:43
Let me pull this up real quick. It's in.

00:27:47
I hear what you have. So many tabs open the title of,

00:27:52
it was talking about a warning from Shanghai and if you've seen

00:27:56
the videos from Shanghai, they are distressing.

00:28:00
I think my tweet this morning basically sums it up that the

00:28:04
human rights abuses going on in China.

00:28:08
Are the things that America used to invade countries over or at

00:28:13
least used as a justification to invade countries over.

00:28:16
It may not have been really why they were invading.

00:28:19
It could be invading for a number of reasons, they could be

00:28:21
invading because well they want the oil or something like that,

00:28:25
but they may say that we want to invade because we want to help

00:28:30
preserve human rights but that seems to not really be the case

00:28:36
when it comes to China. And what's going on in Shanghai.

00:28:40
The videos are really disturbing.

00:28:42
People's pets are being taken away because you can't walk your

00:28:45
pets outside. I don't know what you do with

00:28:47
pets when they're locked inside, all the time with you and you

00:28:50
can't go out unless you want to figure out how to teach your dog

00:28:54
or cat to go potty in the toilet.

00:28:57
I don't know what you expect to do with them, you know?

00:29:00
It's just awful. I posted a video about people

00:29:03
screaming from their skyscrapers because they're hungry and

00:29:06
there's no food and they can't go to the store.

00:29:08
You can't do anything. And yeah, I saw the video about

00:29:11
cats and bags and all that stuff.

00:29:14
It's terrifying. It's terrifying to think that

00:29:17
there's a place in this world that we are.

00:29:20
As a as America are just really we're fine with it.

00:29:25
I guess our leaders are fine with.

00:29:26
I don't think the people are fine with.

00:29:28
I think the people see these videos and go, this is a little

00:29:31
screwed out as little effed up but our leaders obviously don't

00:29:35
want to talk about it. You know, ask Nancy Pelosi Or

00:29:38
ask anybody about it. They don't seem to really care

00:29:42
about what's going on over in Shanghai.

00:29:45
And the fact that they don't shows you that one, they have a

00:29:49
financial interest in keeping China happy, which is true.

00:29:53
They want to make sure China's happy because China buys a lot

00:29:55
of our stuff. And a lot of times, all these

00:29:58
politicians are negotiating deals with China and they're

00:30:01
passing laws that benefit China and then they get a kickback

00:30:03
and, you know, it all goes round and round and round and the

00:30:06
Cesspool of corruption. In Washington DC, but I think

00:30:11
they also want a that style of governance here.

00:30:16
I think they think they can somehow get that to be the issue

00:30:20
here, where they basically turn all Americans into just tax

00:30:25
cattle where we don't have rights.

00:30:26
Where we're just here we work, we pay exorbitant amount of

00:30:30
taxes. They live high on the hog, Nancy

00:30:33
Pelosi eats out of over 30, dollar fridge, and freezer.

00:30:38
And that's it. The elites basically continue to

00:30:42
move on and live the way they want to even better than before.

00:30:46
The rest of us are tax cattle, we can't afford a house.

00:30:48
We can't afford the American dream anymore and I think that's

00:30:51
what they basically want. And there was a really good

00:30:54
podcast. I had a while back.

00:30:57
I'd have to remember the number but there was a good discussion

00:31:00
at a guest on. We talked about China's

00:31:03
influence on California and we talked all about this and how

00:31:07
there. Politicians who go to China and

00:31:09
say, like, can you give us lessons on how we, how can we

00:31:14
implement this stuff here in the United States?

00:31:18
And how can we get more of your style governance here in the

00:31:21
United States? But it's coming to Sacramento.

00:31:27
We've talked about this on the prior podcast two weeks ago.

00:31:30
We had a kind of legislative Roundup was assembly Bill 2098

00:31:36
and this is from Barry Weiss's Op-ed Corner, California

00:31:39
Assembly, Bill, 2098, Physicians, who deviate from an

00:31:43
authorized set of beliefs would do so at the risk of their

00:31:46
medical license, the bill written by assemblyman Evan low,

00:31:50
a democrat in Silicon Valley, no shocker.

00:31:52
Usually all these bills. You could bet your house on the

00:31:55
fact that if it's a crazy crazy bill that you look at, it's a

00:31:59
good chance that it comes from the Bay Area outside of the

00:32:02
milkshake. The milkshake came from

00:32:03
Coachella Valley, that had nothing to do with the Bay Area

00:32:07
currently It's where the California legislature is

00:32:09
motivated by the idea that practicing doctors are spreading

00:32:12
quote, misinformation about the risks of kovin, it's treatment

00:32:16
and the covid vaccine, it declares that Physicians and

00:32:19
surgeons Who quote, disseminate or permit promote

00:32:22
misinformation, disinformation related to covid, including

00:32:25
false, or misleading information regarding the nature and risks

00:32:28
of the virus, it's prevention and its treatment and the

00:32:31
development safety and effectiveness of covid.

00:32:33
Vaccines shall be subject to disciplinary action, which could

00:32:36
result in the loss of The doctor's license, the language

00:32:40
of the bill itself is intentionally vague about what

00:32:43
constitutes quote misinformation, which makes it

00:32:46
makes it even more damaging doctors, fearing loss of their

00:32:50
livelihoods will need to Hew closely to the government line

00:32:53
on covid science and policy. Even if that line does not track

00:32:57
the scientific evidence. After all until recently top

00:33:00
government science bureaucrats like dr.

00:33:02
Fauci clean out. The idea that covid came from a

00:33:04
Wu Han laboratory was a conspiracy theory.

00:33:07
Rather than a valid hypothesis, that should be open to

00:33:10
discussion. The government's track record on

00:33:12
Discerning covid truce is poor. The bill claims that the spread

00:33:17
of misinformation by positions about the covid.

00:33:19
Vaccines quote has weakened public confidence in place lives

00:33:22
at serious risk and quote but how significant is his problem?

00:33:25
Reality over 83%, California's over the age of 50 are fully

00:33:29
vaccinated including the booster.

00:33:33
What is abundantly clear is that this bill represents a chilling

00:33:36
interference with the practice of medicine, the bill itself is

00:33:40
full of misinformation and a demonstration of what a

00:33:42
disaster. It would be to have the

00:33:43
legislature, dictate the practice of medicine.

00:33:49
I'm gonna take a sip of coffee real quick.

00:33:53
I think that dr. Fauci voice makes your voice

00:33:55
scratchy. There's Bill directs,

00:33:58
California, State, Licensing, Board, and impose disciplinary

00:34:00
penalties, which could result in the loss of a medical license on

00:34:04
Physicians who disseminate misinformation.

00:34:07
A loss of a license would be a career-ending for doctors who

00:34:09
spend their lives caring for patients.

00:34:12
But since the examples site in the bill are themselves

00:34:14
misleading, even Physicians, who practice medicine responsibly or

00:34:18
give public presentations grounded and solid scientific

00:34:21
research on. Evolving covid science May face

00:34:24
unjust license suspensions. Going on going on Dudu history

00:34:32
provides abundant examples of what happens when the state

00:34:35
regulates science in the former Soviet Union.

00:34:37
Stalin's favorite Genesis geneticist trofim lysenko lie.

00:34:43
Senko dominated biology and the agricultural Sciences lie.

00:34:47
Senko rejected mendelian genetics.

00:34:49
In favor of his own theory that plants could inherit acquired

00:34:52
current characteristics, Stalin empowered him to destroy the

00:34:55
careers and lives of geneticist who Was them causing many to

00:34:59
suffer, secret arrest, and even death when the theories failed.

00:35:02
The consequences was mass starvation in Russia.

00:35:06
The Chinese Communist also adopted his belief at the cost

00:35:08
of starvation of 30 million people.

00:35:11
We are not the Soviet Union, of course, Nora, we ruled by giant

00:35:14
Chinese Communist. California, lawmakers,

00:35:16
thankfully do not have the power currently being exercised in

00:35:19
Shanghai, but this bill follows the same dangerous principle

00:35:22
that government, authorized science would permit.

00:35:25
No opposition from people with the credentials and knowledge,

00:35:28
To oppose it. The false medical consensus.

00:35:30
Enforced by a bee 2098, will lead doctors to censor

00:35:33
themselves to avoid government-sanctioned and it

00:35:36
will be their patients above all, who will be harmed by their

00:35:39
silence. So that was Barry Weiss talking

00:35:43
out about this bill. A be 2098, I think, the last

00:35:46
time we wait, we looked at was making its way through committee

00:35:50
still has legs at this point. I think it's a duck, it seven

00:35:53
low and I think co-author is dr. Richard Pan.

00:35:58
One of our favorites. We're going to do this alive

00:36:01
again. Check this out where it is.

00:36:05
Do do, do do. And then we'll move into the

00:36:10
comment section or where we what people want to chat about

00:36:14
assembly member low. Co-authors a gear.

00:36:19
Curry, a Killa Webber in Wicks and co-author Center, pans and

00:36:23
waiter, of course, pan and wiener wiener pan.

00:36:27
That's just a funny name wiener pan.

00:36:29
Is they always seem to be at the center of all this stuff.

00:36:32
So, let's see where it is right now.

00:36:37
As of February 24th, it was referred to the committee on

00:36:40
business and professions that was a while ago.

00:36:42
So I don't know where it's at or if it's losing steam, but the

00:36:46
fact that this was even introduced in California's is

00:36:49
scary and it should be a wake-up call to a lot of people that

00:36:53
Shanghai is not as far as you think, it is Shanghai and their

00:36:58
policies are closer because there are people who are Pushing

00:37:04
these policies and they look at China and go.

00:37:07
Hmm, I think we could do that here in California.

00:37:10
Let's give it a shot and a lot of these things are very 1984

00:37:15
ish. They are very obviously

00:37:18
orwellian. They're very authoritarian

00:37:22
obviously controlling truth and what is misinformation as

00:37:25
opposed to letting people just discuss what's best because

00:37:28
there's this old saying, I'd like to get a second opinion.

00:37:31
Remember that when you said like oh, I'd like to get a second

00:37:33
opinion. Meaning you go to another doctor

00:37:37
because they probably have a different opinion.

00:37:39
And if they have the same opinion, then you can say, all

00:37:41
go back to my first doctor. But if you get the second

00:37:43
opinion, that used to be a thing, I remember, you were

00:37:46
allowed to have a second opinion.

00:37:48
I guess not so much as doctors Hearing in California.

00:37:51
And she does talk about how in the article that she's had

00:37:53
colleagues from Stanford who believed a lot.

00:37:57
What she's saying, because she's out there, she's sort of out on

00:37:59
the ledge doing this herself. And basically, they said, look,

00:38:03
I'm on, Tenured. I'm a junior faculty member.

00:38:05
I'm not going to speak up about this stuff because I want to get

00:38:08
tenured and I have a vested interest.

00:38:10
I put my whole life into this study, I don't want to lose

00:38:14
everything for this and you're going to see it.

00:38:16
You're gonna see a lot of. I mean there's I think Jeffrey

00:38:18
Burke dr. Jeffrey Burke.

00:38:19
I think that's his name up in Orange County.

00:38:21
He's one of the most proponent biggest proponents who's always

00:38:25
out there talking about against the covid policies.

00:38:27
He would probably be like Public Enemy.

00:38:30
Number One, if this bill passed because you would have I have

00:38:35
essentially him going they'd have all this data, all these

00:38:38
videos and stuff about him going against.

00:38:41
What their line of Truth is and they would say well you're

00:38:44
spreading misinformation. So we're going to put you two in

00:38:46
front of the disciplinary board and you're going to lose your

00:38:49
license so it's scary. So yeah, we want a little Co bit

00:38:54
heavy today, but that's sort of what's in the news.

00:38:56
Right now. Noodles just got back from

00:38:59
Central America. His I guess, 14 day trip, you

00:39:02
went to Costa Rica, no problem. Babe, don't worry about it, you

00:39:04
know, California's falling apart homelessness is crazy but sure,

00:39:10
go to Costa Rica and make it a big deal.

00:39:13
All right, so we got about 15 minutes left.

00:39:17
If anybody has any comments or questions or things you want to

00:39:20
talk about, now is the time to bring those up.

00:39:25
Wish he stayed there. Yeah, I think a lot of people

00:39:27
kind of wish he stayed there, but somebody asked before, do I

00:39:31
really think he has a shot at the presidency?

00:39:37
I'll get to that question in a second.

00:39:39
First off pan is termed out, so he doesn't really have a

00:39:42
challenger Michael. I'm sure Michael Wang.

00:39:46
MD is another Democrat from his area and probably pushes the

00:39:50
same exact stuff. But someone had asked whether or

00:39:54
not, I believe that noodles can actually make it as president.

00:40:00
And here's my thought on that. I don't think he really knows if

00:40:05
he can become I'm president I don't think he has the shot to

00:40:07
become president. I don't think a lot of people

00:40:09
look at California go. Yeah the way they run

00:40:12
California. That's how I want to do it here

00:40:13
especially in swing states that are you know lost by a

00:40:16
percentage point that are really, really close.

00:40:19
I don't think there's a lot of people in those Independence in

00:40:22
those areas where Look at California up and I don't want

00:40:25
that style of governance here. I don't think in Arizona, he'd

00:40:28
be able to flip Arizona. I don't think he'd be able to

00:40:30
flip. I'm trying.

00:40:32
Another big swing States. In Georgia now is a swing state.

00:40:38
Ohio, he wouldn't be able to flip, I think a lot of people

00:40:41
would look at him and go. He's California, I don't want I

00:40:43
want any part of it but the reason I think he wants to run

00:40:46
is because to him, it's the next.

00:40:48
It's the next thing that he wants to accomplish.

00:40:51
Because for Gavin, Newsom, his whole life has never really been

00:40:54
about actually doing anything with the positions that he's in.

00:40:59
He's kind of made his trajectory and we all kind of can see his

00:41:03
trajectory He was County supervisor and then he was the

00:41:09
mayor of Danny was the mayor of San Francisco?

00:41:14
And then for mayor of San Francisco, I think people sort

00:41:16
of already knew, he was kind of in the running to be governor.

00:41:19
And that everyone kind of had this feeling he was going to be

00:41:21
Governor, but then he went to, he tried to run for Governor.

00:41:27
Jerry Brown stepped in. He became a lieutenant governor.

00:41:29
Now, he's governor. And, but after that, where do

00:41:35
you go? Oh, you can't really go anywhere

00:41:36
else unless he appoints himself Senator.

00:41:39
But that feels like a step back to go from Governor to Senator.

00:41:43
So I think his next thought is that, it's the next Brass Ring.

00:41:45
He's got to go, grab is go become try and become president.

00:41:49
I don't think he has a shot at winning, not in today's

00:41:51
political climate so I don't heed.

00:41:56
I don't think he has a shot at winning, but I think he will

00:41:59
definitely try and try and run. Michael J Hwang for California

00:42:06
State. Senate God country Liberty and

00:42:08
respect doesn't sound like a Democrat.

00:42:10
Let's restore our Liberty. It's time to restore our medical

00:42:13
freedom and fight for your right to protect our children citizens

00:42:16
from tyranny. I'll be on a represent.

00:42:19
You as your state, senator to defend our Constitution and

00:42:22
Liberties. He's got an uphill, battle pans

00:42:24
district is I believe is very, very liberal, so probably not

00:42:30
the best, right out the gate, but Hayes You know, he's got

00:42:34
his, he's got what, you know, that's what he believes in.

00:42:38
Go for it, man. California State Senate, did it

00:42:44
do. I'm trying to see specifically

00:42:47
where he's he's running, but yeah, he's not challenging dr.

00:42:51
Pan because dr. Pan is, he's turned out so came.

00:42:58
I give me the number of this. Where is this?

00:43:01
Where is he running here? Because I can look, This up on

00:43:04
ballotpedia and see what the breakdown is.

00:43:08
I could actually just got about PD right now and figure it out

00:43:12
about PDA. Do do do.

00:43:17
That's a bummer pans. Got to go think anyone says that

00:43:21
it's a bummer that dr. Richard pan has to go Richard

00:43:26
pan. I'm in pants District.

00:43:27
I've had people walk up to me and compliment my grand style

00:43:30
shirt so maybe not as liberal as people think senate seat.

00:43:33
District, 6, thank you. There we go.

00:43:36
All right. It's a lot to remember.

00:43:39
So I know there's a lot of did. It's a big state after the boc

00:43:45
BOS being served last week? Is it going to lead anything?

00:43:48
What were they served with? They were sure it was something

00:43:51
I saw the video. I don't really know what they

00:43:52
were served with. Was it a lawsuit or something?

00:43:59
Let's see make about a hundred fourteen thousand dollars a

00:44:01
year, Senator pan, two hundred dollars a day per diem that adds

00:44:08
up. You know if someone gave you

00:44:09
$200 a day to kind of do what you want with it because it's a

00:44:15
per diem that does add up after a while.

00:44:19
I think Kevin Kylie is one of the only legislature legislators

00:44:23
who doesn't actually take his per diem.

00:44:25
How much is 2011 $211 / burn Times by 365.

00:44:38
Oh, okay, it's a 77 thousand dollars.

00:44:41
Well, probably less because they probably only give you it,

00:44:44
during the five business days. Do, let's see, the race, the

00:44:49
pass phrase, Michael Hwang. Okay.

00:44:54
So there's actually two Republicans, rhyme, Michael

00:44:57
Wang, Roger and yellow, and a Democrat.

00:45:01
And that's the primary is right now.

00:45:03
It's two Republicans. So Right now, there will

00:45:07
actually, if there's two Republicans and one Democrat and

00:45:10
it's the primary election right now, in this Senate District,

00:45:15
there's a chance, you'll get a, there's a good chance.

00:45:17
You'll, you'll actually you'll get a republican because it's,

00:45:20
you're going to get at least one Republican on the ballot for the

00:45:23
Senate District. I don't know if anyone else is

00:45:25
planning to jump in, right now. Let's see.

00:45:28
Paula Maria Vasquez at large are the San San Juan Unified Board

00:45:34
of Education. Running for.

00:45:36
So she's not looking assembly woman who's running for this,

00:45:40
but pan did win in 2018, with 70% of the vote against Eric

00:45:44
frame. Who's an independent Eric frame

00:45:47
running a couple times, but yeah, to give you an idea of,

00:45:55
oh, there's a little bit closer in that one race.

00:45:58
Interesting. Oh, a Libertarian ran in 2010,

00:46:02
but yeah, you'll get a I'm so if you're in the Senate District 6,

00:46:07
you will get a republican. So anyway, any other questions

00:46:11
comments stuff, people want to chat about.

00:46:14
Thank you to everybody who keeps adding the mug to their wish

00:46:16
list. Thank you very much.

00:46:20
Please let me know how it turns out.

00:46:23
When's the next Termino live Q&A Tremaine.

00:46:26
I wasn't reached out to me so I don't know.

00:46:29
I haven't I haven't really heard from his team so unless he's got

00:46:34
anything really new to say, since the last time.

00:46:39
I don't know. I there's a lot of other

00:46:41
candidates to get to, and I've said this before, I don't want

00:46:44
to just focus on the governor's race because that's that's

00:46:49
really not. It's about and and Governor is

00:46:53
not going to change anything. So it's really about the local

00:46:58
races. It's about assembly it's about

00:47:00
Senate. It's about your local school

00:47:02
boards and I'll say this until I'm blue in the face.

00:47:08
That's the stuff that really matters.

00:47:10
That's the stuff that really is. What's going to make a big

00:47:14
difference here. So you can focus on Governor.

00:47:18
You know I told you I've been following Michael shellenberger

00:47:21
a little bit more as highly recommend if you haven't

00:47:24
listened, check out his podcast with Joe Rogan a lot of good

00:47:29
Common Sense stuff. You know like hey just here's

00:47:32
our issues and here's how we can go forward, kind of refreshing.

00:47:36
So better question is when he's going to face the music and

00:47:39
debate Daniel Mercury you know the one he keeps stealing

00:47:42
material from. Whoo.

00:47:44
There's tea. Is there is there really T

00:47:47
between Daniel Mercury and Anthony Tremaine?

00:47:49
Oh, is this like a real Feud or is this something like Daniel

00:47:53
Mercury is trying to get going to believe there's a feud.

00:47:57
I haven't heard if there's a few to, or not between Daniel

00:47:59
Mercury and Anthony Jimena. It will be interesting though to

00:48:07
see how the convention goes, which is coming up this next

00:48:12
week, I believe. Right?

00:48:15
The only It was because I wanted to go and be there but will be

00:48:20
out of town. So there is zero Feud, okay?

00:48:25
I mean I hadn't heard anything so I didn't know there was a,

00:48:28
there was a feud between Daniel Mercury, Anthony Trevino.

00:48:31
Or it was sort of just if it was something that they were just

00:48:36
going to drumming up to create press.

00:48:41
So yeah, it'll be interesting to see who they get behind at the

00:48:45
Republican convention. Convention.

00:48:46
I fully expect they'll get behind Brian Dolly.

00:48:53
Yeah and that's that's basically I think they'll get behind Brian

00:48:57
Dolly, they'll get behind the establishment person and if

00:48:59
there's any if there's any indication who they're going to

00:49:03
go with, excuse me, if there's any indication of who the

00:49:07
California GOP is going to go with, just look at their

00:49:09
endorsement of Scott bow. I mean Scott bowed drop that

00:49:12
video guy is crooked as they come.

00:49:16
He's been an establishment bully for how many years?

00:49:18
I mean he's been the attack, dog for the establishment for

00:49:21
decades and he's been at the middle of a lot of really shady

00:49:25
stuff and the California GOP in the Orange County GOP was like,

00:49:29
yeah, he's our guy, let's go with that guy.

00:49:32
So if that gives you any idea of the California GOP, just

00:49:35
continues to frustrate me to the point where I just go.

00:49:37
I don't even know why anybody is a republican anymore in

00:49:40
California and they got and then I can imagine they sit around,

00:49:44
you know, Jessica Milan. Orson and her her probably a

00:49:47
bunch of yes, people around her cub.

00:49:50
You know, why are we, why are we not connecting with

00:49:52
Californians? I just don't get.

00:49:54
Why are we not? Why are we not doing better in

00:49:56
California? I'm in California, so bad and we

00:49:59
have so much material and so much opportunity to present a

00:50:03
better argument. Why are we just not doing

00:50:06
better? I don't know what, let's endorse

00:50:09
Scott bow. Okay, he's great.

00:50:14
Like Hawaii. I'd love to be a fly on the wall

00:50:16
and a lot of these meetings because a lot of times if you

00:50:19
ever go to a convention and you start to see the inner politics

00:50:23
and I've had conversations with candidates Offline that it it

00:50:27
basically is still the cowboy GOP and the Democrats are that

00:50:32
way to? It's just they're winning and

00:50:34
they're doing what they're supposed to do and California

00:50:36
GOP hasn't figured out that they should adapt.

00:50:40
Basically, it's adapter die. That it's still sort of like an

00:50:46
old boys club where it's basically a, there's a lot of

00:50:49
people who are threatened by change, they don't want to

00:50:52
change, they think everything's fantastic.

00:50:55
They think if they just keep doing, what they're doing,

00:50:57
people will all of a sudden magically wake up one day and

00:51:00
become a Republican and reality. That's not the case at all.

00:51:04
But, you know, they got someone like Jessa, come along

00:51:07
Patterson, who I don't have anything personal against.

00:51:10
I always have to say that I've never met her in person.

00:51:13
I've heard that she's a lovely woman and but she was an

00:51:19
Insider. She was an establishment pick,

00:51:22
she was in the, she had kind of worked her way up through the

00:51:26
California GOP in all the offices and all that stuff and

00:51:30
worked her way up and they picked her.

00:51:32
And it's been how many years since 2018 or whatever?

00:51:37
Well, 2018 was the race with Travis Allen.

00:51:40
So it was like a year or two later he ran for California GOP.

00:51:43
P. Chairman and they went with

00:51:46
Jessica Milan Paris and over Travis Allen and I don't blame

00:51:49
Travis Allen, he's just dropped out of politics probably cuz he

00:51:51
threw his hands in the air and said this is freaking

00:51:53
ridiculous. I can't do anything with this

00:51:55
party, California GOP needs to get some fresh perspective on.

00:52:00
What's really going on in California, I agree and it's

00:52:03
super frustrating. It is very, very frustrating and

00:52:09
what you gonna do. So, we'll see.

00:52:11
We'll see what happens next week at the convention.

00:52:13
I imagine they'll get behind Brian Dolly, and they'll endorse

00:52:17
him because he's there, you know, prototypical sort of pick

00:52:23
and that's, that's it. And you'll, hopefully, I don't,

00:52:27
you know, I'm rooting for a Michael shellenberger.

00:52:30
Gavin Newsom, runoff, few or race in November mostly, because

00:52:37
I think Brian Dolly hasn't brought anything to the table.

00:52:42
I mean, outside of the age, Red meat and stuff that he believes

00:52:46
people will get behind. I don't think he's really done

00:52:51
anything that really catches my eye.

00:52:53
So I know it's probably breaking news.

00:52:55
We were like, oh my gosh, you don't want a republican running,

00:52:58
what Republican really is going to give noodles a run for his

00:53:02
money. And again, I've always talked

00:53:04
about this. It's I don't care where you come

00:53:06
from. I want a blueprint candidate,

00:53:08
who is going to make the blueprint for how to run and win

00:53:12
in California and make things better here in?

00:53:14
In California. Like that's all I care about.

00:53:17
That's what I want to see. I want to see California, get

00:53:20
better. And if somebody else has better

00:53:23
ideas, then I'm going to go with the person who's better idea is

00:53:26
not because they have an r or D. Next Saturday, I'm going to go

00:53:30
hey look you have better ideas and that's the bottom line,

00:53:32
because the end of the day, I just wanted to get better.

00:53:35
I think a lot of people listening.

00:53:36
A lot of people tuning in right now are saying, I just wanted to

00:53:39
get better too. I just want it to die.

00:53:41
Want the craziness to stop and I want California to be.

00:53:44
It normal again, I want to be the state that I came here for.

00:53:49
I was raised here and that's what I want to come for.

00:53:53
And that's what I'm here to support.

00:53:57
So yeah, that's my thoughts. I don't know how we got on that

00:54:02
tangent, O'Daniel Mercury and Anthony's Romina.

00:54:06
Whether to people who won't be endorsed by the California GOP

00:54:10
are having a few because that doesn't really make a

00:54:12
difference. So my more Christian

00:54:16
conservative friends are looking at Shawn Burger really surprised

00:54:19
me. I mean his platform is, I mean,

00:54:23
I don't really want to get down to, you know, big theological

00:54:27
discussion right now. If you look at a lot of his

00:54:31
dances, a lot of his stances are compassionate.

00:54:34
And if you're talking about Christianity in the true really

00:54:36
kind of message of Christianity, it's about compassion for your

00:54:40
fellow man and caring about your fellow man and I think you look

00:54:46
at his plans and you look at what he wants to do and has, I

00:54:50
mean, his book, I want to do a book review on San Francisco San

00:54:53
Francisco, which I've been reading one of these days.

00:54:58
And yeah, it's you look at that. If you're a Christian, you look

00:55:01
as platform ago, that's that's the platform really.

00:55:04
That's that's it. So, all right, any final

00:55:09
comments or questions, doot-doot doot-doot.

00:55:19
Taking one, last sip of coffee. So hopefully we can get them on

00:55:24
it. Be great to have Michael on

00:55:28
schauberger. Make better coverage and

00:55:30
awareness campaigning probably. Yeah and we'll see I think even

00:55:39
if he loses I think again it's about that sort of blueprint

00:55:46
where people can go Look, he ran on these issues, and he proposed

00:55:51
these Solutions and they were popular with Californians and

00:55:57
the way he ran, his campaign looked like a path forward.

00:56:01
We should start to figure out how to push that path forward.

00:56:06
So I applaud him for trying to do something that, you know,

00:56:08
first one through the walls always bloodied and always gets

00:56:11
the worst the worst of it. But yeah.

00:56:16
So is idea. On trigger issues are rather

00:56:19
vague and don't really aligned on conservative values.

00:56:22
Well yeah, I mean he's a former Democrat.

00:56:23
He's he's come out and said that but he he's sort of the same way

00:56:29
that a lot of people say, well I didn't leave the Democratic

00:56:32
party, the Democratic party, left me.

00:56:34
His whole thing was it kind of got away from me to the point

00:56:39
where it got so far left and woke and all that stuff that

00:56:42
like I just couldn't do it anymore so now he's independent

00:56:46
but He's a blueprint. It's worth worth looking at so

00:56:50
we'll see where that goes. But in the meantime there's

00:56:54
still going to be a lot of people coming on the podcast,

00:56:56
who are where assembly Sanic running for these positions.

00:57:02
A lot of local California. I was glad to have Kelly on last

00:57:06
week Kelly Cardin, who is a Libertarian running for Kern

00:57:08
County Board of supervisor. So if you're out in Kern County,

00:57:11
definitely check them out. Definitely support him.

00:57:13
He's really running a Grassroots campaign, so make sure you if

00:57:17
you like what He had to say he's in your district and you want to

00:57:20
support him, definitely throw them, five 10, 20 bucks,

00:57:23
whatever you can do, it all helps, you know, you're not

00:57:27
getting the big backing from a huge political establishment

00:57:30
party with the libertarian party.

00:57:31
It's a lot of Grassroots, they're getting things together.

00:57:35
But yeah, a lot of candidates like that.

00:57:38
We're really just kind of saying, I'm stepping up, I'm

00:57:40
gonna do something because I'm tired of hearing, you know, I'm

00:57:44
to, I want to live here, I want to raise my kids here, so I'm

00:57:47
going to go out There and fight and do something about it.

00:57:49
So there's a lot of politician, a lot of a lot of candidates who

00:57:53
are lining up to talk on the podcast and I'm excited for all

00:57:57
of them. It's going to be a busy busy

00:57:58
year. So with that said next week

00:58:01
things are a little weird will be out so there won't be any

00:58:05
coffee in California politics. Next week, I apologize.

00:58:07
I'm sorry, I'll be traveling and but there will be a podcast next

00:58:13
week. So check out where the podcast

00:58:15
is going to be as always You like it.

00:58:18
Make sure you tell other people about it.

00:58:21
I always ask people if you like it and you like this podcast.

00:58:23
You like listening to it. Tell one person, text one person

00:58:27
say hey you should check this out because I helps grow the

00:58:29
platform. And as always, thank you to

00:58:31
everybody who always supports who've been buying the mugs and

00:58:35
the shirts and all that stuff and all that stuff.

00:58:39
So all of it goes to support the platform, help grow the

00:58:43
platform, get it to the next level and help reach more people

00:58:46
and create more. Relations, which is always the

00:58:48
goal of this podcast is to create more conversations.

00:58:51
So with that said, thank you to everyone for tuning on.

00:58:55
I won't see you next week because of travel, but I will

00:58:59
see you. I'll see you on the next one.

00:59:01
All right. Hopefully, see you Friday

00:59:03
afternoon later. Thank you for listening to

00:59:35
another episode of California underground.

00:59:37
If you like what you heard, remember to subscribe?

00:59:39
Like and review it and follow California Underground on social

00:59:42
media for updates as to when new episodes are available.

00:59:34
Thank you for listening to another episode of California

00:59:36
underground. If you like what you heard,

00:59:38
remember to subscribe? Like and review it and follow

00:59:41
California Underground on social media for updates as to when new

00:59:44
episodes are available.