Episode 210 - Is a San Francisco Revival Possible? (w/ Special Guest Richie Greenberg)

Episode 210 - Is a San Francisco Revival Possible? (w/ Special Guest Richie Greenberg)

Phil and Camille bring you the latest discussions in California politics and do their best to crack through the insanity.


On this episode, we are joined by political activist and former SF mayoral candidate, Richie Greenberg, who has been working hard in San Francisco to try and turn it around. We discuss issues such as the reparations panel, the recall of Chesa Boudin, crime, and the mass exodus of business from the city.


This episode was recorded on 5.16.23


*The California Underground Podcast is dedicated to discussing California politics from a place of sanity and rationality.*


Links Mentioned in Show


www.rejecttheplan.com

www.richiegreenberg.org


Support California Underground on Patreon at www.patreon.com/CaliforniaUnderground

Follow California Underground on Social Media Instagram: www.instagram.com/californiaunderground

YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCj8SabIcF4AKqEVFsLmo1jA

Substack: https://substack.com/profile/72986149-ca_underground

Shop California Underground Merchandise: https://california-underground.creator-spring.com


Review the Anchor.Fm Privacy Policy: Anchor - The easiest way to make a podcast



00:00:01
What's going on everybody? Thanks for tuning in to another

00:00:03
episode of the California underground podcast.

00:00:06
I am your host, Phil as well as with my trusty co-host best and

00:00:10
fastest researcher in the west Camille.

00:00:13
And tonight, we are happy to have a very passionate political

00:00:16
activist. You want to talk about deep

00:00:19
Behind Enemy Lines, Richard Greenberg is deep Behind Enemy

00:00:24
Lines and has been working and he's been actually doing some

00:00:27
great things. I started Following him on

00:00:30
Twitter not too long ago. And I've been loving everything.

00:00:33
He's been putting out and I just reached out to him recently was

00:00:36
like, hey, do you want to come on to the podcast?

00:00:38
And he said, sure and we already had an episode about how

00:00:42
horrible and how bad things are going in San Francisco.

00:00:45
He's based out of San Francisco, and here we are.

00:00:49
And he's rocking the SF pin. He's ready to go.

00:00:52
Richie, welcome to the show. How are you?

00:00:54
Thank you so much. It's a pleasure to be here.

00:00:57
Pleasure to be invited. I really love basically to get

00:01:03
the word out to as many people as possible.

00:01:07
The way I look at it. It doesn't matter what the

00:01:09
platform is. Does it matter how, few, or how

00:01:11
many viewers there are? Does it matter if it's local or

00:01:14
national or International? In print, on podcast, live TV

00:01:20
recorded, radio, does it matter? There is a tremendous interest

00:01:24
in San Francisco, and I'm happy to be part of it.

00:01:28
Awesome. So why don't you tell people a

00:01:30
little bit about your resume because I was reviewing your

00:01:33
resume. You're very active, you've held

00:01:35
you fit warned, several different, hats.

00:01:37
Most recently were also involved in the recall chesa Boudin,

00:01:41
which was a huge win. I don't think anyone expected

00:01:43
that to actually happen in San Francisco made it happen.

00:01:46
So why don't you tell us a little bit about your background

00:01:48
and what you've been up to? So interestingly enough I was

00:01:54
born in Queens, New York. And then grew up on Long Island

00:01:59
and left when I just barely 21 years old.

00:02:02
And I moved to the West Coast because that's that's what, you

00:02:06
know, the coolest the coolest people did is they moved to

00:02:09
California, you know, back in New York the East Coast you put

00:02:15
up with moving around to other East Coast or Northeast cities,

00:02:20
you know? Boston maybe New Jersey

00:02:25
Washington, and or down. Also, the Carolinas or to

00:02:30
Florida, but I wanted to go to school and live in California.

00:02:36
And at that time, it was difficult.

00:02:39
You have to pay per minute on the phone long distance and you

00:02:42
try and get a long distance calling plan.

00:02:45
They didn't have cell phones. We didn't barely even had a fax

00:02:50
machines. I think at that point.

00:02:51
Yeah. I mean, you know, we're talking

00:02:53
a little couple of decades back, so, I moved to Los Angeles, and

00:02:59
I was living if, you know, or if listeners know about Southern

00:03:03
California, I went to Cal State Fullerton.

00:03:07
And I was living in Whittier and La Habra, La Habra Heights.

00:03:12
And a lot of friends in that area there and I studied

00:03:17
business business law and actually took a few courses in

00:03:21
criminal justice as well. And So I was like a Southern

00:03:28
California transplant, and as a result of being there, that's

00:03:33
pretty much why I lost my New York accent.

00:03:37
So if I really strain and you could, you could hear it, but my

00:03:40
attitude is still sort of there. But, you know, growing up in New

00:03:46
York. It toughened me as a person and

00:03:51
wanting to fight for your beliefs.

00:03:56
And to recognize BS. Can we use profanity on this

00:04:01
podcast if you want to or not? Okay, bullshit, bullshit,

00:04:05
instead of be as okay? But even even the mayor, San

00:04:08
Francisco mayor on CNN the other night said, bullshit and they

00:04:11
let that go through. So I can spot bullshit.

00:04:16
I can spot when someone is being manipulative or exploitive that

00:04:21
was and and to and to immediately call someone out on

00:04:24
it. And that's why that's like a New

00:04:26
York, kind of attitude and I still have that it was

00:04:31
suppressed for a while but now it's back after moving here, to

00:04:35
San Francisco but moving from Los Angeles and I lived in a few

00:04:41
other cities and states for a year here a year, they are

00:04:44
including towards the end of the 90s.

00:04:47
I was in South Dakota, I lived there for a couple of years and

00:04:51
I even had a home that I was renovating in North Dakota so I

00:04:56
Both the most Urban cities of San Fran top of the United

00:05:00
States to know what it's like to be in a real urban environment.

00:05:06
And then also in extreme, rural Northern Plains within an hour

00:05:12
or two of the border of Canada. So it's very cold there.

00:05:16
So then I moved here to to San Francisco.

00:05:19
I've been here for 22 years approximately and I have Over

00:05:26
the years, been a business startup consultant, not the big

00:05:31
tech companies, but just small mom-and-pop shops and online

00:05:36
things and really get to know a person as a consultant but

00:05:44
almost like a friend as well. So I have that ability to get

00:05:49
the report to talk with people to see what their needs are.

00:05:53
What their concerns are to see what's important.

00:05:56
Then what's not important and how we can make the best of of

00:05:59
anything, you know, whatever they want to do, whether it's in

00:06:03
business or elsewhere. So living here in San Francisco.

00:06:09
I arrived here just after 9/11 in 2001 and have been here ever

00:06:18
since and I didn't really pay that much attention to politics

00:06:24
at that point. It's a new city.

00:06:27
I wanted just to explore and wanted to see where I fit in

00:06:30
there and niches. The kind of people that are out

00:06:32
there attitudes restaurants, what's fun to do.

00:06:38
And it wasn't really until about eight years ago that I started

00:06:47
feeling that there's big problems here and it's because

00:06:51
of the government. It's not us, it's not my

00:06:54
friends, it's not good, my associate, it's not my clients,

00:06:58
it's not the neighbors, it's the government, and they're the ones

00:07:02
that are creating all these crazy ideas and proposals and

00:07:07
policies. And I started paid paying

00:07:10
attention, more and more. And then in 2008 2015, I decided

00:07:15
to throw my hat in and start exploring different political

00:07:21
clubs that were around. On the city, attend Community

00:07:25
meetings, learn, who's who take a lot of notes and then in 2018,

00:07:35
I was already at that point, I was already pretty involved with

00:07:38
the Republican party at that back end.

00:07:41
And that point, which some people are like, what are you

00:07:45
talking about that? Yes, there's about 30,

00:07:50
32 registered. Atkins in San Francisco.

00:07:55
And I went to the Republican party's monthly meetings and

00:08:03
quickly realize that they were very much the underdog, but I

00:08:06
was, you know, it at that point. Seen that, that is where I fit

00:08:11
in. And the thing to remember,

00:08:14
though is that this is the city SF GOP, not to State GOP, not a

00:08:21
federal not now, National RNC it's City only and I stuck with

00:08:32
it. I ran for mayor.

00:08:35
I decided I want to go ahead and try and make my mark on the

00:08:39
city. I saw the opportunity because

00:08:42
our then current mayor mayor Ed Lee who was pretty well liked

00:08:48
and he was very moderate Centrist.

00:08:50
He was a Democrat as is everybody.

00:08:52
In elected office and he suddenly had a heart attack late

00:08:56
at night and died while shopping at one of those 24-hour

00:09:01
supermarkets. He collapsed and died.

00:09:05
And the next morning I happen to have been in Sacramento on

00:09:07
business and I called back to some of the local San Francisco

00:09:13
GOP leadership and I said I think that's a calling.

00:09:17
I think that's a signal for me to take action.

00:09:22
Personally. So while I was in Sacramento, I

00:09:25
walked right into the, the State political Affairs Department,

00:09:31
which is in the Secretary of State's office, and I filed the

00:09:35
committee forms to open a committee to run for for office.

00:09:40
So, I actually became the first candidate within hours of the

00:09:44
mayor passing away. I filed the paperwork and

00:09:49
somehow that information got to local media Here in San

00:09:53
Francisco within within a half hour already, was getting phone

00:09:57
calls asking for interviews. So so that was 20, 18, June,

00:10:03
2018 was a special election. I actually ran against a few far

00:10:10
leftist communist by candidates that were popular.

00:10:16
That were known as well as London.

00:10:19
Reed, who was our current mayor. Now we were all there were there

00:10:22
were eight of us. Candidates.

00:10:23
And we went to other candidate forums and interviews and

00:10:27
debates on stage, throughout the city.

00:10:30
And I sat right there, right next to London, breed answering

00:10:33
questions in front of a crowd and in front of the media.

00:10:39
So that was a great experience. I didn't win, I had no chance of

00:10:44
winning because the the Democrat Party Machine, the political

00:10:51
machine that is So entrenched in San Francisco and it's

00:10:54
elsewhere, of course, I know would never let an outsider win

00:11:00
for the most part and especially not someone who was from the SF

00:11:03
GOP. So since then, I have left the

00:11:07
party. I am independent right now a lot

00:11:10
more like towards libertarian is what seems a fit for me at this

00:11:14
point but right now I don't need the labels.

00:11:17
Just like so many labels have been causing problems.

00:11:22
Lee in politics looking for the intersection and all this.

00:11:27
So I am trying to avoid being labeled anything, it allows me

00:11:31
then to comment and aligned with and be supportive or critical of

00:11:39
anything and not have to toe the party line.

00:11:42
So that brings you up to date for the most part with the

00:11:47
exception of my activism year and a half two years ago.

00:11:52
With recalling Trista Boden. And now, I'm very active with

00:11:57
trying to push back against the San Francisco version of the

00:12:01
reparations plan. So those are the two things that

00:12:04
are most. I've had on my plate in the last

00:12:06
year and a half or so. It's, as I hear your story, it

00:12:12
actually reflects. I kind of identify with it.

00:12:16
I'm from New Jersey Jersey. What?

00:12:19
What exit weddings? It Exit, 12 off Route, 80

00:12:22
savesies coasters. This is how we communicate, what

00:12:26
is it? You off of Jersey Jersey.

00:12:30
So sharp it, right? Yeah.

00:12:34
And when I heard you're from Queens, I was like, I hope he's

00:12:37
not a Mets fan, like me and suffers.

00:12:39
I am I have, I have a heart meds, that's an Islanders and

00:12:43
jets. That's a rough trail right

00:12:46
there. Yes it is.

00:12:47
You know, we understand each other.

00:12:49
So if you can learn to deal with the disappointment of being a

00:12:52
Mets fan, you can learn what the disappointment of working in

00:12:55
California politics. Yeah.

00:12:58
But so I definitely identify with your story about like,

00:13:02
moving from the east coast to California because there was

00:13:05
this idea that California was sort of this land of milk and

00:13:10
honey and how opportunity is and it was new and you could

00:13:14
experience. New culture.

00:13:16
And just you could, it was different.

00:13:18
It was different than the east coast and it's hard to really to

00:13:22
put into words. It's just you want it to be

00:13:24
somewhere out there and when I first used to go to San

00:13:27
Francisco in college, I loved it.

00:13:30
I went to school up north. My grandfather used to live in

00:13:33
San Francisco. After World War Two.

00:13:35
He worked at Fort Mason down there and his wife worked at the

00:13:40
Presidio for a long time. Yeah there was a magic wand.

00:13:45
Body about California and that's why to me it hurts to see where

00:13:50
San Francisco is right now, and how absolutely overboard.

00:13:55
It's gone with its policies reparations being probably one

00:14:00
of the most insane right now. Talk a little bit about the

00:14:05
specifics of reparations. What they're proposing in San

00:14:08
Francisco because there's there was a state task force, but

00:14:12
there was also a San Francisco task force, correct?

00:14:14
Yes, Correct. You sure you want to go into

00:14:16
this absolutely. We've already done a whole

00:14:20
episode so let's go ahead and just dump jump into it.

00:14:23
I have been approached by several different members of the

00:14:29
media TV and other podcasts and written newspapers and they all

00:14:40
say that it is such a thought button, you know.

00:14:45
Third rail topic that most mainstream media doesn't even

00:14:49
want to cover it. At least they don't want to

00:14:52
cover the push back to it. They are fearful for whatever

00:14:59
reason that it has to be only reported in a positive light, or

00:15:05
sort of like the straight factual, like, the committee

00:15:08
suggest this or the task for Force, wants that amount, or, or

00:15:13
this dollar amount. But But they don't talk about

00:15:16
the ramifications. They don't talk about the

00:15:19
legality and that's where I from the start.

00:15:25
So this just can't be lawful, it can't be constitutional.

00:15:31
That's mostly the how I'm coming at this, right?

00:15:38
So a couple of months ago when here in San Francisco with their

00:15:43
version, It came out of Summer of 2020 when the when the

00:15:52
country was all in the throes of covid, lockdown and BLM George

00:16:00
Floyd defund. The police movements, our mayor

00:16:06
here in San Francisco together with one of the members of our

00:16:11
city council said. I'm just imagining this but the

00:16:16
two of them said to themselves. Now is the time to push for a

00:16:19
reparations effort. So those two together did two

00:16:24
things. This was in I think August July

00:16:28
or August of 2020. They first pushed for a

00:16:34
committee in the state. It's a task force, but in San

00:16:37
Francisco, what was a 15-person reparations committee to create

00:16:42
a committee? And the second thing, what the

00:16:46
mayor did immediately, which I now am going to start

00:16:49
investigating? Is she took tens of millions of

00:16:52
dollars away from the police department budget and put it to

00:16:57
a project that she had just set up herself.

00:17:00
Under the auspices of the mayor's office.

00:17:03
And that was like a mini reparations, kind of test to

00:17:10
start funneling funds to underprivileged groups that are

00:17:17
within this city, but look very much like what the reparations

00:17:22
plan says, in terms of where they were located or who would

00:17:26
qualify to get this. So that's another topic.

00:17:30
So what happens is in 2020, they set up at a reparations

00:17:36
committee made up of 15 individuals and those that

00:17:41
committee works for a year and a half to create the plan 60 Pages

00:17:45
60 and it gets handed over to the Board of Supervisors are our

00:17:53
city council. For the purpose of them city

00:17:58
council reviewing the plan de debating it saying, you know?

00:18:05
Yeah, we like it. We're going to prove the whole

00:18:07
thing or part of it or some of the provisions or we're going to

00:18:11
say no to the whole thing. And so a couple of months ago in

00:18:18
January and early February, that's when this report, the 60

00:18:23
Pages was presented to our Our Board of Supervisors, city

00:18:27
council, that then triggered the Uproar because that then was

00:18:31
public. Now we can see and they publish

00:18:34
the 60 pages on their website. I got a hold of it.

00:18:37
My colleagues got a hold of it and we're like, holy effing

00:18:41
crap. This is absolutely racist.

00:18:45
Segregationist. It's like setting up an

00:18:47
apartheid system with in San Francisco where the

00:18:51
African-American black population are the beneficiaries

00:18:54
and Anyone else who's not? Black has to, then give up

00:18:58
basically everything to benefit the approximate 5% of the

00:19:04
population of San Francisco and the 95% of us have to pay for

00:19:08
it. See.

00:19:09
So I created a website to discuss all the details in

00:19:15
length and that was at length, reject, the plan.com.

00:19:20
So I created that just a couple months ago and at reject the

00:19:26
plan.com, you can see it's all. It's all me.

00:19:29
It's my commentary. My analysis.

00:19:32
My deep dive into the plan. I talk about each of the plan,

00:19:39
Provisions, with a reference to the page of their plan, that you

00:19:44
can look back at. So, for example, one of the

00:19:50
provisions that they said is they want to enact a reparations

00:19:53
tax and then, on my, on my website, it says, what page of

00:19:59
their plan. You can see where

00:20:00
cross-reference, I'm not just making it up here, here's the

00:20:03
page where it's from. So I did that, I got different

00:20:11
different analysis and viewpoints.

00:20:13
I have people that are in the legal profession were feeding me

00:20:17
information to go and put that there and ultimately as the week

00:20:24
We're going with this plan. Now, being out in the open and

00:20:28
being discussed and causing local and even national news and

00:20:33
even outrage to a lot of people justifiably.

00:20:40
I then conferred with an attorney down in the LA area who

00:20:44
is pretty well versed in state and federal constitutional law

00:20:50
and business, law, and political things.

00:20:52
And he Helped me, write a cease and desist.

00:20:58
Cease and desist is not a court filing, but it could become one

00:21:02
where I am saying to the reparations committee, the city

00:21:09
council the mayor to stop in your tracks.

00:21:13
Stop doing any work on this because what you were doing is

00:21:18
unlawful and unconstitutional and you're wasting taxpayers

00:21:22
money on an unlawful unconstitutional effort.

00:21:27
So, First question is, why am I who am I to be saying this?

00:21:34
Well, there is a specific law that is in California, only.

00:21:40
I mean, maybe other states have it, but here in the state of

00:21:41
California is called section 526.

00:21:45
A of the procedure Court procedure civil, civil

00:21:49
procedure, where any taxpayer anyone can file suit, Against a

00:21:59
city, government local government.

00:22:02
In this case, to have the courts enjoying them to stop to the

00:22:08
courts, to stop a local government from wasting

00:22:13
taxpayers funds on a wasteful or unlawful Endeavor.

00:22:20
And that's why I did that. So in the on the reject of

00:22:24
plan.com website, I do have a copy of the cease and desist,

00:22:28
it's like three pages and it outlines very specifically what

00:22:34
state or federal laws the Constitution Article this

00:22:38
article that or the Civil Rights Act or or other court

00:22:42
precedents. It's all in there.

00:22:45
Why the plan is unlawful unconstitutional illegal and

00:22:52
right now? That cease and desist is still

00:22:54
out there. It hasn't been canceled and I'm

00:22:57
waiting with my attorneys that if they try and go any further

00:23:01
to try and push this through and actually pass anything.

00:23:04
Boom? Right to court and you put my

00:23:07
shades. Yes it is who appointed the task

00:23:11
like the actual people and were they paid position?

00:23:14
So. Great question.

00:23:16
And I actually do explain this on the website.

00:23:19
I don't want to keep telling you to go back to the website and

00:23:22
I'm I know that, but this is one of the problems with this whole

00:23:28
reparations in San Francisco, their plan.

00:23:30
They decided to create a 15-member committee and rather

00:23:40
than as a many the Board of Supervisors are city council

00:23:43
said, okay? We're going to set up a 15

00:23:45
member committee to now create the plan, right?

00:23:47
So what they did not do. Is choose or have as a

00:23:56
qualification exemplary, the leaders of industry or or you

00:24:03
know, the best legal minds or infrastructure and business and

00:24:09
law and all that. No, they didn't do that.

00:24:11
What they wound up doing is they said we want a committee of

00:24:20
victims. so they came up with 15 levels of victimhood, one of

00:24:27
them being, if you are incarcerated, That's it.

00:24:32
If you ever cars, if you have to, you have to be black,

00:24:34
African-American, a resident, San Francisco.

00:24:38
If you've been incarcerated, come on by will talk to you.

00:24:41
And we'll see if we want you. If you have been denied,

00:24:47
everyone has to be black. African-American.

00:24:50
I know we use the interchangeably and the

00:24:52
reparations plan uses the word black, a lot more than

00:24:55
African-American, that's just how they're doing it.

00:24:57
So I wind up speaking that way. Oh, if you were ever denied a

00:25:03
loan, Come on, come on to the committee.

00:25:08
If you were a part of that, if you grow grew up and went to

00:25:12
public school between this year in that year, whatever

00:25:15
specifics, right? And you're black and you were

00:25:20
part of a decent desegregation plan.

00:25:23
We want to talk to you right now.

00:25:26
Another, if you're between the ages of 14 and 24 and you work

00:25:30
in like an after-school youth program, that is mostly catering

00:25:35
to Our City's African American kids.

00:25:37
After school, you can be on the program, so of of the 15

00:25:43
different potential, 15 potential seats, they call them

00:25:50
on this committee, each seat had a designation of what it is.

00:25:54
Like number 12 could have been that person who was 14 to 24 and

00:25:57
these field, they filled it. So you have a whole Committee of

00:26:03
Basically, victims, none of them are at the top of their fields,

00:26:08
as I said earlier. So, when they came up with this

00:26:14
60-page monstrosity of a reparations plan, it immediately

00:26:20
is being shot down because they didn't have legal constitutional

00:26:27
anyone on this committee to tell them hey, you can't do this.

00:26:32
You can't do that. You can't create, you can't say

00:26:37
that. I want programs that are going

00:26:39
to prioritize black housing. You can't have black credit card

00:26:47
debt eliminated, you can't create black, run banks with a

00:26:53
black only credit score. These are real provisions and

00:26:58
and so on it, is it, you know, I really I try and be respectful.

00:27:07
I try and be understandable, I understanding but I just cannot

00:27:12
believe they came up with so much of these.

00:27:15
You got to go to reject the plan that calm and see what they have

00:27:19
there. And and and I don't want to

00:27:22
laugh but it's just incredible what they want.

00:27:26
They basically want to segregate themselves out of the rest of

00:27:30
San Francisco, you know, it was like a logically Proverbially

00:27:33
stay in a certain part of the southeast section of San

00:27:37
Francisco and like in a walled-off segregated City black

00:27:44
schools, black teachers, black curriculum.

00:27:47
They want everyone who's not black to pay for all of this

00:27:53
they want within their school system, they want us to pay for

00:27:59
psych psychologist for therapy. To help the African American

00:28:06
teachers. Now today, deal with the white

00:28:11
supremacists curriculum, that they're being forced to have to

00:28:15
teach today in the public schools.

00:28:19
I sound listening to me saying this I sound nuts, what I'm

00:28:24
saying, it sounds nuts, but it is in their plan very openly and

00:28:31
I make reference to each plate page that they say it.

00:28:35
So what happens now is sometime. Next month, the reparations

00:28:43
committee is supposed to now prepare a second version of

00:28:47
their reparations plan. The first one is called the

00:28:50
draft reparations plan. That's what they referred to.

00:28:52
As the graft reparations. Plan a revised version of that

00:28:57
is due next month to be, given to the park, or to the

00:29:01
supervisors for Review, I'm going to be right there.

00:29:05
Getting the revised plan to see what they what they did.

00:29:10
If they made it worse was, and then sometime in September is

00:29:16
when the fateful day will come and our city council is supposed

00:29:21
to vote on it. So, that's where we're at.

00:29:24
It's exhausting. It's a, it's funny how and maybe

00:29:31
this is just how I perceive it. It it seems like San Francisco

00:29:35
was like they saw the state task force and then they were like,

00:29:39
we can't be, we can't be less than what they propose.

00:29:44
So we're gonna like go even farther off the cliff, we get

00:29:49
them like the state could go. It makes the state look more.

00:29:52
Say I mean the whole thing is insane in general.

00:29:55
Yeah absolutely. And on top of it I mean they're

00:30:00
going to make this recommendation but The city

00:30:03
itself is facing what like a 785 million dollar deficit.

00:30:09
It's probably going to balloon up to like 1.3 billion dollars.

00:30:11
So these numbers, they're throwing out there for like five

00:30:14
million dollars per citizen. It's just ludicrous, it's not

00:30:19
realistic. It's never going to happen.

00:30:20
If it did happen, it would definitely put San Francisco

00:30:25
farther in. The holding is, I want to kind

00:30:28
of like touch upon that, like, when we had our Our episode

00:30:33
about San Francisco a couple weeks ago.

00:30:36
The main topic was should we let San Francisco just fail?

00:30:41
Because it's over extended itself, it's has this huge

00:30:46
deficit. It's probably has programs that

00:30:49
can't pay for talk a little bit about that.

00:30:54
It like the state of what we're what San Francisco is looking at

00:30:58
in terms of their own budget in the economy right now.

00:31:01
So, yeah, even my Mine's me. That kind of question is similar

00:31:04
to what you hear about the bank's, you know, years ago.

00:31:06
It's too big to fail, right? We can't let it fail or it won't

00:31:11
fail because it's too big. San Francisco is, is a mess.

00:31:17
You know, it's this whirling whirling Cesspool of political

00:31:21
shit. I mean, it's such a mess and

00:31:26
because there's such a division between the farthest left

00:31:31
Progressive but you can't even call it Progressive.

00:31:34
They're like Marxist. These people are like petulant

00:31:38
children running around communist playing.

00:31:42
I don't know what they think that they're doing compared to

00:31:46
everybody else. Who's trying to hold the city

00:31:49
back from falling off over a cliff.

00:31:51
Okay? So you have a budget, you have a

00:31:57
required amount of money to run the city with all the programs.

00:32:02
You've got a low lower and lower amount of revenues that are

00:32:07
coming in and so you kind of have three choices.

00:32:12
One is to cut back on the programs to make it meet what

00:32:16
the revenues are coming in. The second one is to raise

00:32:20
revenues. The third option is a hybrid of

00:32:23
both. Okay, the problem is that our

00:32:26
city hall leaders for the most part don't want to cut back.

00:32:32
On any of the programs at all. They don't want to trim the fat.

00:32:37
They don't want to find where to cut.

00:32:40
I mean, they're going to have to do, they know that they're not

00:32:43
sure where, and we're waiting to hear what they're planning on

00:32:46
doing. But instead, they're trying to

00:32:49
find more Revenue sources, which means, whatever, unaffected

00:32:56
ineffective wasteful programs that are dealing with drug

00:32:59
addiction homelessness mental illness and all That just wasted

00:33:03
funds is not going to get cut. They're not going to cut giving

00:33:10
the taxpayers money to these ridiculous unaccountable

00:33:16
nonprofits, that are ruining our city streets.

00:33:20
And instead they're doing things like trying to raise taxes and

00:33:24
I'm sure because this year, we don't have an election, it was

00:33:26
postponed next year, we're going to have in March the primary and

00:33:30
then in November, Who is the general along with the

00:33:34
presidential, right? So they're going to try and put

00:33:39
on as many tax increases property tax increases other

00:33:44
taxes to try and pay for what is already, a horrendously High

00:33:50
budget. So there's the problem.

00:33:52
The problem is they are not willing to cut back any

00:33:57
programs, and it's going to squeeze the locals here.

00:34:02
The taxpayers worse and worse. So that's Why many businesses

00:34:07
have figured the big businesses said it's no longer economically

00:34:12
feasible for us to be here anymore beyond the issues of the

00:34:17
the homeless crisis that tend to dwellers and the people shooting

00:34:21
up right outside the front doors of our of our stores.

00:34:24
And I mean, we're like 22 or 23 major known retailers, have shut

00:34:30
up shut and left. Or are about to, you know, And

00:34:36
the tech companies, you know, they're the ones who are getting

00:34:39
the brunt of a lot of blame saying, well, you know, you

00:34:42
started as you're the ones that caused all of this, you know,

00:34:46
that's not true really about the tech companies that are

00:34:49
everyone's part of it. And is it going to fail?

00:34:55
Well, it could in certain aspects certain industries.

00:35:03
Yeah, it could the budget right now is for Fourteen point three

00:35:08
billion dollars, our city is seven miles by seven miles.

00:35:15
So think about where you live and in Orange County or in San

00:35:20
Diego. How far?

00:35:21
We're what is seven miles Square. 7 miles per 7 miles,

00:35:24
right? That's how big San Francisco is.

00:35:27
That's it. We are on the tip of a

00:35:29
peninsula. We're surrounded by water on

00:35:31
three sides. So we can't move anywhere.

00:35:35
We don't can't expand, we don't have any, you know, outskirts,

00:35:39
it's a different different, different counties.

00:35:42
So that's what we have 49 square miles, seven miles by seven

00:35:48
miles, and within it, we have about 800 people and our

00:35:52
budget is fourteen point three billion.

00:35:56
When I ran for office the first time years ago, it was only six

00:36:00
6.8 billion. So it's More than doubled just

00:36:04
in these few years and a lot of it.

00:36:08
Yeah, a lot of it is due to the fact that we have a very large

00:36:14
payroll. Like one of the largest

00:36:18
employers is the government, the city of San Francisco itself.

00:36:24
There's tens of thousands of employees that work for San

00:36:29
Francisco with, you know, the Union's, High hourly, wages,

00:36:35
very high benefit programs and a high pension.

00:36:41
So that I believe the. Last time I looked at that takes

00:36:45
up, like, five five-and-a-half billion of the 14 billion.

00:36:50
So if you say Okay, fourteen point three billion is the Is

00:36:55
the budget for the city, let's cut that down, let's cut it down

00:36:59
to 9, then you don't leave much to run.

00:37:03
Because so much of it is the city government itself, all the

00:37:07
different departments, and everything, everything their Rec

00:37:13
and parks, and, and humans is services.

00:37:17
And the police department. Everything is at least five

00:37:21
billion out of that. And They're not going to want to

00:37:25
cut back, they're not going to water, you know, say we're going

00:37:28
to have our budget. So we are in a very dire

00:37:31
situation and will it fail, it can fail.

00:37:37
But what does that mean? What's that going to look like?

00:37:40
It's going to look like we are hunkered down in our homes

00:37:46
whether we own them or rent, our homes apartments or houses,

00:37:51
we're paying the taxes that are keep it going.

00:37:54
Keep The city going, they'll be shortfalls.

00:37:57
And then they'll probably start defaulting on any of the city

00:38:00
loans. Any of the city Bond measures

00:38:03
the payments, they won't be able to pay on that.

00:38:06
The credit rating goes down. They can't borrow more money.

00:38:10
I have to put all these big projects on hold, and then we're

00:38:13
all going to start suffering the, the school systems, the the

00:38:18
infrastructure. So we're going to have to really

00:38:21
tighten our belts. Otherwise we're in trouble.

00:38:26
How do you even attack? Like the problem with that many

00:38:30
City governments and pensions is these are promises, I guess met

00:38:34
two people for working and they said, okay, well I'm going to

00:38:38
work in this government job and I'm going to get a nice pension.

00:38:41
How do you even tackle an issue like that?

00:38:45
Where people are promised a certain amount of money and you

00:38:48
can't really cut back on it. So how do you, how do you tell

00:38:51
they're? There are a few a few ways.

00:38:54
But, you know, any any attempt to play around with, with the,

00:39:01
with the city's earnings that these salaries.

00:39:04
The pensions is like, if they can attack you, you know, I

00:39:09
understand in La, this was an issue a few years ago and at the

00:39:13
mayoral debates they had they were all asked this question.

00:39:19
So what has to happen is you have to now create categories of

00:39:24
City employees. Those that have been around for

00:39:26
a long time that signed on and got employed with this kind of

00:39:31
benefit package than anyone knew that comes on board.

00:39:35
As of today, has a drastically different benefit package.

00:39:39
So you may have same employees working in similar departments,

00:39:44
maybe even working, you know, shoulder-to-shoulder but they

00:39:47
have different benefit packages because it depends on their

00:39:49
seniority. How long they've been there and

00:39:52
under wide benefit program. They They were hired.

00:39:55
So they're going to have to cut back on that.

00:39:56
That's the first thing. The second thing is possibility

00:40:01
is to ask for early retirement. Saying we, we can't employ you

00:40:07
anymore. We're doing like a mandatory lay

00:40:09
off a mandatory like a furloughing and then we can

00:40:18
bring you back, but it might be in a different category and this

00:40:22
actually happened in 2008. I'm when we had the mortgage

00:40:25
meltdown and all the all that back in those years there, what

00:40:30
the city did is in many of the Departments around the city.

00:40:36
They said, okay, everybody you're all laid off and we're

00:40:39
going to bring you all back with a different category or name or

00:40:46
title job description or job number designation, and you kind

00:40:51
of like, have to You have to come back on and choose your new

00:40:56
designation and you'll have to audition for it and you'll have

00:41:01
a different employment package. You're still, you know, you

00:41:05
haven't lost your position as a as a permanent or part-time City

00:41:11
employee, but now you're in a different different designation

00:41:16
and that will have a different, the benefits, and, and your

00:41:22
retirement, Aunt. So that's a way to do it and I

00:41:24
was long-winded but that's how a way you can do that without your

00:41:27
sing, everybody out, but it's slow, it's a slow process and

00:41:32
because the unit the unions are involved and they're going to

00:41:35
be, you know, really push back. I don't know if it'd push comes

00:41:41
to shove whether or not the Union's themselves would rather

00:41:44
see the city go bankrupt and collapse, then to make

00:41:47
negotiations on their on their, on their employees or And so

00:41:53
that's, that's really drastic, you know, I will see.

00:41:58
We don't want to see. We'll see, it's just, I guess in

00:42:03
a city that loves the idea that the government solves,

00:42:07
everything in the government is all-knowing and Powerful.

00:42:10
Yeah, it's I guess it's hard to think.

00:42:14
That San Francisco those in power.

00:42:16
And I feel like London Breeze. Got a little bit more moderate.

00:42:21
As reality is her office, but she's still, she's still and

00:42:26
moderate. She's got more moderate.

00:42:28
Yeah, compared to what she was. She's still super far left, but

00:42:33
it's just hard to think that, in a city that loves Government

00:42:37
Solutions to governments all these problems to ask them,

00:42:40
okay? We have to cut back and we have

00:42:42
to cut back the government. Aunt as opposed to well we'll

00:42:46
just tax people more because the government is all-knowing and

00:42:49
all-powerful it just seems like that's and with declining

00:42:53
Revenue into calling businesses, it just seems like we're you San

00:42:58
Francisco. Really isn't for like, a doom

00:43:00
Loops scenario. So if you look at the results of

00:43:07
the recall of DHS about Dean, the map, the department of

00:43:14
Chickens and other political analysts were able to come up

00:43:22
with a map and again, San Francisco is the square 7.

00:43:26
Miles by seven miles, it's easy to look at with all the

00:43:29
different districts and neighborhoods, right?

00:43:31
They came up with a map that shows who voted for recalling

00:43:35
chesa Boudin and who oppose the recall who wanted to keep him

00:43:39
in. And so in the center it's a kind

00:43:42
of like a donut in the Our area were those that were staunchly

00:43:46
against his recall, that's where he had the most support.

00:43:49
Were in the center of the donut hole all around the outside.

00:43:52
It's still San Francisco, but it feels more suburban and that's

00:43:57
where I live. I'm on the northwest, the upper

00:44:01
left corner of the donut on the map near the Presidio.

00:44:05
Is you say, so we all voted to recall him and we one more of us

00:44:11
on the periphery of the donut, Voted more moderate, more Pro

00:44:17
Law and Order, the ones in the center, the neighborhoods, their

00:44:21
parts of the mission parts of area, Noe Valley and other

00:44:26
areas. If they're rings a bell, they

00:44:28
voted to keep them in. So that's where the staunchest

00:44:34
most radical people are. Of course, all around there.

00:44:38
There are you know the extreme leftist but our challenge is to

00:44:43
ensure Sure, that that donut does the whole doesn't grow and

00:44:50
it's not like we can prevent people from moving in.

00:44:53
We can't, we can't erect a wall or not.

00:44:56
I'm not suggesting that we put a wall around the donut hole but,

00:45:00
you know, it's just very interesting to see that those

00:45:06
who were the most open to recalling were the ones that

00:45:10
were the most Pro Law and Order. Of course, But are

00:45:15
family-oriented a lot are immigrants or children or

00:45:21
families with immigrant parents. We have a large Russian

00:45:25
population. We have a very well-known large

00:45:29
Asian, Chinese population and then everyone else it just has

00:45:34
families with young kids. So we're all the ones that voted

00:45:40
and a much more moderate way. I don't say conservative because

00:45:43
that's that's not really correct.

00:45:44
But a lot more moderate Pro Merit Pro blond order prosafety

00:45:51
Pro Clean streets, Pro accountability in City Hall.

00:45:56
So we're the ones that are now driving the conversation.

00:46:02
Now, it used to be the most radical leftist, but the problem

00:46:07
is nationally, everyone is lit. The media are listening to the

00:46:12
loudest voices of the For this left because they're the ones

00:46:15
that yell and scream and have tantrums and some sucking, you

00:46:20
know, they're they're letting their beds because I don't want

00:46:23
this, I don't want that. They're the ones who are getting

00:46:27
the attention of the media, but they're not, the ones who are

00:46:31
driving us actual voters. So, it's going to be very

00:46:35
interesting to see, you know, we were supposed to have elections.

00:46:40
This November, we were supposed to have elections for mayor,

00:46:44
Mayor da Sheriff. I think the treasure was it and

00:46:49
the sheriff was supposed to have five.

00:46:51
Key City Hall positions, the mayor and Dai that's a big deal,

00:46:55
London, breed and the new DEA Brooke Jenkins was supposed to

00:46:59
be up for election. This November along with

00:47:02
whatever ballot measures would have been proposed along with it

00:47:06
and just throwing on a ballot, right?

00:47:08
But they put a ballot measure last year in November to say, we

00:47:15
want to delay November's elections for a year and move it

00:47:21
to 20 24, November, 20, 24. So that would be on the same

00:47:26
ballot as the presidential and the governor and all of those.

00:47:30
We fought against it saying, why do you want to do this?

00:47:33
What's the purpose for doing that?

00:47:35
Why do you want to delay democracy to say?

00:47:39
Well it's going to make more drama.

00:47:40
See. Because that was going to be

00:47:42
with all the other. No, it's not more democracy,

00:47:45
you've just moved it, so you cancel democracy.

00:47:47
It's so, anyway, our side lost, meaning meaning no matter how

00:47:54
hard we fought it. For some reason voters.

00:47:57
It was like, it was like, 6633, whatever percent.

00:48:02
Yeah, let's move it. So now we have no elections this

00:48:06
year. We're supposed to be, but it's

00:48:08
not. So now we are still Stuck with

00:48:11
our mayor and no ballot measures until the end of next year, we

00:48:17
have a heater and a half to eight.

00:48:20
Wow. So elections canceled.

00:48:23
Yeah, just yeah. In the name of democracy, you're

00:48:27
speechless, the name of the market.

00:48:29
Yeah. So was that, was that doughnut

00:48:32
hole? Just absolutely filled with, you

00:48:35
know, red bag of hat-wearing. Trump Republicans that doughnut

00:48:39
hole because that's Or how you were painted, if you voted

00:48:42
against chesa Boudin. And I want to talk about that

00:48:46
real quick, as we're coming up on the hour.

00:48:48
I can't believe how fast the time is gone.

00:48:51
Yeah, time flies, when you're having fun.

00:48:53
There's so much. We want to talk about.

00:48:55
We'll just have to admit come back on and do a second.

00:48:57
Do problem? Okay, the one thing I want so

00:49:02
you were integral in recalling chesa boudin.

00:49:05
Now, we have Brooke Jenkins and has the situation with crime.

00:49:10
Moved in San Francisco, or how is that going in San Francisco

00:49:13
right now with crime? Well, so it goes, much more than

00:49:20
removing chesa Boudin know that fraud of a fake da because he

00:49:27
infiltrated the criminal justice system, it wasn't just him.

00:49:31
It was also the people that were on staff in the district,

00:49:35
attorney's office, who he brought over from the defense

00:49:39
side. So it was a Whole mess and also

00:49:42
not just that there's also existing chesa Boudin loyalists.

00:49:47
Those who agree with his and any of the Sorrows mentality anti

00:49:55
prosecution prosecutors that are in in City Hall.

00:50:02
And so that includes some of the judges, the local judges and

00:50:06
includes some of the city councilman it includes The, our

00:50:14
police commission that has the oversight of the police

00:50:18
department, and they are pretty much anti-cop, as well, believe

00:50:21
it or not, the, the police commission is anti-cop.

00:50:25
So we can't really have a clean slate, fixing everything, until

00:50:32
all of, that is taken care of, but the, the chief law

00:50:36
enforcement officer now, Brooke Jenkins.

00:50:39
Yes, she is. To be prosecuting now but we

00:50:43
can't open the floodgates and arrest everyone that should have

00:50:48
been arrested and all bring them in for prosecution because they

00:50:51
don't have the staff. They don't have.

00:50:54
The police department, is in a shambles, as we here and all

00:50:57
over the country is his problem and they don't have the

00:51:01
Personnel to be able to just do a, you know, pick up 1000-2000

00:51:07
criminals and just start process and then they can't do that.

00:51:09
Then it would just overload. The It's overload, in jail, all

00:51:12
of that is that would be mass incarceration, right?

00:51:16
And what it, what is happening though, is, there is a very big

00:51:22
change. Now, in the fact that we have an

00:51:25
actual prosecutor behind, the Helm of the DA's office and

00:51:31
there is a change, but the problem is, we still have those

00:51:35
chesa Boudin loyalists that are still around.

00:51:41
Have you care? It's vote about until the very

00:51:45
2024, correct. All right, I did read that bird.

00:51:49
Jenkins was getting over the next year, when she was getting

00:51:53
rid of a bunch of the stuff. Yep.

00:51:55
Switching over to people who actually want to prosecute but

00:51:58
it is far as elections. Now that's all the lady here,

00:52:01
right? Yeah.

00:52:02
So, whether or not she likes it, whether or not the the mayor

00:52:05
London breed is happy about it or not, they're both in it for

00:52:08
an extra unelected year. They didn't have the campaign

00:52:12
for it, they just got it, you know.

00:52:14
So London breed now is going to be in for five years instead of

00:52:18
four and then she's going to run for re-election next year.

00:52:21
So she'll be in for quite a while.

00:52:24
Will she make it? Well it should be re-elected

00:52:26
right now she's in bad shape so we'll see you think she'll be

00:52:30
beaten by somebody farther left than her?

00:52:37
No because Looking at what happened with chesa Boudin.

00:52:41
And as I said before with the doughnut hole that we now have

00:52:44
that movement where we the scent wrists are a greater voting pack

00:52:52
than the farthest leftist Marxist, socialist bedwetting,

00:52:56
whatever you want to go upstairs.

00:52:59
So the thing is we're now hoping for someone that is to her right

00:53:06
That doesn't mean extremist right, because she has been

00:53:09
slipping further left further, left further left little by

00:53:12
little to, where many of the things that she's been doing.

00:53:15
She's just inept and supporting drug dealers on in some aspects.

00:53:23
She's trying to skirt federal and state laws and doing the

00:53:27
opening, a safe injection sites. That's a far left idea.

00:53:32
That's not centers, that's not moderate.

00:53:34
So, Anyone that is going to come in and come up with a, you know,

00:53:38
a nice slate of proposals could potentially beat her from the

00:53:44
right without being. I'm not a republican, which has

00:53:48
no chance here. Would you consider running

00:53:50
again? Yes, Yes, I will, but will I is

00:53:55
a different question, but considering I already made

00:54:00
promises to people that I wouldn't.

00:54:04
But the pressure. The pressure is mounting and

00:54:07
right now I'm enjoying just like relaxing doing a lot of

00:54:11
commentary on. I hear on a podcast or on TV.

00:54:15
They bring me on off in the just say what I think.

00:54:18
I'm enjoying wearing flip-flops in sand and Shores and enjoying

00:54:22
not shaving. You know, right now I'm having

00:54:25
fun. We'll see what happens in a year

00:54:29
from now, the deadline to file to be a candidate to run for

00:54:32
office is June of next year. So there's still a little over a

00:54:38
year, but that would be cutting it short because people, but

00:54:41
people are already now. Declaring someone three weeks

00:54:45
ago, a city council person already declared that, he's

00:54:47
challenging mayor, London breed, but he is to the left of her.

00:54:52
Wow, I brought this up last week, I will see it done a live

00:54:58
on Instagram just kind of ranting about stuff.

00:55:01
And I had a conversation with a good friend of ours who lives up

00:55:05
there in Pacifica, and just loves San Francisco.

00:55:10
That's her City. She loved going there and all

00:55:13
that. And we were having a

00:55:15
conversation and we knew politically she doesn't align

00:55:18
with my wife. And I, we had always Legend.

00:55:21
She was much farther left than us and somehow we got on the

00:55:25
topic and she said, you know what, I'm a registered Democrat.

00:55:31
But at this point, I don't care if they're Democrat Republican

00:55:36
or independent. I look at what happened in city

00:55:39
of San Francisco. And I just want someone who can

00:55:42
get stuff, done, and fix all these problems.

00:55:46
And I think to your point with the donut hole there's probably

00:55:50
a bunch Of Voters in San Francisco, who are looking for

00:55:54
that Common Sense? Hey, let's get Back to Basics.

00:55:58
Let's get back to just running this city properly, making

00:56:01
everyone feel safe, enjoying the city, and forget about all the

00:56:05
other stuff. So, I think there's probably a

00:56:07
big platform for that. Well, that's how it should be.

00:56:10
You know, technically, legality wise, city positions are

00:56:17
nonpartisan. So when you fill out the

00:56:20
paperwork as a Edit you don't put in what your party

00:56:24
affiliation is. So it's not a democratic running

00:56:29
against the Republican and run off.

00:56:31
No, it's just, it's open but people are proud to say that

00:56:36
there are Democrat when they are running and they put it in their

00:56:39
advertising. If anyone said I'm a proud

00:56:43
Republican, that's it. Your Trump your.

00:56:46
And that's it and you're done your anti your Portion your anti

00:56:52
this Pro. This for that, just link to

00:56:54
Trump and you're dead in the water.

00:56:56
You might as well just pack up and leave and that's that's what

00:56:59
happens. That's how anyone gets attacked.

00:57:02
You just say, you're a trump, your trunkfish, whatever word

00:57:06
you want to say. And you're sunk.

00:57:09
Yeah. Well, this has been an amazing

00:57:13
conversation as I was expecting. Definitely door is open for you.

00:57:19
To come back on. We may have to have you come

00:57:20
back on and check in more about San Francisco for us down here

00:57:25
in Southern California. Where can people find you or

00:57:30
follow you, or what? You're up to and learn more

00:57:32
about you if they want to reach out to you.

00:57:35
Okay. Okay.

00:57:37
So as we were talking about the reparations plan, specifically,

00:57:40
I have the website, reject the plan.com and you can miss a

00:57:44
wealth of information and it's getting updated as more.

00:57:47
And more comes out about that crazy plan.

00:57:51
I'm on Twitter, very active and at reject reject the plan.com.

00:57:55
You can see the link to my Twitter account, you guys follow

00:57:58
me so you can see Ritchie SF 2016 and you can engage with me

00:58:03
or see what I'm Talking about, but then my personal website

00:58:09
which just gives a bit more about me and my media

00:58:12
appearances and things like my positions.

00:58:14
That's my name. Dot org, Richie Greenberg

00:58:17
dot-org. So Ric hie Greenberg is Ollie's

00:58:21
GRE and be ERG, Richie Greenberg dot-org?

00:58:25
And you can always send an email to me and I'm happy to respond.

00:58:29
You can follow me on Twitter and ask questions I can respond.

00:58:32
So that's it. I don't really Anything on any

00:58:35
other social media so it's Twitter and my website, so

00:58:41
that's it. But yeah it was a pleasure to be

00:58:44
here really, really thankful that I have platforms to be able

00:58:48
to talk to anyone that wants to hear from the belly of the Beast

00:58:53
here in San Francisco. Thank you, we were happy happy.

00:58:57
Absolutely, I thank you. Yeah, we'll definitely

00:59:01
scheduling for another, for another podcast soon to check

00:59:04
in. And maybe who knows?

00:59:06
Maybe down the road, we'll be checking in with you as a

00:59:08
mayoral candidate for San Francisco.

00:59:10
I don't know, I'm just saying, I'm just saying, maybe.

00:59:13
Yeah, yeah, but thanks for coming on Richie and make sure

00:59:18
everyone to go follow him on Twitter is a great Twitter,

00:59:20
follower follow. And as always as I end every

00:59:24
show, If you want to help support the show, the best thing

00:59:27
you can do, that's free and the least amount of effort.

00:59:30
It's go. Share this with somebody,

00:59:31
especially people in San Francisco who are dealing with

00:59:35
these issues and need to hear a voice of reason.

00:59:38
Go check out this episode, share it with people and with that,

00:59:42
have a good night, everybody. If you want to help support the

00:59:26
show, the best thing you can do, that's free and the least amount

00:59:29
of effort. It's go.

00:59:30
Share this with somebody, especially people in San

00:59:32
Francisco who are dealing with these issues and need to hear a

00:59:37
voice of reason. Go check out this episode, share

00:59:40
it with people and with that, have a good night, everybody.