Every Wednesday at 9am I go live on Instagram and we discuss California Politics...over coffee.
This week we discuss SB866, the bill that would allow pre-teens to consent to vaccination, as well as other bills like SB871 that take away personal and medical exemptions. We also look at who has been backing Dr. Richard Pan for all these years in Sacramento.
Link to article discussed: https://californiaglobe.com/articles/mandatory-covid-19-vaccine-for-all-california-school-children-under-new-bill/
Follow California Underground on Social Media
Instagram: www.instagram.com/californiaunderground
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCj8SabIcF4AKqEVFsLmo1jA
Substack: https://substack.com/profile/72986149-ca_underground
Shop California Underground Merchandise: https://california-underground.creator-spring.com
Phil is a San Diego based attorney who specializes in criminal defense and constitutional law both under the US and California Constitution.
Review the Anchor.Fm Privacy Policy: Anchor - The easiest way to make a podcast
00:00:06
If you're a California, conservative a Libertarian, a
00:00:09
moderate Democrat. Believe in common sense or just
00:00:12
the same person. This is the political podcast
00:00:15
for you. It's the California underground
00:00:17
podcast. What's going on everybody?
00:00:20
Thanks for tuning in to another episode of coffee in California
00:00:23
Politics. As always, we'll give it a
00:00:26
little bit of a minute to let people hop on.
00:00:33
And get started with today's video because today is going to
00:00:37
be all about this new bill, SB 866, which was introduced by dr.
00:00:44
Richard pan. That's right.
00:00:45
He's he's a doctor. So obviously you have to listen
00:00:48
to everything he says because he's a doctor and he's a
00:00:50
pediatrician first off, a couple announcements and stuff to talk
00:00:55
about before we get started. The cow public event was last
00:00:58
night. Thank you to everybody who came
00:01:00
out. It was a good show.
00:01:02
I think there's a Lot of enthusiasm about the cowl public
00:01:04
can platform and what's happening, if you are not
00:01:08
familiar with what I'm talking about, I would suggest you go
00:01:11
check it out. There's a whole Instagram page
00:01:13
already started Calla Publican, it's very easy.
00:01:17
It's Callie Publican, all one word and you can go check it out
00:01:21
there. I've been posting a lot about
00:01:23
it, so there's going to be more events.
00:01:25
There's going to be more events and there's going to be more in
00:01:29
person events. We kicked around the idea of
00:01:31
like, maybe a virtual event because a a lot of you reached
00:01:33
out and said, hey I want to join or I want to be a part of it,
00:01:37
but I'm in NorCal or something like that.
00:01:39
So I can't get there or I'm in Orange County so there's a lot
00:01:43
of Statewide interest which I'm really happy to see.
00:01:47
And I think there's a lot of people who are really interested
00:01:48
in this because they want to see a platform that provides
00:01:52
Solutions and real real solutions to real California
00:01:55
problems. So that's that's that's the one
00:01:59
announcement. Every other event has been going
00:02:01
well. Tomorrow night, or tomorrow
00:02:05
afternoon? Sorry.
00:02:06
Tomorrow afternoon, I'll have cold.
00:02:07
Brocato on who is running for the thirty eighth District
00:02:11
assembly here. We're going to talk about his
00:02:14
race. And as always, you know, 2022 is
00:02:16
going to be busy. You're going to have a lot of
00:02:17
candidates on. We have a lot of people talk to
00:02:20
next week after that, next Thursday.
00:02:24
We're having Mark Mauser on, who is running for US Senate.
00:02:28
So there's going to be a lot of candidates coming up, so you
00:02:30
they can be highlighted and you can know More about them and
00:02:34
it's going to be really focused on these California policies in
00:02:36
these California politics propositions, as they come out,
00:02:40
which ones we know we will get into and we'll break them down
00:02:44
and kind of see whether you agree with them.
00:02:47
Maybe you don't agree with, that's fine.
00:02:48
We've done that before. We just took an entire coffee
00:02:51
and California politics. And we just sat and talked about
00:02:53
one proposition and people kind of chimed in, whether they
00:02:57
agreed or not. So yeah, and as always the
00:03:02
point, Coughing covering politics is that we get to sit
00:03:04
and discuss California politics over coffee as always.
00:03:13
As I take a little sip of my coffee but I'm going to talk
00:03:16
about this bill from dr. Richard pan.
00:03:20
Because a lot of people have been sending me stuff about this
00:03:24
Calla public and needs to follow you.
00:03:26
Well, it's funny because they're sort of like coinciding but I
00:03:30
think it follows me. But anyway, this new bill SB
00:03:35
866, which a lot of people have been sending me stuff about and
00:03:39
I really just dug into it today. Now if you don't know who
00:03:41
Richard pan is, Pan is one of the most far left assembly
00:03:46
legislators. Well, he's not actually
00:03:49
assembly. He's a senator now, he was
00:03:51
assembly for a while and then he moved up the ranks.
00:03:53
He was promoted to Senator. He's one of those far left
00:03:57
politicians and he's one of The Crazy Ones.
00:03:59
He's one of the kooky ones. Along with Scott weiner.
00:04:02
I think Scott, weiner introduced this bill and if you don't
00:04:04
remember, Scott Winters got winner was the one who
00:04:07
introduced the bill that got past regarding whether or not
00:04:11
miners. Could consent to or young
00:04:14
people. It was like an age thing about
00:04:16
like people consenting to sexual interactions with each other and
00:04:19
even if you're like a minor you're under 18, it was a really
00:04:23
weird bill that you looked at and go.
00:04:25
This is really our top priority while the state is on fire.
00:04:28
Like that's really your your top priority.
00:04:30
So guys like Richard pan and Scott wiener, they always seem
00:04:35
to have people's best interests at heart and I say that
00:04:40
sarcastically because they introduced This bill and it's
00:04:43
gotten a lot of parents who have been sending me messages about
00:04:45
this obviously upset because it's now requiring, it goes even
00:04:53
farther than noodles, old vaccine mandate for all students
00:04:58
and school, it goes even farther than that.
00:05:00
And we're going to talk about the bill itself.
00:05:02
We can talk about previous bill as well that got rid of personal
00:05:06
beliefs and religious exemptions from vaccinations.
00:05:08
This was back in 2015, they were already doing this.
00:05:12
And we're going to talk about Richard pan himself, you know,
00:05:16
not surprising you follow the money.
00:05:18
As I always say, just follow the money with these politicians,
00:05:20
it's all out there in the public and you can just follow the
00:05:24
money and see who's really putting the money in their
00:05:25
pocket. This article is from California
00:05:29
globe and it's mandatory covid. Vaccine for all, California
00:05:34
school children under new bill, according to the bills, author.
00:05:37
Senator Richard pan of Sacramento.
00:05:39
All school children would be required to Receive the covid-19
00:05:43
vaccine by 2023. Now I'll stop right there.
00:05:49
If this was such an emergency, right, if this was such an
00:05:52
emergency, I don't know why we're waiting until 2023.
00:05:57
So they're acting as if like we're doing this because we want
00:05:59
to take a proactive stance and we want to keep Children and
00:06:02
Families safe, but it doesn't go in effect for all year.
00:06:06
So I guess what happens in between now, and then is yet to
00:06:10
be seen a lot of actually mandates are being challenged in
00:06:12
court groups, like let them choose or let them.
00:06:14
Breathe are really doing a great job, kind of pushing back on
00:06:18
them in the courts and we'll see where those kind of go.
00:06:22
But the fact that it's already 20:23 means that it's probably
00:06:27
not that big of an emergency. If we have the time to wait an
00:06:29
entire year to really get this under control, I mean the bill
00:06:33
is already enacted, I guess they're just waiting until it
00:06:36
can get to Noodles desk and all that stuff.
00:06:39
The vaccine would be added to the current list of inoculations
00:06:41
to attend public or private school in California between K
00:06:44
through 12. Unlike previous vaccine
00:06:47
mandates, the bill would not be contingent on us, FDA
00:06:51
Administration, FDA approval. So there could be a vaccine out
00:06:57
there that is not FDA approved. Then in the state of California,
00:07:03
that's fine. They'll recommend it or require
00:07:06
for your child to get it to go to public school.
00:07:09
In addition, the bill also known as the keep schools open and
00:07:12
Safe Act. And I love these names that they
00:07:14
always give Always like the biggest BS names that you ever
00:07:17
hear. It's like how Prop 47 and prop
00:07:21
57 were labeled something like keep neighborhood SAFE Act or
00:07:26
something like that. When in reality after Prop 47
00:07:29
prop, 57 past crime as we know is gotten a lot worse in
00:07:34
California, especially petty theft and Petty crimes like
00:07:36
that. It would supersede a noodles
00:07:40
vaccine mandate for school children while we require the
00:07:43
vaccine like the Mandate it would expand And and remove the
00:07:46
medical or religious exemption, something that a governor cannot
00:07:49
do, but that the legislature can already this is probably going
00:07:58
to run afoul of multiple lawsuits.
00:08:00
Now, the First Amendment, as I understand, it still is the law
00:08:05
of the entire country and still supersedes an enormous amount of
00:08:11
state law and state constitutions in even the cow,
00:08:15
For Nia Constitution, guarantees, the right to
00:08:17
Religious Freedom. So this is probably likely going
00:08:22
to run into some sort of lawsuit.
00:08:24
Now, the issue is is that there's already been a bill out
00:08:28
there since 2015. So it says I looked it up.
00:08:33
We were one of two states that even require students K through
00:08:35
12 to get a vaccine we're already moving toward limiting
00:08:38
exemptions this isn't California lie in the nation it's
00:08:40
California all alone. Yeah, so we're moving the
00:08:45
religious exemption is a big deal.
00:08:48
I think there's you're gonna see a lot of lawsuits and this is
00:08:50
again why I think the culture around politics has really
00:08:56
really changed. Because before in 2015, how many
00:09:00
people show of hands were really nerdy and out on this stuff,
00:09:03
right? How many people were kind of
00:09:05
watching these bills? Come through and see this stuff
00:09:08
happening and kind of raising a foster calling their
00:09:10
representatives and pushing Back on this, not a lot.
00:09:13
I would venture that not a lot of people were doing this back
00:09:16
in the day in 2015 because things were essentially, you
00:09:18
know, everything was kind of moving along, just fine.
00:09:21
And people were like, oh they pass all these bells but now I
00:09:25
think it's a whole different culture and I think there's a
00:09:27
lot of people who are really invested in, what's passing,
00:09:31
what's going on. They may have not even known who
00:09:34
they're represented was. Whether it's their assembly at
00:09:37
or their state, senator, they had no idea and they didn't
00:09:39
really care to be honest. Just figured things were just
00:09:43
moving along. Yeah.
00:09:44
California is a little kooky and a little Progressive and it's
00:09:46
expensive to live here. But now I think there's a and
00:09:51
I'm using the professional term. A crap, ton more people who are
00:09:56
paying attention to this stuff and this stuff is getting huge
00:10:00
news. In skiing, headline news and
00:10:02
people are obviously pushing back and there's most likely
00:10:04
going to be a slew of lawsuits that are going to happen if they
00:10:07
try and enact this. It's still going through the
00:10:10
Senate. So It still has to go through
00:10:13
the process so we'll see if it kind of was introduced and maybe
00:10:17
it gets taken a you know, maybe a dies in a some sort of
00:10:20
procedural move. But this is stuff that they've
00:10:25
and this is stuff that they've been doing for a while getting
00:10:28
rid of religious and personal belief exemptions.
00:10:30
We're going to go over that bill from 2015 and a minute, but this
00:10:35
is stuff that frankly it has been going out for a while and
00:10:38
I'm glad that a lot of people are waking up now.
00:10:40
It's very important. People are waking up now to it,
00:10:44
but it is going to take a lot of work to kind of change it and
00:10:47
move it, or are change it and turn things around.
00:10:50
But if you're already tuning in here and your nerding out with
00:10:52
me on Politics on a Wednesday morning, that's already a good
00:10:55
start. That already shows that you are
00:10:57
taking an active role in learning more about politics.
00:11:00
So as it says, the new bill will closely follow SB 277, that's
00:11:04
the Old Law 2015. That remove personal belief
00:11:07
exemptions from vaccines that were required for public and
00:11:09
private schools in 2015. Tarp and noted a Monday and a
00:11:13
press release following the passage of 27 and 7.
00:11:16
SB 27, 77 years ago. Vaccines drastically increased
00:11:20
among school trip. Well I mean, yeah, if you
00:11:23
require people to get something, it's amazing.
00:11:25
What happens when you require a person to get something
00:11:30
otherwise their kid can't go to school naturally, there's going
00:11:33
to be a lot more vaccinations. Senator Bill, wrote, Senator pan
00:11:38
wrote, the Bill that was introduced on Monday.
00:11:40
Not only to increase covid-19 vaccination rates, like what
00:11:43
ESPYs 277 did for measles and other disease.
00:11:46
But to keep schools open in the coming years, in case of any
00:11:48
future covid-19, outbreaks, as the parent of two school
00:11:52
students, I understand parents need confidence and certainty
00:11:55
that their schools. Child school is safe and can be
00:11:58
in person said Senator pan. On Monday.
00:12:00
The most effective way to keep schools open and safest ensure
00:12:03
the code vaccination rate of It's and School staff is as high
00:12:07
as possible in addition to mass testing a good ventilation to
00:12:09
minimize affections by legislation will get parents
00:12:12
great certainty that their child is unlikely to get seriously
00:12:15
sick and their school will stay open during covid.
00:12:17
There's a lot to unpack. First off as a parent of two
00:12:25
school students, it is your right to make the decision for
00:12:29
your school children. Whatever you want, you can do
00:12:34
whatever you want with your I'll door.
00:12:36
I mean, you can do whatever you want with your child, but it's
00:12:38
your decision. It's your own personal family
00:12:39
decision. And, again, this is sort of the
00:12:43
philosophy of the left and Status.
00:12:46
Like this is they take a position and believe that the
00:12:49
best way to do anything is to have it be at the force of the
00:12:56
government and they take their personal position and they go.
00:13:00
Well, I believe this is correct. So therefore everybody in
00:13:03
California also has to believe it's Whether you agree with me
00:13:06
or not and I'm going to make it illegal.
00:13:07
If you don't agree with me, there is no dissent.
00:13:10
Amongst the left, your, they sign things into law and you
00:13:14
have to listen to it. They don't allow people to make
00:13:16
their own decisions. If he wants to do this for his
00:13:18
own students, and he talked to his doctor or he is a
00:13:21
pediatrician, he can look at the information and say this is a
00:13:24
good idea for my, my my children, go right ahead but I'm
00:13:27
sure there's plenty of parents who are going to go.
00:13:29
Well, I don't agree with in, I don't want to do it so I mention
00:13:33
he is a lame duck Center. Yeah, I heard that he's turned
00:13:35
me out. Out this year.
00:13:36
So that's probably why he's falling on his sword in terms of
00:13:39
bringing this out and taking all the heat.
00:13:42
That's one of the most dangerous things is an assemblyman or
00:13:45
senator who is terming out in California, there are term
00:13:49
limits. You can only be in the assembly
00:13:51
or the senate for a certain amount of years, even if you
00:13:54
jump from assembly to Senate that you can only serve for a
00:13:56
certain amount of years. So, California does have term
00:13:58
limits. You can only be around for a
00:14:00
certain amount of time, but the most dangerous thing is the fact
00:14:04
that. Once they know they can't come
00:14:05
Back in there done and there's nothing they never have to worry
00:14:08
about re-election. That's when they can really
00:14:10
introduce the scariest bills because they go, well, I'm not
00:14:12
being re-elected. So I'm just going to go ahead
00:14:14
and push this out there and it's likely the party finds these
00:14:18
people. And goes, hey, you're going to
00:14:20
introduce this bill because you're turning out and you're
00:14:22
not going to get any political ramifications from this.
00:14:27
But anyway, as you're saying that's your choice, if that's
00:14:30
what you want to do for your school children, That's what you
00:14:34
can do, right? If it's, if the FDA approves it
00:14:37
and says, hey, it's safe for children to take.
00:14:40
And that's your decision. That should be your decision and
00:14:44
just because he likes to put the moniker of why I'm a doctor and
00:14:48
I'm a pediatrician. Yeah, but you're not the
00:14:50
pediatrician, you know, like you're not the only pediatrician
00:14:53
in the entire State and I'm sure plenty of people who disagree
00:14:56
with you. And I'm sure there's families
00:14:58
who have their own pediatricians, who believe what
00:15:01
they're saying because they, No, their children's medical history
00:15:04
or they know what's going on. And so for him to just kind of
00:15:07
make this blank and say, well this is how we're going to do
00:15:09
things because I believe it's the best way to do it.
00:15:13
It's just as a common tactic of status on the left is that they
00:15:16
just think my opinion is correct.
00:15:19
And it's so correct that I should make it illegal for you
00:15:21
to disagree with me. And that's that's that's not
00:15:24
uncommon for them to see. So he says that the way to keep
00:15:29
schools open is obviously get vaccinations as high as
00:15:32
possible. Sounds like Mass are not going
00:15:34
away anytime soon in math, in schools testing and good
00:15:39
ventilation. Good ventilation.
00:15:42
They've been talking about that for a long time.
00:15:43
Teachers union protested over that they said that every school
00:15:48
should be updated with new ventilation.
00:15:51
I don't know if that means you have to rip out all the
00:15:53
ventilation or put in like some sort of stuff that I don't know,
00:15:58
you know. Can you put like a new filter in
00:15:59
or something like that? I don't know.
00:16:03
Health and school officials, praised the new bill.
00:16:06
Let's see Los Angeles Unified. He our students and employees to
00:16:09
save ourselves with a top priority for Los Angeles
00:16:11
Unified. Yep.
00:16:14
As Los Angeles Unified board. President Kelley going as we
00:16:16
maintain continuity of instruction, while establishing
00:16:19
the large, blah, blah, blah blah blah.
00:16:21
Okay California medical association president Robert.
00:16:24
You Wales also approved. The bill on Monday, explain that
00:16:26
as covid cases and hospitalizations of children are
00:16:28
rising due to more infectious variance.
00:16:31
We no, the vaccination is our greatest defense.
00:16:33
Too many children are not fully vaccinated and life for all
00:16:35
believers. Seriously, these Governors
00:16:38
leader appreciates, the leadership of dr.
00:16:40
Richard pan for working to protect Children's Health and
00:16:42
their right to Safe Schools, parent and school.
00:16:46
Groups are currently fighting against a SB 866 12 years old
00:16:51
and up came out in opposition to pans bill on Monday saying that
00:16:55
went too far and that exemptions have been added for a reason.
00:17:00
This new bill just As a Californian politicians, don't
00:17:02
give a damn about people's rights said chip Garnett a
00:17:06
parental group. Leader has school district in
00:17:07
San Diego County to the globe on Monday.
00:17:10
You could have a legit medical problem or a religious belief
00:17:13
that won't allow a vaccination, but this bill pretty much says,
00:17:17
this tramples over your religious rights.
00:17:20
And not only that, it's another vaccine, our kids have to get
00:17:22
that part isn't so big. But just the thought that a
00:17:25
vaccine, which according to bill would need to be FDA-approved,
00:17:28
would not need FDA approval, be added as a regular inoculation.
00:17:31
It's astounding when the gain to think that dr.
00:17:34
Pans medical degree. Degree is only an honorary one
00:17:37
because other doctors have told us that exemptions are needed
00:17:39
for some kids who may not be able to handle the vaccine.
00:17:42
A lot of kids don't have great reactions to them, they can be
00:17:45
out for days get chills at last a long time boil up and all
00:17:47
sorts of things. I know that's just the body's
00:17:49
reaction but seriously no other tried-and-tested vaccine does
00:17:53
that to that extent. So that's the update on the
00:17:57
entire Bill and, you know, you can go read the For yourself, SB
00:18:02
866, I wanna talk about this other Bill, SB 277 that was
00:18:06
approved as of June 30th 2015. This is the bill that really
00:18:11
kind of paved the way for where we are at.
00:18:15
Right now, it says existing law prohibits, the governing
00:18:17
authority of a school or institution from unconditionally
00:18:20
admitting any person as a pupil of any public or private
00:18:23
elementary or secondary school. Child Care Center day nursery,
00:18:27
nursery school, Family Day Care home, or Development Center,
00:18:30
unless prior To his or her admission to that institution.
00:18:33
He or she has been fully immunized against various
00:18:36
diseases and cooling measles mumps.
00:18:38
And appurtenances pertussis per subject to any space specific
00:18:42
age criteria. Existing, law authorizes an
00:18:45
exemption from those Provisions for medical reasons, or because
00:18:49
of personal beliefs. Yeah, that's how the law should
00:18:52
be. Its specified.
00:18:53
Forms are submitted to the governing Authority.
00:18:56
Existing Law requires a government authority of a school
00:18:58
or other institution to require documentary proof Beach entrance
00:19:02
immunization says, existing law authorizes.
00:19:04
The governing authority of a school or other institution to
00:19:06
temporarily exclude, a child from the school or institution.
00:19:09
If the authority has good constantly, the child has been
00:19:11
exposed to some of these diseases.
00:19:13
This bill would eliminate the exemption from existing specify
00:19:16
mutation immunization requirements based on personal
00:19:20
beliefs right there in Black. Okay.
00:19:22
Pour Tous. This is whooping cough.
00:19:24
Okay. See I knew a parent.
00:19:25
Would know what I was talking about this bill would eliminate
00:19:30
the personal exemption in from existing specific specified,
00:19:33
immunization requirements, based on personal leaves but would
00:19:36
allow an exemption from future immunization requirements.
00:19:38
Deemed appropriate, by the State Department of Public Health, for
00:19:41
either medical reasons or personal beliefs.
00:19:44
So this bill basically took away all of the, the exemptions for
00:19:48
personal beliefs for any vaccinations, for kids going
00:19:51
into all of these different institutions.
00:19:53
But now, the state B, did you see the switch that they did
00:19:56
there instead of saying you have these already as personal
00:20:00
beliefs and you have these religious?
00:20:01
It's already because you exist as a human and that's the whole
00:20:04
point of the Constitution is that you, you have these
00:20:06
inalienable rights as a human in this on this planet and
00:20:12
specifically in this country of these inalienable rights.
00:20:15
That should not be infringed upon in the government cannot
00:20:18
infer into bottom. That was the whole point of the
00:20:20
Bill of Rights was. Hey, these are the rights.
00:20:23
We have that come from our creator or whoever you believe
00:20:26
is your creator and you the government can't trample on
00:20:29
them. That's bottom line that's not
00:20:30
the Government's Duty. These are natural laws, they
00:20:33
come from nature and in this bill alone they basically said
00:20:38
we're going to take away that religious exemption because we
00:20:41
don't believe that you're allowed to have that.
00:20:45
Even though again that's not something the state can take
00:20:48
away from you because you already have it.
00:20:51
And they then said, well we're going to take it all away and
00:20:55
then over time, if we deem that you're allowed any exemptions
00:21:00
down the law. And then all of a sudden what
00:21:03
you'll have an exemption, but not until us, the all-powerful
00:21:06
all-knowing state, decides that these are the exemptions that
00:21:10
you should have, that's scary and this is what happens in
00:21:15
2015. So this bill kind of paved the
00:21:19
way for what's happening with this, this new bills that
00:21:22
there's not going to be any personal belief, or religious,
00:21:24
or any sort of exemptions. Because the state in this Bill
00:21:29
said, we will will only allow certain exemptions, right?
00:21:34
And if we don't allow the exemptions, then you're not
00:21:38
going to get it. Because we deem the exemptions,
00:21:41
not, whether there's a real legitimate.
00:21:43
Medical reason, not whether there's an actual religious
00:21:45
book, believe reason, or a personal belief or anything like
00:21:47
that. Now, they're basically saying we
00:21:50
get to choose the parameters of what these exemptions are.
00:21:55
So again, this is what happen in 2015, while probably, a lot of
00:21:59
people weren't really paying attention.
00:22:01
Same people. You know, some kind of All Quiet
00:22:03
on the Western Front rail here. You know, President Obama was
00:22:06
still in office things for hunky-dory here in California or
00:22:10
as we thought hunky-dory, but I think there's a lot of people
00:22:13
who are awake to this now. And this is stuff that, you
00:22:17
know, I hope that any parent who is on this live right now or
00:22:20
listening to this podcast. Later goes and talks to their
00:22:24
representatives and says look This is really about like the
00:22:29
medical exemptions need to be put back in place religious
00:22:32
exemptions needs to be put back in place.
00:22:34
I don't support this. The fact that you guys have
00:22:36
taken all these exemptions away from our children away from
00:22:41
parents to exercise on behalf of their children is frightening
00:22:46
because again this this is really kind of going along with
00:22:51
what I posted about last week. This idea that like the children
00:22:55
of California, don't really belong to the Parents.
00:22:58
And I think a lot of politicians in California actually believe
00:23:01
that. I think a lot of parents in
00:23:03
California actually believe their student or their children,
00:23:06
really are part of the village or the community and that it's
00:23:12
the state's responsibility to tell parents how to raise their
00:23:15
kids. And that to me is going to wake
00:23:19
up a lot of parents that's going to be a lot of parents.
00:23:23
How can you see what your rep voted for on this bill?
00:23:26
Well, if you You got to go to the legislative ledge.
00:23:31
Info dot legislature dot ca.gov you can follow this actually if
00:23:36
you sign in and you have a you want to log in they'll give you
00:23:39
all the updates. You can get the updates of when
00:23:42
it passes committee who voted on it.
00:23:45
And this is stuff that is out there.
00:23:46
There's there's these tools that you can look at and these are
00:23:49
tools that you can have at your disposal and figure out.
00:23:56
You know who's voting on? What who's voting on this bill?
00:23:59
Did it pass committee? Did it get to the floor?
00:24:02
Is it headed to the governor's desk?
00:24:04
You can go to this site, it's ledge L.
00:24:07
EG info dot legislature, Dot ca.gov.
00:24:12
And you can find all of these bills any and the actual bill.
00:24:16
So for example let's see. Let's look up as be 866.
00:24:22
This is Senate Bill 866. This are going to either the
00:24:29
mire a 12-year made kind of kind of infectious or disease
00:24:32
communicable disease. Am I under drug May consent to a
00:24:36
vaccine that is proved by the United States?
00:24:38
So this is the bill. This is 866 and you can go
00:24:42
through and you can go to history and then I mean it was
00:24:45
just introduced so it's brand new hot off.
00:24:47
The press is who voted for it will just been introduced,
00:24:51
probably has to go through committee first and you have to
00:24:53
kind of see where it goes. I'm looking at right now, but
00:24:55
these are stuff. You can do it.
00:24:56
You Your favorites and all that and all these tools are
00:24:59
available for you to go follow this stuff.
00:25:02
So if you're interested in following where all these bills
00:25:04
are going and you want to let other people know where these
00:25:05
are going, go to that site ledge.
00:25:08
Info dot legislature, Dot ca.gov and you can put in the bill and
00:25:13
you can follow it and you can follow that bill all the way
00:25:16
until it gets signed and keep people apprised of it.
00:25:20
So dr. Richard pan term, and out this
00:25:24
year, Yeah. It's always interesting.
00:25:26
You can always follow the money and I say that because I'm
00:25:30
looking at follow the money dot org.
00:25:32
Right now, follow the money dot org is a great site if you want
00:25:35
to get an idea of how much a candidate people have
00:25:39
contributed to one candidate and it keeps track of this.
00:25:43
It goes through all the public databases and it compiles it
00:25:46
into one space. So you can see how many people
00:25:48
contributed to this person, whether that person contributed
00:25:51
to people, you can look at different organizations who they
00:25:54
contributed. To it's really a comprehensive
00:25:57
database. So if you're trying to follow
00:26:00
like where all the money is going go to follow the money dot
00:26:04
org and you can follow exactly where and you can look this up,
00:26:08
you can look up pretty much any candidate.
00:26:09
And they'll show you how much money they made in each race.
00:26:12
How much did they raise, and who gave them money?
00:26:14
So, looking at Richard pan, you have to make sure you click on
00:26:19
him as a candidate. You can we've done this before?
00:26:25
If you follow this account before, you know that I've
00:26:29
showed you how to go on the California Secretary of State
00:26:31
website, how to go on the FEC, there's going to be more of
00:26:34
those videos coming up. Obviously, this year is gonna be
00:26:36
a lot of candidates. They're going to need to be
00:26:37
vetted some sooner than later, but you can look through all
00:26:44
this and you can look through the contributions and you can
00:26:47
organize them by how much people gave.
00:26:50
So in Richard, pans entire career, Top donor, not
00:26:57
surprisingly California Democratic party gave them one
00:26:59
point, three million dollars, Democratic Central Committee,
00:27:03
Los Angeles, County Central Committee, all these different
00:27:05
Cuisine and will keep going down.
00:27:08
And there's some interesting ones.
00:27:09
I mean, the unions are obviously, Kern County
00:27:12
Democratic Central Committee. I don't know why they're really
00:27:14
interested in Sacramento, but because I guess they figured
00:27:17
wanna be a part of his success, SEIU, big Union, obviously, big
00:27:24
Union. Plumbers and pipefitters, local
00:27:26
447, another Union. Let's see.
00:27:30
Food and Commercial Workers. Region 8, Golden State Council
00:27:33
account for Association national nurses.
00:27:35
Organizing California, medical association now.
00:27:38
Remember California, medical association, loved this bill
00:27:42
right, California medical association came out in loved
00:27:45
this bill. They said it was fantastic
00:27:47
richer pans, a great guy, they've donated 36 dollars
00:27:52
to all these campaigns. That's a lot of money.
00:27:54
Money. So they gave him thirty six
00:27:56
thousand dollars to California. Medical association Blue Shield
00:27:59
boot, Blue Cross gave thirty two thousand dollars.
00:28:03
The doctors Co, I don't know what the doctors Co is, but
00:28:06
maybe it's a Cooperative or a company, thirty two, thousand
00:28:09
dollars, California Federation of teachers, thirty thousand
00:28:13
dollars. Let's see.
00:28:17
California Association of Physicians Group 28 dollars.
00:28:22
Keep going down, keep Abbott, Laboratories of strength.
00:28:25
But they are probably a pharmaceutical company, twenty
00:28:27
four thousand dollars. And I'll look at this Johnson &
00:28:31
Johnson, twenty three thousand dollars, interesting, right
00:28:37
AstraZeneca, AstraZeneca is another pharmaceutical company.
00:28:41
They gave nineteen thousand dollars, keep going down Chevron
00:28:46
Big Oil gave 18 dollars to a guy who supposedly very far left
00:28:51
and loves new, you know, new green energy, they gave 18
00:28:57
dollars. Let's see, keep going down, keep
00:29:00
going down Anthem, which is another health insurance, get
00:29:02
fifteen thousand dollars. So, we're what are we seeing
00:29:04
here? We're seeing a lot of health
00:29:06
insurance, California like medical associations and
00:29:10
pharmaceuticals. So unions medical associations
00:29:14
and pharmaceuticals are giving a butt ton of money to Richard
00:29:18
pan. Here we go.
00:29:20
Pfizer he made 14 thousand dollars from Pfizer.
00:29:25
That's good, Novartis. Fourteen thousand dollars Aetna
00:29:29
was thirteen thousand dollars, California Association of Health
00:29:32
Facilities, twelve thousand dollars Farmers.
00:29:35
Insurance gave 13 dollars over the years.
00:29:39
Now keep in mind that these are kind of repeated donations,
00:29:42
because there's only a certain amount, you can give them a lot
00:29:46
of these races. So to rack up this much from
00:29:49
one, donor means that these donors are giving throughout a
00:29:53
long period. Meaning they're giving And you
00:29:55
know, it may be there max contribution over and over and
00:29:58
over again. And it's not like they can just
00:30:01
write one big check. They have to go through these
00:30:03
different max contribution laws. So to give like, 30 dollars
00:30:08
means you've been giving a lot of money over the course of your
00:30:11
career. It's not just one and done.
00:30:14
It's not like they just wrote one check which means that they
00:30:16
believed in this candidate for many many years now.
00:30:20
Is it any surprise? Oh pharmaceutical research
00:30:23
manufacturers Association of Gave thirteen thousand dollars.
00:30:27
So just looking at these top donors we see a lot of the same
00:30:30
stuff, obviously the Democratic party.
00:30:32
We see unions a lot of unions because remember remember the
00:30:37
sort of symbiotic relationship that unions in the California
00:30:42
Democrats have which is California Democrats pass laws
00:30:45
that benefit unions and then the Union's end up turning around
00:30:49
donating to Democrats and then in the process starts all over
00:30:52
or California, Democrats passed laws that benefit unions.
00:30:54
And then the Union's make more money and then they turn around
00:30:57
donate to see. This is where it goes, it's just
00:30:59
around and around. That's why you could probably go
00:31:02
through any big Democratic politician and most of their big
00:31:04
donors. One is going to be Democratic
00:31:06
party, but that's also a funneling way, because they can
00:31:11
then give to the Democratic party.
00:31:12
So unions, give to the Democratic party, overall
00:31:15
Democratic party, then turns around, and gives these
00:31:16
different candidates and they also give to the candidates
00:31:20
individually. So unions are a big thing.
00:31:22
We saw a lot of medical associations and we saw a lot.
00:31:24
Of pharmaceutical companies have been giving to dr.
00:31:27
Richard pan. Now, dr.
00:31:30
Richard pan. Stir me now.
00:31:31
So you're probably saying, well, what's the big deal?
00:31:34
And he's not going to get anymore, doesn't mean they're
00:31:38
not in the pocket of somebody else.
00:31:41
So let's look up somebody else. Like Scott, wiener.
00:31:49
Let's see, Scott wiener as a candidate.
00:31:53
Give it a second to load. I think that's is, is that his
00:31:58
full name, Scott, wiener? Huh.
00:32:01
Okay, they don't have Scott wiener in there. anyway, Scott
00:32:05
wiener Oops, spelled that wrong. Oh, here we go.
00:32:12
Scott wiener. Real Lex got wiener for state
00:32:19
senate, twenty twenty five thousand dollar.
00:32:22
That's a that's a different entity.
00:32:25
So let's see trying to find him as a candidate and will for some
00:32:29
reason. It's not letting me find who it
00:32:32
is as a candidate because he's not a lobbyist.
00:32:34
So let's look up another one. Todd Gloria.
00:32:41
Come outside. Don't let me down now, Todd
00:32:45
Gloria. Let's see.
00:32:46
It Ki Fair election, 20, 2017. Let's see how much money Todd
00:32:51
Gloria made. He was for assembly.
00:32:54
District he his last Assembly District in 2018, he raised
00:32:57
eight hundred sixty thousand dollars.
00:33:00
So between two assembly races he want he got eight hundred sixty
00:33:04
thousand dollars. I wonder if this is the mayoral
00:33:07
one I'm trying to find the mayoral one specifically Todd
00:33:11
Gloria city council. Okay.
00:33:13
They may not have his mayoral in here but let's just let's just
00:33:16
take a look. Of top donors, California,
00:33:21
teachers union, union union, plumbers and Steamfitters
00:33:27
plumbers and Steamfitters. They're busy Pachanga band,
00:33:31
they're big energy companies. The doctors Co, oh, they're
00:33:33
back. Thirteen thousand dollars
00:33:36
Chevron also twelve thousand dollars.
00:33:38
So, as much as they hate oil and fossil fuels, they seem to have
00:33:43
no problem taking a lot of money from fossil fuels.
00:33:47
California, new carlier car dealers, they popped up a whole
00:33:50
bunch of times. I don't know what their deal is
00:33:52
Pacific Gas and Electric. They get a lot of money.
00:33:55
They donate to these politicians who then turn around and decide
00:33:57
the contracts of who gets these different areas.
00:34:01
So that's always good. Let's see Gilead Sciences
00:34:08
AstraZeneca, six thousand dollars, sixty five hundred
00:34:11
dollars, SD Credit, Union, Amgen Pfizer, gay 45, Dollars.
00:34:17
This was back in 2018, so you're starting to see a threat, right?
00:34:25
You're starting to see a common pattern of who gets supported by
00:34:28
democrats. So for, as much as Democrats,
00:34:30
really, talk about how much there for the little guy right
00:34:35
there, always for the little guy, it's always interesting to
00:34:37
me that if you look at their top donors, they are so much in the
00:34:41
pocket of big Union and these unions don't.
00:34:46
We end up doing as much. I've heard from a lot of people
00:34:48
who are part of it, maybe they have a spouse who's in a union
00:34:52
and at the end of the day, they said, well did the union doesn't
00:34:55
really do as much as I we were expecting it to unions teachers,
00:35:00
teachers are very powerful in California, pharmaceutical
00:35:04
companies as much as they claim they don't like pharmaceutical
00:35:08
companies. They seem to have not have a
00:35:09
problem taking money from these pharmaceutical companies and
00:35:13
then fossil fuel and I'm big oil.
00:35:16
When did say they do get Kickbacks for green initiatives.
00:35:19
Sure. Because they do this stuff and
00:35:22
then there's also the reason a lot of these companies do this
00:35:26
stuff, these green initiatives and stuff like that is one they
00:35:29
get to do it as a write off, like research and development
00:35:32
to, they get to say, like, in their portfolio.
00:35:35
You could say, we invested in this many green energy and they
00:35:38
get to make a nice little commercial about how much
00:35:39
they're actually doing. But in reality, the bulk of
00:35:41
their money comes from selling oil.
00:35:44
So as much as Chevron. You know does maybe get a green
00:35:49
initiative here and there at the end of the day they're still
00:35:51
making their money off of Big Oil and fossil fuels.
00:35:57
So they may get these green initiatives but it's really to
00:35:59
just kind of look good and make a nice little commercial and
00:36:03
look really good about it. All right so with that said, I
00:36:08
do want to s be 8770. This is this is something I was
00:36:14
looking up. This is the last one.
00:36:16
I want to ask bh7 one which was introduced just two days ago if
00:36:21
you haven't heard about eight SB. 871, I'll give you the quick
00:36:27
summary of what it says an act to amend sections.
00:36:31
One two, zero three to five and one 2035 of and to repeal
00:36:35
section 1233, eight of the health and safety code relating
00:36:38
to Public Health. Basically, what it's doing is
00:36:44
that existing law provides the government.
00:36:46
The authority of a school or other institution from
00:36:48
unconditionally admitting any person as a pupil of any public
00:36:50
or private school or secondary school, Child Care, blah, blah,
00:36:53
blah, blah, blah, sounds all very familiar to the other Bill,
00:36:55
SB 277 unless prior to admission to that institution.
00:37:01
They've been fully immunized against various diseases,
00:37:03
including measles mumps, pertussis whooping, cough,
00:37:06
Hepatitis, B, and other disease domain, deemed appropriate, by
00:37:08
the State Department of Public Health, as specified, existing
00:37:12
law authorizes, an exemption from those Provisions for
00:37:15
medical, Under existing law, notwithstanding the above
00:37:18
described, purohit, prohibition, formulation against Hepatitis.
00:37:21
B is not a condition by which the governing Authority.
00:37:24
Admits are Advanced a pupil to seventh grade level public or
00:37:28
private apartment. Secondary School challenging, so
00:37:31
I get lost. These, These are really small.
00:37:35
The bill would add additional e prohibit row, Hibbett the
00:37:38
governing three of a school or other institution,
00:37:40
unconditionally admitting any person as a pupil of any public
00:37:43
or private elementary or secondary?
00:37:46
Terry schools, Child Care Center day nursery, nursery school,
00:37:49
Family Day Care home, or Development Center.
00:37:51
Unless prior to their admission, to that institution, they've
00:37:53
been fully immunized against covid-19 to the extent that the
00:37:57
bill would create new duties for school districts.
00:37:59
The bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
00:38:02
So basically they took away one and now they've added covid-19
00:38:06
to the list of. So all these, all these
00:38:10
immunizations covid-19 is now part of that list.
00:38:13
If your area Hepatitis B, I can pronounce Oz that one, influenza
00:38:17
type B measles mumps, pertussis whooping, cough, polio
00:38:20
Metallica, and polite and polio rubella tetanus and Vera.
00:38:26
Kolob chicken pox and covid-19. So that is the other bill that
00:38:31
he introduced. Anyway, so they're pushing hard,
00:38:35
pushing hard to get your kids vaccinated, whether you like it
00:38:38
or not and there's no exemption. So I'll open it up now for
00:38:44
comments and questions because I think people are really going to
00:38:46
have a lot of feedback on this particular or you have a
00:38:48
different question or something you want to talk about other
00:38:53
than this bill. That's the point of this program
00:38:56
is that you can chime in specifically about what you want
00:38:59
to talk about, what is kind of on, on your mind about this.
00:39:06
Again, this is all brand new so this is all coming out in the
00:39:09
past week or so it doesn't mean it's been like Like actually
00:39:12
enacted into law. It still has to go through the
00:39:14
certain committees and all that. But at the end of the day, You
00:39:22
got to keep an eye on it, so it's better to stop it.
00:39:25
Now when people see this rather than let it get through far into
00:39:29
the process, which companies donate the most to Republican
00:39:33
candidates. California, Republicans, I bet
00:39:37
you. It's not Unions.
00:39:38
That's for sure. Let's pick a pick a candidate.
00:39:43
You know, pick a candidate and we'll see.
00:39:47
Parents just pull your kids will figure out the rest later but
00:39:50
for now keep them home. Yeah.
00:39:52
If you have the ability you can certainly do that.
00:39:57
How I got TIG live late, how can we stop this?
00:40:00
Contact your rep. Even if their Democrat, contact
00:40:03
them and let them know because in a year of 2020 to weather is
00:40:07
likely going to be a big backlash against the Democratic
00:40:10
party. Then There may be some who are
00:40:16
in kind of Swing districts. If you remember the if it's less
00:40:19
than if it's 10 and under these are districts that can be
00:40:23
winnable with the right candidate.
00:40:24
So if it's in, like a swing District, at the end of the day,
00:40:28
there are Democrats who are in these districts and they may
00:40:30
say, well I'm going to back off of it.
00:40:34
So even if you have a Democrat, I I put this out there
00:40:37
yesterday. I think there's still the link
00:40:39
in my stories. You can go find, it's like find
00:40:41
your rep, something a California.
00:40:45
Can you do an easy breakdown of what companies back the
00:40:48
candidates? In other words, where do we find
00:40:50
the information? It's really easy.
00:40:52
If you want to go, you can get lost on this.
00:40:55
If you want to nerd out on it. It's called follow the money
00:40:58
dot. Org here.
00:41:00
Let's see. I'll do this.
00:41:03
Somebody wants to. Philo is hard to do.
00:41:11
Follow the money. Dot-org.
00:41:17
There we go. There you go, that's the that's
00:41:21
the website, go file, the money dot org and you can look up,
00:41:23
basically anybody. It's a whole nonprofit, they
00:41:28
worked with open Secrets. Open Secret has another great
00:41:30
site but they're kind of working in conjunction now.
00:41:34
So yeah, it's if you're, if you're really into this stuff
00:41:39
and you like to nerd out, I know there's some people watching you
00:41:41
love to nerd out on this stuff like I do you can certainly go
00:41:46
and and see who is donating to them and kind of let people
00:41:49
know. No, like, hey, just give you a
00:41:51
heads up, this person, donate to him the other place, you can
00:41:54
always go as the California Secretary of State, put in their
00:41:57
name under the campaign financing.
00:41:59
And they'll give you the rundown of every campaign.
00:42:02
Now, if you're familiar with some of my past videos from like
00:42:05
two years ago, I've done this before where I've walked through
00:42:08
candidates and so like okay here's your FEC filings.
00:42:10
I can look who are your top donors.
00:42:13
I always go through top donors because you know those are the
00:42:15
things you want to see which is the big money.
00:42:17
The big ticket. But I've done it for California,
00:42:21
I've done for congress as well. How do you know how to find out?
00:42:25
Who's on that committee? Yeah, you can go to, I believe
00:42:29
it's you can go to California legislative information and
00:42:36
believe you can find it here. Of where you can go find who's
00:42:42
on these committees? Yeah, I think you can, you can
00:42:46
look up the California legislature.
00:42:48
You can see who is on these committees.
00:42:51
It's either that or if like, you are the assembly, California
00:42:55
Assembly. I think there's a whole page
00:42:59
just dedicates the Covered. California.
00:43:01
Welcome to California State Assembly.
00:43:03
I don't want that. Yelp is pulling up a bunch of
00:43:06
reviews for California, Burritos.
00:43:09
I don't need a California Burrito right now.
00:43:12
Come on DuckDuckGo. I'm not looking for California,
00:43:14
Burritos. It's night 9:45 in the morning.
00:43:19
I'm not looking for that. Yeah, you can go to.
00:43:22
So if you go to assembly that ca.gov you can just go and
00:43:27
there's a whole committee. There's all an absolute whole
00:43:30
committee page and you can click on it.
00:43:31
So let's see. Human Services is that Human
00:43:36
Services is the poly employee of Public Safety.
00:43:40
I just wanna make sure I pick the right one.
00:43:42
I think this so health will go to health. because a lot of this
00:43:46
stuff is health is already 60 50, it is an email
00:43:52
assemblymember Chad Myers, he's the vice chair assembly member,
00:43:55
Jim would health committee staff and you can find who's on the
00:44:02
committee right now. So there's a lot of information
00:44:06
so you can members and staff who's on it.
00:44:10
Yeah, they break it down members of the committee on health.
00:44:15
Jim would Chad maze. Frank pegula.
00:44:19
It's a big Murray. Waldron, who is one Republican?
00:44:23
One, two, three, three Republicans.
00:44:27
And one independent is on the Health Board.
00:44:31
Kevin McCarthy. Not the Kevin McCarthy.
00:44:33
Brian mine. Mine shine is on there as well,
00:44:37
but yeah. anyway, so that's where you can get a breakfast
00:44:42
burrito at breakfast, we always sounds like a good idea until
00:44:45
you actually like go have a breakfast Rio and then you just
00:44:48
want, Like sit around, do nothing.
00:44:53
So that's where you can go. And this information is public
00:44:55
like this is not like I don't have like an inside scoop.
00:44:59
This really isn't like I have some like compliment
00:45:02
confidential information that I cracked.
00:45:04
I'm not like project veritas. This is all information that's
00:45:07
out there and you can find it and you can contact people, you
00:45:10
can get involved and you can you can figure out where this bill
00:45:13
is going, whether it's passed committee and all this stuff,
00:45:17
but it's all out there. You can find out.
00:45:19
Who is donating? Somebody asked where does a
00:45:22
Republican And I'm trying to figure out like who's a good
00:45:27
Republican to use for State? Like who's a good Republican to
00:45:32
use for like the state? I mean, you could actually we
00:45:36
could do like let's just do Larry Elder he's not running
00:45:38
again. So I bet you would could pull up
00:45:40
Larry Elder as a candidate. Hold please.
00:45:51
Let's see on itemized donations for Larry Elder.
00:45:55
So on itemized means like individual, it's 2.3 million
00:45:59
dollars. A lot of individuals, a lot of
00:46:03
people giving a lot of money. These are names, I don't see.
00:46:06
Like the Republican party will probably come party in back
00:46:08
anybody in the recall. So if that gives you any idea
00:46:11
right off the bat that that that might be out of that, you know
00:46:15
that maybe sort of different. We could also look up John Cox
00:46:19
as well. These are all Names of people
00:46:21
gave a lot of money. Okay.
00:46:25
Maybe Larry all, there's not the best option because it was a lot
00:46:30
of individual donations that lined up behind.
00:46:33
Let's look up John Cox, mister, mister bear himself.
00:46:37
John Cox, is it? John H, Cox.
00:46:42
Financial advisor, lot of money. Good Lord.
00:46:47
That's a lot of money twenty million dollars.
00:46:49
He raised a total of 34 million dollars.
00:46:54
Let's look at his top donors. He himself.
00:47:00
You ready for this? He himself gave 20 million
00:47:03
dollars to his own campaign, Campaign Committee.
00:47:08
His own Campaign Committee will do Kylie next one, point nine
00:47:11
million dollars, Global income Investments.
00:47:15
Again, this is a lot of individual names, Lincoln Club
00:47:19
of Orange County Sierra telephone names.
00:47:25
Lot of equity groups, strata Equity Group, farming, rice
00:47:29
company, Pacifica Enterprises. That's I think, Pacifica is a
00:47:34
financial groups. There's a lot of financial
00:47:35
groups, a lot of individuals giving a lot of money, so I mean
00:47:40
right there, that's a stark contrast between like a John Cox
00:47:43
who's raised a ton of money. I mean, a lot of it was his own
00:47:46
money but he ran for governor, he ran for governor in 2018 if
00:47:50
you remember he and he had the bag and there's a lot, a big
00:47:53
difference. California Democratic party has
00:47:55
millions of dollars to give to people like Senator pan.
00:48:00
You know, we're not talking about Senator for congress,
00:48:03
we're talking about Senator pan got 1.3 million dollars for the
00:48:07
California Democratic Party. That is an enormous amount of
00:48:12
financial advantage that they can give that much money to a
00:48:15
state senator seat. And that's one issue is that
00:48:19
when you don't have a lot of people in your party, it's hard
00:48:23
to give out a lot of money and kind of support candidates.
00:48:27
Plenty of Republicans. Take big my oh, yeah, yeah,
00:48:29
absolutely. I'm not, I'm not defending, I'm
00:48:31
saying, I'm out of the candidates.
00:48:33
I'm looking at right now. I haven't seen as opposed to,
00:48:37
like, Unions. I mean, I haven't seen just a
00:48:41
couple of these and you can do this for again.
00:48:42
If you want to go do this on your own, you're bored.
00:48:44
And you want to kind of see like what the difference is.
00:48:47
Be my guest and go right ahead. Someone said put in Kevin Kylie.
00:48:54
Do do, do, do do Kevin Kylie as a candidate?
00:49:01
Let's see who Kevin Kylie will. Look at his top donors to do to
00:49:06
any, you know, he's running again for Congress and itemized
00:49:11
donations 385. So Nia is individual.
00:49:16
California Association of Realtors gave them 29
00:49:18
leadership for educational Equity.
00:49:20
You know, he's been a big advocate for school AT&T 21
00:49:25
dollars Chevron again. There twenty one thousand
00:49:28
dollars, Chevron gave him a lot of money, Personal Insurance
00:49:31
Federation of California, 21-thousand dollars, Association
00:49:35
of California. School administrators gave them
00:49:37
18 dollars. Pachanga band Pechanga gives
00:49:40
everybody money, check his jizz all over the place Farmers
00:49:43
Insurance gave him sixteen thousand dollars Associated
00:49:48
builders and contractors Northern California.
00:49:49
Chapter getting 14 thousand dollars.
00:49:52
California. Society of plastic surgeons gave
00:49:54
him fourteen, thousand dollars, California, new Car, Dealers
00:49:59
Association. They're just everywhere, man.
00:50:02
They're just, they're everywhere.
00:50:04
Philip Morris gave him thirteen thousand dollars.
00:50:06
That's interesting. I didn't even know, Philip
00:50:07
Morris was still actually that big of a deal friends in the
00:50:12
yes, Medical Care. Gave him twelve thousand
00:50:14
dollars, Southern Wine & Spirits.
00:50:17
They gave money to somebody else, too.
00:50:21
More Indian tribes, California Association of Health
00:50:23
Facilities. Twelve thousand dollars K.
00:50:26
Compensation defense attorneys Association, eleven thousand
00:50:30
dollars Western manufactured housing community puts PA G and
00:50:33
E gave them ten thousand dollars.
00:50:37
Boop boo Charter Communications gave him nine thousand dollars.
00:50:43
So there's a lot of big governed, California.
00:50:46
I don't know what that is. 8, almost nine thousand
00:50:49
dollars. California, Association of
00:50:52
hospitals, and Health Systems. There's a lot of special
00:50:55
interest in the ironist associations.
00:50:57
There's big companies in here for Kevin Kylie, it's not all
00:51:01
individual donors. A big majority of it, it well,
00:51:04
not even that 385 out of all these other.
00:51:08
There's a lot of people who do donate individually, but an
00:51:11
itemized is a lot of different, lot of different people, small
00:51:15
donors. So you can do this.
00:51:20
And if you've tuned as your first time, I skewer, both the
00:51:23
left and the right. So I think there's a lot of work
00:51:26
to be done on both sides. I think they're both not doing
00:51:29
their job and if you know anything about me, you know,
00:51:31
that I skewer both of them. And in fact, I probably spent a
00:51:34
lot of time skewering, the GOP more than anything, but today's
00:51:39
sort of show was all about Richard pan and this horrible
00:51:43
bill that's trying to make its way through.
00:51:45
All right, so we got about eight minutes left.
00:51:46
I do have to do a hard stop at 10:00 because I do have a bunch
00:51:52
of work to get to today, which is good.
00:51:56
It's good to be busy. It's good to have a lot of work
00:51:58
to get to. Anybody has any final comments
00:52:00
questions, stuff like that? Like I said the beginning.
00:52:05
I was thinking of doing some sort of virtual event for
00:52:10
account, the next caliph, Publican thing.
00:52:11
So people can get to know it. Also, if you want to go check
00:52:14
out the platform and sign up for email updates.
00:52:17
Here, I'll put the link In for the site.
00:52:22
Do you do? I'll do that.
00:52:27
Go check it out, it's live. It just went live this week help
00:52:29
up and caucus dot-org. You can check out the platform
00:52:32
and our values. What we stand for, you can sign
00:52:37
up for emails and what our goals are and stuff like that.
00:52:40
I mean, it's a brand new site. So, you know, take take that
00:52:43
into consideration. We're still kind of getting it
00:52:45
out there but you have to have a website.
00:52:47
How will they enforce? These bills are private schools
00:52:49
that don't accept federal or state money?
00:52:53
I'm sure there's some mechanism. I mean, I'm not complaining.
00:52:56
Completely sure about the structure, but, you know, I'm
00:53:02
not sure there might be some sort of authority, they have
00:53:05
over at you might have to get like a letter for from private,
00:53:08
you know, it's one of those things where, like the you may
00:53:10
be private, but the department of education does have as a give
00:53:13
you like a stamp of approval. I'm always so calm.
00:53:19
I follow politics for a long time and I've noticed there's
00:53:22
Peaks, there's valleys and it's a long game.
00:53:24
It's not. You know if if every day I woke
00:53:27
up hair on fire crazy, I would lose my mind.
00:53:31
So I try and stay as calm as possible.
00:53:33
I try to stay as positive positive.
00:53:37
That's my goal, and thank everybody who always Tunes in
00:53:41
Scott, Pressler is coming to San Diego and February.
00:53:43
You should have him on. I don't know if you'd come on,
00:53:46
but I should reach out to him. See if you would like to come on
00:53:51
or not. Come on, it just kind of talk
00:53:55
about strategy and stuff like that.
00:53:57
Is your name Phil? Yes, my name is Billa.
00:54:01
It's not California underground. My full name is not California
00:54:04
underground. So yeah, I should reach out to
00:54:09
him because I think it's Looking at these numbers and seeing how
00:54:14
a lot of like, you know Democrats have a lot of Voters.
00:54:19
They have a lot of registered voters the Union's help.
00:54:23
They certainly help when it comes to money and donations and
00:54:28
when you have a lot of people supporting you it's a lot easier
00:54:31
to give 1.3 million dollars to a state senator and when you have
00:54:39
someone who's a state senator who's trying to run?
00:54:41
against that person It's not easy to do when that person gets
00:54:45
a crap ton of money from the Democratic party.
00:54:47
And there's nothing you really do.
00:54:49
So, it is a numbers game. I know a lot of people talk
00:54:51
about well, it's all voter fraud and mail in ballots and stuff
00:54:55
like that. Oh man, it's not great.
00:54:57
But at the end of the day if you're going up into battle and
00:55:02
you're constantly outnumbered two to one.
00:55:04
There's not a lot of chance you're going to keep whining
00:55:06
because you're just completely outnumbered all the time and
00:55:09
until There's a better platform and people start to sign up for
00:55:13
it and support it and get on board.
00:55:15
There's not going to be much people are going to do about it.
00:55:16
So Justice, Stephen Breyer is retiring, I didn't hear that.
00:55:22
Wow. Probably.
00:55:25
I mean, which is a shame because I like Breyer.
00:55:28
Breyer is kind of a moderate. He leans left but he's a he's a
00:55:31
decent guy. Briar I've read a lot of
00:55:34
opinions by him through law school.
00:55:37
Stuff like that. He always seemed like a pretty
00:55:39
decent guy. He always James laughed.
00:55:41
They say he's on the liberal court, but I always thought he
00:55:44
was sort of, like, kind of a swing.
00:55:45
You never know where Breyer was going to go.
00:55:47
That's a shame. He was he's a very principled
00:55:49
guy forever, grateful that I learned about your IP page.
00:55:52
It has been sewing for me over the last couple of years, I
00:55:55
learned so much. I know about how politics Works.
00:55:57
IE very welcome. Thank you for tuning in and
00:56:00
joining me on Wednesday morning. You know, the greatest
00:56:05
compliment I ever get? I'm going to get a little mushy
00:56:07
right now is when people Message me and say your platform gives
00:56:15
me hope. You know, that, that is always
00:56:18
to me the greatest compliment that anyone pays me is that if I
00:56:22
could reach just a couple people and all of a sudden, give them
00:56:26
hope that things are going to get better and that they can be
00:56:28
a part of this and do something about it.
00:56:31
Then I feel like I've done my job and that that really
00:56:34
energizes me. Revitalizes me I get all excited
00:56:36
about it, I love it. So that's the best compliment.
00:56:40
I meant that somebody all we can send me is that you hey you you
00:56:43
give me hope that I can be a part of this and change things
00:56:48
whether it's locally or on state level or whatever.
00:56:51
So that's really that's always nice to hear and that's this
00:56:56
might be in a little bit of what being a little mushy.
00:57:00
You know. It's nice to sit and chat with
00:57:02
you guys on Wednesday morning. Alright, so tomorrow afternoon
00:57:07
4:00 Denmark. No longer considering A public
00:57:11
Threat, all mandates. Got you, Europe is basically
00:57:14
just like we're open, screw it, we're going for it.
00:57:16
We're just going to let it rip, you know?
00:57:18
We're just going to go for it. You know.
00:57:20
I don't know when America is going to kind of Get on board
00:57:27
but we'll see think there's a lot of people are still holding
00:57:30
on because they like the power. I feel less isolated spot from
00:57:34
using home. I feel less isolated.
00:57:36
Well, that was a good one. Notice that people still share
00:57:40
the same values as I. Yeah, that was actually you, you
00:57:42
now that that's one of the reasons I started this platform
00:57:45
was because it does feel like you can be short of all alone in
00:57:50
California when you believe stuff like this.
00:57:52
So it's nice. And that was the point of this
00:57:54
platform is the point of this. Daily morning routine for this
00:57:58
weekly routine is that you can kind of look and say, hey
00:58:00
there's other people who agree with me and believe in this
00:58:02
stuff. And there's a lot of people who
00:58:04
agree with me, so I don't feel so alone and if you don't feel
00:58:08
so alone, you have a little bit more, hope that things could
00:58:12
turn around. Not sure if there's been mention
00:58:14
the precincts or County and start sending out email service
00:58:17
for the election, in June to get poll workers, I haven't.
00:58:22
But if you're interested in becoming a poll worker,
00:58:25
absolutely go for it and you have the time to do it.
00:58:28
You know it does make a difference.
00:58:31
You know if you see something Italy is insane you know it's
00:58:35
sad. We want to travel to Italy.
00:58:39
We want to travel Italy. Two years ago we had we were
00:58:42
planning a whole European trip right before everything that you
00:58:45
know crap hit the fan, we were playing this whole European
00:58:49
trip. We were going to go to Italy and
00:58:52
Ireland and all that and then covid happen and we haven't come
00:58:56
you know we haven't even discussed it really We've
00:58:59
basically been like, well, we want to go when we don't have to
00:59:01
worry about. Do you have this card?
00:59:04
You have this passport, you have this, do you have a mask on?
00:59:07
Do you? You know, I didn't want to do
00:59:10
that. So, but anyway, yeah, tomorrow
00:59:13
afternoon at 4:00 ring of coal per kado on the podcast, 4 p.m.
00:59:19
on YouTube. So if you don't follow on
00:59:21
YouTube, that's where all the podcasts are steak for
00:59:26
breakfast. Podcast is good to listen to For
00:59:28
election strategies, I'll check them out.
00:59:30
Yeah, thank you. I'm always checking out new
00:59:32
podcast. So I always, I listen to a lot
00:59:34
of podcasts when I go to the gym, but yeah.
00:59:37
Tomorrow 4:00 tune in will be a good combo with him, about his
00:59:43
run for assembly. And then next week, Mark mousers
00:59:46
coming on, he's going to be running for US Senate.
00:59:49
And as always every Wednesday 9:00 a.m. we always sit we chat.
00:59:53
We talk about politics over coffee and that's Basically, all
00:59:59
right. I will catch you guys on the
01:00:01
next one, later. Thank you for listening to
01:00:42
another episode of California underground.
01:00:44
If you like what you heard, remember to subscribe?
01:00:46
Like and review it and follow California Underground on social
01:00:50
media for updates as to when new episodes are available.
01:00:41
Thank you for listening to another episode of California
01:00:44
underground. If you like what you heard,
01:00:45
remember to subscribe? Like and review it and follow
01:00:48
California Underground on social media for updates as to when new
01:00:51
episodes are available.